
Ed Peters, the retired Chrysler engineer and avid Neon racer, hosted several meets at Modern Performance in Houston TX from 2010-2017. He would give 30-90 minute tech sessions with in depth detailed information about the engines and transmissions in the 1995-2005 Dodge/Plymouth Neon and the 2003-2005 Dodge SRT-4. We have several videos on youtube of his tech talks. Here are links to several of his videos:
]]>
We miss the days of having small, nimble four cylinder cars with no frills. Nowadays every car has 6-8 airbags, huge wheels, huge bumpers, and over the years have gained weight and size.
]]>“One thing I often end up telling friends to their surprise, is that a lighter wheel is not always better. A lighter wheel has advantages, but also disadvantages. Advantage: reduced rotational mass and lower unsprung weight.
Disadvantage: sometimes it comes at the cost of lower stiffness and strength. You can increase strength by forging, but you won’t increase stiffness. A forged wheel has superior yield and tensile strength, more resistance to bending and breaking, but it is not stiffer. Young’s modulus for both forged and cast aluminum is the same, about 70 GPa.
Wheels flex under stress. Cast or forged doesn’t matter. Under heavy G’s there will be some deformation. The larger the diameter, the more susceptible. How much flex? I’ve read around 1 degree of flex per 1g of load. So imagine you run 3 degrees of negative camber, and due to the flex in your wheel that gets cut in half to 1.5 degrees while cornering. That’s a significant amount. It makes the car feel less stable in a corner due to this sudden change in alignment. It becomes the same as deflection in a suspension bushing or chassis flex.
What reduces flex is increased stiffness, and that’s based not on forged/cast, but mainly on the cross sectional area of the spokes. The thicker the spoke, the less “flex”. Of course thickness then adds weight, but for that you gain less flex. I’m making some general statements here, but you definitely can give up things shaving too much weight off. Low weight sells wheels. There’s incentive for a manufacturer…. especially for lesser known brands that don’t have the technology to properly design and produce a strong wheel. They aren’t going to tell you about the increased tendency to fail nor about deflection, since you won’t ask. Just something to keep in mind.”
]]>Allpar.com shows that the 3.8 V6 produced a wide array of horsepower and torque depending on what year it was from. We believe this 3.8 engine is from roughly the 95-00 era. So, thats good for 166-180 hp and 227-240 torque. Wow, if a Neon like this had 180 hp and 240 torque from a NA engine it would be a lot of fun!
| 1991-93 | 150 | 203 | First year (9.0:1 c/r) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994-95 | 162 | 213 | New intake plenum, SMPI |
| 1996-97 | 166 | 227 | Revised intake and exhaust |
| 1998-2000 | 180 | 240 | |
| 2001-04 | 215 | 245 | Variable intake, other changes |
| 2005 | 207 | 238 | |
| 2006 | 205 | 240 | |
| 2007 | 200 | 235 | Minivan/Pacifica |
| 2007-08 | 202 | 237 | Jeep version |
| 2009-10 | 205 | 240 | Jeep version |
| 2008-10 | 197 | 230 | Minivan/Pacifica version |
We do not have any more details on this V6 swap, however there are a few people that have done this swap in the Neons.org project log section.











Oh, Vince’s car also has export rear lights, and export front turn signal lights too!


Be sure to check out blog article showing how Vince got this Neon from the original owner:



