http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: .swf' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' flashvars='config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?id=201104250034' allowscriptaccess='always' allowfullscreen='true' width='320' height='240'></embed></object><br /> <br /> Comment left at <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201104250034">MediaMatters.Org</a>: <i>"How does Shepherd Smith behave so rationally and still keep his job at
Match: Fox News
After: ? I thought they didn't stand for that. Someone needs to sit him down and talk some nonsense into him."</i>http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/2011/04/fox-news-confirms-obama-is-us-citizen.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (99ersUSA)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3874696884313996938.post-1067703697200276253Tue, 19 Apr 2011 06:47:00 +00002011-04-18T

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: e.org/author/ericstoner/" title="Posts by Eric Stoner">Eric Stoner</a> | April 15, 2011, 6:26 pm </div><div class="postmetadata">&nbsp;</div><div class="entry"><img alt="" class="alignright size-full wp-image-9384" height="225px" src="http://wagingnonviolence.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/glenbeckgqcrying_7a6b1.jpg" width="170px" /><br /> <br /> Last week,
Match: Fox News
After: <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2011/apr/07/entertainment/la-et-glenn-beck-20110407" target="_blank">announced</a> that Glenn Beck will lose his show later this year. While this decision was likely made for a variety of reasons, including his falling ratings, the ad boycott launched by <a href="http://colorofchange.org/" target="_blank">Color of Change</a> in July 2009, after Beck called President Obama a racist, clearly playe

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: tive director James Rucker <a href="http://www.alternet.org/module/printversion/150601">explains</a> the logic of the boycott and how it worked this way:<br /> <blockquote>…it was based on a simple theory: Beck’s rhetoric was so egregious, so far over the line of decency, that few advertisers would want to associate their brand with Beck. If we could convince advertisers to abandon Beck’s show, and stay away, this would make Beck a financial liability for
Match: Fox News
After: Channel, ultimately leading to his show’s demise.<br /> The theory proved true: 285,000 people signed our petition to Beck’s advertisers, and hundreds of major companies made sure their ads would not appear during his show. Beck could not attract major advertisers for more than a year, so demand for ad space (and hence, the price of ads) on his TV show plummeted, hurting Fox’s bottom line.</blockquote>As Jason Easley <a href="http://www.politicususa.com/en/color-of-cha

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: s-demise-of-glenn-becks-show/"></span></div></div>http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/2011/04/ad-boycott-hastens-demise-of-glenn.htmlnoreply@blogger.com (99ersUSA)0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3874696884313996938.post-3983450945872130481Tue, 19 Apr 2011 02:17:00 +00002011-04-19T08:42:05.310-07:00<div align="center"><span style="color: black; font-size: small;">&nbsp;by <em>Fox News Wall of Shame</em> contributer Bud Meyers</span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /> <strong><span style="color: black;">Fox News Continues to Wage War on the Unemployed! How News Corp Killed Public Support for Extending Unemployment Benefits for Millions of

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: Jobless Americans as </span>
Match: Fox News
After: and the Wall Street Journal have been on the Attack.</strong></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /> </div><div style="text-align: left;"><strong></strong></div><div style="text-align: left;"><b>WSJ</b>: <i>by Robert Barro:</i> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703959704575454431457720188.html">"The Folly of Subsidizing Unemployment"

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: t;</div><div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2010/el2010-12.html">http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2010/el2010-12.html</a>&nbsp;</span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /> </div><div style="text-align: left;"><b>August 31, 2010</b> - Bill O'Reilly on
Match: Fox News
After: said a "report" says that 1 out of 6 Americans are on the government dole in some way...almost 16%. (He didn't name the report or the source. Is Robert Barro the "source"?) As his guest on "The Factor" that night, John Stossel (a commentator for Fox News), also claimed that a "survey" showed that after 99 weeks of collecting unemployment benefits, a third of the people found a job only 1 week after running out benefits. (He didn't name the survey

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: ally killing me!</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /> </div><div style="text-align: left;">Does John Stossel really believe that 1,333,333 people (1/3 of 4,000,000 who exhausted all unemployment benefits) all found jobs just 1 week after their benefits expired? That's 50,000 new jobs every week over a period of 26 weeks (within 6 months). Did the Bureau of Labor Statistics miss something here? Or is John Stossel just telling us another
Match: Fox News
After: fairy tale at the direction of his boss at News Corp., Rupert Murdoch (the Australian-born multi-billionaire media magnate)?</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /> </div><div style="text-align: left;">Isn't it odd that there's very little (if any) dissention or opposing arguments on Fox News regarding this subject? I wrote Fox challenging them all to a debate on the subject, but I never received a reply.</div><div align=&quo

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: VvXsEheeQdrIft7dab_IfXiZnMPX4V3ot70KKn-R2yW-r3nHIvey3_rEtB4Y2KvmHQGWrayX9A6a2HdY5lRi0YqawMO2Wl56ex0PXsk4GGBG7zreXooh1ywwOqI_CMQ9A_sRNahpo0lWKeF43Q/s320/glenn-beck-hates-99ers.jpg" width="316px" /></a></div><div align="left"><span style="font-size: small;"><b>Update: August 16, 2010 - Glenn Beck Makes His Debut - </b>I'm sad to report that the famous Glenn Beck has stepped into the muck and got himself on the <em>
Match: Fox News
After: Wall of Shame</em>. He made a scathing attack on the long-term unemployed today. (<a href="http://www.prlog.org/10864410-does-glenn-beck-hate-the-unemployed-please-say-it-aint-so.html">See the press release here</a>.) I defended him as long as I could, the last time was when I thought <a href="http://www.prlog.org/10815819-defending-glenn-beck-against-misinformation-and-rumor-mongering.html">Glenn was being falsely accused of bashing the unemployed<

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: uot;.)</div><div align="left"><br /> </div><div align="left">Mister Beck has lost his way...he became too "full of himself" after achieving enormous success. After becoming rich and famous himself, he <i>TOO</i> lost touch with the ordinary citizens of this country. I suppose that always happens to the <i>nouveau riche</i>...they start thinking like the elitists they once abhorred and condemned. Now he too (like
Match: Fox News
After: ' Stuart Varney)&nbsp; practices Class Warfare.</div><div align="left"><br /> </div><div align="left"><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/17/glenn-beck-on-the-99ers-y_n_684807.html"><strong>The Huffington Post also ran a story about Glenn's rant</strong></a> and one reader commented: Cindy Paoletti <strong>-</strong><i> "Mr. Beck, You call yourself a Christian? Christ

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: iv align="left"><br /> </div><div align="left"><span style="font-size: small;">Glenn, you did a good job of exposing some riff-raff in the administration, but when you started lumping the jobless and me into your collection of evil people, I had to&nbsp;draw the line and disown you...especially after</span><span style="font-size: small;">&nbsp;I&nbsp;once defended your right to speak.&nbsp;Now you and
Match: Fox News
After: may be sued for defamation of character and violating my civil rights by influencing the public to deprive me of my "right to life" by not extending my unemployment benefits, cutting my healthcare (Medicaid) and eliminating my food stamps.</span></div><div align="left"><br /> </div><div align="left"><span style="font-size: small;">Also today, that guy who's usually on that show "Bulls &amp; Bears'

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: (the one that never wears a tie ) was speaking on Fox News this morning about 10:15 am. PST and said that unemployment was extended <i>because</i> benefits were extended. The fact that there are no available jobs has nothing to do with it? That's odd, because here I am <i>WITHOUT</i>&nbsp; benefits and I <i>STILL</i> can't find a job. So wouldn't I be a "MythBuster"? Maybe
Match: Fox News
After: thinks that I'd prefer to be penniless (homeless or dead) rather than to work. They report, you decide.</span></div><div align="left"><br /> </div><div align="left"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Update: August 12, 2010 - Neil Cavuto tells another outright lie!</strong> Says people weren't looking for jobs when clearly there were sign at the rally saying "Hire me".</span></div

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: ;left"><strong>UPDATE: Sunday, August 8th, 2010 - </strong>It's without pleasure to add yet another member to this club. <a href="http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/miron">Jeffrey Miron</a>, <em>Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Economics at Harvard University</em>, <a href="http://all247news.com/tier-5-99ers-update-harvard-economist-say-unemployment-extension-discourages-job-hunting/3251/">told
Match: Fox News
After: </a> when unemployment extension benefits are available, not every jobless worker would jump at the first job that comes along. Did <a href="http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/miron">Jeffrey Miron</a> jump at the first job that came along before he got his gig? If he were first offered a busboy job before gettting his postion at Havard, who he have taken that? Would that job have paid his mortgage?</div><br /> <div align="left">* Miro

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: rd.edu/faculty/miron">Jeffrey Miron</a> can be e-mailed at <a href="mailto:miron@fas.harvard.edu">miron@fas.harvard.edu</a><br /> <br /> Tel: 617-495-4129<br /> Fax: 495-8570 (Free on-line Fax web sites here)</div><div align="left"><i>Somebody needs to tell that@-hole that Mc Donald's does not need 15 million new employees!</i></div><br /> <b>UPDATE: Wednesday, JULY 28, 2010</b> -
Match: Fox News
After: ran a piece about discouraged workers this morning at 7:40 a.m. PST, and twisted the facts so badly that I almost had a heart attack.<br /> <br /> <div align="left">Fox made it sound as though it was OUR fault that people weren't spending money (why consumer confidence is down). They mentioned how we all just DROPPED OUT of the work force, and THAT is why we can no longer collect unemployment benefits.&nbsp;</div><div align="left"><br

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: "disturbing trend" (because we were not looking for work and dropping out of the work force), and also because Fox says WHEN the economy DOES begin to pick up again, these people (we) won't take jobs.&nbsp;</div><div align="left"><br /> </div><div align="left">The story was the WORST I've heard to date about the jobless...equal to the insults of Ben Stein, but so twisted in the facts as Hitler's propaganda. Not once did
Match: Fox News
After: say that we didn't take jobs because there were no jobs to take, or that they paid less than the jobs digging holes in Mexico. </div><div align="left"><br /> </div><div align="left">Fox News wants it both ways - they want to bash Obama about jobs when talking about the economy, but when leaving out the "Obama Factor" (and when Fox is just discussing the jobless in general), they just want to bash the unemployed.&nbsp;</div&g

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: t;<div align="left"><br /> </div><strong>July 19, 2010</strong> - Why does the GOP and Fox News want the general public to think that for the last 2 years the jobless have all been relaxing by the side of the pool drinking Marquitas?<br /> <br /> <strong>Sunday, July 18, 2010 9:50 AM PST</strong> - You will never believe this - Fox News is now saying that being without a job can be a GOOD thing!<br /> <br />
Match: Fox News
After: just ran a piece called "The Fun-Employed", showing happy unemployed people saying things like "I'm not getting rich, but I'm enjoying myself." They featured one woman in her lovely home, sitting at her dining room table making home-made jewelry, saying, "I have all this free time to do what I want and to be creative." (She was a lawyer who lost her job a year ago.)<br /> <br /> Another woman who was interviewed said, "I don't have much

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: to do, but it sure beats sitting in a cubicle all day." (They showed her and her husband enjoying a cup of coffee together.)<br /> <br /> Fox News says that the unemployed now have all this free time to do all the things they ever wanted to do, but never had time for before. Another woman mentioned how she was spending all her time on-line on Facebook and Twitter. (Oh happy days!)<br /> <br /> I can't wait for the day when
Match: Fox News
After: features the REAL story about this jobless country...like the evictions and divorces and homelessness....or like the man slumped over his desk with a smoking hand gun and a suicide note nearby, with his bloody brain matter smeared all over the wall behind him. Now THAT would make for great dramatic video! <br /> <br /> <div align="center"><span style="font-size: small;"><b>Karl Dinse - Liar or Paid Off? Or Both?</b></span></div>

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: ;<div align="center"><br /> </div><div align="left"><span style="font-size: small;"><b>July 11, 2010</b> -&nbsp;This morning at 5:16 a.m. PST - Chris Wallace on <b>Fox and Friends</b> (
Match: Fox News
After: ) said that everyone is so concerned about budget deficits that "even the Democrats don't want to extended unemployment benefits."<br /> <br /> <b>ANOTHER FOX NEWS LIE!</b> It was only ONE Democrat that voted that way the last time, and that was Ben Nelson! It's been <i>EVERY</i> Republican who's been blocking the jobless bills! A <i>BOLD FACE</i> lie Chris! You're in the news business, so get your FACTS together!<br /&

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: gt; <br /> Why has Fox News been waging this war against the unemployed? I can specifically name several incidents where commentators have totally misconstrued the facts. I would be very happy to debate anybody at
Match: Fox News
After: on every single point regarding the jobless situation in this country (After being out of work for 2 years, I've become somewhat of an expert).<br /> <br /> I challenge them to invite me on any show (Hannity, Beck, O'Reilly, Wallace, Varney, Huckabee, etc) and I will make them look like the zealots that they are (so long as they pay for my airfare, transportation, and hotel room).<br /> <br /> I'm tired of screaming at my TV and hearing everyone at Fox call u

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: s of hard-working Americans who are down on their luck in this recession. Fair and balanced my ass! Rupert Murdock is not an American patriot and should be deported. Damn bloody Aussie!<br /> <br /> <b>FOX News Sunday</b> (Chris Wallace) - <a href="mailto:fns@foxnews.com">fns@foxnews.com</a><br /> <b>FOX and Friends </b>- <a href="mailto:friends@foxnews.com">friends@foxnews.com</a><br /> <br /> And
Match: Fox News
After: continues to repeat this <em>Wall Street Journal</em> story as well. Yesterday Fox News was still beating the same old story again about some "supposed" engineer who refused a $60,000-a-year job so he could stay at home and baby-sit (claiming he saved money doing this).</span></div><div align="left"><b>Story from Fox web site: </b>July 8, 2010 - Fox News <em>Your World with Neil Cavuto</em> (Brian Sullivan was the guest h

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: he Fox news commentator on the second airing of this story (the guy with the spiffy haircut) called the story "antidotal" <i>(antidotal : a remedy to counteract a poison; anything that works against an evil or unwanted).</i> So does he mean unemployment benefits are "evil or unwanted" or just the jobless are?<br /> <br /> Someone told me that the job recruiter<strong> </strong>(Karl Dinse<strong>,</strong> who told the story on
Match: Fox News
After: and to the WSJ) was paid $25,000 by Fox News to falsely report that story. I don't know if that speaks for <i>everyone</i> at Fox, but it was an "antidotal" story. NOT! (But if Fox doesn't need to name names or offer proof, then why should I?)</span></div><div align="left"><br /> </div><div align="left"><span style="font-size: small;">Also, on March 2, 2010 on <em>Fox and Friends</em&g

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: raphrased<em>) "Cut off their unemployment benefits and maybe they'll go find a job."</em> That's ridiculous!<br /> <br /> The day before that Martha MacCallum deliberately misconstrued a letter from one of Senator Bunning's constituents, saying he wrote "I will give up my extended unemployment benefits to lower the deficit." THAT WASN'T WHAT HE WROTE AT ALL! Play the tape back!<br /> <br /> May 11, 2010 - Courtney Friel on
Match: Fox News
After: regarding unemployed people who couldn't find work and exhausted their benefits: <em>"I don't want pay freeloaders! I work hard for my money!"</em> Like none of us ever had for the past 40 years. Bitch!<br /> <br /> March 13, 2010 - Neil Cavuto - the commentators AGAIN continued their new-found hobby of bashing the unfortunate unemployed people of this country. One commentator suggested that, [paraphrased] <em>"99 weeks of unemployment checks

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: is too much."</em>Another commentator claimed that, [paraphrased] <em>"collecting unemployment checks does not encourage people to find work."</em></span></div><div align="left"><br /> <span style="font-size: small;">Does Fox News want 15 million people (and their families) to become homeless? How many people does
Match: Fox News
After: want to commit suicide because they were too old and not fit enough to survive on the street?<br /> <br /> Where's Bill O'Reilly when you need him? Who's lookin' out for us?</span></div><div align="left"><br /> </div><div align="left"><strong>Contact Fox News</strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /> <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,77538,00.html"

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: <a href="mailto:cavuto@foxnews.com" title="cavuto@foxnews.com">cavuto@foxnews.com</a> </div><div style="font: 10pt arial;"><b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 12, 2010 11:41 AM </div><div style="font: 10pt arial;"><b>Subject:</b> $60,000 Babysitter <br /> <br /> Dear Mr. Karl Dinse (Mr. Sacramento): <br /> &nbsp; <br /> How much money did News Corp pay you for your interviews on
Match: Fox News
After: and the Wall Street Journal? What would you say if I would be willing to match that amount for the name of that engineer who supposedly turned down the $60,000 year job to stay home and baby-sit? (Remember, the guy who said he could stay home and save money that way on day care?) <br /> &nbsp; <br /> As a good law-abiding citizen, did you report this lazy and fraudulent person to his local employment office? By law, those that turn down suitable work are disqualified from receiv

http://foxnewswallofshame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Before: ing any further unemployment benefits, and may be subject to a claw-back by the State in which he resides. I believe it is your duty to name him and report him to this agency...or maybe you could be considered complicit. <br /> &nbsp; <br /> Did Mister Rupert Murdoch personally contact you, or did one of his producers or editors make contact with you? Or did you contact them first? I've been writing to
Match: Fox News
After: for 9 years (2,000 times?) and never received ONE response - - - what contacts do you have with News Corp and how did you establish these connections? (There was a LOT of credible information left out of your story, and much needs to be substantiated). <br /> &nbsp; <br /> How was payment made to you from News Corp, electronically by direct deposit to your bank account, or was it in cash? Were you paid 'per interview', or was it a "package deal"? Please help me

https://programminginsider.com/tag/inside-the-mlb/feed/

Before: > https://programminginsider.com/?p=165279 What follows are the Live + Same Day rating results for the night’s network telecasts on Tuesday, September 17, 2024: — Total Viewers (in millions): ABC: 4.514, NBC: 3.967,
Match: Fox News
After: : 3.017, CBS: 2.550, MSNBC: 1.588, Fox: 1.173, CNN: 0.836, USA (127 min.): 0.677, HGTV: 0.595, Food Network: 0.510, Discovery: 0.431, ID: 0.417, FX: 0.380, […]

The post Tuesday Ratings: Decent Debut for ‘High Potential’ on ABC Following Solid ‘Dancing with the Stars’ 33rd Premiere appeared first on