In case you wanted text versions of the values here you go:
Sub-ivision
Constraints
Construction
Rebar Set
Set
Graphics
Text
Materials and Finishes
Division
Geometry
Electrical
Electrical Engineering
Electrical – Lighting
Electrical – Loads
Segments and Fittings 
Plumbing 
Primary End
Secondary End
Structural
Layers
Slab Shape Edit
Dimensions
Mechanical
Mechanical – Flow
Mechanical – Loads
Analytical Model
Analytical Alignment
Releases / Member Forces
Structural Analysis
Forces
Moments
Identity Data
Phasing
Energy Analysis
IFC Parameters
Fire Protection
Title Text
Green Building Properties
Photometrics
Analysis Results
Model Properties
General
Electrical – Circuiting
Data
Visibility
Overall Legend
Electrical Analysis
Life Safety
Structural Section Dimensions
View to Sheet Positioning
Visualization
Other

I always suggest trying out new features for a while before disabling them. However if you do wish to turn this off it can be done with a single Right Click in the Project Browser and un-ticking the option for “Show View Placement on Sheet Status Icons”

As with most feature this can also be set in the Revit.ini with the following setting.

[Project Browser]

Show View Placement On Sheet Status Icons=1

I haven’t had a chance to really look into all these new improvements but I will say I have looked at the first one, “Rewind tool view cache”. For this one to work it will either need to be changed in the .ini file for the company or via the Options on each users machine.

To do this via the option go to File >> Options (which is located on the lower left of the file dialog). Once in the Options dialog go to the steering wheel options, in there there is an area for Rewind History, this value will need to be unticked (unchecked) in order for the performance improvement to take affect.

How does this affect the end user and/or the software. In previous version when the Rewind tool was used it would show a pretty image of the views previous states, which meant Revit was storing images of every view behind the scenes incase a user used the tool. With this value off the command still works it just eliminates the preview images

If you are planning on making this change before deploying Revit to your company then this setting is as follows in the Revit.ini
[AutoCam]
SaveRewindThumbnails=0
Where 0 is the same as un-ticked above and 1 is ticked

This is one setting I am going to change day one as not many users use the Rewind tool and if they do I don’t really think the images are worth the performance decrease.

In a Twitter conversation there was a question of how do I show a highlighted row for Revit Links where there is more than one instance? The following example will work not only for Revit links but for basically any schedule where the sum of Count is needed.

First a Calculated Parameter will need to be created, in this example I named it “Single”. The formula will equal one so the name seemed appropriate

The Next step is to Sort/Group the schedule based off a value such that a Calculated Parameter can be set up as a Percentage of the Sorting. In this example I sorted by the Type value and toggled off the “Itemize every instance” value

Once the Sorting is set another Calculated Parameter can be created, this example labels it as Percentage. The value is set to be a Percentage parameter which is set to use Single for the “Of:” value and Type is set for the “By:” value.

Once that is set you may notice that the values for all of these are 100%. This is only true if the “Itemize every instance” value in toggled off in the Sorting/Grouping tab. This will be true if the Single value is set to be calculate or not. Therefore another Calculate Parameter is needed. In this example I named this Calculated Parameter “Number” and set the formula Percentage/Single.

This will now give us a percentage value, if there is a single instance it will be reported as 100%, if there are more than one this value will be based on the quantity of elements.

Once this is done now conditional formatting can be set based upon the number value. In this example I want the Type column to change color based on the Number value not equal to 1.

This step could be repeated for each of the columns if desired. Once completed hide any of the columns that don’t need to be visible.

Hopefully you will be able to take this idea and use it for other schedules where the Count value is a hindrance.

I have used several workarounds in the past depending on the panel being used. This week I recently decided to use a common family type that I use to solve alot of Revit limitations and that is the use of an adaptive component family. What I realized is that even when a panel is changed to the Empty System Panel type there are still 6 faces to this invisible element. Which means we can snap to any of those surfaces or corners. Plus a System Panel Solid is then changed to an Empty panel they both have 6 surfaces. I used the default System Panel Solid to snap my adaptive panel to, then I changed it out to and Empty panel the adaptive point stayed. If the grid lines move in the curtain wall design the adaptive panels will adjust with the changes. The only disadvantage is each panel will have to be replace manually by placing all the points.

In order to make the tedious process of placing the points on the panels and selecting the correct points I created a system panel that had a ridiculous offset (mine was 150mm, 6″) and another with a different offset. I then changed the panel types to alternate offsets.

Not saying this would be an ideal situation for hundreds of panels but if there are only a few dozen then it is a decent alternative.

In this clients case he had changed the Projection line weight to be 6, the Out Of The Box template has it set to 1, so during testing I was baffled on why it adjusted with the Line Weight 1 value.

If you know of any other cut fill patterns that don’t abide by the Line weight 1 rule I would love to know about them.

However in Revit 2022 with this same scenario a user is able to move a value if one of the groups above it collapsed.

When modeling a curtain wall, no matter as a window, storefront or as a curtain wall in at a corner there can be an issue where the automatically embedded curtain wall cuts the openings on each wall but fails to cut the end portion out of the wall, as seen in figure 1.

I have seen several suggestions to edit the profile of the wall, or add an in-place void or use the wall opening command. All of these suggestions work but if the curtain wall changes then the user has to change the element they used to cut the opening.

There is another way…

There isn’t any need for edit profile or adding openings or any crazy work around for that.  Curtain walls look to their origin point (green dashed line see Figure 5) to understand where to cut the walls. That origin of the curtain wall must lie within the wall, when that line is set with in the wall it will cut the opening at that location.  If that line lies on the face of the wall then it will cut the wall at the face, removing the little portion everyone hates as seen in figure 2.

How does a user make the wall align with the face yet have the panels and mullions set back from the face? By using the offsets built into the System Panel and Curtain Wall Mullion families. The curtain wall mullions, regardless if they are rectangular, corner or round will have an Offset value in the type properties, this value will allow for the mullion to be located off the green location line of the wall.

Similarly the default system panel for curtain wall panels have the same value.

If these values are set such that the curtain wall itself can be drawn at the face of the wall yet the mullions and panels are set off of that Revit will cut the walls accordingly. Plus it is an easier way to get a consistent set back for all of the curtain walls.

There is only one glitch to this process. If the curtain wall is modeled on the face of the host wall to start. It doesn’t cut the opening, it must be modeled inside the wall then moved or aligned to the face.

While I was setting up their structural metal deck and loading in the profile for “Slab Metal Deck” it dawned on me, these profiles could also be used for other things besides metal deck. Often we want to see floors with 2×6 or tongue and groove decking. Yet we may not want the overhead of modeling these elements (Yes I have modeled them as beam systems in the past).

With that thought I tried to create a simple Structural Deck Profile that was simply an “L” shape. I only needed the vertical line to represent the 2x members but knowing their would have to be a horizontal line that would represent the width of the the 2x member.

However I realized that when these profile families are loaded into the project and assigned to a floor Revit attempts to connect the ends of the lines in the profile, Thus creating undesired results

This means the profiles have to have lines on the left and right end in the same location so Revit can connect them without adjusting the profile.

With that in mind I haven’t found a way to get a tongue and groove to work properly. I am on the fence if I like the line between the groove and tongue but I think it may be worth it. The profile in conjunction with a drafting cut pattern returns a pretty good result.