Key Points: 

• Arizona counties want to permanently move the state’s primary date from the first week of August to the final week of July

• Federal law shortens the time Arizona has to submit primary election results before the general election

• Counties say the change likely has to be enacted during February

Just as in 2024, one of the first issues lawmakers must tackle in the upcoming legislative session will be the state’s primary election date. 

Arizona did move its primary election date from the first week of August to the final week of July in 2024, but that was a temporary measure. Now, with another upcoming midterm election, lawmakers will attempt to move the state’s primary election date to July permanently. 

The 2024 law resulted from the Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022, which changed the procedure for the counting of electoral votes. 

Under those changes, election officials across the state worry that they could miss federal deadlines to submit election results if a recount is triggered. A recount is required if the race is within one-half of a percent, instead of one-tenth of a percent, which was the requirement before a 2022 law went into effect.

Rep. Alex Kolodin, R-Scottsdale, prefiled House Bill 2022 for the upcoming legislative session. His measure would permanently move the primary date to the last week of July while also allowing county party chairs to designate observers at voting locations.

“This is another commonsense measure that recent election cycles have demonstrated is critical to clean elections in Arizona,” Kolodin said in a statement. “The bill ensures that Arizonans will not be disenfranchised by Congress’ mistakes and clarifies that independent observers are permitted at all voting locations.”

Getting observers at voting locations has been a goal for Kolodin and other Republican members of the Legislature in recent years under Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs. In 2024, Hobbs vetoed a bill from Rep. Rachel Keshel, R-Tucson, which would have established the practice into law. 

The governor wrote in her veto letter of House Bill 2153 that she didn’t object to uniform laws regarding political party observers but wasn’t sure whether counties could implement them. 

“I am concerned this bill will strain the resources of counties that already struggle with recruiting poll workers by adding additional responsibilities to manage observers who would be required to act as challengers,” Hobbs wrote in her letter. 

Jen Marson, executive director of the Arizona Association of Counties, told the Arizona Capitol Times that the counties have not yet taken a position on whether to include the ballot observer language in the bill.

The counties plan to run their own mirror bills through both House and Senate election committee chairs, Sen. Wendy Rogers, R-Flagstaff; and Rep. John Gillette, R-Kingman, Marson said. Those bills were not drafted to include the language about ballot observers.

Lawmakers had to act quickly with the 2024 temporary measure. Hobbs signed the bill in early February of that legislative session after the counties warned the Legislature that they might not have enough time to secure polling places and voting locations before the primary election if the bill remained in session. 

This year, the counties have run into the same problem.

“We tried to do it last (session) and we had what we thought was a pretty good vote count, but then we got word that we should not move forward this year and we should wait and do it first out of the gate in 2026, so that’s what we’re doing,” Marson said. “We did take a lot of heat for changing the primary in the year of the primary and I did not want to do that again, but here we are so that’s what we’re going to need to do.”

Kolodin was one of the key negotiators of the 2024 temporary measure with former Democratic state Rep. Laura Terech. Both he and Terech described the negotiations over the bill as an exhausting ordeal, leaving some lawmakers in tears of triumph when they knew the bill would become law. 

It was also an opportunity for Kolodin and other Republicans affiliated with the Arizona Freedom Caucus to negotiate election policies they had previously been unsuccessful in getting signed by Hobbs, including requiring county election officials to compare voters’ signatures from their voter records with a list of specific characteristics. Many election workers were already doing that, but the law established it as a required practice. 

Kolodin’s bill for the 2026 legislative session would also change the amount of time voters have to correct any problems with their mail-in ballot signatures from five business days to five calendar days, which was also implemented in the 2024 measure.

Some Democrats opposed going to five calendar days because they believed it could disenfranchise voters who rely on public Wi-Fi and public transportation which have reduced service on weekends.

Marson said the counties requested that change because it helps give election workers enough time to gain days before federal deadlines if a recount is triggered. 

The post Legislation to permanently hold primary elections in July will face early debate first appeared on Arizona Capitol Times.

Key Points: 

• Governor vetoed 178 bills this session, surpassing her previous record

• Photo enforcement and expedited election results bills vetoed

• Hobbs looking to improve vote counting next session

It may have resulted in faster election returns, with the winners and losers known shortly after the polls close.

However, on July 1, Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed legislation designed to help Arizona expedite results. The governor said she could not accept a provision she believed could penalize voters who wait until the last minute to cast their ballots.

Her rejection of Senate Bill 1001 was in the last batch of bills sent to her before the Legislature adjourned for the year on June 27. She now tallies 178 vetoed bills this session.

Among those last-minute rejections was the governor’s decision to veto a proposal by Sen. Wendy Rogers which would have outlawed the use of photo enforcement to catch speeders and red light runners.

The Flagstaff Republican sided with those who contend such automated enforcement ignores individual circumstances that an on-site police officer could take into account before issuing a citation. And some critics argue that the system is merely a means for communities to generate revenue.

Hobbs, who vetoed an identical measure two years ago, has had no change of heart.

“This bill attempts to remove the ability of local law enforcement to keep our streets safe by eliminating a tool used to enhance roadway safety,” she wrote in her veto message.

Rogers, anticipating a veto, had already crafted a parallel measure to bypass the governor and put the issue directly to the voters. However, that plan faltered when, due to the absence of some state representatives, she was unable to garner the necessary votes on the last day of the session to make it happen.

The state does not allow photo enforcement on its highways after then-Gov. Jan Brewer moved in 2010 to have them removed from any state-controlled road.

More controversial, in some ways, has been the question of how to address the fact that Arizona has developed a reputation as one of the last states in the nation, if not the last, to have final election returns.

It occurred in 2022 when it took days to confirm that Hobbs had beaten Republican challenger Kari Lake. And the situation repeated itself last year when delays in processing ballots left many wondering whether Kamala Harris could make up her vote deficit against Donald Trump.

The problem, according to Sen. J.D. Mesnard, R-Chandler, is that Arizona law allows people to request mail-in ballots but, rather than dropping them in the mail box, wait until Election Day to drop them off in person at a polling place.

The problem is that ballots cannot be tabulated until the signatures on the envelopes are verified. And that verification process for those “late-early ballots” cannot begin until after Election Day.

That’s not a problem when there are just a few.

But in the 2024 general election, there were about 265,000 of these ballots, including more than 210,000 in Maricopa County.

Senate President Warren Petersen sought to address the issue by repealing the ability of voters to drop off their early ballots at polling places on Election Day. That, however, proved to be a non-starter.

So Mesnard came up with an alternate plan.

It would still allow ballot drop-offs – but with the option of on-site verification. That would mean obtaining photo identification from those dropping off their ballots after Friday night, a move that would eliminate the need for the kind of signature verification of “late-early ballots’ that would otherwise not be possible until after Election Day.

His legislation would still allow people to simply drop a ballot and leave. And those ballots would still be counted.

But there was a price of sorts to be paid for forcing that after-election signature verification: That voter would be removed from the “active early voting list,” meaning they would not automatically get another ballot by mail ahead of the next election.

Hobbs pronounced that a non-starter.

She said some voters depend on family members or caregivers to drop off their early ballots, meaning they could not appear in person to have their identification checked.

And that, said the governor, presents them with the choice of either losing the option to complete their ballots on Election Day — an option that exists for everyone else — or being removed from the active early voter list.

“I’m certain that we all agree that every eligible vote should count, and no American should be deprived of this right,” Hobbs wrote.

Mesnard, for his part, was unapologetic for offering the measure.

First, he noted, anyone removed from the active early voter list can be reinstated simply by submitting a new request.

More to the point, Mesnard said nothing in his bill would have interfered with anyone’s right to vote. Instead, he said, it simply would have installed “parameters that ensure that we’re not bogging down the system and delaying results of elections by days or weeks.”

“The idea that that is disenfranchising is confusing the right to vote with the convenience we’ve extended people,” he said. “We, in no way, undermine a person’s right to vote, whatsoever.”

Hobbs said she remains interested in possible changes.

“We must balance the speed of counting votes with accessibility, accuracy and security,” she said, promising to work with any legislator next year “to improve voting and vote counting in Arizona.”

The post Gov. Katie Hobbs clears desk of all bills for the session first appeared on Arizona Capitol Times.

The post Court rejects Toma and Petersen’s claims of legislative privilege tied to how past legislation became law first appeared on Arizona Capitol Times.

The post Republican leaders file brief aimed at protecting lawmakers’ ability to clear homeless encampments first appeared on Arizona Capitol Times.

The post Legislative leaders increase intervening in court  first appeared on Arizona Capitol Times.

The post Homicide charge is not a solution to drug use  first appeared on Arizona Capitol Times.

The post HB2319 infringes on the public’s right to record police   first appeared on Arizona Capitol Times.

The post Stop the lawsuit virus before it spreads first appeared on Arizona Capitol Times.

The post All in a session’s work: Pay hikes to official dinosaurs first appeared on Arizona Capitol Times.

The post Lovas tops lawmaker ‘batting average’ with only 4 winning bills first appeared on Arizona Capitol Times.