The post Call-on Congress 2027: Registration FAQ appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>
Call-on Congress is Fight CRC’s signature annual federal advocacy event, where advocates from across the country travel to Washington, D.C. to meet with their Members of Congress and push for policies that support colorectal cancer research, screening, and care.
Call-on Congress 2027 runs February 28 – March 2, 2027, at the Hilton National Landing in Arlington, VA.
Seats are limited at Call-on Congress 2027, so we’ve added a new application process this year. Applications are first-come, first-served within each state, so apply early to guarantee your spot.
The Global Early Onset Colorectal Cancer (GEOCRC) Think Tank Global Collaborative is also happening at the same time, a separate event that brings together global research leadership. You’ll hear directly from Think Tank participants at Call-on Congress and see how their research connects to the policy asks you’ll bring to the Hill.
The GEOCRC Think Tank Global Collaborative brings together researchers, clinicians, and advocates from around the world to align global partners in the fight against early-onset colorectal cancer. Together, this international community is building the evidence base needed to understand and reverse the alarming rise of colorectal cancer in younger adults worldwide. As an advocate, you’ll see how the research priorities you’re asking Congress to fund connect to a larger, global research effort, giving your Hill meetings a stronger, evidence-backed story to tell.
Any colorectal cancer advocate is welcome to apply. Because space is limited, registration is a structured first-come, first-served application. Applications open on October 1 and close on November 18.
Yes. Call-on Congress 2027 is capped at 175 attendees. Registration includes state-level caps so we can guarantee advocate voices from across the country are represented on the Hill.
The cap and state limits help us guarantee a full room of advocates from as many states and districts as possible, rather than an uneven mix. If your state has reached its cap, you’ll go on the waitlist and will be notified if a spot opens up or if extra spots in your state become available due to lower applicant numbers in other states. While you wait, we will also help you find another way to take action in your own community (see “What if I can’t attend in person?” below).
Spots can open up as the process moves along, so if your state is full and you end up on the waitlist, don’t count yourself out. Stay tuned; we’ll notify you if a spot becomes available.
Registration opens October 1st and closes November 18th. We recommend applying early to make sure you get a spot at Call-on Congress.
More info on application coming soon. Stay tuned!
There is no cost to apply to attend Call-on Congress but applicants who are selected will be required to pay a $100 registration fee to complete the registration process. This fee helps support meals, programming, and transportation to Capitol Hill from the hotel on March 2nd.
Yes, all applicants will be notified whether they are on the registration list or waitlist by December 1st. We recommend waiting to create traveling plans until after this point.
A room block will be available for attendees to book at the Hilton National Landing in Arlington, VA at a rate of $199 per night.
Yes. Fight CRC offers a limited number of scholarships to help cover travel and attendance costs. Scholarships are meant to open the door for advocates who can’t otherwise attend, so don’t let cost hold you back from applying. Previous Fight CRC scholarship recipients are eligible to apply again.
Scholarship decisions will be shared on December 1, at the same time as application acceptance notifications. If you’re accepted, you’ll receive your scholarship information along with your acceptance, so you’ll have everything you need to make your travel plans with confidence.
Scholarships are awarded based on need and availability, and can include any combination of the following:
Scholarships will not include all three. If you’re awarded a scholarship, your notification will explain exactly what is covered.
Don’t let distance stop you. This year we’re offering a community-based virtual advocacy option for advocates who can’t make it to D.C. in person, and it’s just as powerful. Request a meeting with your Members of Congress at their local district office, or connect virtually, and bring the same passion, the same story, and the same impact right to your own community.
Below is more on how to get involved from home.
Call-on Congress is powerful, but it’s not the only way to make your voice heard. March From Home lets you take the same kind of action from wherever you are.
Here’s how it works: March From Home kicks off in January, carries through our March Awareness push, and carries through the spring. You can send your story to the Hill, request a governor’s proclamation, get a flag kit, sign up EARLY as a Prevention Champion, or book a meeting with your member of Congress at their local district office.
Stay tuned for more information on how to participate in March from Home!
No. Call-on Congress welcomes both first-time and returning advocates. We offer advocacy workshops in January and February to help you prepare, covering the CRC policy priorities, how to tell your story effectively, and what to expect from a Hill meeting. All advocates will also be assigned a Regional Leader as a mentor before Call-on Congress. Fight CRC Regional Leaders are experienced advocates who can help prepare all Call-on Congress attendees to advocate in Washington DC in March, and back home in their communities for the rest of the year.
Watch for a post-event debrief and follow-up guide. We’re introducing a structured follow-up process this year to help you track responses from the offices you met with and stay engaged with your Members of Congress long after you leave DC.
But the work doesn’t stop at follow-up emails. Your Hill Day meetings are the start of a relationship, not the end of one. Here are a few ways to keep the momentum going:
Call-on Congress is a launchpad, not a finish line. Year-round advocacy is what turns a good meeting into real change.
| October 1 | Registration applications open. Scholarship applications open. |
| November 18, 2026 | Registration and scholarship applications close. |
| December 1, 2026 | Admission notifications sent. Admitted advocates must confirm their spot by January 4. |
| January 4, 2027 | Unconfirmed spots released to the waitlist. |
| February 28, 2027 | Resource Expo/Mix and Mingle |
| March 1, 2027 | Call-on Congress Training Day |
| March 2, 2027 | Call-on Congress Hill Day & Celebration Dinner |
The post Call-on Congress 2027: Registration FAQ appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>The post Germline multigene panel testing for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 Sep 3:S2468-1253(26)00187-1. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(26)00187-1. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer can arise from an inherited genetic background, but the diagnostic yield of multigene germline panel testing in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to quantify such yield.
METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to Aug 2, 2025, for studies published in English reporting the results of germline multigene panel testing of at least five genes using next-generation sequencing in unselected patients with colorectal cancer. Eligible study designs included cross-sectional and cohort studies, and clinic-based series in which all consecutive patients with colorectal cancer were offered multigene panel testing. Two independent reviewers, masked from each other’s decisions, screened records and extracted summary data and individual participant data, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The primary outcome was the person-level prevalence (diagnostic rate) of at least one pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in cancer predisposition genes. Analyses were stratified by age at colorectal cancer diagnosis and gene penetrance. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated pooled prevalence. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Meta-regression evaluated the effect of age at colorectal cancer diagnosis, panel size, family history, and publication year on diagnostic rates. This study was registered in PROSPERO, CRD42025649177.
FINDINGS: Of 2707 records identified, 1682 duplicates were removed and screening excluded a further 985 records. 40 articles underwent full-text review, of which 21 met eligibility criteria and were included (ten [48%] at low, nine [43%] at moderate, and two [10%] at high risk of bias). Across 6925 individuals with colorectal cancer, the pooled rate of any pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was 15·2% (95% CI 12·8-18·1; 1061/6925; I2=84·1%; k=12), with high-penetrance variants identified in 7·9% (5·9-10·5; 551/6909; I2=88·4%; k=11) and high-penetrance colorectal cancer predisposition variants in 5·4% (3·5-8·6; 408/6909; I2=93·4%; k=11). In early-onset colorectal cancer (age at diagnosis <50 years), yields were 17·7% (15·0-20·7; 1113/7444; I2=85·7%; k=16) for any pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant, 14·2% (11·7-17·3; 917/7409; I2=85·7%; k=15) for high-penetrance variants, and 12·2% (9·5-15·5; 788/7409; I2=89·5%; k=15) for high-penetrance colorectal cancer predisposition variants. In late-onset colorectal cancer (age at diagnosis ≥50 years), yields were 13·0% (10·8-15·7; 711/5243; I2=73·3%; k=11) for all variants, 6·5% (4·4-9·5; 349/5227; I2=86·4%; k=10) for high-penetrance variants, and 3·8% (2·0-7·5; 234/5227; I2=90·3%; k=10) for high-penetrance colorectal cancer predisposition variants. In meta-regression analyses, panel size and publication year did not affect yields. A higher prevalence of first-degree family history of colorectal cancer correlated with increased overall and colorectal cancer-specific variant yields, but not with non-colorectal variant yields. There was a progressive decline in yield with increasing age at colorectal cancer diagnosis, although the yield for high-penetrance variants remained greater than 5% up to age 67 years (95% CI 59-75).
INTERPRETATION: The yield of multigene panel testing is considerable in unselected patients with colorectal cancer, even beyond early-onset disease. The yield of high-penetrance germline variants remains above recognised testing thresholds up to age 67 years, providing a benchmark of universal testing for further study.
FUNDING: Italian Ministry of University, EU-Next Generation EU, and National Cancer Institute.
PMID:42692037 | DOI:10.1016/S2468-1253(26)00187-1
The post Germline multigene panel testing for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>The post Overall survival of immunotherapy versus standard of care in chemorefractory microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis of 708 patients appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>J Immunother Cancer. 2026 Sep 2;14(9):e015414. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2026-015414.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited efficacy in proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, selected patients with specific metastatic patterns may derive benefit.
METHODS: Patients with chemorefractory pMMR/MSS mCRC treated with ICI-based regimens were retrospectively identified. A comparison cohort treated with trifluridine/tipiracil±bevacizumab, regorafenib, or fruquintinib as standard of care (SOC) was generated through 1:1 propensity score matching by age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), liver metastases (present/absent), and RAS/BRAF status. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Cox regression.
RESULTS: A total of 354 patients treated with ICIs and 354 treated with SOC were matched. Median age was 55 years, 52% male, 32% ECOG PS 0, 30% right-sided, and 69% RAS mutated in both groups, while 61% and 60% had liver metastases, respectively. Median OS (mOS) was 10.8 months with ICIs and 9.0 months with SOC (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.92, p=0.004). In patients without liver metastases, mOS was longer with ICIs than SOC (19.1 vs 13.2 months, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.80, p<0.001), whereas outcomes were similar in patients with liver metastases (6.4 vs 6.5 months, p=0.303). In univariable analyses, age, sex, primary tumor site, and RAS/BRAF status were not associated with OS. Treatment with ICIs, absence of liver metastases, one prior line of therapy, less than three metastatic sites, and ECOG PS 0 were associated with the most favorable outcomes in univariable and multivariable models.
CONCLUSIONS: In chemorefractory pMMR/MSS mCRC without liver metastases, ICI-based regimens yielded longer OS than SOC. Further investigation of ICIs in this patient population is warranted.
PMID:42686374 | DOI:10.1136/jitc-2026-015414
The post Overall survival of immunotherapy versus standard of care in chemorefractory microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis of 708 patients appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>The post ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Adenomatous Colorectal Polyposis Syndromes appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>Am J Gastroenterol. 2026 Sep 1;121(9):2086-2120. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000004105.
ABSTRACT
The hereditary adenomatous colorectal polyposis syndromes are incurable, systemic, cancer risk predisposition syndromes with substantial morbidity and mortality. They differ in their mode of inheritance, age at disease onset, phenotypic expression, and cancer risk. The most common cancer risks involve the gastrointestinal tract including the colon, rectum, duodenum, ampulla, and stomach. Identifying these syndromes through personal and family history risk assessment and germline genetic testing, along with timely surgical and endoscopic management, can reduce cancer incidence and mortality. These guidelines use the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to provide clinical guidance on the selection of individuals who should undergo a risk assessment for a hereditary adenomatous colorectal polyposis syndrome, modality and timing of germline genetic testing, cancer risk mitigation through endoscopic and surgical interventions, and the role of chemoprevention. This document reviews the approach to genetic testing in patients with phenotypic colorectal polyposis and the impact of presymptomatic diagnosis in families with a known familial germline pathogenic variant or clinical features suggestive of a hereditary adenomatous polyposis syndrome. Management strategies for patients based on genetic test results or without genetic testing are provided. We also review colorectal and extracolonic phenotypic benign and malignant manifestations of the known hereditary syndromes with a focus on the 2 most common hereditary colorectal polyposis syndromes: familial adenomatous polyposis and MUTYH-associated polyposis. The document concludes with recommendations on polyposis and cancer risk mitigation strategies and highlights updates to management since the previous guideline was published.
PMID:42683623 | DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000004105
The post ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Adenomatous Colorectal Polyposis Syndromes appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>The post Clinical Trials and First-Line Metastatic CRC: What Patients Should Know Before Starting Treatment appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>
Starting treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer raises a lot of questions — about biomarkers, treatment choices, and whether clinical trials are right for you. This FAQ captures key takeaways from Fight CRC’s webinar with answers from our expert panelists.
Featuring:
First-line treatment is the first treatment you receive after a metastatic diagnosis. What your care team recommends will depend on your overall health, your tumor’s biomarker profile, your goals, and whether surgery might be an option.
One of the most important early conversations to have with your oncologist: What is the goal of treatment? Is the aim to shrink the cancer? To keep it stable? Getting aligned on that shapes everything that follows.
Dr. Lieu recommends starting with these five:
Biomarker testing looks for specific changes in your tumor’s genes that tell your care team how your cancer behaves and which treatments are more likely to work for you. It goes by several names: tumor testing, molecular testing, mutation testing, or next-generation sequencing (NGS).
If you are not sure whether you have been tested, ask now. If you are being treated in the metastatic setting, it is absolutely worth bringing up. Dr. Lieu recommends two direct questions:
They are often confused, but they are different. Biomarker testing looks at mutations within your cancer cells specifically — changes that happened in the tumor, not ones you were born with. Genetic testing looks at inherited DNA and can reveal hereditary risk factors like Lynch syndrome, which has implications for family members as well. Both can be important. Ask your care team whether you have had each.
Yes. Clinical trials are not a last resort — they are a legitimate treatment option at every stage, including first-line. Dr. Lieu’s recommendation: ask your oncologist at your first appointment whether any trials are available for your specific biomarker profile.
If you are told to start chemotherapy first, ask two follow-up questions before you begin: Are there any first-line trials available for me right now? And would one cycle of treatment disqualify me? Many trials allow one prior cycle, so starting standard therapy does not always close the door — but it is important to ask before, not after.
Do not stop there. Ask whether other trials exist, look beyond your current institution, and consider reaching out directly to the trial’s contact on ClinicalTrials.gov. As Bill puts it: “There is always a trial. You just have to do some work to get there.”
Two tools that can help: ClinicalTrials.gov is the full database of open trials. ChatCRC (chatbot.fightcolorectalcancer.org) is Fight CRC’s AI-powered tool that lets you search in plain language — Dr. Lieu demonstrated that a simple prompt surfaced six relevant trials versus roughly 50 unfiltered results on ClinicalTrials.gov.
The time commitment is one of the biggest things patients underestimate, especially in early cycles. But Bill also noted that the level of monitoring on a trial is often more intensive than standard care — your health is top of mind for that institution.
Before enrolling, Bill recommends asking: What is the patient’s responsibility? What are the side effect profiles? And what does the time commitment actually look like week to week?
We asked both panelists.
Bill: “Understand that you should be accountable for your own health. Once you do that, you will have the curiosity to find what options are out there for you.”
Dr. Lieu: “Advocate for yourself, but bring people who will advocate for you — a friend, a family member, a patient advocate — because having backup in that room makes a real difference.”
Learn
Find Trials
Connect
Advocate
Stay Informed
This webinar was supported by Pfizer. Fight CRC independently develops and curates all content. The information in this FAQ is for general educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Please consult your care team about your individual situation.


The post Clinical Trials and First-Line Metastatic CRC: What Patients Should Know Before Starting Treatment appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>The post Fight Colorectal Cancer Coalition Grows with Three New Endorsing Organizations appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>Colorectal Cancer Equity Foundation, V Foundation for Cancer Research, and First Ascent Biomedical have joined a growing national coalition working to close gaps in colorectal cancer care
[Springfield, Missouri] Fight Colorectal Cancer (Fight CRC) today highlighted the expansion of its Colorectal Cancer Care Initiative (CRCCI), a national coalition focused on transforming screening, diagnosis, and treatment standards, which has welcomed three new endorsing organizations. The Colorectal Cancer Equity Foundation, V Foundation for Cancer Research, and First Ascent Biomedical have all signed on to lend their support to the initiative, which unites organizations around a shared set of benchmarks aimed at improving outcomes at every stage of the colorectal cancer care continuum, from screening and diagnosis through treatment and follow-up care.
The three organizations bring distinct strengths in community-based equity work, cancer research funding, and precision medicine to a coalition already spanning health systems, advocacy groups, employers, and medical associations nationwide.
“Closing the gaps in colorectal cancer care takes more than any one type of organization can do alone,” said Joya Delgado Harris, Director of CRCCI at Fight Colorectal Cancer. “These three organizations each bring something unique to this coalition, reflective of the all-hands-on-deck approach and commitment that colorectal cancer patients deserve.”
Colorectal Cancer Equity Foundation, which joined CRCCI this summer, works to close disparities in colorectal cancer outcomes among African-American men and other underserved populations, meeting people directly in their communities through education, screening access, and grassroots partnership.
V Foundation for Cancer Research, also an endorser since this summer, funds cancer research and scientists working to accelerate breakthroughs across the field. As a research funder rather than a direct care provider, its endorsement reflects how CRCCI’s goals resonate not only with those delivering care, but with those funding the discoveries meant to improve it.
First Ascent Biomedical, the coalition’s newest endorser, is a biotechnology company that tests hundreds of FDA-approved drugs against a patient’s own cancer cells to identify which treatments are most likely to work, helping clinicians make faster, more precise treatment decisions.
CRCCI includes endorsing organizations across health systems, pharmaceutical and diagnostics companies, nonprofit and patient advocacy groups, and medical associations. Endorsers are united around two CRCCI goals with measurable targets. Goal 1 focuses on timely screening for prevention and early detection, aiming for an 80% screening rate among average-risk patients and ensuring 80% of patients with an abnormal non-invasive test receive follow-up colonoscopy within 90 days. Goal 2 focuses on accurate diagnosis and timely treatment initiation, with targets of 80% of CRC patients receiving biomarker testing per NCCN Guidelines®, 80% receiving germline genetic testing at diagnosis, and 80% initiating treatment within six weeks of diagnosis.
To learn more about CRCCI or to inquire about becoming an endorsing organization, visit fightcolorectalcancer.org or contact Joya Delgado Harris at joya@fightcrc.org.
About Fight Colorectal Cancer
Fight CRC is the leading colorectal cancer advocacy organization offering patient support, screening guidance, research updates, and ways to take action against colon and rectal cancer.
About the Colorectal Cancer Care Initiative
The CRCCI is a national coalition of patient advocates, physicians, public health champions and healthcare leaders uniting around data-driven goals to transform colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Learn how your organization can join the initiative and advance our shared mission.
Media Contact:
Name: Joya Delgado Harris
Email: joya@fightcrc.org.
The post Fight Colorectal Cancer Coalition Grows with Three New Endorsing Organizations appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>The post Did You Have Colon Cancer? You May Be Owed $50,000–$100,000 Through RECA appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>Here’s the short version:
Let’s walk through whether you qualify.
This is the most important question, so let’s be clear and honest about it.
Colon cancer IS covered. If you were diagnosed with colon cancer, your diagnosis is on RECA’s list of covered diseases (for the categories described below).
About rectal cancer: RECA’s official list names “colon” cancer. It does not separately list “rectal” cancer. “Colorectal cancer” is an umbrella term that includes both colon and rectal cancers—but the DOJ program language specifically says colon.
What this means for you: If your diagnosis was colon cancer, you’re on solid ground. If your diagnosis was rectal cancer specifically, it’s not clearly named on the list—but it’s still worth calling the RECA Program (1-800-729-7327) to ask about your exact diagnosis before assuming you don’t qualify. Bring your medical records, which will state the precise diagnosis. Don’t rule yourself out based on this blog alone.
If you had colon cancer, the next question is where you lived, worked, or went to school—and when. There are two situations most likely to apply to colorectal cancer survivors.
You may qualify if you were physically present in one of these areas during a qualifying time:
The areas: the states of Idaho, New Mexico, and Utah, plus these counties:
The timing (you need one of these):
If you qualify: a one-time payment of $100,000. If the person has passed away, their survivors can share the payment.
This category was added in July 2025 and is especially important for people in the St. Louis, Missouri area. You may qualify if you lived, worked, or went to school in a covered ZIP code for at least 2 years after January 1, 1949.
Covered Missouri ZIP codes (St. Louis area):
63031, 63033, 63034, 63042, 63045, 63074, 63114, 63135, 63138, 63044, 63121, 63140, 63145, 63147, 63102, 63304, 63134, 63043, 63341, 63368, 63367
(The program also covers certain ZIP codes in Tennessee, Kentucky, and Alaska—see the DOJ site for those.)
If you qualify:
| Your situation | Payment |
| Had colon cancer + lived in a fallout area (Downwinder) | $100,000 |
| Had colon cancer + lived near St. Louis-area waste, living when you file | $50,000 or your unpaid medical bills (whichever is greater) |
| Had colon cancer + lived near St. Louis-area waste, but the person has passed away | $25,000 to spouse or children |
You can apply online or by mail. It’s free. You cannot apply by email.
Go to the official portal and follow the steps: RECA Claim Portal — reca.justice.gov
You can upload photos or scans of your documents to speed things up.
Step 1 — Download the form that matches your situation:
Step 2 — Gather your documents. You’ll need:
For mailed claims, send original or certified copies.
Step 3 — Mail it to:
Keep a copy of everything you send.
Yes—colon cancer is on RECA’s list of covered diseases for the categories above. You’ll still need to show you lived or worked in a covered area during a qualifying period.
RECA’s official list names “colon” cancer and doesn’t separately list rectal cancer. That doesn’t automatically mean no—but it’s not clearly listed either. Call the RECA Program at 1-800-729-7327 and ask about your specific diagnosis before deciding. Have your pathology report handy.
No. That’s the whole point of RECA—you don’t have to prove what caused your cancer. You only show that you had a covered cancer and lived or worked in a covered area during the right time.
Yes. Surviving family members can file. The amount depends on the category (see the table above).
Nothing. Filing directly with the DOJ is free. Be careful of companies that charge big fees to file for you—you can do it yourself at no cost, and the RECA staff will help you over the phone.
You’ll get an acknowledgment letter after you file. Because so many people are applying, it may take a while. Once you get your RECA Claim Number, use it in any future calls or letters.
Call the free RECA helpline: 1-800-729-7327, Monday–Friday, 9 a.m.–5 p.m. Eastern. It’s better to ask than to assume you don’t qualify.
Yes—December 31, 2027. All claims must be filed by then.
Missouri residents — local help
If you’re in Missouri, the office of U.S. Senator Josh Hawley has a RECA point of contact who can help answer questions about the program:
If you had colon cancer and lived, worked, or went to school in a covered area—especially the St. Louis region or a nuclear fallout state—it costs nothing to find out if you’re owed $50,000 to $100,000. Families of those who have passed away can file too.
The deadline is December 31, 2027. Start at the official DOJ RECA website or call 1-800-729-7327 today.
This article is provided for education by Fight CRC and is not legal or medical advice. Only the U.S. Department of Justice decides who qualifies. Details are current as of the DOJ RECA page dated August 24, 2026, and may change—always confirm on the official DOJ website before filing.
The post Did You Have Colon Cancer? You May Be Owed $50,000–$100,000 Through RECA appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>The post Cancer statistics for Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander people, 2026 appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>Cancer. 2026 Sep 1;132(17):e70584. doi: 10.1002/cncr.70584.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cancer statistics for Asian American and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) people are usually aggregated, masking substantial variation within this heterogeneous population. Herein, the American Cancer Society reports cancer incidence and survival for 8 Asian American and 3 NHPI ethnic groups.
METHODS: The authors used population-based cancer registry data from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, for Asian American and NHPI ethnic groups from 2000 through 2022.
RESULTS: During 2018-2022, overall cancer incidence ranged from 218.3 per 100,000 Kampuchean people to 474.5 per 100,000 Native Hawaiian people, which was 1.5 times higher than the rate for the aggregated Asian American and NHPI population (307.3 per 100,000). High incidence among Native Hawaiian people is largely driven by the highest rates of female breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers, whereas infection-related cancers were highest among Asian American ethnic groups. For example, liver and stomach cancer incidence is highest among Vietnamese (22.2 per 100,000) and Korean people (17.8 per 100,000), respectively, both of which were nearly twice that in Native Hawaiian people (12.9 and 9.6 per 100,000, respectively). Native Hawaiian and Samoan women are twice and 3 times as likely, respectively, to be diagnosed with uterine corpus cancer as aggregated Asian American and NHPI women or White women. Five-year relative survival ranges from 42% in Laotians to 74% in Asian Indians/Pakistanis, with largest differences for colorectal (43% in Laotians to 72% in Asian Indians/Pakistanis) and prostate (63% in Kampucheans to 97% in Japanese) cancers.
CONCLUSIONS: Wide variation in cancer risk within the Asian American and NHPI population highlights the critical need for disaggregated data to effectively target cancer prevention and control interventions.
PMID:42658095 | DOI:10.1002/cncr.70584
The post Cancer statistics for Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander people, 2026 appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>The post Shaping the future of early-onset colorectal cancer prevention appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>Nat Rev Cancer. 2026 Aug 26. doi: 10.1038/s41568-026-00965-5. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) among individuals under age 50 is increasing globally. Lifestyle factors such as obesity, metabolic comorbid conditions, poor diet and sedentary behaviours are linked to EOCRC, but critical gaps remain in identifying additional risk factors, with growing evidence for early-life and gut microbial-related exposures. In addition, how or when the risk factors act, individually or collectively, to initiate or promote colorectal cancer at much younger ages remains unknown. Compounding the complexity are the unique challenges of developing and implementing effective prevention strategies among younger populations. In this Roadmap, we review the progress and challenges of risk factor discovery for EOCRC, highlight opportunities for prevention and propose a transdisciplinary framework integrating population, mechanistic, behavioural and implementation sciences to accelerate causal risk factor discovery and translate insights into strategies to reverse the rising EOCRC burden. This framework, exemplified by emerging global initiatives including the Cancer Grand Challenges team PROSPECT, is broadly adaptable and intended to inspire collaborative efforts across the field. We also emphasize the critical role of patient perspectives and public engagement in shaping these efforts. With the urgency in risk factor discovery, scientists, the public and policymakers must unite to transform knowledge into life-saving solutions for future generations.
PMID:42649278 | DOI:10.1038/s41568-026-00965-5
The post Shaping the future of early-onset colorectal cancer prevention appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>The post Multi-kingdom signatures of the gut microbiome in Lynch syndrome: a prospective model for colorectal cancer evolution appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>Gut. 2026 Aug 25:gutjnl-2026-339088. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2026-339088. Online ahead of print.
NO ABSTRACT
PMID:42642216 | DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2026-339088
The post Multi-kingdom signatures of the gut microbiome in Lynch syndrome: a prospective model for colorectal cancer evolution appeared first on Fight Colorectal Cancer.
]]>