‘Einfach machen’ is what I often tell my colleagues. ‘Just do it’, a certain sports brand would translate that motto. Not that we carelessly walk into the next big data security clusterfuck at our company. To the contrary: we have educated and informed our colleagues about how different AI technologies work, what the pros and cons and risks are. We have shown them how to use those tools. And we have encouraged them to play, test, experiment, to see what works for them and what does not. Because you have to find out for yourself to get a better feeling for what AI can do and what it can not do.
There are plenty of companies (and employees) that prefer to talk endlessly about precautions, risk assessments, procedures, data security protocols and more. Without trying and testing these technologies themselves. I often call it moral superiority: the outspoken opinions of those that might be right in theory, but have absolutely no clue about how this tech could work in practice.
I have written an entire book about strict regulation of the tech sector. There is definitely reason for concern, but that does not warrant a wholesale rejection of AI. To the contrary: I believe in innovation, in progress. I also believe that technology is not the solution to all of society’s problems. But it can definitely bring progress.
My start was a slow one as well. But over the past 2.5 years I have integrated AI technologies more and more into my work life. Some things have not worked very well (maintaining my to-do lists in an unsexy Excel sheet turns out to be more pragmatic than doing it with ChatGPT), but there have also been many what-the-fuck moments. Actually, there have been more what-the-fuck moments in the past two years than in the two decades before that. And I am not one to get carried away quickly.
The much-appreciated professor Ethan Mollick, with whom I would never compare myself, has been running many experiments as well. The funniest one is the one where he tries to create an image of an otter on a plane, reading a book. A scene so bizarre one would expect it to be impossible to imagine for AI, as it would have no examples of that in its training data.
And sure, the first attempt was rather laughable and disappointing. But only 30 months later the results are anything but baffling. Mollick can even generate videos now with stunning accuracy and resolution, as if the otter was really flying in the plane. Useful example? Maybe not. But it shows the progress of AI’s capabilities.
Without realizing it, I have been running two similar benchmark experiments as well. The first is asking AI (usually Large Language Models like ChatGPT and Claude) to draw a map of all the first league football clubs from Buenos Aires province, mark their stadiums, the names of their grounds and their capacity. Basically an infographic.
A human being would take quite some time to produce it, because it takes several steps. The first one, researching the clubs and their stadiums, turned out to be easy for ChatGPT. But putting them on a map that I could actually print was and still is, usually a step too far. Gemini managed to do it a couple of months ago, and it looked beautiful… but the location pins were anything but correct. Claude has come close, but the imaging capabilities of my favorite AI tool are still very limited so the maps are a disaster. And ChatGPT is good in integrating online maps… but these only perform when online. Print it in a PDF? Nope, not really convincing. So this is still a hurdle to take.
The second one is a tracker for new concert announcements in Berlin. I have been going to concerts for many decades, but in a huge city like Berlin so much is going on that there is always a FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out). So I have tried to subscribe to newsletters, to let AI subscribe to newsletters, and much more to get automated updates about newly announced concerts.
Until two months ago all of my attempts failed. Claude even told me it was not the right tool for the task. It pointed me to Distill Web Monitor, a tool that works decently but is still a lot of work. So the relief was huge when I started to use Claude Code more and even let it programme applications for me. Over the course of several evenings it managed to come up with an application that I run weekly, across around 25 websites of concert venues. It registers the newly added ones. And serves everything up on a website that initially only ran on my computer. But mission accomplished!
It made me wonder what else was possible. AI thrives on huge datasets. I have created these in the last two decades: the compulsive side of my character kept Excel sheets of all my jogging runs since 2012, my concerts since 1989, or all the vinyl albums in my collection, for example. The creative side of my character wrote six books about travel, football and technology. Built websites about festivals and travel and Berlin and so much more. This was a goldmine waiting to be explored.
So in the past couple of weeks I have tried to come up with ideas to present all that data in a new and hopefully useful and refreshing way through AI. It has resulted in my own playground, an alternative AI version of my personal website. My own otter on a plane.
There are six areas (or rooms), each revolving around one theme. From my work life to travel, tech, football and running, I have tried to come up with examples what one can do with all that data. There are quizzes, animated videos, there is scrollytelling (a short explainer about my AI book). There are graphics and timelines and huge numbers and so much more. And it’s only the start: when time permits, I might try to push the envelope with more interactive and/or creative formats. Why not?
Why all the effort? Because it has taught me so much of what is possible already. How easy it is to have your own applications and websites built by AI. Not constrained by the demands of work, it has given me an even better perspective on the future that is already happening. I have noticed the stupid small mistakes AI still makes. I have been genuinely impressed by the speed and quality of most of the work, actually. And we are only scratching the surface.
So come and have a look. Let me know what you like and don’t like, whether you have new ideas and wishes and dreams. And maybe, just as happened with me after reading Mollick, it inspires you to start trying for yourself as well!
This book is for curious, open-minded people who want to explore and help shape the future – from business leaders to politicians, from tech enthusiasts to engaged citizens, or anyone who fits more than one of those roles. Because: The World’s a Little Blurry!
Get it as print or free PDF. Let’s build tech that serves people, not just metrics.
#AI #ResponsibleAI #TechPolicy #Interoperability #Privacy #DataTrusts #PlatformEconomics #Governance #EthicsInTech #Leadership

Buy print version
The PDF version can be downloaded here. It is completely for free, but if you want to support me and my work then feel free to contribute through this ‘pay what you like‘ option.
Donate
It already was a special day, as the official launch of my second Dutch book. And because lots of friends and family were in the audience. It became an even more special moment with the unexpected passing of our mother, three weeks prior to the event.
She would have loved it, all these strange people in football shirts, her son at the center of all the attention. The book itself, in which I interview around fifteen people from inside and outside the club and also share many personal experiences and memories, is an ode to her love of football as well. That passion for the game that is so important to many people’s lives and souls.
So yes, it was a great and unforgettable day, also thanks to the people behind Staantribune magazine (compare it to When Saturday Comes in England or 11 Freunde in Germany) who gave me free reign to write as I pleased. We are still looking for options to publish a German version, but those who can read Dutch can order the book online.
Here are some videos and articles where I and others talk about the club.
Union qualifying for the Champions League was of course big news, and the reason for several outlets to talk to me and other friends behind the Union In Englisch fansite (I am also a regular guest in the podcast Mattuschka’s Right Peg):
Around the launch of my Dutch book about Union in August 2023 were several interviews (in Dutch):
Voetbalzone, a Dutch football site, in 2023: (hier tekstversie van het interview)
ESPN Netherlands, before the European game against Feyenoord in November 2021.
The BBC in 2019 before the first city derby in the 1. Bundesliga against Hertha:
It was my 8th visit toe the biggest art show on earth, the first time in spring. No glitzy yachts from oligarchs though this time, there is still a war raging in Europe.
Strangely enough, that conflict is only occasionally the topic of the artworks on display. Artists are still catching up to the war in the Ukraine. And the main exhibition, The Milk Of Dreams, was conceived long before the conflict began.
As has been the case for several years now, the main exhibition is spread out over the two big locations. Both the Arsenale and the Giardini each demand a day of your agenda. Curator Cecilia Alemani has been so wise to make very clear choices. The biggest was to give female artists unprecedented room to show their works.
The Milk Of Dreams is also inspired by the work of a woman, Leonora Carrington, who has a huge museum of her surrealist sculptures in the jungle town of Xilitla in Mexico. A lace I coincidentally visited some years ago.
The exhibition has a huge focus on paintings on this edition. Jaider Esbell has a series of square paintings on a black canvas, in a room where there is also a massive installation out of nice-smeling soil. Yes, you have read that right. Firelei Baez has some amazing paintings of a blue mermaid. And the triptych video Of Men And Gods And Mud is a mesmerizing work about local tribes in the north of Sudan. All can be found in the Arsenale.
Both the Arsenale and the Giardini also have a string of national pavillions. There is a lot of focus on the relationship between nature ad technology. The Italian pavillion is a critique of the decline of industrialization, and the hope nature has to offer. China, as always, also comes up with a dystopian mix of natural concrete shapes and digitally created projections.
There are plenty of algorithms running the artworks here. Uzbekistan has a beautiful, flowing space with a piano that is being played by a machine. Australia has a massive screen with randomly picked black-and-white pictures, accompanied by the soundtrack of guitar feedback noise. Slovenia has beautiful paintings of digitally created surreal scenes. And South Africa (see photo) has Apparitions, pictures of motifs painted in black and white on windows.
There are also more important social issues thematized. New Zealand has a great series of videos and photos of the fa’afine, a part of the Samoa people who form a third identity.
Romania has a Cathedral of the Body, a 45-minute video about the importance of sex and how that physically feels. There are three main characters in the documentary. Especially the stories of a disabled man are taboo-busting.
Interestingly enough, this theme of the importance of touching someone is also picked up by the Netherlands. They have abandonded their regular pavillion in the Giardini and have taken over a beautiful old church in the north of town. The Human Touch is one of the highlights of this year’s Biennale.
The Dutch pavillion is also a great example of why the Biennale still feels like an adventure. The third day is for me always devoted to finding the national pavillions that are located outside the Giardini and Arsenale. It’s a lot of effort, but it’s also nicely far away from the selfie-takers. And the rewards are grand as well.
Uganda makes its debut in Italy with a collection of colorful, powerful paintings. On the eastern tip of Venice for example is a video from Lita Albuquerque called Liquid Light, which will take you to the salt plains of Bolivia.
The personal highlight was an overview exhibition of Chun Kwamg Young. His works (see photo) are basically a collection of paper triangles, that together form massive canvases and/or sculptures. It is labor-intensive, unique and extremely impressive.
There is more to be discovered in that Dorsoduro part of the city. Claire Tabouret has an overview exhibition as well. Especially her paintings have their own distinct style, all the portrayed people seem to have a scratch. And five minutes walking further (if you manage to find it) you can see the innovative paintings of the ever-evolving Ha Chong Hyun, now 85 years old.
And that wasn’t even all, as there are dozens of smaller and bigger pavillions spread all over Venice. Tiring, yes. But also hugely inspiring and never boring. And of course providing an endless stream of photo opportunities
The history of the city was completely determined by the port, or even more the docks there. Building ships and submarines was the biggest economic sector for decades. It is also what led Gdansk to the brink of disappearance, as the allied forces wanted to destroy the docks where the military vessels of the Germans were constructed.
(the entire photo album of Gdansk can be viewed here)
The beautiful old town, with its canals, was in ruins as well. And the reconstruction is still ongoing, though in recent years at an increased pace.
There are still plenty of genuinely old brick buildings to admire. Parts of the city walls, watchtowers, churches, they make for some scenic walks. The cobblestoned street of Mariacka is a tourist’s favourite for example.
But when you move to the island in the heart of the city, Wyspa Spichrzow, you notice many buildings in an old-fashioned style but with new materials. Some of the old warehouses have been restored, others were beyond saving. There is vast construction work still going on here, in an area that is made for mass tourism.
That is also a huge trap for Gdansk. I tend to call it the ‘Krakow’ problem, where budget flights have led to an increase in tourism and ‘nudie bar’ and ‘strip show’ is what is on offer for you all the time. Gdansk isn’t that bad yet, but runs the risk of sliding down that path.
Which is a pity, because there is much more than cheap beer and old houses. Actually, the exciting projects are north of the city centre. Opposite Olowianka island, connected by a spectacular retractable footbridge every thirty minutes, is a new area that tries to mimic Hafen City in Hamburg.
There it is the Elbphilharmonie that catches all the attention, here it is the red World War Museum, a spectacular almost sculptural building with a huge main exhibition that takes hours to see.
From there it is only a short walk to the Imperial Harbour, where the old docks are. Most of the production halls are dilapidated, in some there is still construction of luxury yachts ongoing. Serious ship construction happens on the Mlyniska island, which is closed for tourists.
But it’s much more interesting to walk through the mix of old factories and new apartment blocks. There are several old warehouses now filled with street art, techno clubs and concert Venus or food courts. And the spectacular and massive European Solidarity Centre, clad in rusty steel, tells the story of the Solidarity movement in the 1980s that led to the fall of communism.
That’s not even everything, because Gdansk extends northwest along the Baltic Sea. The suburb of Zaspa is one of the biggest urban art galleries of Europe. Sopot is a classic beach town, and Gdynia another port city only ten minutes further north by train.
Things to do in and around Gdansk:
I will disappoint you first: there will be no nameshaming here. I won’t mention individual companies. Because it is more about the widespread problems you encounter as an applicant throughout the industry. It is the lack of respect. The lack of transparency. The lack of accountability. And systemic problems. That is what this article is about.
Let’s start with respect first. Which means that when someone takes the effort to write you an application letter, and fill in a myriad of forms, you should also take the effort to send a proper reply.
It’s stunning that some companies still don’t even send out standardized ‘thank you for your application’ mails. It is though even completely disrespectful to not send a ‘we reviewed your application but choose to proceed with others’ mail.
As of now, I still have around two dozen applications pending. Amongst them a German ministry, an American NGO and several communication agencies. Now, how does that reflect on these brands?
Especially because, as the old saying goes, ‘practice what you preach’. There was this consultancy agency in Berlin that had a great overview of their recruitment process. Their first promise was to get back to you within 72 hours with a decision to proceed or not.
Needless to say, after 2,5 weeks I got a standard mail that they were not moving forward with me. No problem, of course, if it wouldn’t have been for this promise of replying within 72 hours. Especially because many of these companies position themselves on LinkedIn as modern and communicative and transparent. But it seems more like slick employer branding. As we all know, no branding and marketing can be effective when the product itself doesn’t deliver.
With this consultancy agency I could at least imagine why they rejected my application, as I didn’t have much specific experience in their sector of expertise. But there have been many rejections that have simply baffled me. One job description explicitly mentioned as key criteria ‘at least four years job experience, experience with content marketing projects, structured way of working, communicative and PM skills’. That literally is a description of my CV… but I didn’t even make it into the first round.
That’s part of the game, of course, but as a job applicant you are completely in the dark. Am I overqualified? Were there gaps in my skills and experiences? Was my application letter bad? Did I ask for too much money?
You simply don’t know, so as an applicant you also don’t learn where to improve and on which jobs it might be a better idea to not apply at all. You hear many stories (PDFs being analysed by artificial intelligence? first selection being made by junior HR people?). Maybe my CV is not structured well enough for computers. Maybe I should make my CV more to the point. You simply don’t know. And by not getting any feedback, you can’t grow.
Now I understand some companies get 100+ application letters. Which is still a bad excuse to give no feedback at all, but alright. In this specific case I took the effort to write them a short and friendly mail whether they could give me some explanation why I didn’t make it into the first round. Needless to say, I am still waiting for a reply. And as I write this, I remember two years ago an application where I did four (!!!) rounds of interviews at a German publishing company, to in the end receive a standard rejection mail. When I called their (very sympathetic!) HR officer, he promised to try to get more feedback from the team. Three weeks later he called to tell me no one had taken the time to write him a short explanation on the decision.
There are, let’s make that clear, plenty of good and professional HR people out there. I do understand the massive pressure they are sometimes under as well. Still, that’s not an excuse to not do your job. The application system works both ways, but some companies behave as if you should beg them.
There was the international consultancy agency that had an original application form, with six specific questions instead of the usual request for an application letter. It took some more time to answer these questions, but it set them apart. These bonus points were of course lost after 1) their software didn’t run properly on any Apple device and 2) they never replied after I had finally somehow managed to send them my answers.
These people are there to help you. In two cases I saw three vacancies that were pretty similar and fitted my profile. Thus I sent the HR departments a short mail: Should I apply for all three? Does one application suffice? Is this maybe one vacancy, just written down in slightly different ways?
One HR officer replied to me after ten days, that they had me on my radar for those vacancies. The other one never replied. That didn’t stop me from applying to one of those jobs. But again, how do you think that behaviour reflects on your brand?
And last but not least, speaking about branding: it has become very much ‘en vogue’ for companies to talk about the importance of soft skills, instead of an exact match to the criteria of the job. Sounds great, but I and two friends of mine who have been in the job-hunting mode as well recently still have to receive one invitation for an interview where our CVs didn’t exactly fit the job description. But maybe there is a solution to make this interesting thought of prioritizing soft skills work?
Which brings me to possible improvements. Because after all the complaining I also think one should always offer possible solutions, to keep communication channels open and work together on better ways forward. Recruitment is complicated and ever-evolving, I get that.
Anyway, here are some suggestions for improvement:
Do you have suggestions for improvement? Want to share your experiences? The comments field is open to all! But please: no scapegoating and no nameshaming!
]]>My dad is almost 82 years now. But ask him where he was on May 6th 1970 and he will tell you. My old man was in San Siro in Milan that day, where his beloved Feyenoord team was playing Celtic, another traditional force in football with them beautiful green-white striped T-shirts, in the final of the Europa Cup I. The one for real champions.
When I was young he occasionally showed me the official images. He needed the projector for that, and a huge screen. The living room had to go completely dark so we could admire the 8mm video, the shaky black-and-white images without sound. At some point the tape cracked and had to be mended. But the end result remained the same: 2-1 for Feyenoord, their only European Cup for Champions until now. For the younger crowd: it was the precursor of the Champions League.
I can still remember going through the black-and-white yearbook of the European campaign of Feyenoord that year. Beating Reykjavik in the first round. Then AC Milan, before traveling to Vorwärts Berlin (where are they now?) and in the semi-finals beating Legia Warschau. What an adventure that was.
Obviously, things change. Football has moved on and has become much more professional. It has also unfortunately become much more predictable, with always the same teams making it to the latter stages of the Champions League.
The Super League would have made it even worse, but the current incarnation of the international competition is also unsustainable. And yes, I do have ideas how to change that, though those will not be implemented.
But it is necessary to find ways so many more fans of many more different teams all across Europe can dream of having international success again. Because it will mean something personal to them. And the European Conference League, on a sporting level not even close to being a competitor for the Champions League, will provide that.
Why? Because it fills fans with dreams and stories. One of my best friends is a Feyenoord fan. Although I have been living in Berlin for almost ten years now, we immediately found each other in the past weekend. Because his club qualified for the Conference League. My Union did as well. So there is a slight chance that our old rivalry (I am originally a fan of their archrival Ajax Amsterdam) will be ignited again.
No, this is no competition for the big teams. But for us Union fans it is an adventure. A place to dream. Like it was for Feyenoord in the 70s. Every year was different, always different opponents in other parts of Europe to visit.
That’s why I had to think of that yearbook of 1970. And the 8mm films of my dad. My Union friends immediately started to check which opponents we could meet. It is how we discovered Santa Clara, which turned out to be in the Azores, a mere five-hour flight from Berlin.
Rubin Kazan? Great club, magnificent stadium that I visited during the 2018 World Cup in Russia. I wouldn’t mind going again. Sweden? Belgium? Scotland? Bring it on!
Of course I understand it would become more boring when you play European football every year. Bayern fans probably don’t even get excited anymore about the group stage of the Champions League. That, though, is exactly the reason why that competition should become more unpredictable. Why there should be more geographic spread.
European football isn’t about having the absolutely best teams possible, every year. It’s about being able to dream as a fan. About going special places, about winning something that is once-in-a-lifetime.
As a young Ajax fan I got used to success. Dreaming of winning the Champions League turned out to not be elusive in 1995. But a dream like that would be ridiculous now. Don’t even start about that as well as a fan of Feyenoord, Celtic, Vorwärts Berlin or Legia Warschau.
With Union Berlin we are not going to win the Champions League nor the European Conference League. But we will have several away adventures. We will have some magical European nights we will never forget.
No one can take away those memories from us. That’s what football should be about. And not about two teams that are owned by oil money playing the Champions League final, a personal fun project completely detached from the fans who are the heart and soul of football.
Like many other European capitals, the Berlin real estate market is overheated. In general, populations of big cities tend to grow at this moment. Additionally, the rents in Berlin have historically been low, because it was a relatively poor city during the Cold War with a badly-maintained inventory of real estate.
Now it has become the capital of Germany again, and with a booming tourist industry, the city is changing fast. Renovation projects are happening everywhere, and new construction is progressing at a similar frantic pace. Demand though is massive, both for rental housing and for buying houses.
In stark contrast to the rest of Germany, the proportion of ownership vs rent has always been low. This has created a vast pent-up demand, especially since Berlin is booming economically. This has caused property prices to soar, including the rents.
The big problem has become gentrification. Landlords try to evict old tenants with low rental prices, to renovate the building and crank up the prices. It forces people to move away from their long-time neighborhoods, and causes lots of insecurity. Not only in Berlin by the way, but also in other expensive cities such as Munich, Düsseldorf and Hamburg.
That is why the federal government approved the Mietpreisbremse (rent brake) law in 2015. It is a relatively simple formula to determine the maximum rental price. A tentant can go to his landlord if the rent is higher and demand the lower price.
Problem solved? Not really. Either were most tenants unaware of the new law, or they were too scared (as in my case) to get into trouble with the landlord. Yes, that is how sick and unhealthy the Berlin real estate market has become.
Strangely enough, the government also decided to not enforce the law themselves. They shifted the burden to its citizens. Which basically enables the real estate capitalists to keep on making insane profits.
Discontent with the ever-increasing prices was boiling over though. So the state of Berlin implemented the Mietpreisdeckel (rent cap) in 2019, designed to freeze the prices for five years. Having a huge PR campaign around the rent break would have been much easier and effective.
Especially as there were two major fuck-ups with this new law. The maximum prices were much higher in lots of cases than the Mietpreisbremse, so it didn’t help as much as the other law. And, more importantly, the Constitutional court decided the law was invalid because a single state can’t decide to change the rules for real estate prices.
What next? Well, the rent break is still valid of course, and a much better tool as well. So in my case I conquered my fear of getting into trouble with the landlord. I became member of a Mietschutzverein (tenant protection association, this is mine), talked to a lawyer, used sample letters and told the landlord he should lower his rent.
The calculation is pretty simple. The city of Berlin has a calculator (called Mietspiegel) where you can enter your address and size of your house. It calculates the average rent, you fill in some more details and then you have the specific rent for your dwelling. The maximum price is 10% higher. But in my case that was still 110€ (or 20%) lower than my current rent.
In other words, this one letter to my landlord will save me 1.320€ per year. Unfortunately, the law is not valid backwards (this would have saved me 7.000€ since 2016), though an updated version does give tenants that option for 30 months for contracts signed from 2020 onwards.
My landlord accepted my proposal, with some minor changes. When I told friends about this, they were surprised. And calculations show that they can also lower their rents by 20 to 30%. In other words: the Mietpreisbremse is an excellent tool.
It makes you wonder why most people don’t know of its existence. And the more Berliners implement the law, the likelier it becomes that landlords will accept it as the reality.
The law is extremely necessary: my neighbors are leaving for example. The new proposed rent is 20% higher than the old price, and 50% (250€) higher than the maximum according to the calculator. The landlord gambles that the new tenants don’t pull the rent break. You can call that smart business. Or it’s the equivalent of driving 180 km/h where 120 is allowed: you’re breaking the law.
So tell about this to friends and colleagues. This is not the only solution for the real estate problems in Berlin, but it is a major part of the puzzle. Housing is a basic right and not an investment opportunity. There is a massive campaign underway to demand a referendum on resocializing a lot of rental houses. But with the Mietpreisbremse the solution is already there to a great extent. And if the city starts to encourage not-for-profit house construction at a large scale, the other half of the solution puzzle would be there as well.
]]>Nirvana’s Nevermind kickstarted the avalanche in the 90s in the music industry. One of the kickstarters in the television industry probably was The Killing (Forbrydelsen). Debuting in 2007 on Danish television, the knitted-sweater wearing detective Sarah Lund became an international phenomenon in 2011 when Channel 4 broadcasted it in the UK.
It was the birth of ‘Scandinavian noir’ or Scandinoir on television. The combination of long storylines with bleak photography and mesmerizing landscapes proved something different than the usual ‘crime solved within an hour of television’ formats. The Killing’s first season exaggerated a bit, with twenty (!) episodes, with the other two seasons being a bit more to-the-point before Sarah Lund flew away.
There was obviously demand for this type of television. The Bridge (Broen) satisfied that thirst. It can be viewed on Netflix, and is in my opinion even better than The Killing.
There are not only intelligent meandering storylines, with many twists and dead ends. The biggest quality arguably is again a tormented detective. Actually two detectives in this case, with Saga Noren being the autistic Swedish police detective and martin Rohde her Danish counterpart. Yes, this one is set in Scandinavia as well, and makes for four seasons of gripping television. I happily admit to have cried after the last episode of the first season.
Now, these series started before the advent of streaming services. But in recent years they latched on to the format. So in case you have no idea what to see next, here is a list of what I saw on Netflix:
This is a relatively recent addition, as my VPN has allowed me to watch more high-quality crime series even. So: