Comments for 600 Camp

Comment on How to protect the privilege with in-house counsel by Attorney Immunity and In-House Counsel - 600 Commerce600 Commerce

Attorney Immunity and In-House Counsel - 600 Commerce600 Commerce — Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:49:39 +0000

[…] and authority of an attorney.” No. 15-25-00235-CV, Jul. 14, 2026. (Of general interest, a 2014 Fifth Circuit case addressed similar issues in the context of […]

Comment on Habeas Forum by Alien Habeas - That Was Fast - 600 Camp600 Camp

Alien Habeas - That Was Fast - 600 Camp600 Camp — Wed, 09 Apr 2025 17:06:39 +0000

[…] the Supreme Court said in no uncertain terms that litigation about deportments under the Alien Enemies Act would proceed by habeas in the place […]

Comment on Mifepristone, Buyout Offers, and Standing by DOGE-ing and Standing - 600 Camp600 Camp

DOGE-ing and Standing - 600 Camp600 Camp — Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:26:25 +0000

[…] a theme seen in an earlier DOGE-related ruling, a district judge in Washington DC denied a TRO in a data-access case, observing: “The court […]

Comment on You won, please go away. by Opinions and Decisions - 600 Camp600 Camp

Opinions and Decisions - 600 Camp600 Camp — Thu, 12 Dec 2024 15:27:07 +0000

[…] of appellate courts is useful in distinguishing holding from dicta, identifying the appropriate scope of appellate review, and clarifying questions about the law of the case / res judiciata effect of earlier […]

Comment on Ahoy the ship! There’s personal jurisdiction. by Fifth Circuit Finds Personal Jurisdiction in Favor of Armstrong Lee & Baker LLP's Longshoreman Client - Armstrong Lee & Baker LLP

Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:49:24 +0000

[…] Ahoy the ship! There’s personal jurisdiction. (600 Camp blog) […]

Comment on Writing Wednesday — Judge Easterbook on Fonts by Fonts Continued: More on X-Height - 600 Commerce600 Commerce

Fonts Continued: More on X-Height - 600 Commerce600 Commerce — Thu, 06 Jun 2024 12:29:34 +0000

[…] Easterbrook’s recent opinion about good fonts for legal writing emphasized the importance of “x-height,” which is […]

Comment on Improper Closing Argument by Incurable Argument, Again - 600 Commerce600 Commerce

Incurable Argument, Again - 600 Commerce600 Commerce — Mon, 13 May 2024 15:01:42 +0000

[…] a few weeks after the Fifth Circuit reversed on incurable argument grounds, the Texas Supreme Court did the same in Alonzo v. John holding that the injection of race-based […]

Comment on NDTX will not change judge-assignment practices by Single-Judge District Discussion - 600 Camp600 Camp

Single-Judge District Discussion - 600 Camp600 Camp — Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:35:22 +0000

[…] dialogue about the benefits and drawbacks of single-judge judicial district has led to further public […]

Comment on More Venue — UPDATED by More Venue - 600 Camp600 Camp

More Venue - 600 Camp600 Camp — Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:28:16 +0000

[…] a Fifth Circuit panel granted mandamus relief about a transfer of a case involving the CFPB to the District of Columbia, the district court there […]

Comment on Local Interest and Venue Transfer by Venue? - 600 Camp600 Camp

Venue? - 600 Camp600 Camp — Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:42:33 +0000

[…] this month, the Fifth Circuit granted mandamus relief, including the issuance of a writ of mandamus to the Western District of Texas, requiring that the […]