Sen. Thom Tillis: Dems' strategy of personal destruction against Trump began with Brett Kavanaugh   

Democrats know they can’t beat President Trump by running on the issues the American people care about, which is why they’ve employed the politics of personal destruction.

Steve Hilton: What no one has been reporting about the Trump-Ukraine impeachment saga   

The Democrats' obsession with scandal is out of touch and decadent. People want substance, not scandal.

Steve Moore: Democrats are wrong. Middle-class incomes surging – thanks to Trump policies   

Middle-class families are enjoying a near-unprecedented income windfall.

Mary Anne Marsh: All roads lead to Donald Trump as more learned in impeachment inquiry   

It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election.

Michael Goodwin: Hillary Clinton needs to run for president again — or get over it already   

Her refusal to accept Trump’s election can mean only one thing: In her own mind, she won the election and she’s the real president. Oh dear.

Tomi Lahren: Mr. President, please save California from liberals and liberal policies   

The people of California — even the liberals who won’t admit it — deserve better than this.

Sen. Tom Cotton: Contraband cell phones in prisons are a threat Congress should act on   

Contraband cell phones have become the most serious security risk prisons face today.

Curtis Ellis: Pelosi hopes public forgets these facts as she rewrites history with impeachment inquiry   

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi doesn’t need an airbrush to change history. She has a compliant media to help her.

Andrew McCarthy: If the House won’t vote, impeachment inquiry is just a Democratic stunt   

Speaker Pelosi is a very powerful government official. But she does not have the power to impeach on her own.




Your chance to own a piece of contemporary jewellery! Suspended in Pink Raffle   

Musings about the Suspended in Pink Raffle.

Thanks to Marthe Le Van's recent article, I have been thinking about the 'Suspended in Pink' raffle.

Here is an extract:

"As a retail storeowner and salesperson, the raffle felt amateurish, gimmicky, and a bit desperate—like when I heard about Facebook for the first time. Ultimately, after reconciling all my perspectives, I believe there is much to applaud in the Suspended in Pink raffle. It feels fresh and innovative, optimistic and courageous, liberating and democratic—all worthy consequences pointing toward progress"

Now, I have no problem at all about an idea of mine being compared to the early Facebook- and I am the first to admit the visuals, practicalities and how the raffle is presented still needs some work!
Most raffles are devised as a means of fundraising, to enable an exhibition, event etc... Seen by the  Borax Collective , Handshake Jewellery and an American Art Jewellery group  ( i am sure there are many many more).

And as Le Van notices, through her many astute questions, fundraising is not the aim of the 'Suspended in Pink' Raffle...

So what is it? and WHY should you take part?

I go to many many exhibitions every year. But As a wanna-be collector, I have only three small pins.
I dont want a specially designed brooch with a groups logo on it, a sample piece or a bunch of postcards as a consolation prize- I want THE piece. 

          I want to own Silke Fleischer's amazing necklace and Sam Hamilton's 'Bread' Like brooch.

As a practitioner is who interested in engagement and audience interaction, I am always looking for ways to get my audience to wear the jewellery, understand it, and imagine owning it- and that, in my view, is the real strength of the 'Suspended in Pink' raffle.

So the idea of raffling off one of the jewellery pieces from the Suspended in Pink Exhibition seemed an obvious idea.

 But its more then that.... Once a viewer decides   they wish to take part in the raffle, they then can spend up to an hour, going through the exhibition, trying on the jewellery, comparing, assessing, deciding which item THEY would take home.

Deciding which piece of jewellery spoke out the most to them.

And this was then the piece that they would then bet on.
Maybe they would win it, maybe not- but for £5/€6/$8 it seems like a worth while experience to have- the experience of wearing and imagining that favourite piece of jewellery which YOUR ticket could win you....

And here is the good news- the odds of winning in this raffle are actually really high!

Only a small number of people have guessed the same names, and there are a number of exhibitors who's name has not been guessed yet-

So you have a real chance of winning....

All you have to do is email:
with: your name, the name of the artist who you want to win-

And to send payment of £5/€6/$8 by paypal to:

The winner is announced this Autumn!


Two Vernissages? spoilt for choice!   

Well the title says it all here!

'Suspended in Pink' are gearing up and preparing for a fantastically busy week at Schmuck in exactly two weeks time!

The Super official Vernissage:

Silke Fleischer

Donnerstag, 7. März 2013/
Thursday 7th March
 17-20 Uhr/ 5-8pm

Corrado de Meo


The Super SECRET Viewing on
Sonntag 10. März 2013/ Sunday 10th March
11-14 Uhr /11am-2pm

Come and find us at: 
Studio Gabi Green, 
Gollierstraße 17, 
80339 München, 7.-11.3., Do, Fr 12-20 Uhr, Sa, So 10-18 Uhr,  Mo 10-15 Uhr


Schmuck-Show 6th March   


Come by the  SCHMUCK-Show 2013

As part of Schmuck,  24 exhibitors from 'Suspended in Pink' will be taking part in this fantastic event!
Come and have a sneak preview of some of the fantastic jewellery pieces on show

Everyone is welcome to this opening event for SCHMUCK at Goldbergstudios, Müllerstr. 46A

March 6th 2013
Admission 8:30 pm
Beginning 9 pm

Lina Peterson


Its Raffle Time!!!!!   

Do you want to own a piece of contemporary jewellery? Do you want to win a piece of Jewellery by one of the artists taking part in 'Suspended in Pink'?
If so, this is how!

On the 10th of January, during our fantastic private view- One of THESE artists names was chosen from a hat:
Alexandra Hopp, Andrea Coderch, Annette Dam, Babette Von Dohnanyi, Claire Lavendhomme, Claire McArdle, Corrado de Meo, Demitra Thomloudis, Drew Markou, Erica Voss, Farrah Al-Dujaili, Galatée Pestre, Helena Johansson, Heng Lee, Isabel Dammermann, Iris Eichenberg, Jane Richie, Jo Pond, Jorge Manilla, Josephine Siwei Wang, Karen Bartlett, Karen Vanmol, Karin Roy Andersson, Kate Rohde, Katharina Moch, Kevin Hughes, Lauren Markley, Laurence Verdier, Lital Mendel, Lynn Batchelder, Mallory Weston, Masako Hamaguchi, Michelle Kraemer, Minna Karhu, Patricia A Gallucci, Rachel McKnight, Réka Fekete, Rhona McCallum, Ria Lins, Sam Hamilton, Silke Fleischer, Sofia Björkman, Thea Clark, Vinit Koosolmanomai, Yeseul Seo, Zoe Robertson.

the names- all ready to be picked!!!!

Jo Pond selected a name from the hat-
The name is sealed in the pink envelope, ready to be revealed in August! 

So, Now, All you have to do is:
1. Guess who's name is in the envelope
2. Purchase a raffle ticket (£5/€6/$8) by contacting Laura at, or at one of the exhibitions
3. Love and look after your ticket until the end of our exhibition at the Heidi Lowe Gallery, to see if you have won an item of jewellery from one of our exhibitors!!!!

So, Where does your money go?
Firstly, I truely believe that all artists should be paid for their hard work! SO, rather then asking the participanting artists in 'Suspended in Pink' to donate a piece of jewellery, we shall be purchasing that item, using the money raised in the raffle. Any extra earned income will be invested in the the exhibition, allowing use to travel to new additional and exciting venues throughout the year!

Thanks to Marthe Le Van for aking these questions- hope I have answered them :)

 What if no one guessed the right jeweler? 
Ans: We will chose another name from a hat, and will keep doing it until we have a winner!

What if several people did? 

Ans: We will put there names in a hat and chose from one of these names. Those who guessed right, but did not win the actual piece will win a very small consolation prize.

Who pays shipping and customs? 
Ans: I do!

Will the package be insured? 
Ans: Yes!

Any further questions on this are welcome, just contact Laura at


What... MORE exhibitors?! woww fantastic!   



Una crítica de la realidad de la cultura en el Perú   

Acerca de la exposición “Inteligencia salvaje: La contraesfera pública (1979-2019)”.

El vals que Chopin le dedicó a su primer amor y que solo fue publicado años después de su muerte   

Tenía tan solo 19 años cuando compuso este vals inspirado en su amor a Konstancja. Un amor nunca consumado. Él abandonaría Varsovia al año siguiente, rumbo a París. 

Vizcarra no descarta diálogo tras cierre de Congreso: "Pero hay que ver en qué términos y con quiénes"   

Presidente recordó todas las veces en que intentó tender puentes con el fujimorismo. "Ahora estamos en un periodo en el que no hay Congreso. Lo haremos a través de la Comisión Permanente del Congreso", remarcó.

Visión sobre Perú (3)   

Es muy comprensible e incluso justo que en Perú se cargue más responsabilidad a los grupos armados de izquierda que en otros países. No lo es, sin embargo, que no se reproche con igual o mayor intensidad al accionar del Estad

El Wall Street Journal no ha fijado una posición editorial contra la disolución del Congreso   

Columna de opinión Mary Anastasia O'Grady no compromete de modo alguno la línea editorial del medio estadounidense. "Es una columnista ultraderechista que tiene poca credibilidad", dice Steve Levitsky.

То, что должно случиться, произойдет   

«Если кто-то пытается войти в вашу жизнь, позвольте им это сделать. Если кто-то хочет ее покинуть, не мешайте им. Если что-то должно причинить вам боль, пусть так и будет. А если что-то должно случиться — пусть это произойдет», — Марио Бенедетти.

Вы любите не его, а то, что было между вами в прошлом   

Его прежнего больше нет. Сегодня он – совершенно другой человек, которого вы совсем не знаете...

22 года вместе: Уилл Смит и его жена Джада решили бороться друг за друга до конца, и не ошиблись   

Пара вспоминает, что легче всего, конечно, было развестись, и так решить все проблемы. Но они выбрали более сложный путь и говорят, что сегодня являются не просто мужем и женой, а настоящими «партнёрами по жизни».

Простая философия: не причиняйте вреда, но и не терпите зла   

Золотое правило: поступай с другими так, как хочешь, чтобы поступали с тобой. Но что делать, если кто-то явно ведет себя по-хамски?

Если он не прилагает никаких усилий – вы ему не интересны (лучше отпустите)   

Отношения – это не то, что можно заставить «заработать». И не игра, в которой победитель получает любовь в награду...
Next Page: 25

© Googlier LLC, 2019