Artificial Intelligence

The Importance of the Zero Trust IEEE Standard

emdecker — Wed, 25 Feb 2026 16:25:51 +0000

The Importance of the Zero Trust IEEE Standard emdecker February 25, 2026

In our From the Expert blog series, we feature leading voices from Capitol Tech's network of thought leaders contributing their fresh insights, groundbreaking ideas, and real-world experience. From innovative research to practical applications, their unique perspectives on today’s most exciting scientific and technological discoveries bring us to the frontiers of discovery and inspire us to imagine the future.

Supatman/AdobeStock

The Importance of the Zero Trust IEEE Standard

by Dr. Ron Martin, CPP, CPOI

The significance of the Zero Trust Security Standard encourages organizations to review it for potential adoption. One of the key references for Zero Trust Security is the 2022 National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Special Publication 800-207. This document defines Zero Trust as a cybersecurity approach.

Recognizing the importance of this program and its potential to improve cybersecurity, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) launched a project to develop an IEEE and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard for Zero Trust.

As cyber threats continue to evolve, traditional perimeter-based security models are no longer sufficient to protect sensitive organizational resources. The Zero Trust framework provides a robust approach to cybersecurity by adopting principles such as "never trust, always verify", “assume breach,” and “least privilege access.” This standard outlines a comprehensive framework to help organizations transition to a Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) or build systems that fully embrace Zero Trust principles.

Why This Standard Matters:

Enhanced Security: The framework addresses critical domains such as Identity, Devices, Networks, Applications, and Data, ensuring granular control and protection of organizational assets.
Risk Mitigation: By implementing Zero Trust principles, organizations can reduce vulnerabilities, mitigate risks, and safeguard against increasingly sophisticated cyber threats.
Compliance: The standard aligns with regulatory requirements and provides guidance for maintaining accountability and evidence of ZTA compliance.
Future-Ready: Zero Trust is a dynamic strategy that evolves with the threat landscape, ensuring organizations remain proactive and resilient.

Key Components to Review:

ZT Domains: Identity, Devices, Networks, Applications, and Data.

Cross-Cutting Domains: Governance, Visibility & Analytics, and Automation & Orchestration.

Implementation Guidance: Practical steps for migrating to ZTA, including governance alignment, continuous monitoring, and automation.

This is not just a technical change but a strategic evolution that demands collaboration across all levels of the organization.

Reference: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2025). Draft standard for zero trust security (P3409™/D6). IEEE Computer Society.

Categories: Artificial Intelligence

Dr. Ron Martin

Professor of Practice, CPP, CPOI

Dr. Ron Martin is a Professor of Practice at Capitol Technology University, specializing in the functional areas of Critical Infrastructure, Industrial Control System Security, Identity, Credential, and Access Management. Dr. Martin maintains professional relationships with a diverse mix of businesses. He serves on the board of directors for many profit and nonprofit organizations, such as the International Foundation for Protection Officers (IFPO), and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) P2887 - Zero Trust Security Working Group (ZTSWG) as Vice Chair. He is a voting member of the U.S. Technical Advisory Group to the International Standards Organization (ISO), which works to develop and articulate the U.S. position by ensuring public and private sector stakeholder involvement. He is also a member of the Cloud Security Alliance Zero-Trust/ Software Defined Perimeter Expert’s Working Group and the Security Industry Association Standards Committee. Recently, he has been designated by the U.S. Department of State as a Fulbright Specialist.

Learn More About Our Master's in Critical Infrastructure

Visit Program Page

From the Expert: NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) Training

emdecker — Thu, 08 Jan 2026 15:34:37 +0000

From the Expert: NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) Training emdecker January 8, 2026

Prostock-studio/AdobeStock

NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) Training

by Dr. Ron Martin, CPP, CPOI

On August 6, 2025, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Computer Security Resource Center modified their RMF Online Introductory Courses. These courses are free and introduce key RMF publications to those responsible for managing or overseeing cybersecurity risk. There are four courses offered: RMF Introductory Course, Security and Privacy Controls Introductory Course, Assessing Security and Privacy Controls Introductory Course, and Control Baselines Introductory Course. These courses provide a high-level overview of important security and privacy risk management concepts based directly on the material in the NIST special publications. Participants do not need to have any prior knowledge about cybersecurity concepts to take these courses.

It will take participants under six hours to complete all four courses. There are three components to each course offering. First, the participant will launch the self-guided online course. Second, the participant can download the slides with notes to complete the courses. And third, the participant can download the certificate of completion. The user self-attests to completing the course; NIST does not track completion. The certificate only identifies that the course material was viewed and does not attest to any qualifications, knowledge, or skill level resulting from the completion of the course. However, organizations can use these courses to provide a foundational understanding of cybersecurity. It is recommended for those in academia to integrate this training into their curricula for more robust, career-applicable coursework.

With the rise in cost of education, offering free professional education is a benefit. Using these courses as a basis for cybersecurity and critical infrastructure education will enhance the awareness of these concepts and serve as a jump-off point for further study.

For more information, visit the NIST Risk Management Framework.

Categories: Artificial Intelligence

Dr. Ron Martin

Professor of Practice, CPP, CPOI

Learn More About Our Master's in Critical Infrastructure

Visit Program Page

From the Expert: Critical Infrastructure Sector Guidance versus Sector Cybersecurity Implementation Guidance

emdecker — Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:55:46 +0000

From the Expert: Critical Infrastructure Sector Guidance versus Sector Cybersecurity Implementation Guidance emdecker November 19, 2025

akarapon/AdobeStock

Critical Infrastructure Sector Guidance versus Sector Cybersecurity Implementation Guidance

by Dr. Ron Martin, CPP, CPOI

According to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), there are 16 critical infrastructure sectors whose assets, systems, and networks, whether physical or virtual, are considered so vital to the United States that their incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination thereof. A list of these sectors, along with their corresponding sector guides, can be accessed on their website.

Presidential Policy Directive 21 (PPD-21): Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience advances a national policy to strengthen and maintain secure, functioning, and resilient critical infrastructure. This directive supersedes Homeland Security Presidential Directive 7.

The current CISA Critical Sector Guides were developed using the 2013 National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP). The NIPP, as well as the sector plans, requires revision. Until then, we must use the concepts in NIPP and its sector plans to develop plans for organizational security postures. You can review the 2013 NIPP and resources on the CISA website. This provides current information that critical infrastructure stakeholders can use to improve their overall security postures. The NIPP Document is located on the NIST website.

CISA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) collaborated to guide the implementation of the Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 1.1 across many of the 16 sectors. CSF 1.1 was released in 2014. Therefore, the implementation guides were developed between 2015 and 2020 and can be accessed on the NIST website.

These organizations also leveraged non-federal entities to guide this implementation in some sectors. NIST provided a summary of the federal and non-federal resources. 

NIST recently released the CSF 2.0. This is an important rewrite that will enhance any organization that implements its attributes. You access the CSF 2.0 on the NIST Project Page.

In my research on critical infrastructure, I have not found any integration of the combined guidance areas. Therefore, as part of this critical infrastructure capstone course, I challenged our graduate students to develop and present a Project report on this integration. As graduates of Capitol's Master of Science program, they will contribute an important project report that supports the practice of critical infrastructure and cybersecurity protection.

Categories: Artificial Intelligence

Dr. Ron Martin

Professor of Practice, CPP, CPOI

Learn More About Our Master's in Critical Infrastructure

Visit Program Page

Biggest Data Breach Ever Spotlights Ongoing Challenges for Users and Cybersecurity Professionals

emdecker — Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:52:23 +0000

Biggest Data Breach Ever Spotlights Ongoing Challenges for Users and Cybersecurity Professionals emdecker August 14, 2025

In what cybersecurity experts call the largest data breach in history, more than 16 billion login credentials have been leaked online, exposing passwords for Google, Apple, Facebook, and other major platforms across social media, virtual private networks, and cloud services. This latest large-scale data exposure shows the continuing need for expanded preventative action by both cybersecurity professionals and users themselves to ensure a more cyber-secure future.

DC Studio/AdobeStock

Mega Breaches: A Growing Trend

Major data breaches have been an unfortunate reality since the dawn of the internet. In 2013, Yahoo experienced a previous largest-ever breach, with all 3 billion of its user accounts compromised. The stolen data included names, email addresses, and hashed passwords, and the breach significantly impacted Yahoo’s valuation during its acquisition by Verizon.

More recently, Microsoft disclosed a critical breach involving its on-premises Exchange Server software. The 2021 breach allowed attackers to gain full access to email accounts, administrator privileges, and connected devices. The attack affected more than 250,000 servers worldwide, including those of 30,000 U.S. organizations, government agencies, and financial institutions. The breach highlighted the dangers of unpatched legacy systems and the cascading risks posed by compromised enterprise infrastructure.

In 2023, a breach of the Real Estate Wealth Network exposed 1.5 billion records, including names, addresses, contact information, device details, and sensitive property ownership data. The database also contained internal logs and financial information, including mortgage and tax records for millions of individuals, including celebrities and public figures.

This most recent breach involving over 16 billion of Google, Apple, and Facebook passwords is believed to be the result of multiple infostealer campaigns, which involve using malicious software to extract sensitive data from devices and sending it to remote servers controlled by attackers.

What Happens to Data after a Breach?

Once credentials are leaked, they often end up on dark web marketplaces, where they’re sold in bulk to cybercriminals. These actors use the data in credential stuffing attacks, where automated bots attempt to log into various services using the same username and password combinations. If users have reused passwords across platforms, attackers can gain access to multiple accounts with minimal effort.

Beyond account takeovers, leaked data is used to craft highly targeted phishing campaigns. With access to personal details, attackers can impersonate trusted services and trick users into revealing even more sensitive information. In more severe cases, stolen data is used for identity theft, enabling criminals to open bank accounts, apply for loans, or file fraudulent tax returns in the victim’s name. Exposed data can be reused, repackaged, and exploited for years, causing long-term reputational damage, financial loss, and emotional stress.

How to Protect Yourself if Your Data is Breached

If you suspect your credentials may have been compromised, it’s critical to act quickly. Start by changing your passwords, especially for high-value accounts like email, banking, and cloud storage. Avoid reusing passwords across platforms and consider using a password manager to generate and store strong, unique passwords.

Enabling multi-factor authentication can add an extra layer of protection by requiring a second form of verification, such as a fingerprint or one-time code. You should also monitor your accounts for unusual activity by enabling login alerts and account activity logs and consider identity theft monitoring services that can alert you if your personal information appears on the dark web.

How to Prevent Major Data Breaches

Massive breaches are often the result of systemic weaknesses in cybersecurity infrastructure. Many organizations still rely on outdated systems, fail to patch known vulnerabilities, or lack proper encryption protocols. In some cases, sensitive data is stored without adequate access controls, making it easier for attackers to infiltrate and extract information.

Human error also plays a major role. Employees may fall for phishing scams, use weak passwords, or misconfigure cloud storage settings. Meanwhile, the sheer volume of digital data being generated and its storage in increasingly complex environments creates an ever-expanding attack surface.

Compounding the issue is the fact that, until a breach occurs, cybersecurity is often treated as a secondary concern. One study found that only 2% of organizations have implemented a comprehensive cyber resilience strategy. Without proactive investment and offensive vs. defensive cyber engineering in security architecture, staff training, and incident response planning, organizations remain vulnerable to both sophisticated and opportunistic attacks.

The leak of 16 billion passwords is a blunt reminder that the scale and sophistication of cyberattacks continues to grow. As attackers become more capable—in part by leveraging artificial intelligence—to create more efficient attack methods, cyber professionals must enhance their skills and stay current with evolving technologies to stay one step ahead.

Cybersecurity Education at Capitol Tech

Capitol Technology University is recognized by the National Security Agency (NSA) and Department of Defense (DoD) as a Center of Academic Excellence in Cyber Defense (CAE-CD). Our award-winning programs in cyber and Information security can prepare you to create a safer and more secure digital world. With resources such as our Cyber Lab and Critical Infrastructure Center (CIC), as well as our expert faculty and partnerships with leading cyber agencies, Capitol Tech empowers graduates to succeed in this diverse and expanding field.

Explore what a degree from Capitol Tech can do for you! To learn more, contact our Admissions team or request more information.

Written by Jordan Ford

Edited by Erica Decker

Categories: Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence

Biden Administration Plans to Bolster the Cybersecurity of Water Systems Critical Infrastructure

zqureshi — Tue, 04 Jun 2024 16:35:21 +0000

Biden Administration Plans to Bolster the Cybersecurity of Water Systems Critical Infrastructure zqureshi June 4, 2024

In March 2023, the Environmental Protection Agency issued a rule requiring states to evaluate the cybersecurity of water systems during sanitation surveys. This rule was based on an interpretation of the Safe Drinking Water Act – part of the Biden Administration's broader national cybersecurity strategy, which urges all agencies, including those protecting critical infrastructure like water systems, to establish minimum cybersecurity standards.

However, the EPA’s rule faced legal challenges, leading to a temporary hold by a court in July 2023 after three Republican state attorney generals filed a petition to review it. These petitioners expressed concern that the rule infringed on states' rights and could lead to increased costs for consumers. Consequently, the EPA withdrew the rule last October, with the intention to seek congressional authority to enforce digital safeguards for water and wastewater systems. Currently, the Biden Administration is taking another look at whether the EPA has the authority in the standardization of cybersecurity mandates under which this rule falls.

Protecting Water Systems from Cyber Attacks

Water and wastewater systems are one of the United States’ 16 critical infrastructure sectors, making them a prime target for malicious actors seeking to disrupt or harm American life. Like transportation, energy, and other critical industries, our country’s 50,000 water systems face both universal and sector-specific threats. Prime among these threats is the systems’ exposure to the public-facing internet. Operational technology such as controllers and remote terminal units are often connected to the internet, making them vulnerable to attack.

Thus, regular cybersecurity assessments are crucial to assess and protect vulnerabilities within operational and information technology systems. Assessments can identify systems that require updates, restrict unauthorized users, and ensure data and systems are backed up. Similarly, it can be challenging to maintain system inventories and authorizations across such a vast network, making the entire process difficult to manage and protect.

Human error plays a considerable role as well. Users who don’t change default passwords leave systems open to unauthorized access, as was seen last December. A group affiliated with the Iranian government exploited wastewater networks in 16 states by hacking into the systems using a default password of 1111. Employees without proper cybersecurity awareness training can inadvertently become the weakest link in the security chain. These critical sectors, like all organizations, must develop and execute cybersecurity incident response and recovery plans to better mitigate cyber incidents.

The Road Forward

Despite the withdrawal, the EPA continues to advocate for the adoption of cybersecurity best practices in public water systems to ensure safe and reliable drinking water. In a March 2024 letter to U.S. governors, EPA Administrator Michael Regan asked states to voluntarily review cybersecurity programs within water systems, and the EPA is committed to providing technical assistance, including risk assessments, consultations, training, and funding.

The Biden administration has also stated its continued dedication to securing water systems against cyber threats, and this has been an ongoing, multifaceted effort for several years. They plan to pursue alternative legislative options to obtain the necessary authority from Congress for the EPA to mandate cybersecurity practices.

The decision to rescind the rule has been met with mixed reactions. Some state officials and water sector groups, such as the American Water Works Association and National Rural Water Association, welcomed the withdrawal, while also acknowledging the ongoing and real cyber threats to the water sector. These groups are pushing for a co-regulatory model and have proposed legislation to support cybersecurity in rural water systems. This model “would build on a similar process in the electric sector, maintain EPA oversight, ensure the engagement of water sector experts and protect sensitive information. It would also incorporate the public-private collaboration called for in the recent National Cybersecurity Strategy,” making it a viable option to explore for the protection of our water systems.

Protect Cybersecurity of Critical Infrastructure with Capitol Tech

Capitol Technology University offers degree programs in Critical Infrastructure that prepare students to protect the critical sectors of our nation’s infrastructure. Through cybersecurity education and facilities management training, our comprehensive curriculum sets students on the path to success in this dynamic field. For more information, contact our Admissions team or attend an information session.

Categories: Artificial Intelligence

Powering Up Our Defenses: The DOE Invests in Energy Sector Cybersecurity

emdecker — Tue, 02 Apr 2024 20:40:44 +0000

Powering Up Our Defenses: The DOE Invests in Energy Sector Cybersecurity emdecker April 2, 2024

The Department of Energy (DOE) recently announced a significant investment of $45 million into cybersecurity research for the energy sector. This critical funding aims to bolster the nation's defenses against cyberattacks that threaten our electricity grids, oil pipelines, and natural gas infrastructure. The urgency for such measures cannot be overstated. The energy sector is the backbone of our economy and daily lives, and a successful cyberattack could have crippling consequences, disrupting essential services and causing widespread crisis.

Understanding the Threat Landscape

In recent years, the energy sector has become an increasingly attractive target for cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors. The interconnected nature of our power grids and the growing adoption of digital technologies have created vulnerabilities that malicious actors can exploit. A well-coordinated cyberattack could disrupt power supplies, manipulate energy prices, or even cause physical damage to critical infrastructure.

The 2020 SolarWinds supply chain attack, which compromised software used by many electric utilities, serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers. The attack highlighted the energy sector's interconnectedness and the potential for a single security breach to have cascading effects.

Investing in Energy Cyber Solutions

The DOE's $45 million investment is a positive step towards fortifying the energy sector's cybersecurity posture. The funding will be directed towards several research projects focused on developing innovative solutions to address current and emerging cyber threats. Some of the critical areas of research include:

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Enhanced Security: AI can be a powerful anomaly detection and threat identification tool. The research will focus on developing AI-powered systems that can continuously monitor energy grids for suspicious activity and identify potential cyberattacks in real-time.
Quantum Communication for Unbreakable Encryption: Quantum communication offers the potential for unbreakable encryption, making it extremely difficult for attackers to eavesdrop on communications or tamper with data. Research in this area will explore the feasibility of integrating quantum computing technologies into the energy sector's infrastructure.
Improving Pipeline and Grid Resilience: Research will target ways to improve the resilience of pipelines and electricity grids against cyberattacks. This could involve developing new methods for segmentation and isolation, as well as enhancing the physical security of critical infrastructure.
Workforce Development and Training: A skilled cybersecurity workforce is essential for protecting the energy sector. The funding will also support initiatives to develop a more robust cybersecurity workforce, including training programs and educational opportunities.

The Future of Cybersecurity in the Energy Industry

The DOE's investment in cybersecurity research is a crucial step, but it's just the beginning of a long-term series of efforts that are necessary, such as:

Collaboration: Effective cybersecurity requires collaboration between government agencies, energy companies, technology providers, and cybersecurity experts. Public-private partnerships will be essential for sharing information, developing best practices, and coordinating responses to cyber threats.
Standardization and Regulation: The Department of Energy has already made strides in establishing cybersecurity baselines for the electric sector. Continued efforts are needed to develop and implement consistent cybersecurity standards and regulations across the entire energy industry.
Continuous Improvement: The cyber threat landscape is constantly evolving. It's imperative to foster a culture of continuous improvement within the energy sector, where cybersecurity practices are regularly evaluated and updated to address new threats and vulnerabilities.

By investing in research, promoting collaboration, and fostering a culture of cybersecurity awareness, the DOE and other organizations can build a more resilient energy sector that is less susceptible to cyberattacks. This will safeguard our critical infrastructure and ensure a more reliable and secure energy future for all.

Cybersecurity Education at Capitol Technology University

Do you have a drive to protect our nation's most critical systems? Capitol Technology University offers programs in critical infrastructure where you will develop the skills needed to become a crucial line of cyber defense for our nation. Our program merges in-depth training in Cyber and Information Security, Critical Infrastructure, Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, and many more. Visit our website to learn more.

Categories: Artificial Intelligence

The Bridge Crisis in America

bcook — Wed, 16 Mar 2022 20:59:36 +0000

The Bridge Crisis in America bcook March 16, 2022

At the end of January, the Fern Hollow Bridge in Pittsburgh collapsed, injuring ten. About three weeks later, the arches of a pedestrian bridge in North Carolina collapsed less than a year after construction. According to the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA), one in three U.S. bridges either needs repairs or to be replaced.

The Fern Hollow Bridge collapse is still being investigated and it may take upwards of 12-18 months until a full report of what occurred is issued. One of the potential causes may be that the bridge design is considered “non-redundant,” meaning if the paths to disperse stress place on the bridge fail, the entire bridge fails, reports Margaret J. Krauss for WESA, Pittsburgh’s NPR station.

University of Pittsburgh professor of structural engineering Kent Harries talked with Krauss and shared that, “…non-redundant bridges face restrictions on traffic flow, more stringent inspection guidelines, and more extensive inspection.”

The Fern Hollow Bridge had annual inspections, having been rated in “poor condition” for the last 10 years. Pennsylvania ranks 5th in the nation in percentage of structurally deficient (SD) bridges and 2nd in terms of largest number of bridges in poor condition on ARTBA’s Bridge Report. Every state, including Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico, has multiple bridges that are considered SD or in poor condition.

President Joe Biden arrived in Pittsburgh for a previously scheduled event at Carnegie Mellon University just hours after the bridge collapse.

“Biden promoted the bipartisan infrastructure law, which he said will allocate $1.6 billion to Pennsylvania for repairing and restoring bridges,” report Quint Forgey and Claire Rafford for Politico. “The law, Biden said, is also the largest investment in bridges since former President Dwight D. Eisenhower started the interstate highway system.”

Home to more than 400 bridges, the city of Pittsburgh has the most bridges of any city in the world, and with the Fern Hollow Bridge collapse serves as an example of just how important it is that bridges be maintained and updated appropriately.

According to ARTBA, “The government classifies a bridge as ‘structurally deficient’ if any one of the following bridge components are rated less than or equal to 4 (in poor or worse condition):

Deck condition
Superstructure condition
Substructure condition
Culvert condition.”

Over 43,000 U.S. bridges that are still in active use are considered SD and in poor condition. While this number has decreased from 47, 619 in 2017, ARTBA estimates it would take 30 years to fix all of the nation’s SD bridges.

In addition to the SD bridges, an additional 180,000 bridges are in need of some level of repair.

What is being done to ensure that collapses such as the Fern Hollow Bridge don’t continue to occur? As previously mentioned, the federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), signed into law last November, provides states with additional resources to make improvements to infrastructure, including bridges. Under the act, more than $27.5 billion is being issued to states for bridge repair over the next five years. Additionally, a discretionary bridge program will provide $12.5 billion for projects through 2026.

“State DOTs can also use federal formula highway fund programs, such as the National Highway Performance Program and the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program, for bridge improvements,” states the ARTBA report.

In the Pittsburgh area, steps at the city-level for addressing the city’s bridges are also being implemented.

“Mayor Ed Gainey and City Councilor Corey O’Connor, whose district includes the area around Fern Hollow Bridge, introduced legislation to create an infrastructure commission,” reports Krauss. “That body will recommend how best to maintain and improve city-owned assets.”

Learn more about Capitol Tech’s degree programs in Security, Intelligence, and Critical Infrastructure. Several degree programs are available entirely online including a BS in Construction Management and Critical Infrastructure and a BS in Facilities Management and Critical Infrastructure. Also available are a master’s degree and PhD in critical infrastructure. For more information, contact admissions@captechu.edu.

Categories: Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence

The Importance of the Zero Trust IEEE Standard

The Importance of the Zero Trust IEEE Standard

Dr. Ron Martin

From the Expert: NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) Training

NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) Training

Dr. Ron Martin

From the Expert: Critical Infrastructure Sector Guidance versus Sector Cybersecurity Implementation Guidance

Critical Infrastructure Sector Guidance versus Sector Cybersecurity Implementation Guidance

Dr. Ron Martin

Biggest Data Breach Ever Spotlights Ongoing Challenges for Users and Cybersecurity Professionals

Explore what a degree from Capitol Tech can do for you! To learn more, contact our Admissions team or request more information.

Biden Administration Plans to Bolster the Cybersecurity of Water Systems Critical Infrastructure

Powering Up Our Defenses: The DOE Invests in Energy Sector Cybersecurity

The Bridge Crisis in America

From the Expert: NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) Training

NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) Training

Explore what a degree from Capitol Tech can do for you! To learn more, contact our Admissions team or request more information.