tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505Fri, 24 Jul 2026 06:02:07 +0000Election 2008McCainIraqRepublicansEconomicsObamaPalinBlogsBushmediaScienceSouth CarolinaEvolutionCorruptionLiesRight WingUS Militaryreligious rightHistoryBush AdministrtionGrahamHealth CareStupidityBush AdministrationEconomySexualityTaxDeMintFaithRacismClimate ChangeCulture of CorruptionEducationPrimaryRussiaTWATTerrorismVoteAcornAirlinesCheneyChristiansCongressFaux NewsGeorgiaGonzalesQuizRoveSanfordStupid AmericansTortureWar CrimeshomosexualityAT and TAfghanistanClintonConservatismDementiaDemocratsEmploymentFISAFraudGSAGovernmentHolidayHuckabeeInsuranceIntelegent DesignIntelligent DesignIrmoIsraelLimbaughLinbaughOlbermannPakistanReligionSout CarolinaTravelTurkeyViolenceWLTXWall StWar on ChristmashypocrisysexACLUAIGAbortionAbstinenceAir FranceAl-QaidaAstroTurfAttacksAyersBarackBear StearnsBill O'ReillyBin LadenBirth ControlBlackwaterBradfordBudgetBuisnessCanadaCapitalismCarlinCartoonsCensorshipCharityCigarettesCivil RightsCompassionConservativeCowardCreationismCrimesCubaCustomer ServiceDNCDeathDebateDebtDinosaursDishonestyDomestic SpyingDraftEarmarksEdwardsEnronEqualityEthicsFairFalwellFamily ValuesFloridaFox NewsFramingGeneticsGiulianiGreat DepressionHappy HolidaysHonestyImmigrationImpeachmentIncomeIragKansasKatrinaKristolLawLeadershipLegislating MoralityLewis BlackLiberalLifeMichiganMike FairMilitaryMurderNATOObama AdministrationOutsourcePalestinePlamePoliticsPovertyPowellPropangdaPush PollsRavenelRecessionRegulationRomneyRon PaulS.C.S.C. BarSaudi ArabiaScaliaSenateSouth OssetiaSpinSpitzerSpyingState of the UnionSyriaTal AfarTo Good To Be TrueUKWeatherWilsonWorklessonsA Lie a DayLIE
1.A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood.
2.Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression. 3. The Primary tool of politics used by Republicans.noreply@blogger.com (Jon)Blogger2092125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-7940844197154381033Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:10:00 +00002012-03-22T11:10:00.266-04:00A conservative, moderate and liberal walk into a bar...<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="; imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img aea="true" border="0" src="; /></a></div>
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Romney, Etch-a-scetch, liar</a></div>2012/03/conservative-moderate-and-liberal-walk.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-4523895243804560584Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:14:00 +00002012-03-13T11:20:33.341-04:00Mississippi, Evolution and Stupidity.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
A fairly large number of member of the online progressive community have taken note of some polling information comming <a href=" of Mississipi and Alabama</a>. One data point has gotten frequent mention, a majority of the republicans in these states don't believe in evolution.<br />
<br />
I have a problem with this: Not the data that has been reported in the poll, but how it is being phrased. I do think that a majority of the Republicans in these states (like my home state of South Carolina) no not accept evolution, but this is not a matter of belief, think it is a matter of not understanding.<br />
<br />
Evolution is science, you do not believe in science. You can understand the science, you can accept the science (because you understand how science works, but don't want to spend the time learning the details of this branch of science) or you can deny the science, belief plays no roll here.<br />
<br />
The truth is the people in these areas are either too dumb or too lazy to do the hard work of understanding this theory so they take the easy route and deny science because they 'believe' in their religion ( where belief is essential... it is a major aspect of faith - accepting what cannot be proven as real). As was pointed out in the news reports about this polling:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Mississippi and Alabama are also deeply religious states that generally rank at or close to the bottom in most state education rankings.</blockquote>
Southern Republicans are, on the whol,e willfully dumb. The refuse to learn or to expose themselves to anything that upsets their world view. Time and again we find the greatest level of reactionary behavior, the greatest resistance to change, the locale where old times are not forgotten (but remembered in a very flawed and disny-esq manner) to be the deep south. This happens because of the population doesn't know better and simply refuses to do the work needed to learn the truth.<br />
<br />
As a result we see that the majority of folks who will be voting today think the Obama is a follower of Islam (nope, he is a Christian, just like these folks are) that Evolution is wrong (or somehow in scientific dispute) and that the climate is not changing because of the actions on an industrial society. Heck, this crowd of rubes think Linbaugh is an admirable human being.<br />
<br />
Need we say anything more about the flawed nature of the Southern Republican?<br />
<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Alabama, Evolution, Mississippi, Republicans,</a></div>2012/03/mississippi-evolution-and-stupidity.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-2729488157792742142Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:38:00 +00002012-03-08T14:38:17.918-05:00Kirk Cameron, America's Idiot Crybaby<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">Last week Kurt opened his mouth and removed all doubt about his idiocy. He decided that yet another verbal attack on gays was just what the world needed. So he decided to make a bunch of unsubstantiated and dubious claims about morality and history. When others stepped into the discussion Cameron felt the need to cry on shoulders of the loyal wacks at </span><a href=" style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">World Nuts Daily News</span></a><span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"> with a letter of complaint.</span></div>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“I believe that freedom of speech and freedom of religion go hand-in-hand in America,” he continues. “I should be able to express moral views on social issues – especially those that have been the underpinning of Western civilization for 2,000 years – without being slandered, accused of hate speech and told from those who preach ‘tolerance’ that I need to either bend my beliefs to their moral standards or be silent when I’m in the public square.</blockquote>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">Now, it's time to step back and explain to Kirk that free speech is a two way street; And yes, he does have the right to say as many stupid things as he wants, but other have the right to call him an idiot and point and laugh at his foolishness, and he does have the right to cry about that, and I have the right to laugh at that.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">This latest crying jag is what the right loves to do, make hateful, inflammatory, false and stupid statements and when called out for it, act as if this was somehow an effort to destroy free speech. The facts of the issue are rather different; the 1st amendment only restricts the state (government at all levels) from trying to restrict speech. In addition I would point out to Kirk that no one was preventing him from speaking; only making fun of him after he did it.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">And I do not think there could ever be anything illegal with that, it provides too much fun for the rest of us.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;"><br /></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">1st Amendment, Kirk Cameron, Stupidity</a></div>2012/03/kirk-cameron-americas-idiot-crybaby.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-8158641519289722490Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:19:00 +00002012-03-08T15:53:05.778-05:00Bad night for Mittens<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
The Frothy one was able to win too many states and keep most of the others too close.<br />
<br />
As a result the parade of clowns marchs on, all the way to Tampa it looks like. Great news for late night comics and Obama<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">2012, election, Republicans</a></div>2012/03/bad-night-for-mittens.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-3464770084436753630Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:26:00 +00002012-03-05T15:46:23.541-05:00Gotta Love SC Republicans<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
The crazy in the folks is strong. Now the Laurens Republican Party has develep a code that must be signed prior to joining up.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Before you can join the Laurens County Republican Party in South Carolina and get on the primary ballot, they ask that you pledge that you’ve never ever had pre-marital sex — and that you will never ever look at porn again.</blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Last Tuesday, the LCGOP unanimously adopted a resolution that would ask all candidates who want to get on the primary ballot to sign a pledge with 28 principles, because the party “does not want to associate with candidates who do not act and speak in a manner that is consistent with the SC Republican Party Platform.”</blockquote>
<br />
Wow... <a href=" amazing</a>. It does leave me wondering how they enfoce some of these provisions.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">repression, Republicans, Sex</a></div>2012/03/gotta-love-sc-republicans.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-5761150591976867051Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:16:00 +00002012-03-05T13:56:50.694-05:00Rush Tries to Cover his Oversized Ass<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Rush spent most of last week attacking the woman who testified to congress about the importance of getting contraception included in insurance policies. He engaged in hours of attacks on this woman, he called her a Slut and many other less than polite words, he demanded that she post sex videos on the internet and generally inferred that the only reason that anyone uses contraception is so they can have engage in sexual activity 24/7/365 with as many partners as possible.<br />
<br />
The (rather unexpected) result of all of this is his advertising base has had it and are now walking (running ?) away. Rush, now in a panic, seeing his multi-million dollar gravy train pulling out without him has tried to fix the damage by releasing the following statement:<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity, three hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose the wrong words in my analogy of the situation. I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke.<br />
<br />
I think it is absolutely absurd that during these very serious political times, we are discussing personal sexual recreational activities before members of Congress. I personally do not agree that American citizens should pay for these social activities. What happened to personal responsibility and accountability? Where do we draw the line? If this is accepted as the norm, what will follow? Will we be debating if taxpayers should pay for new sneakers for all students that are interested in running to keep fit? In my monologue, I posited that it is not our business whatsoever to know what is going on in anyone's bedroom nor do I think it is a topic that should reach a Presidential level.<br />
<br />
My choice of words was not the best, and in the attempt to be humorous, I created a national stir. I sincerely apologize to Ms. Fluke for the insulting word choices."</blockquote>
<br />
<br />
This statement, like the vast majority of Rush's words, if full of lies, twists of facts, omissions and self-serving phraseology. He starts early :<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke</blockquote>
But that is what you spent 3 days doing Rush, blasting her, calling her a slut, hinting about her sexual activity and demanding, for lack of a better term, sexual favors from her (The sex tape he wanted her to make). Maybe he was calling all users of contraception sluts, but that doesn't mean that the attacks were not directed directly at Ms. Fluke. The next lie was right after this: <br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I think it is absolutely absurd that during these very serious political times, we are discussing personal sexual recreational activities before members of Congress</blockquote>
The discussion in congress is not about 'personal sexual recreational activities' (please note just how Rush phrased this) it is about making sure that comprehensive insurance policies include contraception coverage. Rush is trying to make the fact that she was providing testimony seem sordid and tawdry by trying to slide the focus away from medical care and over to recreational sex. <br />
<br />
And, so what, one of the reasons that contraception is important is so that persons who wants to engage in recreational sex can do so with the confidence that child will not be the result. Other reasons that should be listed as why this is a very important issue should include is so the couples who are monogamist but sexually active can have children when they are ready to, not before and then limit the number of children they have to what they feel is best for both the parents and the children (Few rational adults want to be the Duggers). Single women may want to be prepared if they chose to or are forced to (rape) engage in unplanned sexual activity. In addition there are numerous, heading onto countless, medical reasons why contraception is necessary and should be included in insurance coverage.<br />
<br />
Now for the third and most egregious lie:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Will we be debating if taxpayers should pay for new sneakers for all students that are interested in running to keep fit?</blockquote>
This is, in very typical rush style, a lie by illusion. Why mention taxpayers paying for anything since this issue had nothing to do with taxpayer services? He does this to muddy the water create the impression that those supporting this issue are looking for some sort of government handout. Not true, but a typical Rush lie. <br />
<br />
As of this morning about 9 national advertisers have announced that they are backing away (for a while at least) from their financial support of Rush. It would be interesting to see if local advertisers are also backing off. Only time will tell if this has been Rush's Glen Beck moment (I would bet it will not be), but this dishonest apology should provide ample evidence that Rush is not sorry, will not change and is a vile today as he was last week.<br />
<br />
This statement is simply about Rush covering his oversized ass, keeping his job and the millions of dollars it provides him, nothing more, nothing less.<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Contraception, Lies, Rush,</a></div>2012/03/rush-tries-to-cover-his-oversized-ass.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-7329145856057525579Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:49:00 +00002012-03-02T14:18:03.698-05:00Republicans sure hate women<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
As noted by <a href=" />
<br />
1. "Sex-Crazed Co-Eds..."<br />
<br />
<br />
2. "Lavishly contracepted." <br />
<br />
3. "What do you expect from a woman driver?"<br />
<br />
4. Women in the military should "expect" to be raped.<br />
<br />
5. In my day, "gals" used to put an "aspirin between their knees" [for contraception]. <br />
<br />
6. Dana Loesch: Women already consented to be penetrated when they got pregnant. <br />
<br />
7. Booing birth control at the GOP debate.<br />
<br />
8. Democrats and Republicans sitting together is "like date rape." <br />
<br />
9. My wife won't sleep with me because of this ultrasound provision.<br />
<br />
10. and 11. And two bonus round comments. The Pope says couples who conceive using in vitro fertilization are arrogant while a DC blogger notes that lady journalists who are nice-looking in their Twitter avatars can't be serious. <br />
<br />
I have no idea what it is Conservatives fear about women, but it is very clear fear them they do.<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Conservatives, misogyny, Republicans</a></div>2012/03/republicans-sure-hate-women.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-9199942235913619341Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:24:00 +00002012-03-01T09:24:43.358-05:00Andrew Breitbart has died<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
And following my grandmothers advice, I have nothing to say.<br />
<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Andrew Breitbart </a></div>2012/03/andrew-breitbart-has-died.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-4376957340653242900Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:42:00 +00002012-03-02T14:18:47.446-05:00The war on Secularism<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
At its core the ongoing culture war should be seen as a war against Secularism. A secular world view is reguarlly denounce by most of the right wing, from the Pope to Rick Santorum to Pat Robinson, as the ultimate evil. But what is Secularism?<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
In political terms, secularism is a movement towards the separation of religion and government (often termed the <a href="; title="Separation of church and state">separation of church and state</a>). This can refer to reducing ties between a government and a <a href="; title="State religion">state religion</a>, replacing laws based on scripture (such as the <a href="; title="Torah">Torah</a> and <a href="; title="Sharia">Sharia</a> law) with civil laws, and eliminating discrimination on the basis of religion. This is said to add to democracy by protecting the rights of religious minorities</blockquote>
Overall the above sounds like a damn good idea. Based on my study of history it is what our founding fathers wanted and how this nation was created; so why does the right opposes this building block of the nation?<br />
<br />
My view is <span style="font-family: Calibri;">conservatives </span>see secularism as a threat to what they view is their right to hold power over others. The right likes the idea of forcing people to pray like they want them to, they like the idea of punishment for sexual activity they do not approve of. The right wants their faith to have priority over all others. In secularism they see their ability to impose their values on others being restricted and they don't like not having that power.<br />
<br />
Is this too harsh of a review? Consider these three points.<br />
<br />
The right likes the idea of forcing people to pray like they want them to. School prayer was an early battle ground in the culture war and one <a href=" is still quite active</a>. The right wing has never forgiven the courts preventing them to make kids pray to their god. The right wing constantly distorts the law, and is constantly breaking the law by trying to sneak religion into school. When you look at the ruling the rights position becomes more absurd. The court said that schools cannot impose prayer on kids. It never said kids (or staff) can not pray, just that they cannot be made to participate in religious events. Here is the law as it now stands: If a student wants to pray, and it will not disrupt instruction, they are free to do so, but the school and its staff are not allowed to engage in any activity that promotes religion. <br />
<br />
You see the student, not the school has the power to determine how and when and even if they want to worship, and the right doesn't like letting the kids have that power.<br />
<br />
The right wing likes the idea of punishment for sexual activity they do not approve of. Both the abortion and contraception issue fit in here (as well as the rights refusial to address the AIS epidemic when it first arose). Bad girls have sex, and because they are bad they should be punished and through history that punishment has been to get pregnant. Contraception and abortion allow women to avoid this punishment, so these cannot be allowed. Just consider this <a href=" quote</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“ One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country. Many of the Christian faith have said, well, that’s OK; contraception is OK. It’s not OK. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.”</blockquote>
Rick has expressed, quite clearly, the reasoning behind the American conservatives anti contraception (and Abortion) movement. Modern society has advanced to the point where women can have better control over their bodies, and the right don't like it.... so it must be stopped. <br />
<br />
The last point to look at is that the right wants their faith to have priority over all others. You see this almost daily now, their faith has to be given special rights (or the rights of other faiths must be repressed) to assure its dominance. In the <a href=" of allegiance</a> on <a href=" <a href=" Plates</a> there has been a constant push to get the state to endorce and promote one faith. If one looks they can seen these efforts almost daily, but this effort to get endorsement is not the only actions taken. There are also efforts to assure that other faiths have <a href=" thrown up</a> in their path.<br />
<br />
The culture war is actually a war on Secularism that the right wing has been fighting for decades, in the effort to overturn the will of our founding fathers and to find a way to maintain or gain power over individules and force them to accept a power structure that favors the collective over the individule and the statis quo over advancement.<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">faith, Republicans, sex</a><br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
</blockquote>
</div>2012/02/war-on-secularism.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-1956145038114062732Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:12:00 +00002012-02-27T14:12:31.544-05:00Religious Freedom and the 1st Amendment<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Something from our <a href=" President:</a>:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Gentlemen: <br />
<br />
<br />
While I received with much satisfaction your address replete with expressions of esteem, I rejoice in the opportunity of assuring you that I shall always retain grateful remembrance of the cordial welcome I experienced on my visit to Newport from all classes of citizens. <br />
<br />
<br />
The reflection on the days of difficulty and danger which are past is rendered the more sweet from a consciousness that they are succeeded by days of uncommon prosperity and security. <br />
<br />
If we have wisdom to make the best use of the advantages with which we are now favored, we cannot fail, under the just administration of a good government, to become a great and happy people. <br />
<br />
The citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy--a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship. <br />
<br />
It is now no more that toleration is spoken of as if it were the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights, for, happily, the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens in giving it on all occasions their effectual support. <br />
<br />
It would be inconsistent with the frankness of my character not to avow that I am pleased with your favorable opinion of my administration and fervent wishes for my felicity. <br />
<br />
May the children of the stock of Abraham who dwell in this land continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other inhabitants--while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree and there shall be none to make him afraid. <br />
<br />
May the father of all mercies scatter light, and not darkness, upon our paths, and make us all in our several vocations useful here, and in His own due time and way everlastingly happy. <br />
<br />
G. Washington </blockquote>
<br />
And <a href=" touch of context</a> .<br />
<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">1st Amendment, Freedom, History, Religion </a></div>2012/02/religious-freedom-and-1st-amendment.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-8639743378654000820Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:26:00 +00002012-02-27T12:26:34.830-05:00Rick Santorum is simply nuts<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
But to be honost, so is the rest of this years GOP field (Most to a lesser extent, but Ron Paul may give Rick a run for the fruit cake).<br />
<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Election, GOP, Santorum</a></div>2012/02/rick-santorum-is-simply-nuts.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-1142706539549996217Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:27:00 +00002012-02-24T14:27:10.838-05:00Even Republican Watch Dogs Lie<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<br />
Brent Bozell is a self proclaimed 'fact checker' who standard song and dance is to attack the liberal media with arguments tainted with modest twists, untruths, omissions etc. Overall he has done a fair job of avoiding telling easy to spot lies.<br />
<br />
<br />
That was till his latest <a href=" to Faux News</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
During a discussion of gasoline prices, frequent Fox News guest Brent Bozell claimed that U.S. oil production has fallen under President Obama. In reality, the opposite is true: after increasing every year since 2009, oil production is at an eight-year high; gas prices continue to rise because they are determined by a world market, not by U.S. production</blockquote>
<br />
And everyone will let Brett get away with the lie.... But then that is what Republicans do, they lie, they have no other tools to use in debate.<br />
<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Brent Bozell, Corruption, Lies, Republicans</a></div>2012/02/even-republican-watch-dogs-lie.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-2276906904835894630Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:42:00 +00002012-02-24T09:42:57.758-05:00S.C. Looks Into Voter Fraud, Finds None<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
South Carolina joined the long list of Republican controlled states that passed voter suppression laws under the guise of an anti voter fraud law. The argument was voter fraud is fairly rampant and unless drastic action was taken our future elections are at risk.<br />
<br />
<br />
There is no evidence of such fraud occurring and no record of any modern election in SC that has been impacted by fraud; But like good republicans, Gov.<span class="st">Nikki Haley</span> and her minions passed this voter suppression law and then went about trying to prove it was needed. A list of over 900 'dead voters' was produced, the state went running to the DOJ (and Faux news) claiming that they had proof that their voter suppression law was necessary.<br />
There was only one problem.... the dead voters were not dead, the issues that were involved included clerical errors at the polling place, absentee ballots and scanner failures, but no illegal voting. This dead, stinking, rotting from the head red herring is the only justification that Nikki and her crew can come up with to explain why their voter suppression law is needed, and it failed.<br />
<br />
The truth is, the Republicans do not want the poor, the elderly and students to vote, these folks tend to not support the party of the rich. So they crafted a law that will make it more difficult for these people to vote and discourage their participation. And from a position of mathematics the efforts to suppress votes makes sense, while the effort to end voter’s fraud are foolish.<br />
<br />
As this latest snipe hunt makes clear, voter fraud seldom happens, and its impact (if it did occur) is nonexistent. IF all 900+ suspected votes were fraud and IF each and every one of them was cast for a single candidate in a high profile state wide election, they would have had ZERO impact in 2008 or 2010. The total count of suspected votes was .00475% of votes in the 2008 election. In other words nothing. On the other hand voter suppression tactics like the current voter ID law are projected to have the potential to prevent 10s of thousands of votes from being cast..... That is a notable impact that could swing an election.<br />
<br />
And that makes the actions of <span class="st">Nikki Haley </span>and her Republican minions understandable.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Corruption, Nikki Haley, Republicans, South Carolina, Fraud</a></div>2012/02/sc-looks-into-voter-fraud-finds-none.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-3433723182690877711Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:11:00 +00002012-02-23T10:11:52.890-05:00Rugby This Weekend<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Just a heads up, 6 Nations rugby is being played this weekend.<br />
<br />
We have Italy at Ireland and Wales at England on Saturday, with a Sunday match of France at Scotland. If you have access to BBC-A they will be showing the Wales England game live at 11am (east). This is a match up of the 2 leading teams and should be very entertaining.<br />
<br />
The current standaings<br />
<br />
1 Wales 2-2<br />
2 England 2-2<br />
3 France 1-0<br />
4 Ireland 0-1<br />
5 Scotland 0-2<br />
6 Italy 0-2<br />
<br />
This weekends winners, I will go with France, Ireland and Wales.<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Rugby, 6 Nations, BBC-A</a></div>2012/02/rugby-this-weekend.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-5421734405878339545Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:33:00 +00002012-02-22T10:40:27.974-05:00Santorum's success confirms my view of Republicans.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
I have a rather depressing view of the Republican Party of these United States. I see it as authoritarian, reactionary, anti-science, anti-woman, theocratic, racist, militaristic, paranoid and cowardly. On occasion, I have looked at this perspective and have reviewed my view of this group of people and have yet to see any reason to change. The actions, statements and behavior of the tea party has done much to verify my view and the Primary season with Santorum's rise in prominence within the GOP has simply confirmed it. <br />
<br />
These are all fairly negative and harsh evaluations of Santorum and all Republicans, but completely justifiable.<br />
<br />
Starting at the top, authoritarian; A love of having control form above and having the ability to impose a collective will on the individual. Santorum's choice of faith (The Pope rules and everyone else follows) is indicative of a person who embraces a top down power structure and his view on the birth control issue is a second clear indicator that he thinks the decision on this issue should not lie with the individual, but someone enpowered above them. This point of view can also be seen in his view on the <a href=" over SOPA and PIPA</a> he again favors striping the individual of the choice, and delivering the power to higher levels.<br />
<br />
Santorum is the perfect example of a reactionary. He seems to want to teardown society and remold it into some fantasy Leave it to Beaver land. He is completely disappointed in our modern reality and truly desires to lead a forced march <a href=" to a simpler time</a>. <br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Anti-Science is another undeniable aspect of both Santorum and the modern GOP. They hate the reality of</span> </span><a href=";, the Big Bang and <a href=" Change</a>. If a science discovery conflicts with their religious mythology or short term corporate goals, well then clearly science is wrong and must be attacked, the very same science that has made modern life possible.</div>
The Anti-woman and theocratic points needs to be discussed at the same time since the one is a result of the other. The view that a woman’s role is secondary to the male is well established in most of the reactionary faiths (Including the ex Senator's). Santorum has made it clear that he <a href=" barefoot and preggers</a> is the proper state for adult females. He bases this on his inerpation of the bible and thinks that this is the standard Government should enforce; His own little <a href=" of christian Sharia</a>, based on what he thinks the bible says. The Theocratic view of how government should work is one he wants and will try to impose.<br />
<br />
Racist is a very impolite charge, but based on last year’s Tea Party signage and some of <a href="; clearly <a href=" statements</a> it is imposable to deny, racism is a central pillar of the right and the fact that it draws votes just confirms that the racism is found attractive to the followers of the individual and the party.<br />
<br />
The last three points, militaristic, paranoid and cowardly, are both tied together and more of a personal impression. Republicans are defiantly pro military (well at least as far as hardware and the military industrial complex are concerned, for the vets, well there is a clear drop off in interest). They love the power and having over 50% of the world’s total military power under our control is a point of pride. Pride but not comfort and this is where both paranoid and cowardly come in. We need more guns, bombs, tanks, troops etc because they are all out to get us (maybe some are, but what the heck can any of them do about it) and without that extra bomber we may risk getting a boo-boo. <br />
<br />
This fear based reflexive behavior of the right was a major factor in keeping Bush in power and it still moves votes within the GOP.<br />
<br />
Santorum's rise from failed and evicted Senator to favored candidate of the GOP says a lot about the modern Republican Party and the people who are its members. And what it says is rather unpleasant. It is clear that Santorum is authoritarian, reactionary, anti-science, anti-woman, theocratic, and racist, the fact that he has become more than a fringe candidate confirms a lot of negative notions about those who consider themselves Republicans<br />
<br />
And confirms my views of the Republican Party and its members.<br />
<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Republicans, Santorum,theocratic</a></div>2012/02/santorums-success-confirms-my-view-of.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-4342576574590813687Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:29:00 +00002012-02-21T09:01:44.979-05:00Less Government Intervention?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="separator" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The fine folks in the Republican Party (please include the the Tea Party and the rest of the conservative movement) are always screaming about wanting a smaller less intrusive government. But the actions of the GOP, what they support, what they oppose and </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">what they </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">constantly try to do, tell us a vastly different story. A story this cartoon illustrates perfectly:</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="; imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" lda="true" src="; /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">For some reason, when the government wants (needs) to reduce pollution, or assure that when we harvest resources from our environment ( </span><a href=" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Oil</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> , </span><a href=" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Natural Gas</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> , etc ) that we do as little harm as we can, the government is overstepping is bounds and authority, destroying opportunity and imposing on our freedom. But according to the same right wing folks here in the US, if a woman want to use a contraceptive or end a pregnancy the government or even the individual’s employer should have the right to reduce and restrict access to medical options, even demand the performance of </span><a href=" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">invasive medical tests</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> in the effort to block her options and restrict her ability to control her own body.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Where is the freedom or liberty in that? And please explain how this is a smaller less intrusive government.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Liberty, GOP, Contraception</a></div>
</div>
</div>2012/02/less-government-intervention.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-6922992570121468434Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:38:00 +00002012-02-21T07:02:51.183-05:00Climate, weather, dishonesty and stupidity.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Last winter the US experanced a massive snow storm, <a href=";. For a few days much of the the ground in the US was white; Schools and airports were closed and in areas where snow is rare, life slowed to a stop for a day or two. For many people this was a nice break. I remember it an opportunity to break from the daily grind and a chance to play and spend time with with the kids, friends and neighbors.<br />
<br />
<br />
What I also remember was the laughable reporting about how this storm was proof that climate change was nothing to worry with and that this storm was undeniable proof that climate change was a scientific hoax. While Faux was the worst of the offenders, this theme was found on CNN and the other major media players in the US. The question seemed to be, if you have climate change how can you have snow. Most of our media folks seemed unable to understand that weather and climate are not synonymous, but used this confusion to continue the efforts to deny the whole idea of climate change.<br />
<br />
Now for a simple question: If last year’s snowpocalypse was proof that climate change was not occurring, then one would assume that Faux and their media friends would be pronouncing this year without a winter is proof that climate change is real. Funny thing, I have seen no media hinting at that. I do not know if this is a positive, indicating that our nation’s reporters and their employers have learned a little science in the last 12 months, or more likely this is just more evidence that silly right wing ideas can gain traction while equally silly left wing ideas (correctly) go nowhere. And since the media is clearly liberal (ask any right winger), these series of events have left me confused and marveling at how lies of the right take off, while simple truths never seem to be accepted.<br />
<br />
And now more evidence why this suppression of facts and the spreading of BS happens so often.<br />
<br />
We now have access to some <a href=" leaked documents clearly showing</a> <span style="font-family: inherit;">showing how corporate interests intend to spend millions to keep the population of this land uneducated and misinformed. This right wing think tank (term used very loosely here, I suspect there is not a lot of thinking going on at the Heartland Institute) has decided to copy the work of the US Tobacco industry, and pay scientist who are willing to sell their soul to create enough confusion to prevent any action being taken to address this issue. It worked for 30-40 years for smoking, if unchecked and allowed to fester there is no reason to believe that the Heartland group will not see similar results</span><span style="font-family: Calibri;">.</span> <br />
<span style="font-family: Calibri;"></span> <br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Corporate Corruption, Right Wing, Climate</a></div>2012/02/climate-weather-dishonesty-and.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-5542371591718235559Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:30:00 +00002012-02-16T09:30:00.045-05:00Be Careful What You Ask For<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
The Militia movement has always has a presence in South Carolina. It is to be expected, we have a pro gun culture, we hold a hyper authoritarian view on society, we do not like the federal government and we are, as a state and individually, on the whole under-educated. Fertile ground for conspiracy theories that fuel these movements<br />
<br />
That is why we see <a href=" like this</a> foolishness in our state.<br />
<br />
We have a onetime county GOP leader, a town councilman and 'community leader' spinning tales of oppression, the creation of a police state and the overreach of law enforcement. In addition, this man hints of retaliation and taking the fight to the police.<br />
<br />
What started this? He got pulled over for DUI. His feelings are hurt and he is now seeking a way to excuse his behavior by blaming others.<br />
<br />
While I do agree with him on some points; I do think that we have created an environment where the police may have too much power and we may have removed too many of the protections that we once had against illegal searches etc. That said I would tell this man, and those who think like him, that it is not some grand global conspiracy, merely the end product of the changes that he and his ilk have demanded of society that has led to this. .<br />
<br />
The GOP (The group this man has close ties with) has led the push for law and order. Demanded more power for the police and insisted that the courts erode protections that had been in places for decades. It is the GOP that pushed for the creation of the Department of Homeland security and the Patriot act and a countless other measures that have all resulted in the police having more power. This has led to more pressure being put on them to do something to address some type of behavior. The end result of all of this is inevitable, heightened enforcement, more traffic stops, and more arrests, leading to pissed off GOP county chairmen busted for DUI who are now seeking revenge.
<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">GOP, Militia, Stupidity</a></div>2012/02/be-careful-what-you-ask-for.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-4807366903003240659Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:36:00 +00002012-02-15T10:52:21.968-05:00Why Now<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Over at <a href=" and Liars</a> they are featuring a video of Republican senator Jeff Sessions whining about the nation debt. The folks there make a very good point, why now. Durring the period from 2000-2008, when the debt of the nation doubled (and tax policy was enacted that is still adding to the debt), this ass did not complain, in fact he voted for the policies that doubled the debt.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
His crying now seems more than a bit dishonest.<br />
<br />
<br />
Tags <a href="; rel="tag">Republicans, Tax Policy, Debt</a></div>2012/02/why-now.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (Jon)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11651505.post-998309474226277909Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:15:00 +00002012-02-14T09:15:00.518-05:00It is about power, not religion<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
One of the more interesting objections to the current administrations plan to assure that all women have insurance coverage for contraception has been claim that this was a violation of the free expression of religion. I for one do not see it. There is no requirement that a person use this benefit. Anyone who, because of their religious teaching, doesn’t want to use birth control is free to continue to not use it. This policy does one thing, and one thing only, provides insurance coverage that the individual may chose to use. How is this violating anyone’s right of religious expression?<br />
<br />
<br />
The right has tried to argue that it is religious institutions, Hospitals, Universities etc whose religious expression is being blocked. The Republicans argument seems to be that unless these organizations have the power to restrict their employees’ access to contraception the hospital or school will be a sinner in the eyes of god, and will be facing an eternity in hell. I for one was not aware that corporations or buildings had souls and could be facing eternal judgment.<br />
<br />
The simpler truth is this is an argument over power. The administration’s plan ultimately shifts power to the individual, and removes it from the institution. This is the antithesis what the modern conservati