You’re utterly overcomplicating this. After questions were raised about the C2 zoning proposals, the CDD said it was going to get a consultant to write a report. They put out an RFP and hired a consultant.
We just want to see the work product.
Maybe it answers useful questions, maybe it doesn’t.
Wanting to see what it says is, in my opinion, perfectly reasonable, even from otherwise unreasonable people.
]]>Huh?
What I expect to see from a report is whether the height/density we settled on in C2 is really enough to actually cause development to happen and, if ti isn’t, what we should have recommended.
If getting this report actually turns into a thing that delays Council action, that’s on the CDD, not the Council.. There’s no good reason, given the importance of the report, this shouldn’t have been released a long time ago.
]]>Do you really need a report to tell you that 70/sqft NNN is more lucrative than even 4.21/sqft? Or that linkage above 50k sqft on a commercial project (even at the scifi level of $24.30) is less than value of 47 units of affordable? Why do you think Leggat McCall was trying to go commercial and why would they give 24 units @ 1/3 affordable, middle, and market so easily and happily? I do not need a report to tell me that the world is not flat. I need a council that stops looking for a shrub to hide in.
]]>