second ["Q-01 How much s N President this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
no quid pro quo in his administration\u2019s dealings with the government of Ukraine ["Q-02 What N not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the second of a two - column s N this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
I ["Q-03 Who reiterated your argument that it has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
The President\u2019s Best Ukraine Defense Not an Impeachable Offense Editor\u2019s Note This is the second of a two-column series this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House Democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump\u2019s dealings with the government of Ukraine.Yesterday in part one of this two-part series I reiterated my argument ["Q-04 Who has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-05 Who \u2019 of dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
the government of Ukraine ["Q-06 Who is not just because quid pro quo terms are a staple of negotiations between sovereigns ; nor is it just because the evidence is strong that President Trump did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
quid pro quo terms ["Q-07 Who are a staple of negotiations between sovereigns ; nor is it just because the evidence is strong that President Trump did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
Best Ukraine Defense Not an Impeachable Offense Editor\u2019s Note This is the second of a two-column series this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House Democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump\u2019s dealings with the government of Ukraine.Yesterday in part one of this two-part series I reiterated my argument that it has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters to claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration\u2019s dealings with the government of Ukraine. That is not just because quid pro quo terms are a staple of negotiations between sovereigns; nor ["Q-08 Who is it just because the evidence is strong that President Trump did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in for
Best Ukraine Defense Not an Impeachable Offense Editor ["Q-09 Who is strong that President Trump did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-10 Who did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-11 Who seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
Ukraine\u2019s president ["Q-12 Who sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
no quid pro quo ["Q-13 Who is misguided because it is largely irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-14 Who is largely irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-15 Who explained in part one you are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-16 Who are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt ?"] "
a prosecutor ["Q-17 Who must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt ?"] "
crime ["Q-18 What did if a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was ( or at least said they were satisfied ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
President Trump did pressure Ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine\u2019s president sought -- the release of $400 million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit.The \u201cno quid pro quo\u201d claim is misguided because it is largely irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry. As explained in part one we are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. If a majority of the Democratic-controlled House was satisfied (or at least said they were satisfied) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal-law specifications ["Q-19 Whom did if a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was ( or at least said were satisfied ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they c
Democratic-controlled House ["Q-20 Who was that ( or at least said they were satisfied ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
Democratic-controlled House ["Q-21 Who were or ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
egregious abuse of power ["Q-22 Who occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
Democratic-controlled House ["Q-23 Who could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
corrupt quid pro quo ["Q-24 Who could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
More important the president\u2019s camp ["Q-25 Who should stick with and relentlessly argue his best point the president \u2019 s actions in conducting ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-26 Who relentlessly argue his best point the president \u2019 s actions in conducting ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ?"] "
The president ["Q-27 Who conducting ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ?"] "
The president\u2019s actions in conducting Ukrainian relations ["Q-28 Who do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ?"] "
defense aid ["Q-29 Who was temporary and Ukraine got all of it ?"] "
Ukraine ["Q-30 Who got all of it ?"] "
The Zelensky government ["Q-31 Who did not have to commence or assist any investigations to get it ?"] "
The Zelensky government ["Q-32 Who assist any investigations to get it ?"] "
no material harm ["Q-33 What did the delay caused ?"] "
The Zelensky government ["Q-34 Who caused no material harm ?"] "
no material harm ["Q-35 What is it certainly fair to c N in the absence of some vital emergent american interest a president should not put a hold on aid to a friendly and strategically significant nation that Congress has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
President Trump did pressure Ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine\u2019s president sought -- the release of $400 million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit.The \u201cno quid pro quo\u201d claim is misguided because it is largely irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry. As explained in part one we are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. If a majority of the Democratic-controlled House was satisfied (or at least said they were satisfied) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal-law specifications.More important the president\u2019s camp should stick with and relentlessly argue his best point The president\u2019s actions in conducting Ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances. Let\u2019s consider the relevant issues.1/ , emergent American interest a president " ["Q-37 Who should not put a hold on aid to a friendly and strategically significant nation that Congress has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
Congress ["Q-38 Who has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
Congress has directed in legislation and the president ["Q-39 Who has signed into law ?"] "
Congress has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ["Q-40 What does the Constitution however gives foreign - affairs authority so Trump would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver the aid altogether ?"] "
The Constitution ["Q-41 Who however gives the president sweeping foreign - affairs authority so Trump would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver the aid altogether ?"] "
the president ["Q-42 Who sweeping foreign - affairs authority so Trump would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver the aid altogether ?"] "
Trump ["Q-43 Who would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver the aid altogether ?"] "
Ukraine\u2019s defense ["Q-44 Where did this by contrast was merely a temporary delay that was of no consequence ?"] "
material harm ["Q-45 What did this by contrast was temporary delay that was of no consequence to Ukraine \u2019 s defense ?"] "
Trump ["Q-46 Who was merely a temporary delay that was of no consequence to Ukraine \u2019 s defense ?"] "
impeachable offense is just the next stage in a tireless political campaign ["Q-47 What were if you talking about any other president some criticism would be in order ?"] "
Trump ["Q-48 Who were talking about any other president some criticism would be in order ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-49 Who would be in order ?"] "
impeachable offense is just the next stage in a tireless political campaign. It trivializes impeachment.2\. The Democrats and Ukraine. It is precious indeed to hear Democrats complain that Ukraine was imperiled by the hold on defense aid. President Obama refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid after Russia began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014. President Trump has been providing it and has imposed tough sanctions on Russia. The Democrats sudden obsession over Ukraine\u2019s well-being like their newfound angst over the geopolitical challenge posed by Russia is political posturing.3\. Assistance to U.S. investigations. Most of the assistance the president sought from Ukraine was unobjectionable. It is common for presidents to ask their foreign counterparts to assist Justice Department investigations. House Democrats will not acknowledge this because they seek to delegitimize the Barr/Durham probe as a Trump 2020 campaign initiative; but it is not.To , Yuriy Lutsenko " ["Q-51 What it t N ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-52 Who trivializes impeachment ?"] "
The Democrats ["Q-53 Who ukraine ?"] "
Ukraine. It is precious indeed to hear Democrats complain that Ukraine ["Q-54 Where is it precious indeed to hear democrats complain was imperiled by the hold on defense aid ?"] "
impeachment.2\. ["Q-55 Who is precious indeed to hear democrats complain that Ukraine was imperiled by the hold on defense aid ?"] "
Ukraine ["Q-56 Who was imperiled by the hold on defense aid ?"] "
The Democrats ["Q-57 Where did President Obama refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014 ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-58 What did President Obama refused to p R with any lethal defense aid after Russia began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014 ?"] "
President Obama ["Q-59 Who refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid after Russia began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014 ?"] "
Russia ["Q-60 Who began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014 ?"] "
Russia ["Q-61 Who seizing territory in 2014 ?"] "
Ukraine with any lethal defense aid ["Q-62 What has President Trump been providing and has imposed tough sanctions on Russia ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-63 Who has been providing it and has imposed tough sanctions on Russia ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-64 Who has imposed tough sanctions on Russia ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-65 Who s angst like their newfound angst over the geopolitical challenge posed by Russia is political posturing ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-66 Who posed their newfound a N political posturing ?"] "
Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-67 Where most of the assistance the president sought was unobjectionable ?"] "
the president ["Q-68 Who sought from Ukraine was unobjectionable ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-69 Who was unobjectionable ?"] "
unobjectionable ["Q-70 What is it common for presidents to ask foreign counterparts to assist Justice Department investigations ?"] "
unobjectionable ["Q-71 What is it common for presidents to ask their foreign counterparts to a J ?"] "
AG Barr ["Q-72 Who is common for presidents to ask their foreign counterparts to assist Justice Department investigations ?"] "
Trump 2020 campaign initiative ["Q-73 House democrats will not acknowledge where this because they seek to delegitimize the Barr / durham probe ; but it is not ?"] "
the Barr/Durham probe ["Q-74 House democrats will not acknowledge this because they seek to delegitimize as a trump 2020 campaign initiative ; but it is not ?"] "
House Democrats ["Q-75 Who seek to delegitimize the Barr / durham probe as a trump 2020 campaign initiative ; but it is not ?"] "
The Shadow State Department ["Q-76 Who is not ?"] "
AG Barr ["Q-77 Who is irregular for a president to seek a foreign government \u2019 s investigative assistance absent a request from the attorney general ?"] "
AG Barr ["Q-78 Who did not ask the president to intercede with Ukraine ?"] "
AG Barr ["Q-79 Who was unwise for the president to do so unilaterally ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-80 Who may even achieve \u201c witch hunt \u201d status ) the president has just given them more ammunition to argue that the probe is politicized ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation (soon it may even achieve \u201cwitch hunt\u201d status) the president ["Q-81 Who has just given them more ammunition to argue that the probe is politicized ?"] "
Biden ["Q-82 Who is politicized ?"] "
the probe is politicized ["Q-83 What does this makes \u2019 job more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-84 Who makes the prosecutors \u2019 job more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
prosecutors ["Q-85 Who \u2019 job more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
Barr and Durham ["Q-86 Who will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
Barr and Durham ["Q-87 Who bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
presidential pressure ["Q-88 Who not proof ?"] "
AG Barr ["Q-89 Who s asking another country to assist an ongoing u ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-90 Where influence ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-91 What J over Ukraine ?"] "
seek information ["Q-92 What did it was not improper for Trump to s J about Joe Biden \u2019 s squeezing of Kyiv to fire the prosecutor ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-93 Who was not improper for Trump to seek information about Joe Biden \u2019 s squeezing of Kyiv to fire the prosecutor ?"] "
Joe Biden ["Q-94 Who s squeezing of Kyiv to fire the prosecutor ?"] "
Joe Biden ["Q-95 Who could plainly be relevant to the Barr / durham investigation ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-96 Whom do though you do not k N assume prosecutors are examining whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities t T investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham ["Q-97 Who do not know you assume prosecutors are examining whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities t T investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham ["Q-98 Who are examining whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities t T investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Obama-administration agencies ["Q-99 Who pressured ukrainian authorities t T investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Biden ["Q-100 Who firing \u2019 s c N probative of the Obama administration \u2019 s influence over ukrainian law - enforcement ?"] "
corruption ["Q-101 What is that kind of evidence in conspiracy prosecutions ?"] "
Hunter Biden ["Q-102 Who is routinely admitted in conspiracy prosecutions ?"] "
not requesting assistance in an ongoing U.S. investigation it is reasonable to deduce that he was primarily hoping for information -- and potentially a Ukrainian prosecution ["Q-103 What did since the president was in an ongoing u ?"] "
the president ["Q-104 Who was apparently not requesting assistance in an ongoing u ?"] "
ongoing U.S. investigation ["Q-105 Who is reasonable to deduce that he was primarily hoping for information -- and potentially a ukrainian prosecution -- that might help his 2020 campaign in the event the democrats nominate Biden to run against him ?"] "
the president ["Q-106 Who was primarily hoping for information -- and potentially a ukrainian prosecution -- that might help his 2020 campaign in the event the democrats nominate Biden to run against him ?"] "
little U.S. ["Q-107 What national interest in asking asking to investigate one of that country \u2019 s own companies for violations of its own laws ?"] "
U.S. ["Q-108 What national interest in asking asking another country to investigate of that country \u2019 s own companies for violations of its own laws ?"] "
Biden ["Q-109 Who asking another country to investigate one of that country \u2019 s own companies for violations of its own laws ?"] "
Joe Biden ["Q-110 Who \u2019 s own companies for violations of its own laws ?"] "
little U.S. ["Q-111 How much national interest in asking asking another country to investigate of that country \u2019 s own companies for violations of its own laws ?"] "
our citizens ["Q-112 What are like Paul Manafort Hunter and Joe Biden -- even if their political rivals in their zeal seem to forget such things from time to time ?"] "
Paul Manafort Hunter ["Q-113 Who are your citizens -- even if their political rivals in their zeal seem to forget such things from time to time ?"] "
political rivals in their zeal ["Q-114 Who seem to forget such things from time to time ?"] "
president\u2019s foolish remark ["Q-115 What J may have been tongue - in - cheek ?"] "
the president\u2019s foolish remark ["Q-116 Who may have been tongue - in - cheek ?"] "
Paul Manafort Hunter and Joe Biden are our citizens -- even if their political rivals in their zeal seem to forget such things from time to time. That is why it was so wrong for President Trump ["Q-117 Who said the president does have a legitimate interest in policing corruption particularly potential U ?"] "
the president ["Q-118 Who does have a legitimate interest in policing corruption particularly potential U ?"] "
the president ["Q-119 Who policing corruption particularly potential U ?"] "
U.S. government corruption in countries ["Q-120 Who provide significant aid ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation (soon it may even achieve \u201cwitch hunt\u201d status) the president has just given them more ammunition to argue that the probe is politicized. This makes the prosecutors\u2019 job more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof. Nevertheless there is nothing illegal or improper in principle about a president\u2019s asking another country to assist an ongoing U.S. investigation.4\. Investigating Vice President Biden\u2019s influence over Ukraine. It was not improper for Trump to seek information about Joe Biden\u2019s squeezing of Kyiv to fire the prosecutor. That could plainly be relevant to the Barr/Durham investigation. Though we do not know we assume prosecutors are examining whether Obama-administration agencies pressured Ukrainian authorities to investigate Paul Manafort Trump\u2019s former campaign chairman. If so Biden\u , fair to point out " ["Q-122 Who have done myself ) that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
Trump supporters ["Q-123 Who \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
Trump supporters ["Q-124 Who is not very convincing ?"] "
Ukraine\u2019s ["Q-125 Where is he known to overlook far worse corruption in seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Trump supporters\u2019 depiction of the president ["Q-126 What is he known to overlook far worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
far worse corruption ["Q-127 What is he known to o N than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Trump supporters ["Q-128 Who is known to overlook far worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Ukraine\u2019s ["Q-129 Who seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
the president ["Q-130 Who campaigned on the need for the United states to stop bearing the financial burden of other countries \u2019 security challenges particularly Europe \u2019 s ?"] "
Russia China North Korea Turkey ["Q-131 Who \u2019 security challenges particularly Europe \u2019 s ?"] "
Europe\u2019s. Since he is predisposed against this kind of foreign aid it is logical for him to demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it. You may think his position on this is shortsighted but being wrong on policy is not an abuse of power ["Q-132 What is since he predisposed against this kind of foreign aid it is logical for him to demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it ?"] "
Trump supporters ["Q-133 Who is predisposed against this kind of foreign aid it is logical for him to demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it ?"] "
foreign aid ["Q-134 Who is logical for him to demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it ?"] "
Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman ["Q-135 Who getting it ?"] "
his position ["Q-136 What may i think on this is shortsighted but being wrong on policy is not an abuse of power ?"] "
his anticorruption stance ["Q-137 What if me think was just a pretext for hurting Biden i may be right but it \u2019 s not a baseless pretext ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-138 What is in any event it concocted the Biden self - dealing scenario out of whole cloth ?"] "
The Shadow State Department ["Q-139 Who is not like President Trump concocted the Biden self - dealing scenario out of whole cloth ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-140 Who concocted the Biden self - dealing scenario out of whole cloth ?"] "
Obama supporters ["Q-141 Who are wo nt to say that there was no impropriety in the administration \u2019 s prodding of Ukraine to investigate Manafort because there was plenty of corruption evidence ?"] "
Obama supporters ["Q-142 Who s prodding of Ukraine to investigate Manafort because there was plenty of corruption evidence ?"] "
Obama supporters ["Q-143 Who is not clear that Ukraine will actually renew investigative interest in Burisma much less that the Bidens will be affected ?"] "
Ukraine ["Q-144 Who will actually renew investigative interest in Burisma much less that the Bidens will be affected ?"] "
the Bidens ["Q-145 Who will be affected ?"] "
Bottom line ["Q-146 Who was inappropriate for the president to point the ukrainians specifically and explicitly at the Bidens ?"] "
A more polished president ["Q-147 Who would simply have said \u201c you want i to root out corruption no matter how high up it goes even in your own government \u201d -- the ukrainians would have gotten the point and there would be nothing to criticize ?"] "
A more polished president ["Q-148 Who want i to root out corruption no matter how high up it goes even in your own government \u201d -- the ukrainians would have gotten the point and there would be nothing to criticize ?"] "
A more polished president ["Q-149 Who goes even in your own government \u201d -- the ukrainians would have gotten the point and there would be nothing to criticize ?"] "
Trump ["Q-150 Who went about it crudely ?"] "
my boss ["Q-151 Who have respect and affection ) ?"] "
concerns center on Rudy Giuliani the president\u2019s private lawyer ["Q-152 What are these concerns by many trump - administration officials and not just because it diminishes their roles ?"] "
private lawyer ["Q-153 Who are also shared by many trump - administration officials and not just because it diminishes their roles ?"] "
Trump-administration officials ["Q-154 Who diminishes their roles ?"] "
disruption ["Q-155 What can a so - called shadow State Department cause especially if the emissary is wearing two hats as Rudy was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
A so-called shadow State Department ["Q-156 Who can cause disruption especially if the emissary is wearing two hats as Rudy was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
the emissary ["Q-157 Who is wearing two hats as Rudy was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-158 Who was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-159 Who helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-160 Who dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
government officials ["Q-161 What can such arrangements undermine as they attempt to carry out what they understand to be administration policy ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-162 Who can undermine government officials as they attempt to carry out what they understand to be administration policy ?"] "
government officials ["Q-163 Who attempt to carry out what they understand to be administration policy ?"] "
government officials ["Q-164 Who understand to be administration policy ?"] "
Taylor\u2019s testimony ["Q-165 How much e N \u2019 describes the government \u2019 s regular foreign - policy channel ( the National Security Council State and Defense Departments etc ?"] "
Lev Parnas ["Q-166 Who etc ?"] "
irregular\u201d channel ["Q-167 Who focused on assistance in investigations pertaining to the 2016 election and the Bidens ?"] "
assistance in investigations ["Q-168 Who pertaining to the 2016 election and the Bidens ?"] "
the Bidens ["Q-169 What is yet it that presidents occasionally deploy influential non - government officials as their envoys ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-170 Who is simply a fact that presidents occasionally deploy influential non - government officials as their envoys ?"] "
presidents ["Q-171 Who occasionally deploy influential non - government officials as their envoys ?"] "
envoys ["Q-172 Who being a uniformly bad practice it can further american interests in the cloak - and - dagger realm foreign relations can often be ?"] "
uniformly bad practice ["Q-173 Who can further american interests in the cloak - and - dagger realm foreign relations can often be ?"] "
foreign relations ["Q-174 Who can often be ?"] "
uniformly bad practice it can further American interests in the cloak-and-dagger realm foreign relations ["Q-175 What is it that the Obama administration colluded with elements of the bureaucracy -- particularly the law - enforcement intelligence and diplomatic agencies -- to undermine Trump \u2019 s campaign and presidency ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-176 Who is also a fact that the Obama administration colluded with elements of the bureaucracy -- particularly the law - enforcement intelligence and diplomatic agencies -- to undermine Trump \u2019 s campaign and presidency ?"] "
Obama administration ["Q-177 Who colluded with elements of the bureaucracy -- particularly the law - enforcement intelligence and diplomatic agencies -- to undermine Trump \u2019 s campaign and presidency ?"] "
unaccountable federal bureaucracy works ["Q-178 What does if President Trump believes against him because it thinks it knows better that is not merely a figment of his admittedly active imagination ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-179 Who believes the unaccountable federal bureaucracy works against him because it thinks it knows better that is not merely a figment of his admittedly active imagination ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-180 Who thinks it knows better that is not merely a figment of his admittedly active imagination ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-181 Who knows better that is not merely a figment of his admittedly active imagination ?"] "
envoys ["Q-182 While there is no legal bar to as what using the president \u2019 s using trusted outside advisers is obviously fair to ask whether the Giuliani deployment has done more harm than good ?"] "
the Giuliani deployment ["Q-183 While there is no legal bar to the president \u2019 s using trusted whether whom is outside advisers as envoys it obviously fair to ask has done more harm than good ?"] "
outside advisers ["Q-184 While there is no legal bar to what using the president \u2019 s using trusted as envoys it is obviously fair to ask whether the Giuliani deployment has done more harm than good ?"] "
more harm ["Q-185 While there is no legal bar to the president \u2019 s using trusted outside advisers as envoys it is obviously fair to ask what has whether the Giuliani deployment done than good ?"] "
no legal bar to the president\u2019s ["Q-186 Who using trusted outside advisers as envoys it is obviously fair to ask whether the Giuliani deployment has done more harm than good ?"] "
envoys ["Q-187 Who is obviously fair to ask whether the Giuliani deployment has done more harm than good ?"] "
Giuliani deployment ["Q-188 Who has done more harm than good ?"] "
Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman two Giuliani associates who helped Rudy research the activities of the Bidens in Ukraine ["Q-189 Who are now under indictment ?"] "
Parnas and Fruman are alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch\u2019s removal -- including by inducing then\u2013Representative Pete Sessions (R. Texas ["Q-190 What are Parnas and Fruman alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch \u2019 s removal -- including by inducing then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
illegal campaign contributions ["Q-191 What are Parnas and Fruman alleged to have made to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch \u2019 s removal -- including by inducing then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
political ["Q-192 What are Parnas and Fruman alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch \u2019 s removal -- including by inducing then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
Parnas and Fruman are alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch\u2019s removal -- including by inducing then\u2013Representative Pete Sessions (R. Texas ["Q-193 What are Parnas and Fruman alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch \u2019 s removal -- including by inducing then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
Parnas and Fruman ["Q-194 Who are alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch \u2019 s removal -- including by inducing then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
Lev Parnas ["Q-195 Who including to h V then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
Representative Pete Sessions ["Q-196 Who note that Yovanovitch vigorously denies that she was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
Yovanovitch ["Q-197 Who vigorously denies that she was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
Yovanovitch ["Q-198 Who was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
Parnas and Fruman ["Q-199 Who were allegedly acting at the urging of a ukrainian government official who has been identified in press reporting as Yuriy Lutsenko ?"] "
Ukrainian government official ["Q-200 Who been identified in press reporting as Yuriy Lutsenko ?"] "
Ukrainian prosecutor ["Q-201 What is he who is said to have given Giuliani extensive information about the Bidens ?"] "
Giuliani ["Q-202 Whom is he a former ukrainian prosecutor who is said to have given extensive information about the Bidens ?"] "
Yuriy Lutsenko ["Q-203 Who is a former ukrainian prosecutor who is said to have given Giuliani extensive information about the Bidens ?"] "
Lutsenko ["Q-204 Who reportedly says the Bidens did not break any ukrainian laws -- which is noteworthy even if it is far from an endorsement of their influence peddling ?"] "
the Bidens ["Q-205 Who did not break any ukrainian laws -- which is noteworthy even if it is far from an endorsement of their influence peddling ?"] "
a president ["Q-206 Who is far from an endorsement of their influence peddling ?"] "
influence peddling.)Constitutionally a president ["Q-207 Who does not need to have a reason to remove an ambassador ?"] "
impeachment inquiry ["Q-208 What is Congress however entitled to examine the president \u2019 s conduct of diplomacy ?"] "
impeachment inquiry ["Q-209 What is Congress however entitled to examine s conduct of diplomacy ?"] "
Congress ["Q-210 Who however is entitled to examine the president \u2019 s conduct of diplomacy ?"] "
impeachment ["Q-211 Who was reassigned because she was an obstacle to the president \u2019 s push -- with Giuliani \u2019 s encouragement -- for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens ?"] "
impeachment ["Q-212 Who was an obstacle to the president \u2019 s push -- with Giuliani \u2019 s encouragement -- for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens ?"] "
a mess ["Q-213 What is this that neither the president nor the country needed ?"] "
Giuliani ["Q-214 Who is a mess that neither the president nor the country needed ?"] "
the president ["Q-215 Who needed ?"] "
two-year investigation ["Q-216 What J as well as the pending Justice Department inspector - general and Barr / durham probes to some extent all involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns ?"] "
all Mueller ["Q-217 Who pending Justice Department inspector - general and Barr / durham probes to some extent all involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns ?"] "
Barr/Durham probes ["Q-218 Who involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns ?"] "
Barr/Durham probes to some extent all involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns. It is fair game for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden\u2019s political influence; and if Giuliani as the president\u2019s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U.S. law violations those would appropriately be referred to the Justice Department ["Q-219 Whether whom is it fair game for the Trump campaign to explore cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden \u2019 s political influence ; and if Giuliani as the president \u2019 s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
fair game ["Q-220 What is it for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden \u2019 s political influence ; and if Giuliani as the president \u2019 s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
Barr/Durham probes to some extent all involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns. It is fair game for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden\u2019s political influence; and if Giuliani as the president\u2019s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U.S. law violations those would appropriately be referred to the Justice Department ["Q-221 Who is fair game for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden \u2019 s political influence ; and if Giuliani as the president \u2019 s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman two Giuliani associates who helped Rudy research the activities of the Bidens in Ukraine are now under indictment. That case (brought by the Trump Justice Department in the Southern District of New York) includes a successful scheme to persuade the president to remove Marie Yovanovitch the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. Parnas and Fruman are alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch\u2019s removal -- including by inducing then\u2013Representative Pete Sessions (R. Texas) to write the president a letter urging that the ambassador be fired for exhibiting anti-Trump bias. (I note that Yovanovitch vigorously denies that she was \u201cdisloyal\u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by American anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine.) Parnas and Fruman were allegedly acting at the urging of a , Hunter Biden and Burisma corruption " ["Q-223 Who found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
U.S. ["Q-224 What law violations those would appropriately be referred to the Justice Department ?"] "
U.S. law violations ["Q-225 Who would appropriately be referred to the Justice Department ?"] "
Ukraine ["Q-226 Who was inappropriate -- particularly when the president is attacking Biden for being insensitive to patent conflicts of interest ?"] "
the president ["Q-227 Who is attacking Biden for being insensitive to patent conflicts of interest ?"] "
Biden ["Q-228 Who being insensitive to patent conflicts of interest ?"] "
Biden ["Q-229 Who is to to portray bad judgment in these circumstances as an impeachable offense ?"] "
The Bidens\u2019 behavior ["Q-230 Who is highly questionable ?"] "
Clinton campaign ["Q-231 While whom did the Obama administration liberally enlisted foreign powers in the politicized investigation of Trump colluded with foreign powers to tar Trump ?"] "
foreign powers ["Q-232 What did the Obama administration liberally enlisted in the politicized investigation of Trump while the Clinton campaign colluded with foreign powers to tar Trump ?"] "
The Obama administration ["Q-233 Who liberally enlisted foreign powers in the politicized investigation of Trump while the Clinton campaign colluded with foreign powers to tar Trump ?"] "
Clinton campaign ["Q-234 Who colluded with foreign powers to tar Trump ?"] "
president Trump ["Q-235 Who ultimately stood down from his hold on ukrainian aid ?"] "
no commitment ["Q-236 What did Kyiv made to investigate the Bidens and prudently wants to stay out of U ?"] "
Democrats and Ukraine. It is precious indeed to hear Democrats complain that Ukraine was imperiled by the hold on defense aid. President Obama refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid after Russia began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014. President Trump has been providing it and has imposed tough sanctions on Russia. The Democrats sudden obsession over Ukraine\u2019s well-being like their newfound angst over the geopolitical challenge posed by Russia is political posturing.3\. Assistance to U.S. investigations. Most of the assistance the president sought from Ukraine was unobjectionable. It is common for presidents to ask their foreign counterparts to assist Justice Department investigations. House Democrats will not acknowledge this because they seek to delegitimize the Barr/Durham probe as a Trump 2020 campaign initiative; but it is not.To be sure it is irregular for a president to seek a foreign government\u2019s investigative assistance absent a reque , Kyiv " ["Q-238 Who made no commitment to investigate the Bidens and prudently wants to stay out of U ?"] "
Trump ["Q-239 Who prudently wants to stay out of U ?"] "
all sides ["Q-240 Who is not an episode over which a national consensus would support the president \u2019 s removal ?"] "
Marie Yovanovitch ["Q-241 Who would support the president \u2019 s removal ?"] "
impeachment.2\. ["Q-242 Where is it inconceivable that two - thirds would ever oust Trump over his actions in Ukraine so House democrats are clearly pursuing impeachment for 2020 campaign purposes ?"] "
Barr/Durham ["Q-243 Who is inconceivable that two - thirds of the Senate would ever oust Trump over his actions in Ukraine so House democrats are clearly pursuing impeachment for 2020 campaign purposes ?"] "
two-thirds of the Senate ["Q-244 Who would ever oust Trump over his actions in Ukraine so House democrats are clearly pursuing impeachment for 2020 campaign purposes ?"] "
House Democrats are clearly pursuing impeachment for 2020 campaign purposes. They are titillating their base ["Q-245 What are they titillating at the cost of exacerbating the deep divide in your nation ?"] "
House Democrats ["Q-246 Who are titillating their base at the cost of exacerbating the deep divide in your nation ?"] "
House Democrats ["Q-247 Who exacerbating the deep divide in your nation ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-248 Who will not be able to govern under the new standards they are forging ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-249 Who are forging ?"] "
Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-250 What N ?"] "
platonic ideal ["Q-251 What do you do not have of presidential fitness ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-252 Who do not have a platonic ideal of presidential fitness ?"] "
The constitutional qualifications ["Q-253 Who are minimal and when the people elect a person that person is presumptively fit because the sovereign has spoken ?"] "
the people ["Q-254 Who elect a person that person is presumptively fit because the sovereign has spoken ?"] "
the people ["Q-255 Who is presumptively fit because the sovereign has spoken ?"] "
Yuriy Lutsenko ["Q-256 Who has spoken ?"] "
fitness judgments ["Q-257 What do after that you make on job performance the president is deemed too unfit to serve if he commits high crimes and misdemeanors so egregious that the House files articles of impeachment and a supermajority of the Senate votes to convict and remove ?"] "
Democrats and other Trump detractors ["Q-258 Who are determined to reverse this norm ?"] "
not seeking to deduce unfitness from impeachable offenses ["Q-259 What do they have \u2019 election of Trump ?"] "
any misstep ["Q-260 What are they to deduce unfitness from impeachable offenses ?"] "
the voters\u2019 election of Trump ["Q-261 Who are not seeking to deduce unfitness from impeachable offenses ?"] "
the unfitness finding ["Q-262 What did they predetermined and have spent three years looking for some misstep -- any misstep -- that might pass the laugh test as an impeachable offense ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-263 Who predetermined the unfitness finding and have spent three years looking for some misstep -- any misstep -- that might pass the laugh test as an impeachable offense ?"] "
Giuliani ["Q-264 Who have spent three years looking for some misstep -- any misstep -- that might pass the laugh test as an impeachable offense ?"] "
three years ["Q-265 Who looking for some misstep -- any misstep -- that might pass the laugh test as an impeachable offense ?"] "
do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-266 What did if that approach became new normal it would be much more harmful t T the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-267 Who became your new normal it would be much more harmful t T the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-268 Who would be much more harmful t T the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-269 Who shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s ["Q-270 Who here was at most t T leverage his power t T advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
2016 ["Q-271 When does it does not hold a candle to what democrats did when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of the government in the service of the democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
a candle ["Q-272 What does it does not hold to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed the intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-273 Who does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when the incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
incumbent administration ["Q-274 Who placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
in 2016 ["Q-275 How much does it does not hold a candle to what democrats did in when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
no impropriety in the administration\u2019s prodding of Ukraine to investigate Manafort ["Q-276 What are the president and his supporters wo nt to say that the democrats \u2019 C of presidential powers for partisan political purposes is the worst abuse of power since Watergate ?"] "
The president and his supporters ["Q-277 Who are wo nt to say that the democrats \u2019 exploitation of presidential powers for partisan political purposes is the worst abuse of power since Watergate ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-278 Who is the worst abuse of power since Watergate ?"] "
we\u2019ll ["Q-279 What is if it proved may well be -- you \u2019 ll have to see what the Justice Department \u2019 s investigations establish ?"] "
the president\u2019s best foot forward in opposing impeachment ["Q-280 How much can condemn what happened in 2016 yet not see any problem whatsoever with President Trump \u2019 s handling of Ukraine -- even with the caveat that t T portray the Ukraine excesses as grist for impeachment is overkill ?"] "
the president\u2019s best foot forward in opposing impeachment ["Q-281 Who don \u2019 t see how one can condemn what happened in 2016 yet not see any problem whatsoever with President Trump \u2019 s handling of Ukraine -- even with the caveat that t T portray the Ukraine excesses as grist for impeachment is overkill ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-282 Who is overkill ?"] "
overkill ["Q-283 What is that caveat best foot forward in opposing impeachment ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-284 Who is the president \u2019 s best foot forward in opposing impeachment ?"] "
president\u2019s best foot forward ["Q-285 Who opposing impeachment ?"] "
president\u2019s best foot forward in opposing impeachment ["Q-286 What is it best reason why democrats should stand down ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s handling of Ukraine -- even with the caveat that to portray the Ukraine excesses as grist for impeachment is overkill.That caveat is the president ["Q-287 Who is also the best reason why democrats should stand down ?"] "
Joe Biden ["Q-288 Who is not the nominee ?"] "
Ukraine excesses as grist for impeachment is overkill.That caveat is the president\u2019s best foot forward in opposing impeachment. It is also the best reason why Democrats should stand down. Ukraine seems like an effective campaign issue for them especially if Joe Biden is not the nominee ["Q-289 What as the basis for putting putting through an impeachment crisis though it is likely to explode on them ?"] "
Joe Biden ["Q-290 Who putting the country through an impeachment crisis though it is likely to explode on them ?"] "
Joe Biden ["Q-291 Who is likely to explode on them ?"] "
second ["Q-01 How much s N President this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s dealings with the government of Ukraine ["Q-02 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s is Note this the second of a two - column this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
a two-column ["Q-03 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s of what is note this the second with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
recent developments ["Q-04 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the second of with what a two - column series this weekend dealing dealing in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
I reiterated my argument ["Q-05 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the second of in what a two - column series this weekend dealing dealing with recent developments democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
a two-column series this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House Democrats are conducting in connection ["Q-06 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the second of in what a two - column series this weekend dealing dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-07 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the second of with what a two - column series this weekend dealing dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s ["Q-08 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the second of a two - column series this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are with what dealings of Ukraine ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s ["Q-09 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the second of a two - column series this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are where dealings with the government ?"] "
no quid pro quo in his administration\u2019s dealings with the government of Ukraine ["Q-010 What N not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the second of a two - column s N this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
Impeachable Offense Editor\u2019s Note ["Q-011 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not what J is the second of a two - column s N this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s dealings with the government of Ukraine.Yesterday in part one of this two-part series I reiterated my argument that it has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters to claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration\u2019s dealings with the government of Ukraine ["Q-012 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s what is Note this second of a two - column s N this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s dealings ["Q-013 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the second of a two - column s s N N N this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s dealings with the government of Ukraine ["Q-014 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the second of what s a two - column s N this weekend dealing N with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s dealings ["Q-015 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the s J of a two - column s N this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are what J with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s dealings ["Q-016 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the second of a two - column whose this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
two-column series this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House Democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump\u2019s dealings ["Q-017 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s s how much is Note this the second of a two - column this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s dealings ["Q-018 The President \u2019 s Best Ukraine Defense not an impeachable Offense Editor \u2019 s Note this is the second of a two - column how much s s N N N this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-019 ]
my ["Q-020 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated has your argument that it been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
The President\u2019s Best Ukraine Defense Not an Impeachable Offense Editor\u2019s Note This is the second of a two-column series this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House Democrats are conducting in connection ["Q-021 Yesterday in part one of that whom did this two - part series you reiterated your argument has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
my ["Q-022 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated for what has your argument that it been a strategic error and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
my ["Q-023 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated has your argument that it been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
a strategic error ["Q-024 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated your argument that it has been in what a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
government ["Q-025 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated your argument that it has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo with what dealings of Ukraine ?"] "
Ukraine ["Q-026 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated your argument that it has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo where dealings with the government ?"] "
my argument ["Q-027 Yesterday in part one of what did this two - part series you reiterated that it has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
my argument that it has been a strategic error ["Q-028 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated what has your argument that it been for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
two-part series I reiterated my argument that it has been a strategic error ["Q-029 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated your argument that it has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t N claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
no ["Q-030 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated your argument that it has been what a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
impeachment inquiry ["Q-031 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated your argument that it has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo what J with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
The President\u2019s Best Ukraine Defense Not an Impeachable Offense Editor\u2019s Note This is the second of a two-column series this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House Democrats are conducting in connection ["Q-032 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated your argument that it has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters whose claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
his administration ["Q-033 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated your argument that it has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo in whose administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
I ["Q-034 Who reiterated your argument that it has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
The President\u2019s Best Ukraine Defense Not an Impeachable Offense Editor\u2019s Note This is the second of a two-column series this weekend dealing with recent developments in the impeachment inquiry House Democrats are conducting in connection with President Trump\u2019s dealings with the government of Ukraine.Yesterday in part one of this two-part series I reiterated my argument ["Q-035 Who has been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t T claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-036 Who \u2019 of dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
it has been a strategic error ["Q-037 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated t how much has your argument that it been a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
a strategic error ["Q-038 Yesterday in part one of this two - part series you reiterated your argument that it has been how much a strategic error for President Trump and his supporters t N claim that there was no quid pro quo in his administration \u2019 s dealings with the government of Ukraine ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-039 ]
impeachment inquiry ["Q-040 That is not just because what are quid pro quo terms of negotiations between sovereigns ; nor is it just because the evidence is strong that President Trump did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
the government of Ukraine ["Q-041 That is not just because quid pro quo terms are a staple of negotiations between sovereigns ; whom is nor just because the evidence is strong that President Trump did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
pressure Ukraine ["Q-042 That is not just because quid pro quo terms are a staple of negotiations between sovereigns ; nor is it just because the evidence is what did strong that President Trump did by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
investigative assistance ["Q-043 That is not just because quid pro quo terms are a staple of negotiations between sovereigns ; nor is it just because the evidence is strong that President Trump did what pressure ukraine by seeking seeking in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
Ukraine\u2019s president sought ["Q-044 That is not just because quid pro quo terms are a staple of negotiations between sovereigns ; nor is it just because the evidence is strong that President Trump did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what what J -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
the government of Ukraine ["Q-045 Who is not just because quid pro quo terms are a staple of negotiations between sovereigns ; nor is it just because the evidence is strong that President Trump did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
quid pro quo terms ["Q-046 Who are a staple of negotiations between sovereigns ; nor is it just because the evidence is strong that President Trump did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
nor ["Q-047 Who is it just because the evidence is strong that President Trump did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
Best Ukraine Defense Not an Impeachable Offense Editor ["Q-048 Who is strong that President Trump did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-049 Who did pressure ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-050 Who seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine \u2019 s president sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
President Trump did pressure Ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine\u2019s president ["Q-051 Who sought -- the release of million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-052 ]
an impeachment inquiry ["Q-053 The \u201c no quid pro quo \u201d claim is misguided to what is because it largely irrelevant ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-054 The \u201c no quid pro quo \u201d because whom is claim misguided is largely irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry ?"] "
a staple of negotiations between sovereigns ["Q-055 The \u201c no quid pro quo \u201d what is claim misguided because it is largely irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry ?"] "
no quid pro quo ["Q-056 Who is misguided because it is largely irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-057 Who is largely irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-058 ]
impeachment inquiry ["Q-059 In what did As explained explained are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt ?"] "
criminal court prosecution ["Q-060 As explained in part one about what are you not here talking in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt ?"] "
a reasonable doubt ["Q-061 As explained in part one you are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which beyond what must a prosecutor prove a crime ?"] "
not here talking ["Q-062 As explained in part one what are you about a criminal court prosecution in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt ?"] "
a crime ["Q-063 As explained in part one you are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which what must a prosecutor prove beyond a reasonable doubt ?"] "
impeachment inquiry ["Q-064 Who explained in part one you are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-065 Who are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt ?"] "
a prosecutor ["Q-066 Who must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-067 ]
proved to criminal-law specifications ["Q-068 If a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was satisfied ( or at least said they were satisfied ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved ?"] "
egregious abuse of power ["Q-069 If a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was satisfied ( or at least said that what were they ) of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
power ["Q-070 If a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was satisfied ( or at least said of what were they ) that an egregious abuse occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
impeachment ["Q-071 If a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was satisfied ( or at least said they were satisfied ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred of what could they vote an article even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry. As explained in part one we are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution ["Q-072 If a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was satisfied ( or at least said they were satisfied ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred if what could they vote an article of impeachment even corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
crime beyond a reasonable doubt ["Q-073 What did if a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was ( or at least said they were satisfied ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
President Trump did pressure Ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine\u2019s president sought -- the release of $400 million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit.The \u201cno quid pro quo\u201d claim is misguided because it is largely irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry. As explained in part one we are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. If a majority of the Democratic-controlled House was satisfied (or at least said they were satisfied) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal-law specifications ["Q-074 Whom did if a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was ( or at least said were satisfied ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they
if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal-law specifications ["Q-075 If a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was satisfied ( or at least said what were they ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal-law specifications ["Q-076 If a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was satisfied ( or at least said they were satisfied ) that whom did an egregious abuse of power occurred could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
an article of impeachment ["Q-077 If a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was satisfied ( or at least said they were satisfied ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred what could they vote of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
pro ["Q-078 If a majority of the Democratic - controlled House was satisfied ( or at least said they were satisfied ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro what quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
Democratic-controlled House ["Q-079 Who was that ( or at least said they were satisfied ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
Democratic-controlled House ["Q-080 Who were or ) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
egregious abuse of power ["Q-081 Who occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
Democratic-controlled House ["Q-082 Who could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
corrupt quid pro quo ["Q-083 Who could not be proved to criminal - law specifications ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-084 ]
relentlessly ["Q-085 More important the president \u2019 s camp should stick in what with and relentlessly argue his best point the president \u2019 s actions ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ?"] "
the circumstances ["Q-086 More important the president \u2019 s camp should stick with and relentlessly argue his best point the president \u2019 s actions in conducting under what do ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense ?"] "
do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ["Q-087 More important the president \u2019 what s s N N N should stick with and relentlessly argue his best point the president \u2019 s actions in conducting ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ?"] "
relentlessly ["Q-088 More important the president \u2019 s camp should stick what with and relentlessly argue best point the president \u2019 s actions in conducting ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ?"] "
Ukrainian relations ["Q-089 More important the president \u2019 s camp should stick with and relentlessly argue his what best point the president \u2019 s actions in conducting conducting do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ?"] "
an impeachable offense ["Q-090 More important the president \u2019 s camp should stick with and relentlessly argue his best point the president \u2019 s actions in conducting what do ukrainian relations do not establish under the circumstances ?"] "
More important the president\u2019s camp ["Q-091 Who should stick with and relentlessly argue his best point the president \u2019 s actions in conducting ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-092 Who relentlessly argue his best point the president \u2019 s actions in conducting ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ?"] "
The president ["Q-093 Who conducting ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ?"] "
The president\u2019s actions in conducting Ukrainian relations ["Q-094 Who do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-095 ]
The 2016 precedent ["Q-096 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-097 ]
President Trump did pressure Ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine\u2019s president sought -- the release of $400 million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit.The \u201cno quid pro quo\u201d claim is misguided because it is largely irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry. As explained in part one we are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. If a majority of the Democratic-controlled House was satisfied (or at least said they were satisfied) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal-law specifications.More important the president\u2019s camp should stick with and relentlessly argue his best point The president\u2019s actions in conducting Ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances. Let\u2019s consider the relevant issues.1/ , all of it " ["Q-099 The president \u2019 s hold on defense aid was what did temporary and Ukraine got of it ?"] "
defense aid ["Q-0100 Who was temporary and Ukraine got all of it ?"] "
Ukraine ["Q-0101 Who got all of it ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0102 ]
any investigations ["Q-0103 The zelensky government did not have to commence what or assist to get it ?"] "
Ukraine ["Q-0104 The zelensky government did not have to commence whom or assist any investigations to get ?"] "
The Zelensky government ["Q-0105 Who did not have to commence or assist any investigations to get it ?"] "
The Zelensky government ["Q-0106 Who assist any investigations to get it ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0107 ]
no material harm ["Q-0108 What did the delay caused ?"] "
The Zelensky government ["Q-0109 Who caused no material harm ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0110 ]
no material harm ["Q-0111 It is certainly fair to contend that in the absence of to what some vital emergent american interest a president should not put a hold on aid friendly and strategically significant nation that Congress has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
no material harm ["Q-0112 In what is it certainly fair to contend that of some vital emergent american interest a president should not put a hold on aid to a friendly and strategically significant nation that Congress has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
vital emergent American ["Q-0113 Of what is it certainly fair to contend that in the absence should not put a hold on aid to a friendly and strategically significant nation that Congress has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
aid ["Q-0114 It is certainly fair to contend that in the absence of on what some vital emergent american interest a president should not put a hold to a friendly and strategically significant nation that Congress has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
no material harm ["Q-0115 It is certainly fair to contend that in the absence of where some vital emergent american interest a president should not put a hold on aid to a friendly and strategically significant nation has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
legislation ["Q-0116 It is certainly fair to contend that in the absence of some vital emergent american interest a president should not put a hold on aid to a friendly and strategically in what has significant nation that Congress directed and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
law ["Q-0117 It is certainly fair to contend that in the absence of some vital emergent american interest a president should not put a hold on aid to a friendly and strategically significant nation that Congress has directed into what has in legislation and the president himself signed ?"] "
no material harm ["Q-0118 What is it certainly fair to c N in the absence of some vital emergent american interest a president should not put a hold on aid to a friendly and strategically significant nation that Congress has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
no material harm ["Q-0119 It is certainly fair to contend that in the absence of what some vital emergent american interest a president should not put on aid to a friendly and strategically significant nation that Congress has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
no material harm ["Q-0120 It is certainly fair to contend that in the absence of some vital emergent american interest a president should not put a hold on aid to a friendly and strategically what has significant nation that Congress directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
no material harm ["Q-0121 It is certainly fair to contend that in the absence of some vital emergent american interest a president should not put a hold on aid to a friendly and strategically significant nation that Congress has directed what has in legislation and the president himself signed into law ?"] "
President Trump did pressure Ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine\u2019s president sought -- the release of $400 million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit.The \u201cno quid pro quo\u201d claim is misguided because it is largely irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry. As explained in part one we are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. If a majority of the Democratic-controlled House was satisfied (or at least said they were satisfied) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal-law specifications.More important the president\u2019s camp should stick with and relentlessly argue his best point The president\u2019s actions in conducting Ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances. Let\u2019s consider the relevant issues.1/ , emergent American interest a president " ["Q-0123 Who should not put a hold on aid to a friendly and strategically significant nation that Congress has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
Congress ["Q-0124 Who has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ?"] "
Congress ["Q-0125 Who has signed into law ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0126 ]
Trump ["Q-0127 The Constitution however gives where the president sweeping sweeping foreign - affairs authority would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver the aid altogether ?"] "
Congress has directed in legislation and the president himself has signed into law ["Q-0128 What does the Constitution however gives foreign - affairs authority so Trump would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver the aid altogether ?"] "
foreign-affairs authority so Trump would arguably have had the power ["Q-0129 The Constitution however gives the president sweeping what foreign - affairs authority so Trump would arguably have had to decline to deliver the aid altogether ?"] "
foreign-affairs authority so Trump would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver the aid ["Q-0130 The Constitution however gives the president sweeping what foreign - affairs authority so Trump would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver altogether ?"] "
The Constitution ["Q-0131 Who however gives the president sweeping foreign - affairs authority so Trump would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver the aid altogether ?"] "
the president ["Q-0132 Who sweeping foreign - affairs authority so Trump would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver the aid altogether ?"] "
Trump ["Q-0133 Who would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver the aid altogether ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0134 ]
Ukraine\u2019s defense ["Q-0135 Where did this by contrast was merely a temporary delay that was of no consequence ?"] "
Trump would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver the aid ["Q-0136 Of what did this by contrast was merely a temporary delay that was to Ukraine \u2019 s defense ?"] "
material harm ["Q-0137 What did this by contrast was temporary delay that was of no consequence to Ukraine \u2019 s defense ?"] "
Trump ["Q-0138 Who was merely a temporary delay that was of no consequence to Ukraine \u2019 s defense ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0139 ]
any other president some criticism ["Q-0140 About what were if you talking would be in order ?"] "
in order ["Q-0141 If you were talking about in what would any other president some criticism be ?"] "
impeachable offense is just the next stage in a tireless political campaign ["Q-0142 What were if you talking about any other president some criticism would be in order ?"] "
Trump would arguably have had the power to decline to deliver the aid altogether. This by contrast was merely a temporary delay that was of no consequence to Ukraine\u2019s defense. If we were talking about any other president some criticism would be in order. To portray what happened as an impeachable offense is just the next stage in a tireless political campaign. It trivializes impeachment.2\. The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0143 Who were talking about any other president some criticism would be in order ?"] "
any other president some criticism ["Q-0144 Who would be in order ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0145 ]
a tireless political campaign ["Q-0146 To portray what happened as in what is an impeachable offense just the next stage ?"] "
bad judgment ["Q-0147 To portray what happened as what is an impeachable offense next stage in a tireless political campaign ?"] "
impeachable ["Q-0148 Who is just the next stage in a tireless political campaign ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0149 ]
Rudy ["Q-0150 What it t N ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0151 Who trivializes impeachment ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0152 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0153 ]
The Democrats ["Q-0154 Who ukraine ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0155 ]
Ukraine ["Q-0156 Where is it precious indeed to hear democrats complain was imperiled by the hold on defense aid ?"] "
the hold ["Q-0157 It is precious indeed to hear democrats complain by what was that Ukraine imperiled on defense aid ?"] "
defense aid ["Q-0158 It is precious indeed to hear democrats complain on what was that Ukraine imperiled by the hold ?"] "
impeachment.2\. ["Q-0159 It is precious indeed to hear democrats complain what was that Ukraine imperiled by the hold on defense aid ?"] "
President Trump did pressure Ukraine by seeking investigative assistance in exchange for what Ukraine\u2019s president sought -- the release of $400 million in foreign aid and an Oval Office visit.The \u201cno quid pro quo\u201d claim is misguided because it is largely irrelevant to an impeachment inquiry. As explained in part one we are not here talking about a criminal court prosecution in which a prosecutor must prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. If a majority of the Democratic-controlled House was satisfied (or at least said they were satisfied) that an egregious abuse of power occurred they could vote an article of impeachment even if a corrupt quid pro quo could not be proved to criminal-law specifications.More important the president\u2019s camp should stick with and relentlessly argue his best point The president\u2019s actions in conducting Ukrainian relations do not establish an impeachable offense under the circumstances. Let\u2019s consider the relevant issues.1/ , Ukraine " ["Q-0161 Who was imperiled by the hold on defense aid ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0162 ]
any lethal defense aid ["Q-0163 With what did President Obama refused to provide Ukraine after Russia began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014 ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine. It is precious indeed to hear Democrats complain that Ukraine was imperiled by the hold on defense aid. President Obama refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid after Russia ["Q-0164 Where did President Obama refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014 ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0165 President Obama refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid after Russia began attacking when it and seizing seizing territory ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0166 What did President Obama refused to p R with any lethal defense aid after Russia began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014 ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine. It is precious indeed to hear Democrats complain that Ukraine was imperiled by the hold on defense aid. President Obama refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid after Russia began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014. President Trump ["Q-0167 President Obama refused to provide Ukraine with what began any lethal defense aid after Russia attacking and seizing territory in 2014 ?"] "
territory ["Q-0168 President Obama refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid after Russia began attacking what it and seizing seizing in 2014 ?"] "
President Obama ["Q-0169 Who refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid after Russia began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014 ?"] "
Russia ["Q-0170 Who began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014 ?"] "
Russia ["Q-0171 Who seizing territory in 2014 ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0172 President Obama refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid after Russia began attacking in how much it and seizing seizing territory ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0173 ]
Russia ["Q-0174 President Trump has been providing where has it and imposed tough sanctions ?"] "
Ukraine with any lethal defense aid ["Q-0175 What has President Trump been providing and has imposed tough sanctions on Russia ?"] "
Ukraine with any lethal defense aid ["Q-0176 President Trump has been providing what has it and imposed on Russia ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0177 Who has been providing it and has imposed tough sanctions on Russia ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0178 Who has imposed tough sanctions on Russia ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0179 ]
angst ["Q-0180 The democrats like what well - being over the geopolitical challenge posed by Russia is political posturing ?"] "
Ukraine\u2019s ["Q-0181 The democrats over what like their newfound angst by Russia is political posturing ?"] "
U.S. investigations ["Q-0182 The democrats sudden obsession over Ukraine \u2019 s well - being like their newfound angst over where did the geopolitical challenge posed is political posturing ?"] "
political posturing.3\. Assistance to U.S. investigations ["Q-0183 The democrats j like their newfound angst over the geopolitical challenge posed by Russia is political posturing ?"] "
political posturing.3\. Assistance to U.S. investigations ["Q-0184 The democrats sudden obsession over Ukraine \u2019 s well - being like their newfound angst over what did the geopolitical challenge posed by Russia posed ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0185 Who s angst like their newfound angst over the geopolitical challenge posed by Russia is political posturing ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0186 Who posed their newfound a N political posturing ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0187 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0188 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0189 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0190 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0191 ]
Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0192 Where most of the assistance the president sought was unobjectionable ?"] "
the president ["Q-0193 Who sought from Ukraine was unobjectionable ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0194 Who was unobjectionable ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0195 ]
presidents ["Q-0196 For what is it common to ask their foreign counterparts to assist Justice Department investigations ?"] "
irregular ["Q-0197 What is it common for presidents to ask foreign counterparts to assist Justice Department investigations ?"] "
unobjectionable ["Q-0198 What is it common for presidents to ask their foreign counterparts to a J ?"] "
AG Barr ["Q-0199 Who is common for presidents to ask their foreign counterparts to assist Justice Department investigations ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0200 ]
Trump 2020 campaign initiative ["Q-0201 House democrats will not acknowledge where this because they seek to delegitimize the Barr / durham probe ; but it is not ?"] "
the Barr/Durham probe ["Q-0202 House democrats will not acknowledge this because they seek to delegitimize as a trump 2020 campaign initiative ; but it is not ?"] "
House Democrats ["Q-0203 Who seek to delegitimize the Barr / durham probe as a trump 2020 campaign initiative ; but it is not ?"] "
House Democrats ["Q-0204 Who is not ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0205 ]
a president ["Q-0206 To be for what is sure it irregular to seek a foreign government \u2019 s investigative assistance absent a request from the attorney general ?"] "
foreign government\u2019s ["Q-0207 To be sure it is irregular for a president to seek from what investigative assistance absent a request ?"] "
Trump 2020 campaign initiative; but it is not ["Q-0208 To be what is sure it irregular for a president to seek s investigative assistance absent a request from the attorney general ?"] "
a foreign government\u2019s investigative assistance absent a request ["Q-0209 To be sure it is irregular for a president to seek what J from the attorney general ?"] "
AG Barr ["Q-0210 Who is irregular for a president to seek a foreign government \u2019 s investigative assistance absent a request from the attorney general ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0211 ]
Ukraine ["Q-0212 Reportedly where did Ag Barr did not ask the president to intercede ?"] "
the president ["Q-0213 Reportedly what did Ag Barr did not ask to intercede with Ukraine ?"] "
AG Barr ["Q-0214 Who did not ask the president to intercede with Ukraine ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0215 ]
the president ["Q-0216 Though not for what did unlawful it was unwise to do so unilaterally ?"] "
AG Barr ["Q-0217 Who was unwise for the president to do so unilaterally ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0218 ]
the probe ["Q-0219 With democrats already disparaging the Barr / durham investigation ( soon it may even achieve \u201c witch hunt \u201d status ) that what does the president has just given them more ammunition to argue is politicized ?"] "
witch hunt\u201d status ["Q-0220 With democrats a R disparaging the Barr / durham investigation ( soon what it may even a r ) the president has just given them more ammunition to argue that the probe is politicized ?"] "
the president has just given them more ammunition to argue that the probe is politicized ["Q-0221 With democrats already disparaging the Barr / durham investigation ( soon it may even achieve \u201c witch hunt \u201d status ) what does the president has more ammunition to argue that the probe is politicized ?"] "
the probe is politicized ["Q-0222 With democrats already disparaging the Barr / durham investigation ( soon it may even achieve \u201c witch hunt \u201d status ) the president has just given them more ammunition to argue what is that the probe politicized ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0223 Who may even achieve \u201c witch hunt \u201d status ) the president has just given them more ammunition to argue that the probe is politicized ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation (soon it may even achieve \u201cwitch hunt\u201d status) the president ["Q-0224 Who has just given them more ammunition to argue that the probe is politicized ?"] "
Biden ["Q-0225 Who is politicized ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0226 ]
the probe is politicized ["Q-0227 This makes the prosecutors \u2019 job more difficult -- that what will Barr and Durham need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
presidential pressure not proof ["Q-0228 This makes the prosecutors \u2019 job more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome on what bring the inevitable claims that any case they is based not proof ?"] "
the probe is politicized ["Q-0229 What does this makes \u2019 job more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
the probe is politicized ["Q-0230 This makes what the prosecutors \u2019 N more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
strong evidence ["Q-0231 This makes the prosecutors \u2019 job more difficult -- what will Barr and Durham need to have to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
inevitable claims ["Q-0232 This makes the prosecutors \u2019 job more difficult -- what will Barr and Durham need to have strong evidence to overcome that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
the probe is politicized ["Q-0233 This makes the prosecutors \u2019 job more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome what the inevitable claims that any case they b N on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0234 Who makes the prosecutors \u2019 job more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
prosecutors ["Q-0235 Who \u2019 job more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
Barr and Durham ["Q-0236 Who will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
Barr and Durham ["Q-0237 Who bring is based on presidential pressure not proof ?"] "
The Shadow State Department ["Q-0238 Who not proof ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0239 ]
not improper for Trump ["Q-0240 Nevertheless there is nothing illegal or what s improper in principle about a president \u2019 asking to assist an ongoing u ?"] "
an ongoing U.S. investigation.4\. ["Q-0241 Nevertheless there is nothing illegal or what s improper in principle about a president \u2019 asking another country to assist ?"] "
AG Barr ["Q-0242 Who s asking another country to assist an ongoing u ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0243 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0244 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0245 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0246 ]
Russia China North Korea Turkey and Saudi Arabia spring to mind.Nevertheless the president campaigned on the need for the United States to stop bearing the financial burden of other countries\u2019 security challenges particularly Europe\u2019s. Since he is predisposed against this kind of foreign aid it is logical for him to demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it. You may think his position on this is shortsighted but being wrong on policy is not an abuse of power. If you think his anticorruption stance was just a pretext for hurting Biden you may be right but it\u2019s not a baseless pretext.In any event it is not like President Trump concocted the Biden self-dealing scenario out of whole cloth. There is plenty of evidence to support corruption suspicions that should be explored by our government. (Note that Obama supporters are wont to say that there was no impropriety in the administration\u2019s prodding of Ukraine to investigate Manafort because there , Democrats " ["Q-0248 What J over Ukraine ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0249 ]
Trump ["Q-0250 For whom did it was not improper to seek information about Joe Biden \u2019 s squeezing of Kyiv to fire the prosecutor ?"] "
Joe Biden\u2019s ["Q-0251 About what did it was not improper for Trump to seek information s squeezing of Kyiv to fire the prosecutor ?"] "
Kyiv ["Q-0252 It was not improper for Trump to seek where s information about Joe Biden \u2019 squeezing to fire the prosecutor ?"] "
unwise for the president to do so unilaterally. With Democrats already disparaging the Barr/Durham investigation (soon it may even achieve \u201cwitch hunt\u201d status) the president has just given them more ammunition to argue that the probe is politicized. This makes the prosecutors\u2019 job more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof. Nevertheless there is nothing illegal or improper in principle about a president\u2019s asking another country to assist an ongoing U.S. investigation.4\. Investigating Vice President Biden\u2019s influence over Ukraine. It was not improper for Trump to seek information ["Q-0253 What did it was not improper for Trump to s J about Joe Biden \u2019 s squeezing of Kyiv to fire the prosecutor ?"] "
squeezing ["Q-0254 It was not improper for Trump to seek what N of Kyiv to fire the prosecutor ?"] "
fire the prosecutor ["Q-0255 It was not improper for Trump to seek what s information about Joe Biden \u2019 squeezing of Kyiv to f N ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0256 Who was not improper for Trump to seek information about Joe Biden \u2019 s squeezing of Kyiv to fire the prosecutor ?"] "
Joe Biden ["Q-0257 Who s squeezing of Kyiv to fire the prosecutor ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0258 ]
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0259 That could plainly be relevant ?"] "
Joe Biden ["Q-0260 Who could plainly be relevant to the Barr / durham investigation ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0261 ]
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0262 Though you do not know you assume prosecutors are examining did whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0263 Though you do not know you are assume prosecutors examining pressured ukrainian authorities t T investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0264 Though you do not know you assume prosecutors are examining did whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0265 Whom do though you do not k N assume prosecutors are examining whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities t T investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0266 Though you do not know you what are assume prosecutors examining whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities t T investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0267 Though you do not know you assume prosecutors are examining what whether obama - administration agencies p J t T investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0268 Though you do not know you assume prosecutors are examining whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities t N investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0269 Though you do not know you assume prosecutors are examining whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities t T what you you N N N s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0270 Though you do not know you assume prosecutors are examining whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities t what J ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0271 Though you do not know you assume prosecutors are examining whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities whose investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham ["Q-0272 Who do not know you assume prosecutors are examining whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities t T investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham ["Q-0273 Who are examining whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities t T investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Obama-administration agencies ["Q-0274 Who pressured ukrainian authorities t T investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0275 Though you do not know you assume prosecutors are examining t how much did whether obama - administration agencies pressured ukrainian authorities investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation ["Q-0276 Though you do not know you assume prosecutors are examining whether obama - administration agencies pressured how much ukrainian authorities t N investigate Paul Manafort Trump \u2019 s former campaign chairman ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0277 ]
Obama administration ["Q-0278 If so Biden \u2019 s capacity to extort of whom Kyiv into firing a prosecutor firing probative s influence over ukrainian law - enforcement ?"] "
a prosecutor ["Q-0279 If so Biden \u2019 s capacity to extort what Kyiv into firing firing would be probative of the Obama administration \u2019 s influence over ukrainian law - enforcement ?"] "
probative ["Q-0280 If so Biden \u2019 s capacity to extort Kyiv into firing a prosecutor would be what J over ukrainian law - enforcement ?"] "
Biden\u2019s capacity to extort Kyiv into firing a prosecutor ["Q-0281 Who firing \u2019 s c N probative of the Obama administration \u2019 s influence over ukrainian law - enforcement ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0282 ]
conspiracy prosecutions.5\. Investigating Hunter Biden and Burisma corruption ["Q-0283 In what is that kind of evidence routinely admitted ?"] "
routinely admitted in conspiracy prosecutions.5\. Investigating Hunter Biden and Burisma corruption ["Q-0284 What is that kind of evidence in conspiracy prosecutions ?"] "
Hunter Biden ["Q-0285 Who is routinely admitted in conspiracy prosecutions ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0286 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0287 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0288 ]
president\u2019s pressure ["Q-0289 More problematic is for what pressure of potential corruption in Hunter Biden \u2019 s relationship with Burisma and in Joe Biden \u2019 s motive to push for the prosecutor \u2019 s firing ?"] "
president\u2019s ["Q-0290 More problematic is of what pressure for a ukrainian investigation in Hunter Biden \u2019 s relationship with Burisma and in Joe Biden \u2019 s motive to push for the prosecutor \u2019 s firing ?"] "
president\u2019s ["Q-0291 More problematic is in what pressure for a ukrainian investigation of potential corruption s relationship with Burisma and in Joe Biden \u2019 s motive to push for the prosecutor \u2019 s firing ?"] "
president\u2019s ["Q-0292 More problematic is with whom pressure for a ukrainian investigation of potential corruption in Hunter Biden \u2019 s relationship and in Joe Biden \u2019 s motive to push for the prosecutor \u2019 s firing ?"] "
potential corruption ["Q-0293 More problematic is the president \u2019 s pressure for a ukrainian investigation of in what relationship with Burisma and s motive to push for the prosecutor \u2019 s firing ?"] "
prosecutor\u2019s firing ["Q-0294 More problematic is the president \u2019 s pressure for a ukrainian investigation of potential corruption in Hunter Biden \u2019 s for what motive to push ?"] "
the president\u2019s pressure ["Q-0295 More problematic is what J for a ukrainian investigation of potential corruption in Hunter Biden \u2019 s relationship with Burisma and in Joe Biden \u2019 s motive to push for the prosecutor \u2019 s firing ?"] "
potential corruption in Hunter Biden\u2019s relationship ["Q-0296 More problematic is the president \u2019 s pressure for a ukrainian investigation of what N with Burisma and in Joe Biden \u2019 s motive to push for the prosecutor \u2019 s firing ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0297 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0298 ]
an ongoing U.S. investigation ["Q-0299 In what did since the president was apparently not requesting assistance ?"] "
not requesting assistance in an ongoing U.S. investigation it is reasonable to deduce that he was primarily hoping for information -- and potentially a Ukrainian prosecution ["Q-0300 What did since the president was in an ongoing u ?"] "
the president ["Q-0301 Who was apparently not requesting assistance in an ongoing u ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0302 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0303 ]
Barr/Durham ["Q-0304 That whom is investigation it reasonable to deduce was primarily hoping for information -- and potentially a ukrainian prosecution -- that might help his 2020 campaign in the event the democrats nominate Biden to run against him ?"] "
information -- ["Q-0305 Investigation it is reasonable to deduce for what did that he was primarily hoping -- and potentially a ukrainian prosecution -- that might help his 2020 campaign in the event the democrats nominate Biden to run against him ?"] "
an ongoing U.S. investigation ["Q-0306 Investigation it is reasonable to deduce in what did that he was primarily hoping for information -- and potentially a ukrainian prosecution -- that might help his 2020 campaign democrats nominate Biden to run against him ?"] "
him ["Q-0307 Investigation it is reasonable to deduce against whom did that he was primarily hoping for information -- and potentially a ukrainian prosecution -- that might help his 2020 campaign in the event the democrats nominate Biden to run ?"] "
primarily hoping ["Q-0308 Investigation it is reasonable to deduce what did that he was for information -- and potentially a ukrainian prosecution -- that might help his 2020 campaign in the event the democrats nominate Biden to run against him ?"] "
2020 campaign ["Q-0309 Investigation it is reasonable to deduce what did that he was primarily hoping for information -- and potentially a ukrainian prosecution -- that might help in the event the democrats nominate Biden to run against him ?"] "
Biden ["Q-0310 Investigation it is reasonable to deduce whom did that he was primarily hoping for information -- and potentially a ukrainian prosecution -- that might help his 2020 campaign in the event the democrats n J to run against him ?"] "
ongoing U.S. investigation ["Q-0311 Who is reasonable to deduce that he was primarily hoping for information -- and potentially a ukrainian prosecution -- that might help his 2020 campaign in the event the democrats nominate Biden to run against him ?"] "
the president ["Q-0312 Who was primarily hoping for information -- and potentially a ukrainian prosecution -- that might help his 2020 campaign in the event the democrats nominate Biden to run against him ?"] "
not requesting assistance ["Q-0313 Investigation it is reasonable to deduce how much did that he was primarily hoping for information -- and potentially a ukrainian prosecution -- that might help his campaign in the event the democrats nominate Biden to run against him ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0314 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0315 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0316 ]
U.S. ["Q-0317 Of what national interest in asking asking another country to investigate one \u2019 s own companies for violations of its own laws ?"] "
violations ["Q-0318 National interest in asking another country to investigate one for what of that country \u2019 s own companies of its own laws ?"] "
Ukraine\u2019s well-being like their newfound angst over the geopolitical challenge posed by Russia is political posturing.3\. Assistance to U.S. investigations. Most of the assistance the president sought from Ukraine was unobjectionable. It is common for presidents to ask their foreign counterparts to assist Justice Department investigations. House Democrats will not acknowledge this because they seek to delegitimize the Barr/Durham probe as a Trump 2020 campaign initiative; but it is not.To be sure it is irregular for a president to seek a foreign government\u2019s investigative assistance absent a request from the attorney general. Reportedly AG Barr did not ask the president to intercede with Ukraine. Though not unlawful it was unwise for the president to do so unilaterally. With Democrats already disparaging the Barr/Durham investigation (soon it may even achieve \u201cwitch hunt\u201d status) the president has just given them more ammunition to argue that the probe is po , little U.S. " ["Q-0320 What national interest in asking asking to investigate one of that country \u2019 s own companies for violations of its own laws ?"] "
U.S. ["Q-0321 What national interest in asking asking another country to investigate of that country \u2019 s own companies for violations of its own laws ?"] "
Ukraine. It was not improper for Trump to seek information about Joe Biden\u2019s squeezing of Kyiv to fire the prosecutor. That could plainly be relevant to the Barr/Durham investigation. Though we do not know we assume prosecutors are examining whether Obama-administration agencies pressured Ukrainian authorities to investigate Paul Manafort Trump\u2019s former campaign chairman. If so Biden\u2019s capacity to extort Kyiv into firing a prosecutor would be probative of the Obama administration\u2019s influence over Ukrainian law-enforcement. That kind of evidence is routinely admitted in conspiracy prosecutions.5\. Investigating Hunter Biden and Burisma corruption. More problematic is the president\u2019s pressure for a Ukrainian investigation of potential corruption in Hunter Biden\u2019s relationship with Burisma and in Joe Biden\u2019s motive to push for the prosecutor\u2019s firing.There is no known Justice Department corruption investigation of the Bidens. Since the presi , AG Barr " ["Q-0323 Who asking another country to investigate one of that country \u2019 s own companies for violations of its own laws ?"] "
Joe Biden ["Q-0324 Who \u2019 s own companies for violations of its own laws ?"] "
little U.S. ["Q-0325 How much national interest in asking asking another country to investigate of that country \u2019 s own companies for violations of its own laws ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0326 ]
foreign governments ["Q-0327 Generally by what speaking moreover you speaking the United states government to protect american citizens from potentially aggressive or arbitrary treatment ?"] "
violations of its own laws ["Q-0328 Generally what speaking moreover you speaking states government to protect american citizens from potentially aggressive or arbitrary treatment by foreign governments ?"] "
violations of its own laws ["Q-0329 Generally what speaking moreover you speaking the United states government to p J from potentially aggressive or arbitrary treatment by foreign governments ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0330 ]
political rivals ["Q-0331 Like Paul Manafort Hunter and Joe Biden are your citizens -- even if their to what political rivals in their zeal seem to forget such things from time ?"] "
potentially aggressive or arbitrary treatment by foreign governments ["Q-0332 If what are like Paul Manafort Hunter and Joe Biden your citizens -- even political rivals in their zeal seem to forget such things from time to time ?"] "
in their zeal ["Q-0333 In what are like Paul Manafort Hunter and Joe Biden your citizens -- even if their political rivals seem to forget such things from time to time ?"] "
political rivals ["Q-0334 Like Paul Manafort Hunter and Joe Biden are your citizens -- even if their from what political rivals in their zeal seem to forget such things to time ?"] "
our citizens ["Q-0335 What are like Paul Manafort Hunter and Joe Biden -- even if their political rivals in their zeal seem to forget such things from time to time ?"] "
American citizens from potentially aggressive or arbitrary treatment by foreign governments. Like Paul Manafort Hunter and Joe Biden are our citizens -- even if their political rivals ["Q-0336 Like Paul Manafort Hunter and Joe Biden are your citizens -- even if their what political rivals in their zeal seem to forget from time to time ?"] "
their ["Q-0337 Like Paul Manafort Hunter and Joe Biden are your citizens -- even if their political rivals in whose zeal seem to forget such things from time to time ?"] "
Paul Manafort Hunter ["Q-0338 Who are your citizens -- even if their political rivals in their zeal seem to forget such things from time to time ?"] "
Paul Manafort Hunter and Joe Biden ["Q-0339 Who seem to forget such things from time to time ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0340 ]
tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0341 That is why did it was so wrong for President Trump suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive t T do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0342 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t T suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China allowing no motive do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0343 That is why for what did it was so wrong t T suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive t T do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0344 That is why did it was so wrong for President Trump suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive t T do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
Communist China ["Q-0345 That is why it was so where T suggest should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive t T do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0346 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t T suggest that where communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing would have no motive t T do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0347 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t T suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China allowing no motive do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0348 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t T suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have where do no motive t T do so does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
U.S. presidents ["Q-0349 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t T suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive t T do so from what does that China does not take marching orders ?"] "
tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0350 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t t N N N suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive t T do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
the Bidens -- ["Q-0351 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t T suggest that what Communist China should also investigate -- even allowing that China would have no motive t T do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
would have no motive ["Q-0352 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t T suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even what allowing that China allowing t T do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0353 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t T suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive t t N N N do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
marching orders from U.S. presidents ["Q-0354 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t T suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive t T do so what does that China does not take from U ?"] "
tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0355 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump whose suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive t T do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
U.S. presidents and that the president\u2019s foolish remark may have been tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0356 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t T suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive whose do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0357 That is why t how much did it was so wrong for President Trump suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive t T do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
U.S. presidents and that the president\u2019s foolish remark may have been tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0358 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t T suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even t how much allowing that China allowing no motive do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0359 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump how much t t N N N suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive t T do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
tongue-in-cheek ["Q-0360 That is why it was so wrong for President Trump t T suggest that communist China should also investigate the Bidens -- even allowing that China would have no motive how much t t N N N do so that China does not take marching orders from U ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0361 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0362 ]
president\u2019s foolish remark ["Q-0363 What J may have been tongue - in - cheek ?"] "
China ["Q-0364 Presidents and that the president \u2019 s what may foolish remark have been tongue - in - cheek ?"] "
the president\u2019s foolish remark ["Q-0365 Who may have been tongue - in - cheek ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0366 ]
policing corruption ["Q-0367 All that said in what does the president have a legitimate interest particularly potential U ?"] "
provide significant aid ["Q-0368 All what did that said does have a legitimate interest in policing corruption particularly potential U ?"] "
legitimate interest ["Q-0369 All that said what does the president have in policing corruption particularly potential U ?"] "
U.S. government corruption in countries to which we provide significant aid ["Q-0370 All that said the president does have what a legitimate interest in policing policing particularly potential U ?"] "
Paul Manafort Hunter and Joe Biden ["Q-0371 Who said the president does have a legitimate interest in policing corruption particularly potential U ?"] "
the president ["Q-0372 Who does have a legitimate interest in policing corruption particularly potential U ?"] "
the president ["Q-0373 Who policing corruption particularly potential U ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0374 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0375 ]
significant aid ["Q-0376 Government corruption in countries to which what you provide ?"] "
U.S. government corruption in countries ["Q-0377 Who provide significant aid ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0378 ]
it is fair to point out ["Q-0379 Is on that score it fair point out ( as you have done myself ) that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
it is fair to point out ["Q-0380 Is on that score it fair point out ( as you have done myself ) that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
fair to point out ["Q-0381 On that score it is as whom fair t T point out ( have done myself ) that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
Trump supporters\u2019 ["Q-0382 On that score it is fair t T point out ( where have as you done myself ) \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
the president ["Q-0383 On that score it is fair t T point out ( as you have done myself ) of what that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
a scourge of global corruption ["Q-0384 On that score it is fair t T point out ( as you have done myself ) as what that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
global corruption ["Q-0385 On that score it is fair t T point out ( as you have done myself ) of what that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge is not very convincing ?"] "
it is fair to point out ["Q-0386 On that score it is fair t t N N N point out ( as you have done myself ) that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
point out ["Q-0387 On that score it is fair t T point out ( what have as you done ) that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
depiction ["Q-0388 On that score it is fair t T point out ( as you have done myself ) what that Trump supporters \u2019 C of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
global corruption is not very convincing ["Q-0389 On that score it is fair t T point out ( as you have done myself ) that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of what is global corruption ?"] "
point ["Q-0390 On that score it is fair whose point out ( as you have done myself ) that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation (soon it may even achieve \u201cwitch hunt\u201d status) the president has just given them more ammunition to argue that the probe is politicized. This makes the prosecutors\u2019 job more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof. Nevertheless there is nothing illegal or improper in principle about a president\u2019s asking another country to assist an ongoing U.S. investigation.4\. Investigating Vice President Biden\u2019s influence over Ukraine. It was not improper for Trump to seek information about Joe Biden\u2019s squeezing of Kyiv to fire the prosecutor. That could plainly be relevant to the Barr/Durham investigation. Though we do not know we assume prosecutors are examining whether Obama-administration agencies pressured Ukrainian authorities to investigate Paul Manafort Trump\u2019s former campaign chairman. If so Biden\u , fair to point out " ["Q-0392 Who have done myself ) that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
Trump supporters ["Q-0393 Who \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
Trump supporters ["Q-0394 Who is not very convincing ?"] "
it is fair to point out ["Q-0395 T how much is on that score it fair point out ( as you have done myself ) that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
point out ["Q-0396 On that score it is fair how much t t N N N point out ( as you have done myself ) that Trump supporters \u2019 depiction of the president as a scourge of global corruption is not very convincing ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0397 ]
Trump supporters\u2019 depiction of the president ["Q-0398 He is known to overlook far worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Ukraine\u2019s ["Q-0399 Where is he known to overlook far worse corruption in seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
warmer relations ["Q-0400 In what is he known to overlook far worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
despicable regimes ["Q-0401 He is known to overlook far with what worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking seeking warmer relations -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Trump supporters\u2019 depiction of the president ["Q-0402 He is known to overlook far worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Trump supporters\u2019 depiction of the president ["Q-0403 What is he known to overlook far worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
far worse corruption ["Q-0404 What is he known to o N than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
warmer relations ["Q-0405 He is known to overlook far what worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking seeking with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Trump supporters\u2019 depiction of the president ["Q-0406 He is known to overlook far worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a a D D D Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Trump supporters\u2019 depiction of the president ["Q-0407 He is known to overlook far worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey whose Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Trump supporters ["Q-0408 Who is known to overlook far worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Ukraine\u2019s ["Q-0409 Who seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey a C Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Trump supporters\u2019 depiction of the president ["Q-0410 He is known to overlook far a how much worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Trump supporters\u2019 depiction of the president ["Q-0411 He is known to overlook far worse corruption than Ukraine \u2019 s in seeking warmer relations with despicable regimes -- Russia China North Korea Turkey how much a a D D D Saudi Arabia spring to mind ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0412 ]
the need ["Q-0413 Nevertheless on what did the president campaigned for the United states to stop bearing the financial burden of other countries \u2019 security challenges particularly Europe \u2019 s ?"] "
warmer relations with despicable regimes ["Q-0414 Nevertheless for what did the president campaigned on the need states to stop bearing the financial burden of other countries \u2019 security challenges particularly Europe \u2019 s ?"] "
warmer relations with despicable regimes ["Q-0415 Nevertheless of what did the president campaigned on the need for the United states to stop bearing the financial burden \u2019 security challenges particularly Europe \u2019 s ?"] "
financial burden ["Q-0416 Nevertheless what did the president campaigned on the need for the United states to stop bearing of other countries \u2019 security challenges particularly Europe \u2019 s ?"] "
Russia China North Korea Turkey ["Q-0417 Nevertheless the president campaigned on the need for the United states to stop bearing the financial burden of what other countries \u2019 J particularly Europe \u2019 s ?"] "
the president ["Q-0418 Who campaigned on the need for the United states to stop bearing the financial burden of other countries \u2019 security challenges particularly Europe \u2019 s ?"] "
Russia China North Korea Turkey ["Q-0419 Who \u2019 security challenges particularly Europe \u2019 s ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0420 ]
this kind of foreign aid ["Q-0421 Against what is since he predisposed of foreign aid it is logical for him to demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it ?"] "
foreign aid ["Q-0422 Of what is since he predisposed against this kind is logical for him to demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it ?"] "
United States ["Q-0423 Since he is predisposed against this kind of for whom is foreign aid it logical to demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it ?"] "
corruption ["Q-0424 Since he is predisposed against this kind of of what is foreign aid it logical for him to demand some policing in the countries getting it ?"] "
the countries ["Q-0425 Since he is predisposed against this kind of in what is foreign aid it logical for him to demand some policing of corruption ?"] "
Europe\u2019s. Since he is predisposed against this kind of foreign aid it is logical for him to demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it. You may think his position on this is shortsighted but being wrong on policy is not an abuse of power ["Q-0426 What is since he predisposed against this kind of foreign aid it is logical for him to demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it ?"] "
demand some policing of corruption ["Q-0427 Since he is predisposed against this kind of what is foreign aid it logical for him to d N of corruption in the countries getting it ?"] "
some ["Q-0428 Since he is predisposed against this kind of foreign aid it is logical for him to demand whom some policing of corruption in the countries getting getting ?"] "
Trump supporters ["Q-0429 Who is predisposed against this kind of foreign aid it is logical for him to demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it ?"] "
foreign aid ["Q-0430 Who is logical for him to demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it ?"] "
Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman two Giuliani associates ["Q-0431 Who getting it ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0432 ]
demand some policing of corruption in the countries getting it. You may think his position on this is shortsighted but being wrong on policy is not an abuse of power. If you think his anticorruption stance was just a pretext for hurting Biden you may be right but it\u2019s not a baseless pretext ["Q-0433 On what may i think his position is shortsighted but being wrong on policy is not an abuse of power ?"] "
policy ["Q-0434 You may think his position on this is on what did shortsighted but being shortsighted wrong is not an abuse of power ?"] "
power ["Q-0435 You may think his position on this is shortsighted but being of what is wrong on policy not an abuse ?"] "
his position ["Q-0436 What may i think on this is shortsighted but being wrong on policy is not an abuse of power ?"] "
abuse of power ["Q-0437 You may think his position on this is shortsighted but being what is wrong on policy of power ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0438 ]
hurting Biden ["Q-0439 If me think for whom did his anticorruption stance was just a pretext may be right but it \u2019 s not a baseless pretext ?"] "
his anticorruption stance ["Q-0440 What if me think was just a pretext for hurting Biden i may be right but it \u2019 s not a baseless pretext ?"] "
\u2019s not a baseless pretext ["Q-0441 If me think what did his anticorruption stance was for hurting Biden i may be right but it \u2019 s not a baseless pretext ?"] "
Biden ["Q-0442 If me think his anticorruption stance was just whom a pretext for hurting hurting may be right but it \u2019 s not a baseless pretext ?"] "
baseless pretext ["Q-0443 If me think his anticorruption stance was just a pretext for hurting Biden i may be right what but it \u2019 s N ?"] "
If you think his anticorruption stance ["Q-0444 If me think whose anticorruption stance was just a pretext for hurting Biden i may be right but it \u2019 s not a baseless pretext ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0445 ]
whole cloth ["Q-0446 In any event it is not out what did like President Trump concocted the Biden self - dealing scenario ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0447 What is in any event it concocted the Biden self - dealing scenario out of whole cloth ?"] "
Biden self-dealing scenario ["Q-0448 In any event it is not whom did like President Trump concocted out of whole cloth ?"] "
a baseless pretext ["Q-0449 Who is not like President Trump concocted the Biden self - dealing scenario out of whole cloth ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0450 Who concocted the Biden self - dealing scenario out of whole cloth ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0451 ]
Obama-era ["Q-0452 ]
our government ["Q-0453 ( in what are Note that Obama supporters wo nt to say that there was no impropriety s prodding of Ukraine to investigate Manafort because there was plenty of corruption evidence ?"] "
no impropriety ["Q-0454 ( note that Obama supporters are wo nt to say that there was where s no impropriety in the administration \u2019 prodding to investigate Manafort because there was plenty of corruption evidence ?"] "
corruption evidence ["Q-0455 ( note that Obama supporters are wo nt to say that there was of what s no impropriety in the administration \u2019 prodding of Ukraine to investigate Manafort because there was plenty ?"] "
no impropriety ["Q-0456 ( what are Note that Obama supporters wo nt to say that there was in the administration \u2019 s prodding of Ukraine to investigate Manafort because there was plenty of corruption evidence ?"] "
no impropriety ["Q-0457 ( note that Obama supporters are wo nt to say that there was what N of Ukraine to investigate Manafort because there was plenty of corruption evidence ?"] "
Manafort ["Q-0458 ( note that Obama supporters are wo nt to say that there was what s no impropriety in the administration \u2019 prodding of Ukraine to you N because there was plenty of corruption evidence ?"] "
our government ["Q-0459 ( note that Obama supporters are wo nt to say that there was what s no impropriety in the administration \u2019 prodding of Ukraine to investigate Manafort because there was of corruption evidence ?"] "
Obama supporters ["Q-0460 Who are wo nt to say that there was no impropriety in the administration \u2019 s prodding of Ukraine to investigate Manafort because there was plenty of corruption evidence ?"] "
Obama supporters ["Q-0461 Who s prodding of Ukraine to investigate Manafort because there was plenty of corruption evidence ?"] "
impeachment.2\. ["Q-0462 ]
Ukraine ["Q-0463 ) moreover where is it not clear will actually renew investigative interest in Burisma much less that the Bidens will be affected ?"] "
Burisma ["Q-0464 ) moreover it is not in whom clear that Ukraine will actually renew investigative interest much less that the Bidens will be affected ?"] "
corruption evidence ["Q-0465 ) moreover it is not that whom clear that Ukraine will actually renew investigative interest in Burisma much less will be affected ?"] "
renew investigative interest ["Q-0466 ) moreover it is not what clear that Ukraine will actually r R in Burisma much less that the Bidens will be affected ?"] "
less ["Q-0467 ) moreover it is not clear that Ukraine will actually renew investigative interest in Burisma much what will that the Bidens be affected ?"] "
Obama supporters ["Q-0468 Who is not clear that Ukraine will actually renew investigative interest in Burisma much less that the Bidens will be affected ?"] "
Ukraine ["Q-0469 Who will actually renew investigative interest in Burisma much less that the Bidens will be affected ?"] "
the Bidens ["Q-0470 Who will be affected ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0471 ]
president ["Q-0472 For what did Bottom line it was inappropriate to point the ukrainians specifically and explicitly at the Bidens ?"] "
the Bidens ["Q-0473 At what did Bottom line it was inappropriate for the president to point the ukrainians specifically and explicitly ?"] "
president to point the Ukrainians ["Q-0474 Bottom line it was inappropriate for the what p p N N to p N ukrainians specifically and explicitly at the Bidens ?"] "
Bottom line ["Q-0475 Who was inappropriate for the president to point the ukrainians specifically and explicitly at the Bidens ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0476 ]
We want ["Q-0477 A more polished president would simply have said whom \u201c you w N to root out corruption no matter how high up it goes even in your own government \u201d -- the ukrainians would have gotten the point and there would be nothing to criticize ?"] "
root out corruption no matter ["Q-0478 A more polished president would simply have said what \u201c you want i to r N how high up it goes even in your own government \u201d -- the ukrainians would have gotten the point and there would be nothing to criticize ?"] "
the point ["Q-0479 A more polished president would simply have said \u201c you want i to root out corruption no matter how what does high up it goes even in your own government \u201d -- the ukrainians would have gotten and there would be nothing to criticize ?"] "
nothing ["Q-0480 A more polished president would simply have said \u201c you want i to root out corruption no matter how what does high up it goes even in your own government \u201d -- the ukrainians would have gotten the point and there would be to criticize ?"] "
A more polished president ["Q-0481 Who would simply have said \u201c you want i to root out corruption no matter how high up it goes even in your own government \u201d -- the ukrainians would have gotten the point and there would be nothing to criticize ?"] "
A more polished president ["Q-0482 Who want i to root out corruption no matter how high up it goes even in your own government \u201d -- the ukrainians would have gotten the point and there would be nothing to criticize ?"] "
A more polished president ["Q-0483 Who goes even in your own government \u201d -- the ukrainians would have gotten the point and there would be nothing to criticize ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0484 ]
Commendable ["Q-0485 About whom did Trump went crudely ?"] "
Trump ["Q-0486 Who went about it crudely ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0487 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0488 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0489 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0490 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0491 ]
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0492 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0493 ]
my boss ["Q-0494 Who have respect and affection ) ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0495 ]
These concerns are also shared by many Trump-administration officials ["Q-0496 Are these concerns also shared and not just because it diminishes their roles ?"] "
Rudy Giuliani the president\u2019s private lawyer ["Q-0497 Because whom are these concerns also shared by many trump - administration officials and not just diminishes their roles ?"] "
concerns center on Rudy Giuliani the president\u2019s private lawyer ["Q-0498 What are these concerns by many trump - administration officials and not just because it diminishes their roles ?"] "
because it diminishes their roles ["Q-0499 These concerns are also shared by many trump - administration officials and not just what because it d N ?"] "
private lawyer ["Q-0500 Who are also shared by many trump - administration officials and not just because it diminishes their roles ?"] "
Trump-administration officials ["Q-0501 Who diminishes their roles ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0502 ]
the emissary ["Q-0503 If what can a so - called shadow State Department cause disruption especially is wearing two hats as Rudy was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-0504 A so - called shadow State Department can cause disruption especially as whom is if the emissary wearing two hats was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
private lawyer ["Q-0505 A so - called shadow State Department can cause disruption especially if the emissary is wearing two hats as Rudy was ( 1 ) of what private lawyer helping helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
private lawyer ["Q-0506 A so - called shadow State Department can cause disruption especially if the emissary is wearing two hats as Rudy was ( 1 ) for what private lawyer helping helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
top Ukrainian officials ["Q-0507 A so - called shadow State Department can cause disruption especially if the emissary is wearing two hats as Rudy was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) with what designee of the president for dealing dealing ?"] "
disruption ["Q-0508 What can a so - called shadow State Department cause especially if the emissary is wearing two hats as Rudy was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
two hats ["Q-0509 A so - called shadow State Department can cause disruption especially what is if the emissary wearing as Rudy was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
so-called shadow State Department can cause disruption especially if the emissary is wearing two hats as Rudy was (1) private lawyer ["Q-0510 A so - called shadow State Department can cause disruption especially if the emissary is wearing two hats as Rudy was ( 1 ) what private lawyer helping helping and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
A so-called shadow State Department ["Q-0511 Who can cause disruption especially if the emissary is wearing two hats as Rudy was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
the emissary ["Q-0512 Who is wearing two hats as Rudy was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-0513 Who was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-0514 Who helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-0515 Who dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
two ["Q-0516 A so - called shadow State Department can cause disruption especially how much is if the emissary wearing hats as Rudy was ( 1 ) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign ; and ( 2 ) designee of the president for dealing with top ukrainian officials ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0517 ]
Rudy ["Q-0518 As whom can such arrangements undermine government officials attempt to carry out what they understand to be administration policy ?"] "
government officials ["Q-0519 What can such arrangements undermine as they attempt to carry out what they understand to be administration policy ?"] "
administration policy ["Q-0520 Such arrangements can undermine government officials as they attempt to carry out what what they understand to be ?"] "
Rudy was (1) private lawyer helping the president and his campaign; and (2) designee of the president for dealing with top Ukrainian officials ["Q-0521 Who can undermine government officials as they attempt to carry out what they understand to be administration policy ?"] "
government officials ["Q-0522 Who attempt to carry out what they understand to be administration policy ?"] "
government officials ["Q-0523 Who understand to be administration policy ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0524 ]
Taylor\u2019s testimony ["Q-0525 How much e N \u2019 describes the government \u2019 s regular foreign - policy channel ( the National Security Council State and Defense Departments etc ?"] "
Taylor\u2019s testimony for example describes the government\u2019s regular foreign-policy channel (the National Security Council State and Defense Departments ["Q-0526 Taylor \u2019 s testimony for e e N N N describes the government \u2019 s regular foreign - policy channel ( the National Security Council State and Defense Departments etc ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-0527 Taylor \u2019 s testimony for what e e N N N d you s regular foreign - policy channel ( the National Security Council State and Defense Departments etc ?"] "
the government\u2019s regular foreign-policy channel ["Q-0528 Taylor \u2019 s testimony for e N describes what J ( the National Security Council State and Defense Departments etc ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-0529 Taylor \u2019 s testimony for whose describes the government \u2019 s regular foreign - policy channel ( the National Security Council State and Defense Departments etc ?"] "
Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman ["Q-0530 Who etc ?"] "
two hats ["Q-0531 Taylor \u2019 s testimony for how much e e N N N describes the government \u2019 s regular foreign - policy channel ( the National Security Council State and Defense Departments etc ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0532 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0533 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0534 ]
the 2016 election and the Bidens ["Q-0535 Agenda for Kyiv security economic stability anti - corruption ; while simultaneously the \u201c irregular \u201d channel focused to what on assistance in investigations pertaining pertaining and the Bidens ?"] "
assistance ["Q-0536 Agenda for Kyiv security economic stability anti - corruption ; while simultaneously the \u201c on what did irregular \u201d channel focused in investigations pertaining to the 2016 election and the Bidens ?"] "
investigations ["Q-0537 Agenda for Kyiv security economic stability anti - corruption ; while simultaneously the \u201c in what did irregular \u201d channel focused on assistance to the 2016 election and the Bidens ?"] "
irregular\u201d channel ["Q-0538 Who focused on assistance in investigations pertaining to the 2016 election and the Bidens ?"] "
assistance in investigations ["Q-0539 Who pertaining to the 2016 election and the Bidens ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0540 ]
presidents ["Q-0541 That what is yet it simply a fact occasionally deploy influential non - government officials as their envoys ?"] "
their envoys ["Q-0542 Yet it is simply as what a fact that presidents occasionally deploy influential non - government officials ?"] "
the Bidens ["Q-0543 What is yet it that presidents occasionally deploy influential non - government officials as their envoys ?"] "
irregular\u201d channel focused on assistance in investigations pertaining to the 2016 election and the Bidens.Yet it is simply a fact that presidents occasionally deploy influential non-government officials ["Q-0544 Yet it is simply what a fact that presidents occasionally d J as their envoys ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-0545 Who is simply a fact that presidents occasionally deploy influential non - government officials as their envoys ?"] "
presidents ["Q-0546 Who occasionally deploy influential non - government officials as their envoys ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0547 ]
bad ["Q-0548 Far from being a uniformly in what bad practice it can further american interests foreign relations can often be ?"] "
uniformly bad practice ["Q-0549 Far what from being being can further american interests in the cloak - and - dagger realm foreign relations can often be ?"] "
further American interests ["Q-0550 Far from being a uniformly what bad practice it can in the cloak - and - dagger realm foreign relations can often be ?"] "
envoys ["Q-0551 Who being a uniformly bad practice it can further american interests in the cloak - and - dagger realm foreign relations can often be ?"] "
uniformly bad practice ["Q-0552 Who can further american interests in the cloak - and - dagger realm foreign relations can often be ?"] "
foreign relations ["Q-0553 Who can often be ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0554 ]
the Obama administration ["Q-0555 That whom is it also a fact colluded with elements of the bureaucracy -- particularly the law - enforcement intelligence and diplomatic agencies -- to undermine Trump \u2019 s campaign and presidency ?"] "
elements ["Q-0556 It is also with what did a fact that the Obama administration colluded of the bureaucracy -- particularly the law - enforcement intelligence and diplomatic agencies -- to undermine Trump \u2019 s campaign and presidency ?"] "
bureaucracy ["Q-0557 It is also of what did a fact that the Obama administration colluded with elements -- particularly the law - enforcement intelligence and diplomatic agencies -- to undermine Trump \u2019 s campaign and presidency ?"] "
uniformly bad practice it can further American interests in the cloak-and-dagger realm foreign relations ["Q-0558 What is it that the Obama administration colluded with elements of the bureaucracy -- particularly the law - enforcement intelligence and diplomatic agencies -- to undermine Trump \u2019 s campaign and presidency ?"] "
Trump\u2019s campaign and presidency ["Q-0559 It is also whom did a fact that the Obama administration colluded with elements of the bureaucracy -- particularly the law - enforcement intelligence and diplomatic agencies -- to u J and presidency ?"] "
Rudy ["Q-0560 Who is also a fact that the Obama administration colluded with elements of the bureaucracy -- particularly the law - enforcement intelligence and diplomatic agencies -- to undermine Trump \u2019 s campaign and presidency ?"] "
Obama administration ["Q-0561 Who colluded with elements of the bureaucracy -- particularly the law - enforcement intelligence and diplomatic agencies -- to undermine Trump \u2019 s campaign and presidency ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0562 ]
toxicity ["Q-0563 To what has the president contributed but let \u2019 s not pretend that the progressive governing establishment \u2019 s insubordinate machinations have not occurred ?"] "
progressive governing establishment\u2019s insubordinate machinations ["Q-0564 The president has contributed to the toxicity but let that what not pretend have not occurred ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0565 ]
him ["Q-0566 Against whom does if President Trump believes the unaccountable federal bureaucracy works because it thinks it knows better that is not merely a figment of his admittedly active imagination ?"] "
toxicity ["Q-0567 Because whom does if President Trump believes the unaccountable federal bureaucracy works against him thinks it knows better that is not merely a figment of his admittedly active imagination ?"] "
toxicity ["Q-0568 If President Trump believes the unaccountable federal bureaucracy works against him because it thinks of what it knows better that is not merely a figment admittedly active imagination ?"] "
unaccountable federal bureaucracy works ["Q-0569 What does if President Trump believes against him because it thinks it knows better that is not merely a figment of his admittedly active imagination ?"] "
toxicity ["Q-0570 If President Trump believes whom the unaccountable federal bureaucracy works against him because it t N knows better that is not merely a figment of his admittedly active imagination ?"] "
a figment ["Q-0571 If President Trump believes the unaccountable federal bureaucracy works against him because it thinks it knows what is better that of his admittedly active imagination ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0572 Who believes the unaccountable federal bureaucracy works against him because it thinks it knows better that is not merely a figment of his admittedly active imagination ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0573 Who thinks it knows better that is not merely a figment of his admittedly active imagination ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0574 Who knows better that is not merely a figment of his admittedly active imagination ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0575 ]
envoys ["Q-0576 While there is no legal bar to as what using the president \u2019 s using trusted outside advisers is obviously fair to ask whether the Giuliani deployment has done more harm than good ?"] "
the Giuliani deployment ["Q-0577 While there is no legal bar to the president \u2019 s using trusted whether whom is outside advisers as envoys it obviously fair to ask has done more harm than good ?"] "
outside advisers ["Q-0578 While there is no legal bar to what using the president \u2019 s using trusted as envoys it is obviously fair to ask whether the Giuliani deployment has done more harm than good ?"] "
more harm ["Q-0579 While there is no legal bar to the president \u2019 s using trusted outside advisers as envoys it is obviously fair to ask what has whether the Giuliani deployment done than good ?"] "
no legal bar to the president\u2019s ["Q-0580 Who using trusted outside advisers as envoys it is obviously fair to ask whether the Giuliani deployment has done more harm than good ?"] "
envoys ["Q-0581 Who is obviously fair to ask whether the Giuliani deployment has done more harm than good ?"] "
Giuliani deployment ["Q-0582 Who has done more harm than good ?"] "
The Shadow State Department ["Q-0583 ]
indictment ["Q-0584 Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman two Giuliani associates who helped under what are Rudy research the activities of the Bidens in Ukraine now ?"] "
Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman two Giuliani associates who helped Rudy research the activities of the Bidens in Ukraine ["Q-0585 Who are now under indictment ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0586 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0587 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0588 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0589 ]
Ambassador Yovanovitch\u2019s removal ["Q-0590 For what are Parnas and Fruman alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push -- including by inducing then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
inducing ["Q-0591 By what are Parnas and Fruman alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch \u2019 s removal -- including then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
Parnas and Fruman are alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch\u2019s removal -- including by inducing then\u2013Representative Pete Sessions (R. Texas ["Q-0592 What are Parnas and Fruman alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch \u2019 s removal -- including by inducing then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
illegal campaign contributions ["Q-0593 What are Parnas and Fruman alleged to have made to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch \u2019 s removal -- including by inducing then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
political ["Q-0594 What are Parnas and Fruman alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch \u2019 s removal -- including by inducing then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
Parnas and Fruman are alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch\u2019s removal -- including by inducing then\u2013Representative Pete Sessions (R. Texas ["Q-0595 What are Parnas and Fruman alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch \u2019 s removal -- including by inducing then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
Representative Pete Sessions (R. Texas ["Q-0596 Parnas and Fruman are alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch \u2019 s removal -- what including by inducing including ( R ?"] "
Parnas and Fruman ["Q-0597 Who are alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch \u2019 s removal -- including by inducing then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
Lev Parnas ["Q-0598 Who including to h V then \u2013 representative Pete Sessions ( R ?"] "
The Shadow State Department ["Q-0599 ]
Representative Pete Sessions ["Q-0600 Texas ) to write that what the president a letter urging urging be fired for exhibiting anti - trump bias ?"] "
Representative Pete Sessions ["Q-0601 Texas ) to write for what the president a letter urging that the ambassador urging anti - trump bias ?"] "
Representative Pete Sessions ["Q-0602 Texas ) to write what the president a letter urging that the ambassador urging for exhibiting anti - trump bias ?"] "
anti-Trump bias ["Q-0603 Texas ) to write the president a letter urging that the ambassador be fired what for exhibiting exhibiting ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0604 ]
the president ["Q-0605 ( you note that Yovanovitch vigorously denies to what did that she was \u201c disloyal \u201d and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
Yovanovitch ["Q-0606 ( that whom you note vigorously denies that she was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
Marie Yovanovitch ["Q-0607 ( you note that whom that yovanovitch vigorously denies was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
anti-Trump bias ["Q-0608 ( you note that Yovanovitch vigorously denies that what did that she was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
her ["Q-0609 ( you note that Yovanovitch vigorously denies against what did that she was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
American anti-corruption efforts ["Q-0610 ( you note that Yovanovitch vigorously denies did that she was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged in Ukraine ?"] "
Ukraine ["Q-0611 ( you note that Yovanovitch vigorously denies where did that she was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts ?"] "
disloyal ["Q-0612 ( you note that Yovanovitch vigorously denies what did that she was to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
anti-Trump bias ["Q-0613 ( you note that Yovanovitch vigorously denies what did that she was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman two Giuliani associates who helped Rudy research the activities of the Bidens in Ukraine are now under indictment. That case (brought by the Trump Justice Department in the Southern District of New York) includes a successful scheme to persuade the president to remove Marie Yovanovitch the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. Parnas and Fruman are alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch\u2019s removal -- including by inducing then\u2013Representative Pete Sessions ["Q-0614 Who note that Yovanovitch vigorously denies that she was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
Yovanovitch ["Q-0615 Who vigorously denies that she was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
Yovanovitch ["Q-0616 Who was \u201c disloyal \u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by american anti - corruption efforts in Ukraine ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0617 ]
the urging ["Q-0618 ) parnas at what were and Fruman allegedly acting of a ukrainian government official who has been identified in press reporting as Yuriy Lutsenko ?"] "
Ukrainian government official ["Q-0619 ) parnas and Fruman were allegedly of what acting at the urging acting who has been identified in press reporting as Yuriy Lutsenko ?"] "
press ["Q-0620 ) parnas and Fruman were allegedly acting at the urging of a ukrainian government official who has in what been been identified identified as Yuriy Lutsenko ?"] "
Yuriy Lutsenko ["Q-0621 ) parnas and Fruman were allegedly acting at the urging of a ukrainian government official who has as what been been identified identified in press reporting ?"] "
Parnas ["Q-0622 ) parnas what were and Fruman at the urging of a ukrainian government official who has been identified in press reporting as Yuriy Lutsenko ?"] "
Parnas and Fruman were allegedly acting at the urging of a Ukrainian government official who has been identified in press reporting as Yuriy Lutsenko. He is a former Ukrainian prosecutor who is said to have given Giuliani ["Q-0623 ) parnas and Fruman were allegedly acting at the urging of a ukrainian government official who has what been been identified identified in press reporting as Yuriy Lutsenko ?"] "
Parnas and Fruman ["Q-0624 Who were allegedly acting at the urging of a ukrainian government official who has been identified in press reporting as Yuriy Lutsenko ?"] "
Ukrainian government official ["Q-0625 Who been identified in press reporting as Yuriy Lutsenko ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0626 ]
the Bidens ["Q-0627 About whom is he a former ukrainian prosecutor who is said to have given Giuliani extensive information ?"] "
Ukrainian prosecutor ["Q-0628 What is he who is said to have given Giuliani extensive information about the Bidens ?"] "
Giuliani ["Q-0629 Whom is he a former ukrainian prosecutor who is said to have given extensive information about the Bidens ?"] "
Yuriy Lutsenko ["Q-0630 Who is a former ukrainian prosecutor who is said to have given Giuliani extensive information about the Bidens ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0631 ]
the Bidens ["Q-0632 ( Lutsenko reportedly says if whom not break any ukrainian laws -- which is noteworthy even is far from an endorsement of their influence peddling ?"] "
an endorsement of their influence peddling.)Constitutionally ["Q-0633 ( Lutsenko reportedly says the Bidens did not break any ukrainian laws -- which is noteworthy even from what is if it far of their influence peddling ?"] "
their influence peddling.)Constitutionally ["Q-0634 ( Lutsenko reportedly says the Bidens did not break any ukrainian laws -- which is noteworthy even of what is if it far from an endorsement ?"] "
the Bidens ["Q-0635 ( whom does Lutsenko reportedly says did not break any ukrainian laws -- which is noteworthy even if it is far from an endorsement of their influence peddling ?"] "
Ukrainian laws ["Q-0636 ( Lutsenko reportedly says what not break -- which is noteworthy even if it is far from an endorsement of their influence peddling ?"] "
Lutsenko ["Q-0637 Who reportedly says the Bidens did not break any ukrainian laws -- which is noteworthy even if it is far from an endorsement of their influence peddling ?"] "
the Bidens ["Q-0638 Who did not break any ukrainian laws -- which is noteworthy even if it is far from an endorsement of their influence peddling ?"] "
Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman two Giuliani associates who helped Rudy research the activities of the Bidens in Ukraine are now under indictment. That case (brought by the Trump Justice Department in the Southern District of New York) includes a successful scheme to persuade the president to remove Marie Yovanovitch the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. Parnas and Fruman are alleged to have made illegal campaign contributions to acquire political influence and then to have used that influence to push for Ambassador Yovanovitch\u2019s removal -- including by inducing then\u2013Representative Pete Sessions (R. Texas) to write the president a letter urging that the ambassador be fired for exhibiting anti-Trump bias. (I note that Yovanovitch vigorously denies that she was \u201cdisloyal\u201d to the president and reasons that those who campaigned against her stood to be financially damaged by American anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine.) Parnas and Fruman were allegedly acting at the urging of a , Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. " ["Q-0640 ]
influence peddling.)Constitutionally a president does not need to have a reason ["Q-0641 ) constitutionally what does a president does not need to have to remove an ambassador ?"] "
influence peddling.)Constitutionally a president does not need to have a reason to remove an ambassador ["Q-0642 ) constitutionally what does a president does not need to have a reason to remove ?"] "
influence peddling.)Constitutionally a president ["Q-0643 Who does not need to have a reason to remove an ambassador ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0644 ]
diplomacy ["Q-0645 Congress however is entitled to examine of what conduct ?"] "
impeachment inquiry ["Q-0646 What is Congress however entitled to examine the president \u2019 s conduct of diplomacy ?"] "
impeachment inquiry ["Q-0647 What is Congress however entitled to examine s conduct of diplomacy ?"] "
impeachment ["Q-0648 Congress however is entitled to examine the president \u2019 what s s N N N of diplomacy ?"] "
Congress ["Q-0649 Who however is entitled to examine the president \u2019 s conduct of diplomacy ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0650 ]
president\u2019s push ["Q-0651 Democrats are using their impeachment inquiry to explore whether yovanovitch was reassigned to what did because she was an obstacle s push -- with Giuliani \u2019 s encouragement -- for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens ?"] "
whether Yovanovitch ["Q-0652 Democrats are using their impeachment inquiry to explore because whom was whether yovanovitch reassigned was an obstacle to the president \u2019 s push -- with Giuliani \u2019 s encouragement -- for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens ?"] "
Giuliani ["Q-0653 Democrats are using their impeachment inquiry to explore whether yovanovitch was reassigned because she was an obstacle to with whom push -- s encouragement -- for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens ?"] "
president\u2019s ["Q-0654 Democrats are using their impeachment inquiry to explore whether yovanovitch was reassigned because she was an obstacle to where push -- with Giuliani \u2019 s encouragement -- to investigate the Bidens ?"] "
whether Yovanovitch ["Q-0655 Democrats are using their impeachment inquiry to explore what was whether yovanovitch reassigned because she was an obstacle to the president \u2019 s push -- with Giuliani \u2019 s encouragement -- for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens ?"] "
an obstacle ["Q-0656 Democrats are using their impeachment inquiry to explore whether yovanovitch was reassigned what did because she was to the president \u2019 s push -- with Giuliani \u2019 s encouragement -- for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens ?"] "
whether Yovanovitch ["Q-0657 Democrats are using their impeachment inquiry to explore whether yovanovitch was reassigned because she was an obstacle to the president \u2019 what s s N N N -- with Giuliani \u2019 s encouragement -- for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens ?"] "
president\u2019s ["Q-0658 Democrats are using their impeachment inquiry to explore whether yovanovitch was reassigned because she was an obstacle to what push -- with Giuliani \u2019 s encouragement -- for Ukraine to investigate ?"] "
impeachment inquiry to explore whether Yovanovitch ["Q-0659 Who was reassigned because she was an obstacle to the president \u2019 s push -- with Giuliani \u2019 s encouragement -- for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens ?"] "
impeachment ["Q-0660 Who was an obstacle to the president \u2019 s push -- with Giuliani \u2019 s encouragement -- for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0661 ]
a mess ["Q-0662 What is this that neither the president nor the country needed ?"] "
Giuliani ["Q-0663 Who is a mess that neither the president nor the country needed ?"] "
president ["Q-0664 Who needed ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0665 ]
some extent all ["Q-0666 After all Mueller \u2019 s two - year investigation as well to what as the pending pending Justice Department inspector - general and Barr / durham probes involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns ?"] "
Trump 2020 ["Q-0667 As what two - year investigation as well inspector - general and Barr / durham probes to some extent all involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns ?"] "
foreign powers ["Q-0668 After all Mueller \u2019 s two - year investigation as well as the pending Justice Department inspector - general and Barr / durham probes to with what some extent all involve collusion in connection with political campaigns ?"] "
connection ["Q-0669 After all Mueller \u2019 s two - year investigation as well as the pending Justice Department inspector - general and Barr / durham probes to in what some extent all involve collusion with foreign powers with political campaigns ?"] "
political campaigns ["Q-0670 After all Mueller \u2019 s two - year investigation as well as the pending Justice Department inspector - general and Barr / durham probes to with what some extent all involve collusion with foreign powers in connection ?"] "
two-year investigation ["Q-0671 What J as well as the pending Justice Department inspector - general and Barr / durham probes to some extent all involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns ?"] "
impeachment inquiry to explore whether Yovanovitch was reassigned because she was an obstacle to the president\u2019s push -- with Giuliani\u2019s encouragement -- for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.This is a mess ["Q-0672 After all Mueller \u2019 s two - year investigation as well what as the pending pending inspector - general and Barr / durham probes to some extent all involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns ?"] "
collusion ["Q-0673 After all Mueller \u2019 s two - year you N as well as the pending Justice Department inspector - general and Barr / durham probes to what N with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns ?"] "
all Mueller ["Q-0674 Who pending Justice Department inspector - general and Barr / durham probes to some extent all involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns ?"] "
Barr/Durham probes ["Q-0675 Who involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0676 ]
Trump campaign ["Q-0677 For whom is it fair game to explore whether the Bidens cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden \u2019 s political influence ; and if Giuliani as the president \u2019 s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
Barr/Durham probes to some extent all involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns. It is fair game for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden\u2019s political influence; and if Giuliani as the president\u2019s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U.S. law violations those would appropriately be referred to the Justice Department ["Q-0678 Whether whom is it fair game for the Trump campaign to explore cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden \u2019 s political influence ; and if Giuliani as the president \u2019 s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
Vice President Biden\u2019s political influence ["Q-0679 It is fair game for the Trump campaign to explore on what whether the Bidens cashed in overseas s political influence ; and if Giuliani as the president \u2019 s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
overseas on Vice President Biden\u2019s ["Q-0680 It is fair game for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in if whom political influence ; and as the president \u2019 s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
overseas on Vice President Biden\u2019s political ["Q-0681 It is fair game for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in as what political influence ; and if Giuliani private lawyer found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
private lawyer found any evidence of possible U.S. law violations those would appropriately be referred to the Justice Department ["Q-0682 It is fair game for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden \u2019 s political influence ; and if Giuliani as the president \u2019 s of what private lawyer found any evidence ?"] "
fair game ["Q-0683 What is it for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden \u2019 s political influence ; and if Giuliani as the president \u2019 s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
political influence ["Q-0684 It is fair game for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in what R ; and if Giuliani as the president \u2019 s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
any evidence of possible U.S. law violations those would appropriately be referred to the Justice Department ["Q-0685 It is fair game for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden \u2019 s political influence ; and if Giuliani as the president \u2019 s what private lawyer found of possible U ?"] "
Barr/Durham probes to some extent all involve collusion with foreign powers in connection with political campaigns. It is fair game for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden\u2019s political influence; and if Giuliani as the president\u2019s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U.S. law violations those would appropriately be referred to the Justice Department ["Q-0686 Who is fair game for the Trump campaign to explore whether the Bidens cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden \u2019 s political influence ; and if Giuliani as the president \u2019 s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
Bidens ["Q-0687 Who cashed in overseas on Vice President Biden \u2019 s political influence ; and if Giuliani as the president \u2019 s private lawyer found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
Giuliani ["Q-0688 Who found any evidence of possible U ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0689 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0690 ]
U.S. ["Q-0691 To what law violations those would appropriately be referred ?"] "
U.S. ["Q-0692 What law violations those would appropriately be referred to the Justice Department ?"] "
U.S. law violations ["Q-0693 Who would appropriately be referred to the Justice Department ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0694 ]
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0695 ]
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0696 ]
the president is attacking Biden ["Q-0697 Government \u2019 s foreign relations with Ukraine was inappropriate -- particularly when for what is the president attacking Biden insensitive to patent conflicts of interest ?"] "
Biden ["Q-0698 Government \u2019 s foreign relations with Ukraine was inappropriate -- particularly when the president is attacking of what Biden for being being insensitive to patent conflicts ?"] "
Biden ["Q-0699 Government \u2019 s foreign relations with Ukraine was inappropriate -- particularly when whom is the president attacking for being insensitive to patent conflicts of interest ?"] "
Biden ["Q-0700 Government \u2019 s foreign relations with Ukraine was inappropriate -- particularly when the president is attacking what Biden for being being insensitive to p N of interest ?"] "
Ukraine ["Q-0701 Who was inappropriate -- particularly when the president is attacking Biden for being insensitive to patent conflicts of interest ?"] "
the president ["Q-0702 Who is attacking Biden for being insensitive to patent conflicts of interest ?"] "
Biden ["Q-0703 Who being insensitive to patent conflicts of interest ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0704 ]
overwrought ["Q-0705 Nonetheless in what is it to portray bad judgment as an impeachable offense ?"] "
overwrought ["Q-0706 Nonetheless as what is it to portray bad judgment in these circumstances ?"] "
overwrought ["Q-0707 Nonetheless what is it to portray bad judgment in these circumstances as an impeachable offense ?"] "
bad judgment ["Q-0708 Nonetheless what is it to p N in these circumstances as an impeachable offense ?"] "
Biden ["Q-0709 Who is to to portray bad judgment in these circumstances as an impeachable offense ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0710 ]
The Bidens\u2019 behavior ["Q-0711 Who is highly questionable ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0712 ]
politicized investigation ["Q-0713 In what did the Obama administration liberally enlisted foreign powers of Trump while the Clinton campaign colluded with foreign powers to tar Trump ?"] "
Trump ["Q-0714 Of whom did the Obama administration liberally enlisted foreign powers in the politicized investigation while the Clinton campaign colluded with foreign powers to tar Trump ?"] "
Clinton campaign ["Q-0715 While whom did the Obama administration liberally enlisted foreign powers in the politicized investigation of Trump colluded with foreign powers to tar Trump ?"] "
foreign powers ["Q-0716 The Obama administration liberally enlisted foreign powers in with what did the politicized investigation of Trump while the Clinton campaign colluded to tar Trump ?"] "
foreign powers ["Q-0717 What did the Obama administration liberally enlisted in the politicized investigation of Trump while the Clinton campaign colluded with foreign powers to tar Trump ?"] "
Barr/Durham investigation. Though we do not know we assume prosecutors are examining whether Obama-administration agencies pressured Ukrainian authorities to investigate Paul Manafort Trump\u2019s former campaign chairman. If so Biden\u2019s capacity to extort Kyiv into firing a prosecutor would be probative of the Obama administration\u2019s influence over Ukrainian law-enforcement. That kind of evidence is routinely admitted in conspiracy prosecutions.5\. Investigating Hunter Biden and Burisma corruption. More problematic is the president\u2019s pressure for a Ukrainian investigation of potential corruption in Hunter Biden\u2019s relationship with Burisma and in Joe Biden\u2019s motive to push for the prosecutor\u2019s firing.There is no known Justice Department corruption investigation of the Bidens. Since the president was apparently not requesting assistance in an ongoing U.S. investigation it is reasonable to deduce that he was primarily hoping for information -- and pote , The Obama administration " ["Q-0719 Who liberally enlisted foreign powers in the politicized investigation of Trump while the Clinton campaign colluded with foreign powers to tar Trump ?"] "
Clinton campaign ["Q-0720 Who colluded with foreign powers to tar Trump ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0721 ]
Clinton campaign colluded with foreign powers to tar Trump ["Q-0722 From what stood As president Trump ultimately down on ukrainian aid ?"] "
Ukrainian aid ["Q-0723 On what stood As president Trump ultimately down from his hold ?"] "
president Trump ["Q-0724 Who ultimately stood down from his hold on ukrainian aid ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0725 ]
out of U.S. politics ["Q-0726 Kyiv made no commitment to investigate out what does the Bidens and prudently wants to stay ?"] "
no commitment ["Q-0727 What did Kyiv made to investigate the Bidens and prudently wants to stay out of U ?"] "
Trump ["Q-0728 Whom did Kyiv made no commitment to investigate and prudently wants to stay out of U ?"] "
Kyiv ["Q-0729 Who made no commitment to investigate the Bidens and prudently wants to stay out of U ?"] "
Trump ["Q-0730 Who prudently wants to stay out of U ?"] "
Obama-era ["Q-0731 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0732 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0733 ]
the indecorous behavior on all sides this is not an episode ["Q-0734 Given the lack of actual harm and what is the indecorous behavior on all sides this over which a national consensus would support the president \u2019 s removal ?"] "
this is not an episode over which a national consensus would support the president\u2019s removal ["Q-0735 Given the lack of actual harm and the indecorous behavior on all sides this is not an episode over which what would a national consensus support s removal ?"] "
\u2019s removal ["Q-0736 Given the lack of actual harm and the indecorous behavior on all sides this is not an episode over which a national consensus would support the president \u2019 what s s N N N ?"] "
the indecorous behavior on all sides ["Q-0737 Who is not an episode over which a national consensus would support the president \u2019 s removal ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0738 Who would support the president \u2019 s removal ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0739 ]
two-thirds ["Q-0740 Is it inconceivable of the Senate would ever oust Trump over his actions in Ukraine so House democrats are clearly pursuing impeachment for 2020 campaign purposes ?"] "
Barr/Durham probe as a Trump 2020 campaign initiative; but it is not.To be sure it is irregular for a president to seek a foreign government\u2019s investigative assistance absent a request from the attorney general. Reportedly AG Barr did not ask the president to intercede with Ukraine. Though not unlawful it was unwise for the president to do so unilaterally. With Democrats already disparaging the Barr/Durham investigation (soon it may even achieve \u201cwitch hunt\u201d status) the president has just given them more ammunition to argue that the probe is politicized. This makes the prosecutors\u2019 job more difficult -- Barr and Durham will need to have strong evidence to overcome the inevitable claims that any case they bring is based on presidential pressure not proof. Nevertheless there is nothing illegal or improper in principle about a president\u2019s asking another country to assist an ongoing U.S. investigation.4\. Investigating Vice President Biden\u2019s influence , impeachment.2\. " ["Q-0742 It is over what inconceivable that two - thirds of the Senate would ever oust Trump in Ukraine so House democrats are clearly pursuing impeachment for 2020 campaign purposes ?"] "
impeachment.2\. ["Q-0743 It is where inconceivable that two - thirds of the Senate would ever oust Trump over his actions so House democrats are clearly pursuing impeachment for 2020 campaign purposes ?"] "
impeachment.2\. ["Q-0744 It is for what inconceivable that two - thirds of the Senate would ever oust Trump over his actions in Ukraine so House democrats are clearly pursuing impeachment ?"] "
impeachment.2\. ["Q-0745 It is whom inconceivable that two - thirds of the Senate would ever o J over his actions in Ukraine so House democrats are clearly pursuing impeachment for 2020 campaign purposes ?"] "
impeachment.2\. ["Q-0746 It is what inconceivable that two - thirds of the Senate would ever oust Trump over his actions in Ukraine so House democrats are for 2020 campaign purposes ?"] "
Barr/Durham ["Q-0747 Who is inconceivable that two - thirds of the Senate would ever oust Trump over his actions in Ukraine so House democrats are clearly pursuing impeachment for 2020 campaign purposes ?"] "
two-thirds of the Senate ["Q-0748 Who would ever oust Trump over his actions in Ukraine so House democrats are clearly pursuing impeachment for 2020 campaign purposes ?"] "
impeachment.2\. The Democrats and Ukraine. It is precious indeed to hear Democrats complain that Ukraine was imperiled by the hold on defense aid. President Obama refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid after Russia began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014. President Trump has been providing it and has imposed tough sanctions on Russia. The Democrats sudden obsession over Ukraine\u2019s well-being like their newfound angst over the geopolitical challenge posed by Russia is political posturing.3\. Assistance to U.S. investigations. Most of the assistance the president sought from Ukraine was unobjectionable. It is common for presidents to ask their foreign counterparts to assist Justice Department investigations. House Democrats will not acknowledge this because they seek to delegitimize the Barr/Durham probe as a Trump 2020 campaign initiative; but it is not.To be sure it is irregular for a president to seek a foreign government\u2019s investigative a , The Democrats and Ukraine " ["Q-0750 ]
cost ["Q-0751 At what are they titillating their base of exacerbating the deep divide in your nation ?"] "
Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0752 Of what are they titillating their base at the cost deep divide in your nation ?"] "
our nation ["Q-0753 They are titillating in what their base at the cost of exacerbating exacerbating the deep divide ?"] "
House Democrats are clearly pursuing impeachment for 2020 campaign purposes. They are titillating their base ["Q-0754 What are they titillating at the cost of exacerbating the deep divide in your nation ?"] "
the deep divide ["Q-0755 They are titillating what their base at the cost of exacerbating exacerbating in your nation ?"] "
House Democrats ["Q-0756 Who are titillating their base at the cost of exacerbating the deep divide in your nation ?"] "
House Democrats ["Q-0757 Who exacerbating the deep divide in your nation ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0758 ]
the new standards ["Q-0759 Under what and they will not be able to govern are forging ?"] "
forging.7\. President Trump\u2019s fitness ["Q-0760 And they will not be able to govern under what are the new standards they forging ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0761 Who will not be able to govern under the new standards they are forging ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0762 Who are forging ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0763 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0764 ]
Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0765 What N ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0766 ]
presidential fitness ["Q-0767 Of what do you do not have a platonic ideal ?"] "
platonic ideal ["Q-0768 What do you do not have of presidential fitness ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0769 Who do not have a platonic ideal of presidential fitness ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0770 ]
the people ["Q-0771 The constitutional qualifications are minimal and when that what the people elect a person is presumptively fit because the sovereign has spoken ?"] "
sovereign ["Q-0772 The constitutional qualifications are minimal and when the people elect because what is a person that person presumptively fit has spoken ?"] "
the people ["Q-0773 The constitutional qualifications are minimal and when what the people elect that person is presumptively fit because the sovereign has spoken ?"] "
fit ["Q-0774 The constitutional qualifications are minimal and when the people elect a person that person is presumptively what has fit because the sovereign spoken ?"] "
The constitutional qualifications ["Q-0775 Who are minimal and when the people elect a person that person is presumptively fit because the sovereign has spoken ?"] "
the people ["Q-0776 Who elect a person that person is presumptively fit because the sovereign has spoken ?"] "
the people ["Q-0777 Who is presumptively fit because the sovereign has spoken ?"] "
the sovereign ["Q-0778 Who has spoken ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0779 ]
job performance ["Q-0780 After that you make on what did fitness judgments based based is deemed too unfit to serve if he commits high crimes and misdemeanors so egregious that the House files articles of impeachment and a supermajority of the Senate votes to convict and remove ?"] "
if he commits high crimes and misdemeanors so egregious ["Q-0781 After that you make if whom did fitness judgments based on job performance the president based too unfit to serve commits high crimes and misdemeanors so egregious that the House files articles of impeachment and a supermajority of the Senate votes to convict and remove ?"] "
the sovereign ["Q-0782 After that you make fitness judgments based on job performance the president is deemed too unfit to serve where if he commits high crimes and misdemeanors so egregious files articles of impeachment and a supermajority of the Senate votes to convict and remove ?"] "
impeachment ["Q-0783 After that you make fitness judgments based on job performance the president is deemed too unfit to serve of what if he commits high crimes and misdemeanors so egregious that the House files articles and a supermajority of the Senate votes to convict and remove ?"] "
House files ["Q-0784 After that you make fitness judgments based on job performance the president is deemed too unfit to serve if he commits high crimes and misdemeanors so where articles of impeachment and a supermajority to convict and remove ?"] "
fitness judgments ["Q-0785 What do after that you make on job performance the president is deemed too unfit to serve if he commits high crimes and misdemeanors so egregious that the House files articles of impeachment and a supermajority of the Senate votes to convict and remove ?"] "
presumptively fit because the sovereign has spoken. After that we make fitness judgments based on job performance The president is deemed ["Q-0786 After that you make what did fitness judgments based on job performance the president based too unfit to serve if he commits high crimes and misdemeanors so egregious that the House files articles of impeachment and a supermajority of the Senate votes to convict and remove ?"] "
high crimes ["Q-0787 After that you make fitness judgments based on job performance the president is deemed too unfit to serve what if he c N and misdemeanors so egregious that the House files articles of impeachment and a supermajority of the Senate votes to convict and remove ?"] "
presumptively fit ["Q-0788 After that you make fitness judgments based on job performance the president is deemed too unfit to serve if he commits high crimes and misdemeanors so egregious that the House what f f N N N of impeachment and a supermajority of the Senate votes to convict and remove ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0789 ]
Ukraine ["Q-0790 Democrats and what are other Trump detractors determined to reverse this norm ?"] "
Ukraine ["Q-0791 Democrats and what are other Trump detractors determined to r N ?"] "
Democrats and other Trump detractors ["Q-0792 Who are determined to reverse this norm ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0793 ]
Trump ["Q-0794 Of what do they have never accepted the voters \u2019 election ?"] "
not seeking to deduce unfitness from impeachable offenses ["Q-0795 What do they have \u2019 election of Trump ?"] "
accepted the voters\u2019 election of Trump ["Q-0796 They have never what the voters \u2019 J of Trump ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0797 ]
impeachable offenses ["Q-0798 From what are they not seeking to deduce unfitness ?"] "
Democrats and Ukraine. It is precious indeed to hear Democrats complain that Ukraine was imperiled by the hold on defense aid. President Obama refused to provide Ukraine with any lethal defense aid after Russia began attacking it and seizing territory in 2014. President Trump has been providing it and has imposed tough sanctions on Russia. The Democrats sudden obsession over Ukraine\u2019s well-being like their newfound angst over the geopolitical challenge posed by Russia is political posturing.3\. Assistance to U.S. investigations. Most of the assistance the president sought from Ukraine was unobjectionable. It is common for presidents to ask their foreign counterparts to assist Justice Department investigations. House Democrats will not acknowledge this because they seek to delegitimize the Barr/Durham probe as a Trump 2020 campaign initiative; but it is not.To be sure it is irregular for a president to seek a foreign government\u2019s investigative assistance absent a reque , the voters\u2019 election of Trump " ["Q-0800 Who are not seeking to deduce unfitness from impeachable offenses ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0801 ]
three years ["Q-0802 They predetermined the unfitness finding and have spent three for what years looking looking -- any misstep -- that might pass the laugh test as an impeachable offense ?"] "
three years ["Q-0803 They predetermined the unfitness finding and have spent three as what years looking looking for some misstep -- any misstep -- that might pass the laugh test ?"] "
unfitness finding ["Q-0804 What did they predetermined and have spent three years looking for some misstep -- any misstep -- that might pass the laugh test as an impeachable offense ?"] "
three years looking ["Q-0805 They predetermined what have the unfitness finding and spent for some misstep -- any misstep -- that might pass the laugh test as an impeachable offense ?"] "
laugh test ["Q-0806 They predetermined the unfitness finding and have spent three what years looking looking for some misstep -- any misstep -- that might pass as an impeachable offense ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0807 Who predetermined the unfitness finding and have spent three years looking for some misstep -- any misstep -- that might pass the laugh test as an impeachable offense ?"] "
Giuliani ["Q-0808 Who have spent three years looking for some misstep -- any misstep -- that might pass the laugh test as an impeachable offense ?"] "
three years ["Q-0809 Who looking for some misstep -- any misstep -- that might pass the laugh test as an impeachable offense ?"] "
three years ["Q-0810 They predetermined how much have the unfitness finding and spent years looking for some misstep -- any misstep -- that might pass the laugh test as an impeachable offense ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0811 ]
do.8\. ["Q-0812 If that approach became your to what would new normal it be much more harmful than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0813 If that approach became your would new normal it be much more harmful the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0814 If that approach became your than what would new normal it be much more harmful t T the country -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0815 If that approach became your under what would new normal it be much more harmful t T the country than anything President Trump -- of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0816 If that approach became your where would new normal it be much more harmful t T the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0817 What did if that approach became new normal it would be much more harmful t T the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0818 If that approach became your new normal it would be much more harmful t t N N N the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0819 If that approach became your what would new normal it be much more harmful t T the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken eight - year Obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0820 If that approach became your new normal it would be much more harmful whose the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0821 Who became your new normal it would be much more harmful t T the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0822 Who would be much more harmful t T the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
President Trump ["Q-0823 Who shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0824 If that approach became your t how much would new normal it be much more harmful the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0825 If that approach became your new normal it would be much more harmful how much t t N N N the country than anything President Trump -- under the watchful eye of a hostilely aggressive Congress and a media that has shaken off its eight - year obama - era snooze -- may do ?"] "
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0826 ]
The Democrats and Ukraine ["Q-0827 ]
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0828 ]
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0829 Finally President Trump \u2019 s did offense here was at most leverage his power t T advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0830 Finally President Trump \u2019 s did offense here was at most t T leverage his power advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0831 Finally President Trump \u2019 s did offense here was at most leverage his power t T advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0832 Finally President Trump \u2019 s did offense here was at most t T leverage his power advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
leverage his power ["Q-0833 Finally President Trump \u2019 s offense here was at in what his political ambitions -- that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
effect ["Q-0834 Finally President Trump \u2019 s offense here was at without what his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s offense ["Q-0835 Finally what N here was at most t T leverage his power t T advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0836 Finally President Trump \u2019 s did offense here was at most t N leverage his power t T advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0837 Finally President Trump \u2019 s what did offense here was at most t T leverage t T advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0838 Finally President Trump \u2019 s offense here was at most t T leverage his power t t N N N advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0839 Finally President Trump \u2019 s what did offense here was at most t T leverage his power t T a N political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0840 Finally President Trump \u2019 s offense here was at most whose leverage his power t T advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
The 2016 precedent ["Q-0841 Finally President Trump \u2019 s offense here was at most t T leverage his power whose advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
President Trump\u2019s ["Q-0842 Who here was at most t T leverage his power t T advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0843 Finally President Trump \u2019 s t how much did offense here was at most leverage his power t T advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0844 Finally President Trump \u2019 s t how much did offense here was at most t T leverage his power advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
do.8\. ["Q-0845 Finally President Trump \u2019 s how much did offense here was at most t N leverage his power t T advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
do.8\. The 2016 precedent ["Q-0846 Finally President Trump \u2019 s offense here was at most t T leverage his power how much t t N N N advance his political ambitions -- in a manner that was minor temporary and without effect ?"] "
Obama-era snooze -- may do.8\. ["Q-0847 ]
Democrats ["Q-0848 Does it does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0849 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D did incumbent administration placed intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0850 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D did incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0851 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D did incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0852 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D did incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0853 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D did incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats\u2019 agenda to win the election ["Q-0854 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
2016 ["Q-0855 When does it does not hold a candle to what democrats did when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of the government in the service of the democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Tellingly Democrats ["Q-0856 Does it does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of the government in the service of the democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Tellingly Democrats ["Q-0857 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D did incumbent administration placed intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of the government in the service of the democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats\u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump\u2019s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration\u2019s conduct of foreign relations. Tellingly Democrats ["Q-0858 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D of what did incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus in the service of the democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
the service ["Q-0859 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of in what government of the democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats\u2019 ["Q-0860 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in of what service democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0861 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of democrats \u2019 agenda to win election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats\u2019 agenda to win the election ["Q-0862 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
foreign relations ["Q-0863 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited of what conduct ?"] "
a candle ["Q-0864 What does it does not hold to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed the intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0865 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t t N N N incumbent administration placed the intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0866 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D what did incumbent administration placed and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0867 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t N D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t t N N N government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0868 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t N D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t N D government in t t N N N service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0869 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t N D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t N D government in t N D service of t t N N N democrats \u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats\u2019 agenda ["Q-0870 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed what intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 N to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0871 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed what intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
election ["Q-0872 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D s N of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win what that to s N s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
election ["Q-0873 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win whom that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0874 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D s N of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited what N of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0875 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when whose incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0876 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed whose intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0877 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of whose government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0878 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in whose service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0879 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of whose democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0880 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win whose election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0881 It does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited whose Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0882 Who does not hold a candle to what democrats did in 2016 when the incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
incumbent administration ["Q-0883 Who placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win the election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited the Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "
Democrats ["Q-0884 In how much does it does not hold a candle to what democrats did when t D incumbent administration placed t D intelligence and law - enforcement apparatus of t D government in t D service of t D democrats \u2019 agenda to win t D election and failing that to suffocate Donald Trump \u2019 s administration -- an enterprise that energetically exploited t D Obama administration \u2019 s conduct of foreign relations ?"] "