Home page - Home, sweet home ヅ

Свет и Тьма

AMV007 — Sat, 31 Oct 2026 10:58:07 +0000

Light and Darkness AMV007 Sat, 10/31/2026 - 14:04

Racing 3D

AMV007 — Sat, 31 Oct 2026 10:07:01 +0000

Racing 3D AMV007 Sat, 10/31/2026 - 13:07

ASCII редактор таблиц

AMV007 — Sun, 18 Oct 2026 20:45:44 +0000

ASCII table editor AMV007 Sun, 10/18/2026 - 23:46

Игра Boulder Dash

AMV007 — Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:40:01 +0000

Game Boulder Dash AMV007 Fri, 09/18/2026 - 13:48

Гонки 2D

AMV007 — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:56:43 +0000

Racing 2D AMV007 Mon, 08/31/2026 - 12:57

Minecraft подобная игра

AMV007 — Tue, 18 Aug 2026 09:56:14 +0000

Minecraft like game AMV007 Tue, 08/18/2026 - 12:57

Paint

AMV007 — Mon, 17 Aug 2026 12:28:13 +0000

Paint AMV007 Mon, 08/17/2026 - 15:28

Punto switcher - исправить раскладку клавиатуры

AMV007 — Sun, 16 Aug 2026 21:40:17 +0000

Punto switcher - fix the keyboard layout AMV007 Mon, 08/17/2026 - 00:41

If you forgot to switch your keyboard layout and ended up with a string of Latin characters instead of Russian text (or vice versa), paste the text into the field below and click "Fix layout." The service runs directly in your browser.

Identify RAL color from a photo online

AMV007 — Sun, 16 Aug 2026 21:22:39 +0000

Identify RAL color from a photo online AMV007 Mon, 08/17/2026 - 00:22

An online tool for matching the closest RAL color from a photo. Upload an existing photo of a part, facade, or product, or take a picture directly with your phone's camera; the service will identify the RAL Classic code that most closely matches the selected area of the image.

How to use:

1. Tap "Upload file" to select a photo from your gallery, or "Take photo" to capture one using your phone's camera.
2. Wait for the image to appear on the screen.
3. Tap the area of the photo where you want to identify the color.
4. The service will display the closest color from the RAL Classic palette, including the code (e.g., RAL 9010), the name, and the approximate match accuracy (ΔE).

Please note: The result depends on the lighting in the photo and camera settings, so you should verify the final shade against a physical RAL color fan deck—this tool provides an approximate match only.

Мысли в слух

AMV007 — Thu, 11 Jul 2024 02:14:16 +0000

Thinks in loud AMV007 Thu, 07/11/2024 - 05:14

A smart human?

We are taught that Darwin's theory is correct.
But if you look at a human being, or any other living creature based on DNA (and we are all based on it), as a complex device, how RNA and DNA work, how DNA repair occurs, how cells and the nervous system work, it becomes obvious that this cannot be the result of chance or evolution.
It's like a plane or a computer appearing as a result of evolution.
The similarity between earthly organisms may not be the result of evolution, but the result of reusing existing designs between organisms, so as not to develop everything from scratch, but to create something using already existing designs, which may indicate the engineered nature of all creatures.
If we appeared as a result of evolution, then we should most likely be surrounded by our prototypes, for example, six-fingered or three-fingered people, since there are no serious reasons for their extinction.
Not to mention the differences resulting from the different work of cells (one cell is possibly more complex than the most modern processors), and people, perhaps not fully understanding how it works even today, simply called it the result of evolution, because it was easier for them, rather than a complex design that even modern man is incapable of creating.
In order to randomly evolve to the current level, humans would have to be surrounded by a lot of their prototypes, but they are not.
At the same time, there is limited adaptation of humans to the local environment, this is obvious. But there are no fundamental differences between such people. They are quite capable of producing viable offspring with each other.

It's worth noting the complexity and fine-tuning of the reproductive cycle; even small deviations would cause it to stop working, and humanity would die out. If we compare this to the randomness of evolution, we could say that a chimpanzee has a chance to write "War and Peace" simply by randomly typing on a typewriter, sooner or later. But in that case, this chimpanzee would have to be surrounded by a mountain of its incorrect works, which are not visible around us.

Knowing programming, I can imagine how difficult it is to write DNA, RNA, to design the entire system, how it unfolds into a human being, how it repairs itself, how it reproduces, adapts, and then packages the changes back for improved adaptation. It's incredibly difficult to unfold it from a single cell to an organism, and it also does this in the reverse direction, without making mistakes, and even checks the archive for integrity and restores it as much as possible. You simply can't imagine how difficult it is to do this, even in a computer, like in a sandbox, and we are dealing with chemistry, physics... A small disruption/change and everything will simply stop working, and there will be no humanity. Not to mention that if the temperature on Earth, for example, rises by 10 degrees, then humanity will also cease to exist... And yet, everything works like clockwork. Saying that all this happened by chance is like expecting a spaceship to appear spontaneously, having designed itself and successfully flown into space 😁

Or expecting Windows with all its programs to write itself from scratch, pack itself into an archive, and unpack itself on your computer – and that would be millions of times simpler!

5 billion years – the time of human evolution – is not that much considering the length of the human genome – 3 billion base pairs, the number of possible combinations: 4 ^3×10 ^9, a number so large that it is impossible to adequately imagine or express it with ordinary numbers; it exceeds the number of atoms in the Universe.

Why is it that no one else besides humans is going through this path to becoming Homo sapiens, no one even starts it anymore?

A practical example: we have DNA and DNA archiving, let's say it happened by chance.
1. The cell mutated DNA archiving by chance.
2. But there is no de-archiving.
3. The cell died.

1. The cell mutated DNA archiving by chance.
2. The cell mutated DNA de-archiving by chance.
3. But it didn't take this into account during reproduction -
4. The cell died.

and so on.
But it's not just about mutating, but also about working out all the possible applications of this.

The question is, how was man created and what was used for this?