Next Page: 25

At least 1 dead, 7 injured in shooting outside McDonald's in downtown Seattle   

At least one person was killed and seven others injured — including a child — after a dispute in front of a McDonald's led to a shooting in downtown Seattle on Wednesday night.Multiple people fired shots and panicked people fled in different directions, Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best said, and investigators are reviewing evidence to determine how many suspects are at-large.Seattle Fire Chief Harold Scoggins said authorities began receiving calls at about 5 [...]

EU confirma primer caso de coronavirus procedente de China   

Se encienden las alarmas en Estados Unidos por el misterioso virus chino que ha puesto al mundo en alerta: se registró el primer caso del coronavirus chino. Sucedió cerca de Seattle. Ciudad de México a 21 de enero de 2020.- Hasta ahora, el peligroso virus ha infectado a más de 300 personas y cobrado la vida de ...

New Release Round-Up 01-24-20   


Wolf Parade - Thin Mind -Sub Pop Wolf Parade - Dan Boeckner, Spencer Krug, and Arlen Thompson - release Thin Mind , the groups fifth album for Sub Pop. The 10-track record was recorded by John Goodmanson at Risque Disque on Vancouver Island, BC, mixed by Goodmanson at Bogroll Studios in Seattle, WA, and mastered by Noah Mintz at Lacquer Channel Mastering in Toronto, ON. Thin Mind has sci-fi, post-apocalyptic and dystopian narratives interwoven throughout. These themes emerged while working at Risque Disque, which Boeckner jokingly describes as a Dutchmans failed utopia, a problematic structure with a post-apocalyptic vibe: the studio is housed in a stone barn hand-built by the Dutchman in the middle of the woods, using local materials and based on his memory of a building he loved growing up in the Netherlands. Thin Mind finds the core members of Wolf Parade working as a trio, as they did on past albums Apologies to the Queen Mary and At Mount Zoomer, with songwriting duties evenly split between singers Dan Boeckner and Spencer Krug. The album includes the singles Forest Green, Julia, Take Your Man Home, and Against the Day, the latter of which features a rare, co-vocal performance from Boeckner and Krug.


Breaking Benjamin - Aurora - Hollywood Records Aurora features reimagined versions of the bands biggest and most popular songs with special guests including Lacey Sturm (ex-Flyleaf), Scooter Ward(Cold) and Spencer Chamberlain (Underoath), to name a few. Speaking about Aurora, Breaking Benjamin s founder/frontman, Ben Burnley, had this personal message to share, This album is a celebration of our incredible fans; for those who have been there since hearing So Cold for the first time in 2004, and the new ones who have joined us on this amazing journey along the way. Weve always shared a unique emotional connection to our music with our fans, and this album attributes to those dark times and euphoric ones. From wherever you joined along the road to Aurora, this one is for you. Thank you.

Andy Shauf - The Neon Skyline -Anti Andy Shauf is becoming one of the most important songwriters of his generation. His songs are tuneful vignettes of small moments and big hearts. On his latest, The Neon Skyline Shauf intertwines stories of a group of friends who frequent a local dive bar, and through them, makes poignant observations about human nature with a novelists detail and melancholic humor. The songwriting is down to earth, yet sophisticated and inventively melodic. The Neon Skyline is a creative leap for this already acclaimed artist.


The Black Lips - Sing In A World That's Falling Apart - FireRecords It's country music but not as we know it which begs the question: Have these Bad Kids of 21st Century rock 'n' roll finally grown up on their ninth studio album? Are they at peace with themselves? Have they made a record their parents could listen to? The Black Lips new album ' Sing In A World That's Falling Apart ' continues to flick the middle finger to one and all. This ain't another gaggle of bearded southern sons fleeing their collective suburban upbringings and collegiate music education. There aren't the usual clichs about drinking, honkytonks, and heartbreak. These are, after all, the same Black Lips who rescued the waning garage punk subgenre by not sounding or dressing their musical predecessors. They also dug contemporary hip-hop and punk and actualized themselves Like so many dramatic moments in the Black Lips career, 'Sing In A World That's Falling Apart' was born out of crisis. The band's stylistic evolution through decades of prolific touring and recording took them where no garage punk band had gone before - huge venues, network television shows, and major music festivals. Here Black Lips are at their grimiest, most dangerous and equipped with the best collection of songs since the aughts. Skidding onto the asphalt in a shower of sparks, they roll on with an unapologetic southern-fried twang, pacing the beast, every now and then dropping a psycho howl into the rubber room madness lurking underneath the truckstop fireworks. This ain't your granny's country album. And conversely this ain't your mama's Black Lips. Pet Shop Boys - Hotspot -X2 2020 release, the 14th studio album from the British electro-pop duo. Hotspot was mostly written and recorded in Berlin and Los Angeles and produced and mixed by Stuart Price. Features the singles "Dreamland" (featuring Years & Years) and "Burning the Heather".

The Wood Brothers - Kingdom In My Mind -Honey Jar Records Recorded over the course of a series of freewheeling, improvisatory sessions, Kingdom In My Mind is The Wood Brothers seventh studio release and their most spontaneous and experimental collection yet. A testament to the limitless creativity of the unharnessed mind, the record explores the power of our external surroundings to shape our internal worlds (and vice versa), reckoning with time, mortality, and human nature. The songs here find strength in accepting what lies beyond our control, thoughtfully honing in on the bittersweet beauty that underlies our pain and sadness with vivid character studies and unflinching self-examination. Deep as the lyrics dig, the arrangements always manage to remain buoyant and light, though, drawing from across a broad sonic spectrum to create a transportive, effervescent blend that reflects the trio s unique place in the modern musical landscape.




The Haden Triplets - Family Songbook Elton John - Live From Moscow Caspian - On Circles Supergrass - The Strange Ones: 1994-2008 Lisa Mills - The Triangle Glass Beach - The First Glass Beach Album Dirty Shirley - Dirty Shirley Kirk Windstein - Dream In Motion Jeff Parker - Suite For Max Brown Ethan Gruska - En Garde Bonny Light Horseman - Bonny Light Horseman Revolution Saints - Rise Davey Suicide - Rock Ain't Dead Tnght - II [LP] & More .....

Avi Kaplan - I'll Get By EP Kilo Kish - Redux EP [Vinyl] Taylor Swift - Should've Said No [Ltd Ed White Vinyl Single] Green Day - Oh Yeah!


Joey Alexander - Warna -Verve At 16, Joey Alexander has already recorded two GRAMMY-nominated studio albums, as well as a critically acclaimed surprise release from late 2017 to honor Thelonious Monk's centennial. With his third studio effort Eclipse, Joey took another giant step forward, demonstrating his aptitude as a composer, bandleader, and musician, hinting at the many artistic paths open to him in the decades ahead. Joey has made appearances on 60 Minutes, The Today Show, and NPR's Tiny Desk series.


For more information on these and other releases out this week, check out our New Releases charts by week section.


Mon grand amour pour Jésus m'a amené à l'Islam   

Traduit par  Leila FARHAT Table des Matières I. Introduction .............................................................. II. Mon expérience aux Etats Unis d'Amérique…...... III. Les Evangiles ..................................................... IV. L’authenticité du Coran......................................... V. La vie et la…


I- Introduction

En tant que catholique, j’ai été persuadé de croire que le catholicisme était la seule et unique vraie religion, et que le judaïsme était une préparation au christianisme.

Ainsi, les autres religions étaient-elles fausses. Je ne pris connaissance pour la première fois de l’existence de l’Islam, qu’en 1978. J’appris ainsi que les musulmans croyaient en l’origine divine du christianisme et du judaïsme et que le Coran affirmait qu’Allah avait envoyé des prophètes partout sur terre pour guider les hommes sur le chemin de la vérité et de la vertu.

Afin de graver le message du christianisme au plus profond de la conscience des jeunes, l’église catholique avait conçu un plan qui, appliqué depuis la plus tendre enfance, devait sans failles influer sur le comportement des jeunes pour le restant de leur vie. Le personnage central dans ce dessein est Jésus (que la bénédiction et le salut de Dieu soient sur lui). En commençant par sa naissance qui eut lieu, dit-on, en décembre jusqu’à sa présumée crucifixion à Pâques, l'on exerce des pratiques et activités qui, des siècles après la disparition de Jésus étaient inexistantes, mais qui furent introduites, non pas à la suite d'une révélation divine, mais par la volonté des hommes.

Suivant une tradition vénézuelienne, le 24 décembre à minuit, je devais attendre l’arrivée de Jésus chargé des cadeaux que je lui avais auparavant demandés dans ma lettre annuelle de souhaits. Etant issu d’une famille pauvre et ayant plusieurs frères et soeurs, il était difficile pour « l’Enfant Jésus » de répondre positivement à tous mes souhaits. Il m’arrivait plusieurs fois d’essayer de comprendre cette énigme: pourquoi Jésus qui avait fait tant de miracles - selon ce que disaient les bonnes soeurs et les prêtres- ne pouvait-il pas m’apporter en cadeau un tricycle ? Cela ne lui était pas bien plus facile à faire que de ressusciter des morts? C’est pour cela que, des années durant, j’étais toujours déçu par « l’Enfant Jésus ».

A l’approche de Pâques, j’avais l’habitude de regarder la télévision qui diffusait des programmes qui retraçaient la vie de Jésus et montraient comment il avait été longtemps maltraité, jusqu’à son supplice sur la croix et sa mort. C’est alors que j’étais pris par l'envie d'entrer dans le poste de télévision pour venir en aide à Jésus, d’une façon ou d’une autre. Je priais Dieu pour qu'Il lui vienne en aide et évite que Son « fils » soit crucifié. Je finissais toujours par aller pleurer en cachette puisque comme on nous l’avait appris, « un homme ne pleure pas ». Je ne parvenais pas à comprendre pourquoi tant de cruauté était commise envers un homme aussi bon. Par la suite, je me mis à ressentir un profond amour pour ce grand prophète d’Allah. Alors que chez d’autres enfants, c’était sans doute la concrétisation de leurs souhaits en cadeaux de Noël, qui a éveillé et entretenu leur affection pour Jésus.

Si l’objectif de l’église avait été donc de nous inculquer d’une certaine manière, un sentiment de révérence pour Jésus, en ce qui me concerne elle y a réussi. J’appris à aimer Jésus plus que mes propres parents.

Toutefois, c’est durant mon enfance que je commençais à me poser des questions au sujet du pouvoir de Dieu. Ma conception de Dieu était qu’il pouvait faire tout ce qu’il voulait. Il avait créé l’univers, la terre, le soleil, la lune, les étoiles et les êtres humains. Je me demandais donc, pourquoi il ne pouvait pas sauver Jésus de la mort sur la croix.

Il m’arriva une fois, dans le but de résoudre cette énigme, de grimper sur un petit mur dans notre arrière jardin et d’apostropher Dieu en ces termes : «Si Tu es vraiment si puissant et que Tu peux faire ce que Tu veux, fais-moi voler en sautant de ce mur; sinon, je ne croirai plus en Ta puissance, puisque par ailleurs, Tu n’as pas pu sauver Jésus de la croix, non plus.» Heureusement, le mur n’était pas bien haut et évidemment, je suis tombé par terre. Ainsi après chaque tentative de voler, je devins de plus en plus convaincu que Dieu, n’était pas après tout, si puissant que cela. Une analyse enfantine, c'et évident!

Au début de mes études secondaires, mes parents m’autorisèrent à travailler avec un vieil homme qui était photographe; je l’accompagnais en plusieurs endroits. Mon vieil ami photographe était connu pour sa pratique de la sorcellerie. Où que nous allions, plusieurs de ses clientes lui demandaient de leur parler des événements futurs de leur vie. Dans ce but, il fumait du tabac brun. Tandis que le tabac se consumait et qu'il se réduisait en cendres, mon vieil ami « révélait » des choses à ses clientes. J’appris par ailleurs qu’il avait l’habitude d’hypnotiser ses clientes afin qu'elles lui avouent inconsciemment leurs secrets. Il se mettait par la suite à leur débiter ces secrets en les faisant passer pour d'authentiques révélations.

Toutes ces expériences étaient imprimées dans ma conscience dès mon plus jeune âge. En ces temps là, mes parents fréquentaient un centre spécialisé en parapsychologie. Je les y accompagnais plusieurs fois pour voir de quoi il s’agissait, et c’est dans ce centre que j’appris les concepts de méditation, d’esprits, de possession et ce que je croyais être les morts parlant aux vivants([1]), etc. C’est à cet endroit que j’ai appris à prier deux fois par jour devant un petit autel construit par mon père avec beaucoup de soin et de dévouement. Durant l’une des réunions à laquelle j’assistais, le chef de la séance me prépara un talisman qui, d’après lui, me protégerait ; et donc je l’emportais avec moi partout où j’allais.

Entre temps, je continuais à penser à la crucifixion de Jésus. Mon père avait un livre qu’il lisait fréquemment, intitulé « La vie de Jésus dictée par lui-même ». Il me raconta une fois que d’après ce livre, Jésus avait visité divers endroits en dehors de Jérusalem, ce qui m’a rendu un peu plus optimiste au sujet de la question de sa crucifixion.

Quand j’ai terminé mes études secondaires, j'ai eu l’opportunité d’obtenir une bourse pour des études d'ingénieur aux Etats-Unis d’Amérique; ce que j’acceptais avec joie. Avant mon départ pour les USA en 1977, j’ai eu une expérience qui influa négativement sur ma foi de chrétien. Je vis un jour deux chrétiens secourir un homme pris par une crise d’épilepsie en pleine rue. Par la suite, ils ouvrirent le portefeuille du malade et y prirent une partie de son argent([2]).En dépit du fait que l’on ne peut pas juger la validité ou l’invalidité d’une religion d’après des actes d'individus isolés comme ceux-là, cet incident m’affecta énormément. Il est possible que beaucoup de gens trouvent cet incident insignifiant; moi par contre, qui avais vu mon frère sévèrement puni pour avoir ramené à la maison l’équivalent d’un quart de dollar, trouvé dans la rue, sans qu'il ait pu fournir à cela une valable explication, l'épisode du portefeuille m'avait grandement marqué.

II. Mon expérience aux Etats Unis d’Amérique

Je me rendis aux Etats Unis d’Amérique en 1977 pour commencer mes études universitaires. Tout d’abord, je pris des cours d’anglais dans une école où je rencontrai des personnes de différentes croyances qui provenaient de plusieurs régions du monde. A Seattle, dans l’état de Washington, à l’école d’anglais, j’avais un camarade de chambre musulman qui préparait un master. Il s’appelait Fouad. Un jour, Fouad me demanda s’il lui était possible de prier dans la chambre. Je lui répondis que cela m’était égal. J’étais étonné, car c’était la première fois que je voyais un musulman prier. Avant de commencer ses prières, il s'est lavé les mains, il s'est rincé la bouche, il s'est lavé le visage et les bras([3]) dans le petit lavabo de notre chambre. C’était la première fois que je voyais une personne se laver les pieds dans un lavabo conçu pour les mains. Ainsi je me mis à observer la succession de ses mouvements et les rituels durant la prière. Il se levait, se baissait et se prosternait, ce qui me rappelait qu’à l’église, on s’agenouillait et on priait seulement. Fouad, lui, priait de manière différente. Après une courte période, il changea de logement et, pendant plusieurs mois, je ne vis pas un autre musulman prier.

A l’école d’anglais, durant la récréation, les étudiants de différents pays avaient l’habitude de se réunir et de discuter de plusieurs questions. Je me souviens une fois où, avec plusieurs étudiants de différents pays, nous avions débattu l’origine des religions et des prières. A un moment donné, je leur dis : « Vous priez de cette façon parce que c’est de cette façon que vos ancêtres priaient. » Ensuite, je leur faisais remarquer que leurs ancêtres avaient l’habitude d’adorer le soleil, les étoiles, et c’est depuis ce temps là que la tradition avait été transmise à travers les générations, jusqu'à aujourd’hui. Je commençais même à avoir des doutes au sujet de la foi en Dieu. Cependant, je ne devins pas athée parce que j’étais profondément croyant et le christianisme était bien enraciné en moi.

Un jour, alors que je visitais une mosquée, je remarquais plusieurs personnes en train de prier de la même manière que le faisait Fouad. Le sol était très froid; malgré cela tous ceux qui étaient dans la mosquée étaient assis; ceci m’encouragea à écouter ce que l’Imam avait à dire.

Il s’appelait Jamil Abdel-Razzak et il était Iraqien. Il parlait de la « médisance » en anglais. Je me souviens que sa voix était aiguë et émouvante. Il regardait son audience comme si quelqu'un avait dit du mal de quelqu’un d’autre; mais il ne désignait personne en particulier. Je pense que son but était de faire en sorte que quiconque était concerné par la médisance, se sente coupable.

Ce jour là, je reçus une enveloppe contenant quelques brochures et guides des études. Certains de ces documents faisaient état d'étude comparée entre l’Islam et le Christianisme. Comme je venais de commencer mes études en première année, à l’université étatique d’Oklahoma (State University of Oklahoma) il m'a fallu beaucoup de temps pour lire les documents que j’avais reçus. C’est en effet à travers ces écrits d'études comparées que j’appris que l’Islam et le message de Jésus étaient tous deux des révélations. Jésus avait affirmé que le message qu’il transmettait n’était pas le sien mais celui de Dieu : « Car je n'ai point parlé de moi-même; mais le Père, qui m'a envoyé, m'a prescrit lui-même ce que je dois dire et annoncer. » (Jean 12:49). De même, la Révélation du Prophète Mohamed au reste de l’humanité avait été envoyée par Allah par l’intermédiaire de l’Ange Gabriel : « Ce (Coran) ci, c'est le Seigneur de l'univers qui l'a fait descendre, et l'Esprit fidèle est descendu avec cela sur ton coeur, pour que tu sois du nombre des avertisseurs.» (Coran 26: 192-194)

L’authenticité et l’origine divine de toute religion dépendent donc en grande partie de la précision avec laquelle la Révélation de Dieu a été conservée et transmise au reste de l’humanité sans altération, dans son état original. Le degré de déviation et d'incertitude du message original dépend de la précision avec laquelle chaque mot révélé aux prophètes, a été transmis au reste des humains.

Si ces mots n’ont pas été rapportés avec exactitude et ont subi des altérations, il est fort probable que l’essence du message original soit perdue à jamais. Pour cela, dans le but de faire une juste et impartiale évaluation, il est nécessaire de déterminer à quel point les Evangiles originaux et le Coran ont été préservés de toute altération, ajout ou suppression. Ce que le lecteur trouvera dans les pages qui suivent sera une sorte de brève comparaison entre l'Islam et le Christianisme, deux des plus grandes et des plus proches religions dans le monde du point de vue de leurs adeptes. Dieu veuille donc que ce livre soit utile à tout chercheur de vérité dans sa quête de la religion véritable.

III. Les Evangiles

Les quatre Evangiles les plus réputés sont ceux de Mathieu, Marc, Luc et Jean et constituent une partie du Nouveau Testament de la Bible. Ils furent rédigés entre 70 et 115 de l’ère chrétienne, c'est-à-dire des décennies après la disparition de Jésus, sur la base de documents qui ont été perdus. L’Evangile selon Marc est le premier d’entre eux; il a été écrit à Rome au moins quarante ans après la disparition de Jésus. L’Evangile selon Mathieu a été écrit en Grec, à peu près en l’année quatre-vingt dix de l’ère chrétienne. L’Evangile selon Luc a été écrit en Grec, environ en l’année quatre-vingt de l’ère chrétienne. Ces trois Evangiles sont appelés synoptiques parce qu’ils proviennent des mêmes documents qui ont été perdus.

L’Evangile selon Jean([4]), cependant, présente des différences fondamentales avec les Evangiles synoptiques.

C’est dans cet Evangile selon Jean que la divinité et la préexistence de Jésus ont été déclarées, bien que ceci n'ait jamais été confirmé par Jésus lui-même. Cet Evangile a été écrit entre 110 et 115 de l’ère chrétienne.

Les Evangiles ont été composés après que les premiers disciples de Jésus se soient divisés en plusieurs sectes et il est certain qu’ils ont été écrits dans le but de refléter la conception des besoins pratiques de la communauté. Bien que des sources traditionnelles aient été utilisées pour les écrire, ils n'ont pas été entourés de l’attention nécessaire à préserver leur contenu original des ajouts, des suppressions et autres formes de corruption. En fait, leur contenu visait à exprimer les intérêts personnels de leurs auteurs. Ceci a été confirmé par des sources chrétiennes([5]) après que le Coran l’ait clairement affirmé depuis et durant plus de quatorze siècles.

Il faut dire que les quatre Evangiles n’étaient pas les seuls documents écrits durant les siècles qui ont succédé à la disparition de Jésus. Il y en avait bien d’autres; tels les Evangiles de Jacob, de Pierre, de Thomas, de Philippe, de Barnabé, etc. Si l’on considère «Les Evangiles selon les Hébreux», par exemple, l'on trouve qu'ils constituent un document écrit dans la même langue que celle que parlait Jésus et qui était utilisée par les Nazarethins. Ces derniers

niaient la divinité de Jésus et le considéraient seulement comme un grand prophète. Au quatrième siècle de l’ère chrétienne, les Evangiles selon Marc, Mathieu, Luc et Jean ont été inclus dans le corps du principal texte Biblique et l’Eglise déclara textes hérétiques tout le reste des documents existants. Cependant, des changements supplémentaires ont été effectués même sur ces Evangiles, dont les textes ont déjà été falsifiés maintes fois. Ceci
démontre à l'évidence l'incontestable opération de corruption que ces livres ont subie.

En analysant la véracité des quatre Evangiles canonisés et la fidélité des messages qu'ils transmettent, nous devons considérer entre autres facteurs; les suivants:

1. L’Evangile original tel qu’il a été révélé à Jésus et mentionné dans le Coran et même dans les Evangiles contemporains, actuellement n’existe plus([6]).

2. Les premiers témoignages des paroles de Jésus, rédigés quelque temps après son ascension au paradis, ont tous été perdus.

3. Les Evangiles ont été écrits entre 70 et 115 de l’ère chrétienne, c'est-à-dire des décennies après la disparition de Jésus et sur la base de documents perdus. Par conséquent, il a été possible de manipuler en toute liberté leur contenu.

4. Aucun des auteurs des Evangiles n'a vu Jésus ou l’a entendu parler. Ils n’en étaient pas des témoins oculaires.

5. Les Evangiles ont été écrits en langue grecque alors que Jésus parlait l’araméen.

6- Les Evangiles actuels et la plupart des épîtres n’ont été choisis et validés qu’au quatrième siècle de l’ère chrétienne et suite à la décision non de la majorité, mais de la minorité des présents, au Conseil OEcuménique de Nicée, tenu l’an 325 apr. J.C. Avant cette date, les Evangiles n’avaient pas d’autorité canonique et des scribes de différentes sectes les modifiaient en fonction de leurs intérêts et selon leurs désirs personnels.

L'opération de transformation et de modification est constante et continue à se dérouler à nos jours.

7- La grande majorité des Evangiles vient des écrits de Paul et de ses élèves. Paul n’avait jamais vu ni entendu Jésus parler; il était l’un de ses plus grands ennemis. Il tua et emprisonna plusieurs disciples du Messie [Actes 8: 3, 9:1-2]. Par la suite, il les obligea à confesser leurs mensonges envers Jésus [Actes 26: 11]. Quand il a fait montre d'être converti «Lorsqu'il se rendit à Jérusalem, Paul tâcha de se joindre à eux; mais tous le craignaient, ne croyant pas qu'il fût un disciple. Alors Barnabé, l'ayant pris avec lui, le conduisit vers les apôtres" [Actes 9: 26-27]. Ceci s'est passé après qu’il ait affirmé et témoigné lui-même([7]) que Jésus lui était apparu et lui avait parlé pendant qu’il était en chemin, vers Damas [Actes 9:3-8]. Il est étonnant qu'il soit devenu soudainement le porte-parole de Jésus et qu'il réclame qu'il a été désigné par lui pour prêcher au monde, sans fournir la moindre preuve de la vérité de son affirmation [Actes 9: 3-6] ([8]). Paul accusa aussi ceux qui « ne le considéraient pas comme un disciple » d’avoir fait erreur en ce qui concerne la foi [1 Timothée 6: 20- 21]. Même Barnabé, qui était bon avec lui, est décrit comme ayant été « entraîné dans leur dissimulation.» [Galates 2:13].

Il s’octroya même le droit de propager des enseignements qui étaient en contradiction avec ceux de Jésus Christ et allaient à l’encontre de « la loi » que Jésus était venu accomplir([9]). [Actes 21: 21], [Romains 7:6]. Nous trouvons aussi que « Paul voulait se présenter devant le peuple, mais les disciples l'en empêchèrent »[Actes 19: 30] ; ce n’était donc pas surprenant qu’il déclare: « Tu sais que tous ceux qui sont en Asie m'ont abandonné,» [2Timothée 1: 15] et «personne ne m'a assisté, mais tous m'ont abandonné. [2 Timothée 4: 16].

8- Les plus anciens manuscrits Bibliques que nous avons sont les manuscrits vaticans, les Sinaïtiques et l'Alexandrin de Codex, qui remontent tous à la période entre le 4ème et 5ème siècles apr. J.-C. L'ampleur des changements que les évangiles ont subi avant ces dates peut à peine être déterminée, si l’on considère que la langue des évangiles était le Grec, alors que Jésus était censé avoir parlé l'araméen.

9- Il y a des divergences énormes et en plusieurs endroits, entre les manuscrits des 4ème et 5ème siècles([10]).

10- Les Evangiles, dans leur ensemble, ainsi que les Epîtres, contiennent plusieurs erreurs et contradictions([11]). De surcroît, l’authenticité de leurs auteurs reste douteuse.

Ces faits sont mentionnés ici comme preuves pour montrer que l’Evangile de Jésus tel qu’il a été révélé par Allah ne nous est pas parvenu sous sa forme originale. En conséquence, nous pouvons affirmer que les quatre Evangiles inclus dans la Bible actuelle et les messages qui l’accompagnent ne peuvent être considérés comme semblables ou identiques à l’Evangile révélé à Jésus. A titre de preuves, nous présentons les indications qui suivent.

Le Nouveau Testament sur lequel les doctrines chrétiennes reposent a subi des changements radicaux, et presque toute nouvelle édition est différente des précédentes. Certains changements qui ont lieu actuellement sont si fondamentaux qu’ils touchent les racines mêmes du christianisme. Par exemple, les deux seules références à l’ascension de Jésus, trouvées dans les Evangiles de Marc et Luc, ont été maintenant supprimées de l'édition de 1952. Ces passages contenaient « la preuve » citée pour supporter l’ascension de Jésus, comme suit: « Le Seigneur, après leur avoir parlé, fut enlevé au ciel et il s’assit à la droite de Dieu. » [Marc 16: 19]. «Pendant qu'il les bénissait, il se sépara d'eux, et fut enlevé au ciel. » [Luc 24: 51].

En ce qui concerne le verset en rapport avec l’ascension de Jésus dans l’Evangile de Marc, il a été supprimé avec un certain nombre d’autres versets le précédant ou lui succédant immédiatement.

Mais Luc 24: 51 maintenant se lit comme suit:«Pendant qu'il les bénissait, il se séparait d’eux. »

Ainsi, les mots «fut enlevé au ciel » ont été supprimés.

Dans Mathieu 16: 27-28, nous pouvons lire: « Car le Fils de l'homme doit venir dans la gloire de son Père, avec ses anges; et alors il rendra à chacun selon ses oeuvres. Je vous le dis en vérité, quelques-uns de ceux qui sont ici ne mourront point, qu'ils n'aient vu le Fils de l'homme venir dans son règne. » Comme cette prophétie ne se réalisa jamais, nous pouvons en conclure que ce n’était là qu’une fabrication imputée à Jésus Christ, lequel était un vrai prophète de Dieu et donc, ne mentait pas.

En parlant de Pierre, l’Evangile de Mathieu se contredit dans la même page. Alors que Jésus dit de lui:«Jésus, reprenant la parole, lui dit: Tu es heureux, Simon, fils de Jonas; car ce ne sont pas la chair et le sang qui t'ont révélé cela, mais c'est mon Père qui est dans les cieux. Et moi, je te dis que tu es Pierre, et que sur cette pierre je bâtirai mon Église, et que les portes du séjour des morts ne prévaudront point contre elle. Je te donnerai les clefs du royaume des cieux: ce que tu lieras sur la terre sera lié dans les cieux, et ce que tu délieras sur la terre sera délié dans les cieux. » [Mathieu 16: 17-19], Mathieu 16: 23, cependant, a une position totalement opposée à tout ce qui a été mentionné ci-dessus, quand il dit: «Mais Jésus, se retournant, dit à Pierre: Arrière de moi, Satan! Tu m'es en scandale; car tes pensées ne sont pas les pensées de Dieu, mais celles des hommes.»

Selon les événements de la soi-disant « crucifixion », Mathieu 27: 44 dit: «Les brigands, crucifiés avec lui, l’insultaient de la même manière.» Ici, il est fait référence aux (deux) brigands agissant ensemble. Par contre, Luc 23: 39-40 dit: «L'un des malfaiteurs crucifiés l'injuriait, disant: N'es-tu pas le Christ?

Sauve-toi toi-même, et sauve-nous! Mais l'autre le reprenait, et disait: Ne crains-tu pas Dieu, toi qui subis la même condamnation?». Dans ce dernier exemple, les deux brigands agissent en contradiction l’un avec l’autre. La liste des contradictions dans la Bible est trop longue, pour que nous puissions les mentionner toutes dans cet écrit.

Les changements, altérations et contradictions ne se trouvent pas seulement dans le Nouveau Testament mais aussi dans l’Ancien Testament([12]). Par exemple, dans 2 Rois 8: 26, on nous apprend: «Achazia avait vingt-deux ans lorsqu'il devint roi…» Ceci contredit 2 Chroniques 22: 2 qui affirme: «Achazia avait quarante-deux ans lorsqu'il devint roi …» Une autre contradiction se trouve dans 2 Rois 24: 8: «Jojakin avait dix-huit ans lorsqu'il devint roi, et il régna trois mois à Jérusalem.», si on la compare à 2 Chroniques 36: 9: «Jojakin avait huit ans lorsqu'il devint roi, et il régna trois mois et dix jours à Jérusalem.» 2 Samuel 6: 23: «Or Mical, fille de Saül, n'eut point d'enfants jusqu'au jour de sa mort.» est en contradiction avec 2 Samuel 21: 8 où l'on peut lire: «Mais le roi prit les deux fils que Ritspa, fille d'Ajja, avait enfantés à Saül, Armoni et Mephiboscheth, et les cinq fils que Mical, fille de Saül, avait enfantés à Adriel de Mehola, fils de Barzillaï.» Dans la Nouvelle Version Américaine Standard de 1973, le nom Mical, qui apparaît tout à la fois dans la Version du Roi James et dans la Nouvelle Traduction Mondiale des Témoins de Jéhovah, est remplacé par Mérab pour dissimuler la contradiction.

Abordant la question de la vision de Dieu, comme cela est affirmé à la fois dans l’Ancien et le Nouveau Testament, Jean 1: 18 nous raconte: «Personne n'a jamais vu Dieu …» Ceci est également confirmé par 2 Jean 4: 12. Cependant, Genèse 32: 30 nous réfère une différente histoire «Jacob appela ce lieu du nom de Peniel: car, dit-il, j'ai vu Dieu face à face, et mon âme a été sauvée.» D’une façon assez étrange, ceci est aussi confirmé par Exode 33: 11 «L'Éternel parlait avec Moïse face à face, comme un homme parle à son ami.» et dans Exode 24: 9-11, nous sommes ainsi informés: «Moïse monta avec Aaron …. Ils virent Dieu, et ils mangèrent et burent.»

Nous trouvons de même dans Jean 3: 13 «Personne n'est monté au ciel, si ce n'est celui qui est descendu du ciel, le Fils de l'homme qui est dans le ciel.» Ceci contredit de nouveau Genèse 5: 24 qui dit: «Hénoc marcha avec Dieu; puis il ne fut plus, parce que Dieu le prit.» ainsi que 2 Rois 2: 1 «Lorsque l'Éternel fit monter Élie au ciel dans un tourbillon, Élie partait de Guilgal avec Élisée.» Donc, c’était seulement le Christ qui a été élevé au ciel ou est-ce que Hénoc et Élie l'ont été eux aussi ?

De même, il existe de nombreuses versions contradictoires de l’Ancien Testament (Hébreux, Grec, Sumérien) dont les auteurs, dans de nombreux cas, selon des autorités bibliques, restent anonymes. La même chose s’applique à «la grande majorité des auteurs et des éditeurs des livres de la Bible, qui étaient présumés constituer les porte parole de Dieu pour leurs peuples,

étaient eux aussi anonymes» d’après la version française.

La position de l’Islam vis-à-vis de la Bible est une position juste et équitable. Il est évident que la Bible est un livre qui contient un mélange de vérités et de mensonges.

Le critère et la référence que l’Islam utilise pour distinguer la vérité du mensonge sont le Saint Coran et la Sunna du Prophète Mohamed. Plus simplement, toute chose qui dans la Bible est en accord avec le Coran et la Sunna est acceptable et toute chose en contradiction avec le Coran est rejetée. D’autres rapports ne doivent pas être crus ou critiqués. Quant aux livres saints révélés aux Prophètes Abraham, Moise, David, Jésus, etc. (que la paix soit sur eux tous) c’est une obligation pour tout fidèle musulman d'y croire.

IV. L’authenticité du Coran

Le dernier Livre révélé par Allah à l’humanité, le Coran, est resté intact, préservé de tout changement humain pendant désormais plus de 1400 ans([13]).Le dernier message d’Allah fut révélé au Prophète Mohamed sur une période de vingt-trois ans. Il fut révélé en segments de différentes longueurs. Aussitôt que le Prophète Mohamed recevait un segment, il en récitait les versets à ses compagnons qui, à leur tour, les écrivaient et les mémorisaient. De plus, le Prophète indiquait l’endroit précis où chaque segment doit être placé dans le corps de la compilation complète du texte. De cette façon, le Coran, dans sa totalité, a été écrit et mémorisé par des centaines de ses disciples durant toute sa vie. Abu-Bakr, le premier Calife, chargea Zeid-Ibn-Thabet de compiler un volume authentique, sous forme d’un livre, après la mort du Prophète. Par la suite, sur ordre du troisième Calife, Othman-Ibn-Affene, sept manuscrits compacts furent préparés et envoyés aux différents centres du monde islamique.

L’existence du Coran dans son texte original, en arabe, l’existence de millions de personnes qui le mémorisèrent avec précision et exactitude, en différentes parties du monde et l’accord total entre toutes ces copies et ces manuscrits témoignent de l’authenticité de la dernière

révélation envoyée par Allah à l’humanité.

Le Coran dans sa totalité est la parole de Dieu, dans son fond et dans sa forme, sans adjonction ou omission.

Quand Allah dit dans le Coran:«Dis: "Il est Allah, Unique"», le Prophète Mohamed, qui est le messager, ne pouvait supprimer un mot ni même une lettre de la parole divine. Il doit dire «Dis: "Il est Allah, Unique"» et cela sans omettre la forme impérative du verbe. De plus, les hadiths prophétiques qui sont la deuxième source de la législation islamique et qui ont été eux aussi révélés par Allah dans leur signification et non dans leur forme, sont consignés et gardés à part, dans des livres de hadiths.

Quant à la Bible, c’est un mélange de discours présumés dits par Dieu, accompagnés à d’autres, attribués aux Prophètes et d’autres encore, référés par des personnes.

Il est évident pour quiconque lit le Coran, que ce livre se concentre entièrement sur l'unicité d'Allah (taouhid). Il ne décrit pas la vie du Prophète Mohamed ou ses actes héroïques, comme la plupart des gens peuvent s’imaginer.

Quiconque lit le Saint Coran voit avec clarté que celui-ci promeut la croyance en l’unicité (taouhid) d’Allah, Le glorifie, respecte Ses commandements et appelle à s’abstenir de ce qu’Il a interdit. Le Coran fait référence à Mohamed en tant que Messager de Dieu comme tous les Messagers qui l’ont précédé. Au chapitre 3, verset 144, on peut lire «Muhammad n'est qu'un messager -des messagers avant lui sont passés -. S'il mourait, donc, ou s'il était tué, retourneriez-vous sur vos talons? Quiconque retourne sur ses talons ne nuira en rien à Allah; et Allah récompensera bientôt les reconnaissants.» Le Prophète est aussi décrit comme étant incapable d'intervenir au bénéfice de quiconque, même sa propre personne, sans la permission d’Allah. Chapitre 7, verset 188 nous fait savoir «Dis: "Je ne détiens pour moimême ni profit ni dommage, sauf ce qu'Allah veut. Et si je connaissais l'Inconnaissable, j'aurais eu des biens en abondance et aucun mal ne m'aurait touché. Je ne suis, pour les gens qui croient, qu'un avertisseur et un annonciateur".»

En effet, certains versets reprochent même au Prophète certaines de ses actions; d’autres versets lui lancent de sévères avertissements. Dans une des sourates, il est question d'un aveugle qui s’approcha du Prophète Mohamed alors que celui-ci appelait les riches de la Mecque à se convertir à l’Islam; ainsi il l’interrompait en le suppliant de l’instruire. Le Prophète fronça les sourcils et ignora le vieillard, car il savait que c'était un homme pieux qui pouvait sans aucun mal attendre la fin de la réunion. Cependant, le Prophète fut blâmé par Allah dans le Coran au chapitre 80, versets 1-11 «Il s'est renfrogné et il s'est détourné, parce que l'aveugle est venu à lui. Qui te dit: peut-être (cherche)-t-il à se purifier? Ou à se rappeler en sorte que le rappel lui profite? Quant à celui qui se complaît dans sa suffisance (pour sa richesse), tu vas avec empressement à sa rencontre. Or, que t'importe qu'il ne se purifie pas". Et quant à celui qui vient à toi avec empressement, tout en ayant la crainte, tu ne t'en soucies pas. N'agis plus ainsi ! Vraiment ceci est un rappel.»

Celui qui lit le Coran peut également être surpris en lisant chapitre 69, versets 44-47, qui s’adressent au Prophète Mohamed: «Et s'il avait forgé quelques paroles qu'ils Nous avait attribuées, Nous l'aurions saisi de la main droite, ensuite, Nous lui aurions tranché l'aorte. Et nul d'entre vous n'aurait pu lui servir de rempart.»

D’ailleurs, les païens du temps du Prophète l’accusaient d’être lui-même l'auteur et falsificateur du Coran. C’est à ce moment-là qu’Allah révéla au Prophète plusieurs versets dans lesquels Il lançait aux païens le défi de produire un livre semblable au Coran. Au chapitre 17, versets 88, on peut lire «Dis: "Même si les hommes et les djinns s'unissaient pour produire quelque chose de semblable à ce Coran, ils ne sauraient produire rien de semblable, même s'ils se soutenaient les uns les autres".» De même, au chapitre 52, versets 33-34, il est dit «Ou bien ils disent: "Il l'a inventé lui-même?" Non... mais ils ne croient pas. Eh bien, qu'ils produisent un récit pareil à lui (le Coran), s'ils sont véridiques». Mais ils ne réussirent jamais à le faire. Plus tard, le défi fut réduit à dix chapitres, comme il nous est dit au chapitre 11, verset 13, où l’on peut lire: «Ou bien ils disent: "Il l'a forgé (le Coran)"- Dis: "Apportez donc dix Sourates semblables à ceci, forgées (par vous).

Et appelez qui vous pourrez (pour vous aider), hormis Allah, si vous êtes véridiques".» Mais ils échouèrent encore.

Ensuite, le défi fut réduit à un seul et unique chapitre.

Le Chapitre 2, versets 23-24, nous informe: «Si vous avez un doute sur ce que Nous avons révélé à Notre Serviteur, tâchez donc de produire une sourate semblable et appelez vos témoins, (les idoles) que vous adorez en dehors d'Allah, si vous êtes véridiques. Si vous n'y parvenez pas et, à coup sûr, vous n'y parviendrez jamais, parez-vous donc contre le feu qu'alimenteront les hommes et les pierres, lequel est réservé aux infidèles.» Au chapitre 10, verset 38, on peut lire: «Ou bien ils disent: "Il (Muhammad) l'a inventé?" Dis: "Composez donc une sourate semblable à ceci, et appelez à votre aide n'importe qui vous pourrez, en dehors d'Allah, si vous êtes véridiques".»

Ils échouèrent toujours.Tout cela prouve que les implacables ennemis de l’Islam, malgré leur très grande éloquence en Arabe, ne parvinrent jamais à composer un seul chapitre semblable à ceux du Coran. S’ils avaient été à la hauteur du défi, ils se seraient épargnés le temps et l’effort qu'ils ont dépensé pour mettre un terme à l’Islam par la force.

Contrairement à la Bible, le Saint Coran est exempt de toute erreur, anomalie, contradiction et/ou conflit avec la raison et/ou la science. Au chapitre 4, verset 82, on peut lire: «Ne méditent-ils donc pas sur le Coran? S'il provenait d'un autre qu'Allah, ils y trouveraient certes maintes contradictions!»

Le Coran qui fut révélé il y a quatorze siècles a mentionné des faits qui n’ont été découverts ou prouvés par les hommes de science, que récemment. C’est au-delà de la limite du raisonnable de penser qu’un homme analphabète 1400 ans auparavant, ait pu connaître des faits qui n’ont été découverts ou prouvés que depuis très peu de temps et cela grâce à des équipements sophistiqués et au bout de longues et très prenantes recherches scientifiques.

Ceci prouve sans le moindre doute que Mohamed (la paix d’Allah soit sur lui) est un vrai Prophète d’Allah et que le Coran n’a pas été composé par lui, ni par tout autre humain. Par exemple, Allah parle avec vivacité des différentes phases du développement embryonnaire de

l’homme en ces termes: «Nous avons certes créé l'homme d'un extrait d'argile. Puis Nous en fîmes une goutte de sperme dans un reposoir solide.

Ensuite, Nous avons fait du sperme une adhérence; et de l'adhérence Nous avons créé un embryon; puis, de cet embryon Nous avons créé des os et Nous avons revêtu les os de chair.

Ensuite, Nous l'avons transformé en une tout autre création. Gloire à Allah le Meilleur des créateurs! » [Coran 23: 12-14]

Le Saint Coran parle également de la formation de l’univers. Au chapitre 21, verset 30, on peut lire: «Ceux qui ont mécru, n'ont-ils pas vu que les cieux et la terre formaient une masse compacte? Ensuite Nous les avons séparés et fait de l'eau toute chose vivante. Ne croiront-ils donc pas?» Rien de surprenant donc que le sujet de ce verset ait été celui du Prix Nobel en 1973, alors que la science moderne prouve que 80% du cytoplasme de la cellule vivante est constitué en fait, d’eau. Que Mohamed (la paix d'Allah soit sur lui), un homme analphabète([14]), dise cela quatorze siècles auparavant, est une preuve évidente que le Coran n’est rien d'autre que la parole de Dieu et que Mohamed est Son Messager.

V. La vie et la mission de Jésus On connaît très peu des premières années de la vie de Jésus. La Vierge Marie lui donna naissance en Palestine.

Tous les musulmans croient en Jésus et le respectent à cause des références à son sujet dans le Coran, comme l’un des plus grands Prophètes d’Allah.

L’essence de ses préceptes est basée sur la croyance en un Dieu unique et l’amour pour l’humanité. Il réalisa plusieurs miracles. Cependant, il n’attribua jamais leur mérite à sa propre personne mais il montra toujours que c’était la volonté d’Allah([15]). Dans Jean 5: 30, Jésus dit: «Je ne puis rien faire de moi-même.» Dans Luc 11: 20, on peut aussi lire: «Mais, si c'est par le doigt de Dieu que je chasse les démons,…». Jésus avait aussi l’habitude de prier Allah, le Créateur des Cieux et de la Terre, pour que les voeux se réalisent. En ce qui concerne le retour de Lazare à la vie, Jean 11: 41-42 déclare: «Ils ôtèrent donc la pierre. Et Jésus leva les yeux en haut, et dit: Père, je te rends grâces de ce que tu m'as exaucé..» Simon  (Pierre), un des principaux disciples, dit: «Hommes Israélites, écoutez ces paroles! Jésus de Nazareth, cet homme à qui Dieu a rendu témoignage devant vous par les miracles, les prodiges et les signes qu'il a opérés par lui au milieu de vous, comme vous le savez vous-mêmes.» (Actes 2: 22). Même ceux qui furent les témoins oculaires de ces miracles savaient qu’ils étaient approuvés par Dieu et que Jésus n’était qu’un de Ses Prophètes. Quant au fils de la veuve que Jésus avait ramené à la vie, ceux qui étaient présents proclamèrent: «disant: Un grand prophète a paru parmi nous, et Dieu a visité son peuple.» (Luc 7: 16).

Dans le Coran, ce grand Prophète d’Allah est mentionné sous le nom de Issa, fils de Marie (Jésus fils de Marie- que la paix soit sur eux ) vingt-cinq fois, alors que le nom du Prophète Mohamed (que la bénédiction et le salut de Dieu soient sur lui) n'est lui, mentionné que cinq fois.

Dans la sourat (chapitre) d’Al Imran (la famille de Imran) 3: 42-62, nous lisons:42. (Rappelle-toi) quand les Anges dirent:"Ô Marie([16]), certes Allah t'a élue et purifiée; et Il t'a élue au-dessus des femmes des mondes.

43. "Ô Marie, obéis à Ton Seigneur, prosterne-toi, et incline-toi avec ceux qui s'inclinent".44. Ce sont là des nouvelles de l'Inconnaissable que Nous te révélons. Car tu n'étais pas là lorsqu'ils jetaient leurs calames pour décider qui se chargerait de Marie! Tu n'étais pas là non plus lorsqu'ils se disputaient! 45. (Rappelle-toi) quand les Anges dirent:"Ô Marie, voilà qu'Allah t'annonce une parole([17]) de Sa part: son nom sera "Al-Masîh", "`Issâ", fils de Marie, illustre ici-bas comme dans l'au-delà, et l'un des rapprochés d'Allah".46. Il parlera aux gens, dans le berceau et en son âge mûr et il sera du nombre des gens de bien".47. Elle dit: "Seigneur! Comment aurais-je un enfant, alors qu'aucun homme ne m'a touchée?" -"C'est ainsi!" dit-Il. Allah crée ce qu'Il veut. Quand Il décide d'une chose, Il lui dit seulement: "Sois";et elle est aussitôt.48. Et (Allah) lui enseignera l'écriture, la sagesse([18]), la Thora et l'Evangile,49. et Il sera le messager aux enfants d'Israël, (et leur dira): "En vérité, je viens à vous avec unsigne de la part de votre Seigneur. Pour vous, je forme de la glaise comme la figure d'un oiseau([19]), puis je souffle dedans: et, par la permission d'Allah, cela devient un oiseau. Et je guéris l'aveugle-né, et le lépreux, et je ressuscite les morts, par la permission d'Allah. Et je vous apprends ce que vous mangez et ce que vous amassez dans vos maisons. Voilà bien là un signe, pour vous, si vous êtes croyants! 50. Et je confirme ce qu'il y a dans la Thora révélée avant moi, et je vous rends licite une partie de ce qui vous était interdit. Et j'ai certes apporté un signe de votre Seigneur. Craignez Allah donc, et obéissez-moi. 51. Allah est mon Seigneur et votre Seigneur. Adorez-Le donc: voilà le chemin droit." 52. Puis, quand Jésus ressentit de l'incrédulité, de leur part, il dit: "Qui sont mes alliés dans la voie d'Allah?" Les apôtres dirent: "Nous sommes les alliés d'Allah. Nous croyons en Allah. Et sois témoin que nous lui sommes soumis. 53. Seigneur! Nous avons cru à ce que Tu as fait descendre et suivi le messager. Inscris-nous donc parmi ceux qui témoignent". 54. Et ils (les autres) se mirent à comploter. Allah a fait échouer leur complot. Et c'est Allah qui sait le mieux leur machination! 55. (Rappelle-toi) quand Allah dit: "Ô Jésus, certes, Je vais mettre fin à ta vie terrestre, t'élever vers Moi([20]), te débarrasser de ceux qui n'ont pas cru et mettre jusqu'au Jour de la Résurrection, ceux qui te suivent au-dessus de ceux qui ne croient pas. Puis, c'est vers Moi que sera votre retour, et Je Jugerai, entre vous, ce sur quoi vous vous opposiez.56. Quant à ceux qui n'ont pas cru, Je les châtierai d'un dur châtiment, ici-bas tout comme dans l'au-delà; et pour eux, pas de secoureurs. 57. Et quant à ceux qui ont la foi et font de bonnes oeuvres, Il leur donnera leurs récompenses. Et Allah n'aime pas les injustes. 58. Voilà ce que Nous te récitons des versets et de la révélation précise. 59. Pour Allah, Jésus est comme Adam qu'Il créa de poussière, puis Il lui dit: "Sois" et il fut. 60. La vérité vient de ton Seigneur. Ne sois donc pas du nombre des sceptiques. 61. A ceux qui te contredisent à son propos, maintenant que tu en es bien, informé, tu n'as qu'à dire: "Venez, appelons nos fils et les vôtres, nos femmes et les vôtres, nos propres personnes et les vôtres, puis proférons exécration réciproque en appelant la malédiction d'Allah sur les menteurs. 62. Voilà, certes, le récit véridique. Et il n'y a pas de divinité à part Allah. En vérité, c'est Allah qui est le Puissant, le Sage.

Et au chapitre Mariam (Marie) 19: 16-36, Allah révèle: 16. Mentionne, dans le Livre (le Coran), Marie, quand elle se retira de sa famille en un lieu vers l'Orient. 17. Elle mit entre elle et eux un voile. Nous lui envoyâmes Notre Esprit (Gabriel), qui se présenta à elle sous la forme d'un homme parfait. 18. Elle dit: "Je me réfugie contre toi auprès du Tout Miséricordieux. Si tu es pieux, (ne m'approche point)." 19. Il dit: "Je suis en fait un Messager de ton Seigneur pour te faire don d'un fils pur". 20. Elle dit: "Comment aurais-je un fils, quand aucun homme ne m'a touchée, et que je ne suis pas prostituée?" 21. Il dit: "Ainsi sera-t-il! Cela M'est facile, a dit ton Seigneur! Et Nous ferons de lui un signe pour les gens, et une miséricorde de Notre part. C'est une affaire déjà décidée". 22. Elle devint donc enceinte (de l'enfant), et elle se retira avec lui en un lieu éloigné. 23. Puis les douleurs de l'enfantement l'amenèrent au tronc du palmier, et elle dit:"Malheur à moi! Que je fusse morte avant cet instant! Et que je fusse totalement oubliée!" 24. Alors, il l'appela d'au-dessous d'elle, (lui disant:) "Ne t'afflige pas. Ton Seigneur a placé à tes pieds une source. 25. Secoue vers toi le tronc du palmier: il fera tomber sur toi des dattes fraîches et mûres. 26. Mange donc et bois et que ton oeil se réjouisse! Si tu vois quelqu'un d'entre les humains, dis (lui:) "Assurément, j'ai voué un jeûne au Tout Miséricordieux: je ne parlerai donc aujourd'hui à aucun être humain". 27. Puis elle vint auprès des siens en le portant (le bébé). Ils dirent: "Ô Marie, tu as fait une chose monstrueuse! 28. "Soeur de Haroun, ton père n'était pas un homme de mal et ta mère n'était pas une prostituée". 29. Elle fit alors un signe vers lui (le bébé). Ils dirent: "Comment parlerions-nous à un bébé au berceau?" 30. Mais (le bébé) dit: "Je suis vraiment le serviteur d'Allah. Il m'a donné le Livre et m'a désigné Prophète. 31. Où que je sois, Il m'a rendu béni; et Il m'a recommandé, tant que je vivrai, la prière et la Zakat([21]); 32. et la bonté envers ma mère. Il ne m'a fait ni violent ni malheureux. 33. Et que la paix soit sur moi le jour où je naquis, le jour où je mourrai, et le jour où je serai ressuscité vivant." 34. Tel est `Issâ - (Jésus), fils de Marie: parole de vérité, dont ils doutent. 35. Il ne convient pas à Allah de S'attribuer un fils. Gloire et Pureté à Lui! Quand Il décide d'une chose, Il dit seulement: "Sois!" et elle est. 36. (Jésus dit), Certes, Allah est mon Seigneur tout comme votre Seigneur. Adorez-le donc. Voilà un droit chemin". De surcroît, la Sunna du Prophète Mohamed fait aussi référence au Prophète Jésus. Dans un hadith, le Prophète Mohamed dit: '' De tous les gens de ce monde ou de l’au-delà, je suis le plus proche de Issa Ibn Mariyam. Les prophètes sont des frères parentaux, leurs mères sont

différentes, mais leur religion est unique''. (Al-Boukhari:3370)

Dans un autre Hadith, le Prophète Mohamed dit également: «Quand un être humain est né, Satan le touche des deux côtés du corps avec ses deux doigts, sauf Jésus, le fils de Marie, que Satan a essayé de toucher mais échoua, car il toucha l’extérieur du placenta à sa place».( Al-

Boukhari: 3359) Ceci était en réponse à la supplication de sa grand-mère ‘la femme d’Imran’ quand, d’après la narration du Coran, elle disait: «… "Je l'ai nommée Marie, et je la place, ainsi que sa descendance, sous Ta protection contre le Diable, le banni".»(Coran 3: 36) ([22])

Le Coran considère que Jésus et Mohamed (que la paix soit sur eux) ont des caractères semblables: ils sont pareillement purs, immaculés et nobles, étant donné qu’ils sont tous deux Prophètes de Dieu Tout-Puissant.

VI. Le prophète Mohamed

Jésus avait informé les juifs qu’après lui, aucun Prophète ne paraîtrait parmi eux et que le Royaume de Dieu leur serait retiré et transféré à une nation plus méritante. Il est indiqué dans Mathieu 21: 43: "C`est pourquoi, je vous le dis, le royaume de Dieu vous sera enlevé, et sera donné à une nation qui en rendra les fruits.." Ceci fait ainsi référence aux descendants d’Ismaël, qui avaient été rejetés par les juifs ([23]).

Le Saint Coran déclare au chapitre 63, verset 6: «Et quand Jésus fils de Marie dit: "Ô Enfants d'Israël, je suis vraiment le Messager d'Allah (envoyé) à vous, confirmateur de ce qui, dans la Thora, est antérieur à moi, et annonciateur d'un Messager à venir après moi, dont le nom sera "'Ahmad". Puis quand celui-ci vint à eux avec des preuves évidentes, ils dirent: "C'est là une magie manifeste".».

Dans le Nouveau Testament, Jésus prédit la venue du Prophète Mohamed (que la bénédiction et le salut de Dieu soient sur lui) en ces termes: «Cependant je vous dis la vérité: il vous est avantageux que je m'en aille, car si je ne m'en vais pas, le consolateur ne viendra pas vers vous; mais, si je m'en vais, je vous l'enverrai. Et quand il sera venu, il convaincra le monde en ce qui concerne le péché, la justice, et le jugement... Quand le consolateur sera venu, l'Esprit de vérité, il vous conduira dans toute la vérité; car il ne parlera pas de lui-même, mais il dira tout ce qu'il aura entendu, et il vous annoncera les choses à venir. Il me glorifiera...» [Jean 16: 7-14]. Qui donc honora Jésus autant que le Prophète Mohamed (que la bénédiction et le salut de Dieu soient sur lui) ? ([24])

Dans l’un des Evangiles non canoniques, l’Evangile de Barnabé, Jésus dit: «…mais comme les hommes m'ont appelé Dieu et fils de Dieu, Dieu a voulu pour que je ne sois pas raillé par les démons le jour du jugement, que les hommes me bafouent dans le monde par la mort de Judas([25]) en faisant croire à chacun que c'était moi qui était mort sur la croix. Aussi cette dérision durera-t-elle jusqu'à la venue de Muhammad, le Messager de Dieu. En venant dans le monde, il détrompera de cette tromperie tous ceux qui croiront à la loi de Dieu. » [L’Evangile de Barnabé: 220].

Le Prophète Mohamed (que


Construction Manager New Home   

WA-Seattle, American Homes 4 Rent As one of the country's fastest-growing property management companies of single-family rental homes, American Homes 4 Rent has an exhilarating and fluid start-up culture and permanency of a well-founded corporation, rich with diversity. As pioneers in the industry, solidified by our place on Wall Street, American Homes 4 Rent (AMH: NYSE) is currently looking for qualified can

Clinical Pharmacist Consultant   

OR-Portland, Overview Clinical Pharmacist Consultant Seattle, WA At Cambia, our values are fundamental to achieving our Cause of transforming the health care industry. They guide our actions and bring diverse perspectives together to improve the health care journey better for those we serve. All eight values are equally important and linked to the others: Empathy, Hope, Courage, Trust, Commitment, Innovation,

The IRS Decided to Get Tough Against Microsoft. Microsoft Got Tougher.   


ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.

This story was co-published with Fortune.

Eight years ago, the IRS, tired of seeing the country’s largest corporations fearlessly stash billions in tax havens, decided to take a stand. The agency challenged what it saw as an epic case of tax dodging by one of the largest companies in the world, Microsoft. It was the biggest audit by dollar amount in the history of the agency.

Microsoft had shifted at least $39 billion in U.S. profits to Puerto Rico, where the company’s tax consultants, KPMG, had persuaded the territory’s government to give Microsoft a tax rate of nearly 0%. Microsoft had justified this transfer with a ludicrous-sounding deal: It had sold its most valuable possession — its intellectual property — to an 85-person factory it owned in a small Puerto Rican city.

Over years of work, the IRS uncovered evidence that it believed laid the scheme bare. In one document, a Microsoft senior executive celebrated the company’s “pure tax play.” In another, KPMG plotted how to make the company Microsoft created to own the Puerto Rico factory — and a portion of Microsoft’s profits — seem “real.”

Meanwhile, the numbers Microsoft had used to craft its deal were laughable, the agency concluded. In one instance, Microsoft had told investors its revenues would grow 10% to 12% but told the IRS the figure was 4%. In another, the IRS found Microsoft had understated revenues by $15 billion.

Determined to seize every advantage against a giant foe, the small team at the helm of the audit decided to be aggressive. It used special powers that the agency had shied away from using in the past. It took unprecedented steps like hiring an elite law firm to join the government’s side.

To Microsoft and its corporate allies, the nature of the audit posed a dire threat. This was not the IRS they knew. This was an agency suddenly committed to fighting and winning. If the aggression went unchecked, it would only encourage the IRS to try these tactics on other corporations.

“Most people, the 99%, they’re afraid of the IRS,” said an attorney who works on large corporate audits. “The other 1%, they’re not afraid. They make the IRS afraid of them.”

Microsoft fought back with every tool it could muster. Business organizations, ranging from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to tech trade groups, rallied, hiring attorneys to jump into the fray on Microsoft’s side in court and making their case to IRS leadership and lawmakers on Capitol Hill. Soon, members of Congress, both Republicans and Democrats, were decrying the IRS’ tactics and introducing legislation to stop the IRS from ever taking similar steps again.

The outcome of the audit remains to be seen — the Microsoft case grinds on — but the blowback was effective. Last year, the company’s allies succeeded in changing the law, removing or limiting tools the IRS team had used against the company. The IRS, meanwhile, has become notably less bold. Drained of resources by years of punishing budget cuts, the agency has largely retreated from challenging the largest corporations. The IRS declined to comment for this article.

Recent years have been a golden age for corporate tax avoidance, with massive companies awash in profits routinely paying tax rates in the single digits, or even nothing at all. But how corporations manage to do this and keep the IRS at bay is mostly shrouded in secrecy. The audit process is confidential, and the IRS, for all its flaws, simply doesn’t leak. Microsoft’s war with the IRS offers a rare view into how a giant company maneuvers to avoid taxes — and how it responds when the government tries to crack down. ProPublica has reconstructed the fight from thousands of pages of court documents, information obtained through public records requests and accounts from current and former IRS employees.

Microsoft declined to discuss its taxes in any detail. In response to extensive questions provided in writing, the company said it “follows the law and has always fully paid the taxes it owes.”

In 2010, the IRS announced that it was creating a new unit to audit international, intra-company deals. Tech, pharmaceutical and other giants had figured out how to use these dubious deals to avoid taxes on a colossal scale. It was hardly a secret: News articles had detailed how Google, Pfizer and others saved billions. Senate hearings ensued.

Despite the publicity, nothing changed. The trend, which had taken off in the 2000s, intensified. The losses to the U.S. Treasury in uncollected taxes ran well into the hundreds of billions of dollars. In 2016 alone, according to an estimate by economists including Gabriel Zucman of the University of California, Berkeley, U.S. corporations avoided $61 billion in taxes by sending profits to tax havens.

See the Chart: A Larger Share of U.S. Corporate Profits Shifted to Tax Havens

The concept was simple. A U.S. company sold its most valuable asset — for a tech company, its intellectual property — to a subsidiary in a place (Ireland, Singapore, Puerto Rico, etc.) where the tax rate was extremely low.

The details of these deals were monstrously complex, making it difficult for the IRS to prove they were done solely to dodge taxes. Essentially, the IRS had to argue that the company had set the wrong price for its intellectual property. And to do that, the agency had to understand the company, its markets and its prospects top to bottom. It was a near-impossible task, and the IRS suffered some key losses in court, which only emboldened companies to stake out even more aggressive positions.

In 2011, the IRS picked Samuel Maruca to lead the new unit. A partner at the prominent law firm Covington & Burling, Maruca had spent decades advising corporations on “transfer pricing,” as this area of tax is called, and facing off against the agency on audits. He came to the job, he said, to help fix a broken system.

Maruca is the picture of a tax lawyer (thinning hair, glasses). But unlike many of his colleagues, he expresses himself clearly, sometimes in moral terms. He told peers at industry conferences that the nation’s corporations had grown excessively bold. “We would all benefit,” he said, “from a resurgence of moderation and heightened regard for principle.”

To restore balance, the IRS “must produce some winners,” he said. “I really want to make a difference.”

Maruca built a team of about 60 — agents, attorneys and economists — with half recruited from outside the agency. For the IRS, this was a notable influx of talent. But it was still modest when compared with the scale of the challenge.

Among the key advisers on the new team was Eli Hoory, an attorney who had worked under Maruca at Covington and followed him over to the IRS a few months later. Hoory, then in his mid-30s, had a shaved head and prominent nose that gave him an angular appearance. Known for being extremely bright, he was also frank and outspoken, sometimes to a fault. A graduate of the U.S. Coast Guard Academy, he’d served as a reservist during law school and studied at the London School of Economics before landing at Covington.

Maruca and his team set about canvassing the IRS’ inventory to find good targets for producing “some winners,” as he’d put it.

Microsoft’s Puerto Rico deal almost slipped by. The week before Maruca started at the IRS in May 2011, the agency, which had already been auditing the transaction for four years, completed its work and sent Microsoft its findings.

That 2011 assessment by the IRS isn’t public, but it’s clear Maruca and Hoory were unimpressed. The IRS, they thought, had been credulous, accepting too many of Microsoft’s numbers. They also thought the IRS was set up for failure. The agency had been able to retain only one outside expert, an economist. If the case went to court, Microsoft would surely summon a cast of varied experts to undermine the IRS’ position.

It seems likely, given the size of Microsoft’s Puerto Rico transaction, that the IRS in May 2011 had hit the company with a tax bill in the billions. But Maruca and Hoory thought the agency was thinking small.

Maruca told Microsoft the IRS needed more time, and in early 2012, the IRS withdrew its findings. By then, Hoory had taken leadership of the audit. He began sending new document requests to Microsoft, asking for more interviews and considering what other experts the IRS needed to round out its case. Over the next three years, he and his team amassed tens of thousands of pages and conducted dozens of interviews with Microsoft personnel. (Hoory, who still works at the IRS, declined to comment.)

The evidence they assembled told a story. It revealed how Microsoft had built a massive Rube Goldberg machine that channeled at least $39 billion in profits to Puerto Rico. It revealed a workshop of outside consultants, economists and attorneys who, as they had with other corporate clients, meticulously planned a structure that seemed to have a basis in the law, even if it violated common sense.

The documents showed that Microsoft had been caught red-handed, Hoory believed. Despite all their care in preparing for an eventual audit, the deal’s architects had left damning evidence that, he thought, made it possible for the IRS to expose the sham.

In 2003, Microsoft had a decision to make. Since 1989, it had operated a manufacturing facility in the small city of Humacao at the eastern end of Puerto Rico. The factory existed because of a tax break, and that break was due to expire after 2005.

A 2003 company memo laid out the quandary. Microsoft had about 85 employees in Humacao burning Windows and Office software onto CDs. Doing that in Puerto Rico had saved the company almost $200 million in taxes over the years. Closing the plant and outsourcing Microsoft’s CD production when the tax break expired was the obvious choice. “The cost to manufacture one CD [in Puerto Rico] is from 1.4 to almost three times the cost of outsourcing,” the memo said.

There was one alternative to closing the plant, but it would “require very aggressive tax structuring and work,” according to Microsoft’s head of international tax, Glenn Cogswell, as cited in the 2003 memo. Microsoft could create a new tax advantage by using the factory as a means to stash U.S. profits. The memo dismissed that option as impractical.

But the next year, Microsoft changed its mind. KPMG, one of the “Big Four” accounting firms, made a persuasive pitch. Microsoft should engage in that very aggressive tax structuring, after all.

KPMG had “significant experience assisting Fortune 50 companies” faced with the same problem, according to a July 2004 PowerPoint presentation to Microsoft executives. KPMG could do for Microsoft what it had done for those other giant American corporations: send U.S. profits to the island.

Puerto Rico — which has an autonomous tax system even though it’s a U.S. territory — didn’t have a particularly low tax rate, but KPMG could fix that. Its partner in the San Juan office, the PowerPoint said, had “previously advised several U.S. clients on migrations of this type and successfully negotiated significant tax holidays for U.S. companies with the Puerto Rican government.”

The next month, a team of Microsoft executives met with KPMG to hash out the details. They made sure not to leave a paper trail. “This needs to be a verbal briefing with no handouts and no e-mail,” wrote Bill Sample, a senior Microsoft tax executive, in an email scheduling the meeting. “We will do this on the white board.”

Shuttling company profits from country to country was not a new idea for Microsoft. Not long before, it had conjured deals to send its profits in Asia to Singapore and its profits in Europe and Africa to Ireland. The Puerto Rico transaction, which would cover North and South America, would be the biggest and boldest yet.

Here’s how it would work. Microsoft’s Puerto Rican subsidiary would produce all the CDs for the American market. Because it was the sole producer, it would buy the exclusive rights to Microsoft’s technology. Those licenses would entitle the Puerto Rican company to a share of Microsoft’s American profits.

According to Hoory’s calculations, the factory subsidiary would send the parent company about $31 billion over 10 years — and receive almost $70 billion in profits in return over the same period. Instead of being taxed in the U.S., where the rate was 35%, the $39 billion difference between those figures would be taxed in Puerto Rico at a rate near 0%. It was a long-term plan that could continue indefinitely.

A chart developed by the IRS’ Eli Hoory to illustrate Microsoft’s Puerto Rico deal over its first 10 years. The government presented the chart in court in 2015.

It didn’t matter that the transaction was fundamentally absurd. Microsoft would never actually sell its most valuable asset to another company, let alone to a little tropical factory. Still, there were rules for constructing and valuing deals like this, and Microsoft and KPMG set out to prove they were following them.

Minutes from meetings involving KPMG’s experts show them straining to fit the details together. “This work needs to be very detailed and [have] incredibly great documentation to refute any IRS issues,” read the notes for one meeting in March 2005.

One problem was that there was a rush to get the deal done that summer, but Microsoft’s factory wouldn’t be ready to produce 100% of the CDs that soon. As a result, the new Puerto Rican subsidiary would only be a company on paper, while the old Puerto Rican company was still pumping out CDs. In order for the transaction to seem genuine, the new Puerto Rican subsidiary needed to appear to be bona fide.

“What can we do to make this thing real?” was the question, according to the notes for another KPMG meeting. They had an answer: “Go out and do something substantial, so go out and use insurance. Point to a contract with a third party … [that] shows that something real is being done.”

The spitballing continued when KPMG’s team met with a group of Microsoft employees a few days later. “What happens when all info sent online?” was another conundrum, according to meeting notes. If customers downloaded the software instead of getting it on a CD that was produced in Puerto Rico, would the premise of the deal — that it was based on CD manufacturing — be undermined? They ultimately decided that wasn’t a problem, “because customers seem to want CDs, and we’ll put the servers down in PR and send them CDs too.”

KPMG kept its promise to land a rock-bottom rate from the Puerto Rican government. In exchange for Microsoft’s promise to hire an additional 46 full-time employees, Puerto Rico’s secretary of state agreed to grant the company a tax rate that ranged from 0% to 2% for a period of 15 years. A spokesman for KPMG declined to comment.

See the Chart: Microsoft is Stashing More Money Offshore

By the next year, Microsoft had shifted all CD production for the Americas to Puerto Rico. In a written self-evaluation, a Microsoft executive celebrated: “This was a pure tax play and because we took the factory live by July 1 we were able to start claiming the tax benefit as planned.”

But Microsoft wouldn’t be telling the IRS the transaction was a pure tax play. The two sides of the transaction were supposed to arrive at a fair, “arm’s length” price, one that an unrelated company might pay to another. Of course, Microsoft was dealing with itself, and no company of its size had ever sold anything like what it was selling. So, to arrive at a price, KPMG’s economists generated complicated models. These would provide protection if the IRS questioned Microsoft’s numbers. The price was supposedly impartial, based on a thorough analysis of all the relevant variables.

One document in particular exploded this fallacy, Hoory believed. Shortly after the deal went live, a consulting firm delivered a report to Microsoft about the Puerto Rican subsidiary. It valued the company at $30.4 billion. As Hoory later testified, the document was “effectively saying a company that was worth nothing or a nominal amount on June 30th, 2005, was worth $30 billion one day later.”

On Jan. 14, 2014, Hoory stepped in front of a room of Microsoft executives and attorneys from Baker McKenzie, Microsoft’s law firm for the audit. It was his first presentation of his team’s findings. He did not hold back, showing slide after slide that detailed the distortions and errors of the Puerto Rico deal.

“Deal of the Century Return on Investment” said one slide. According to the IRS’ analysis, the Puerto Rican subsidiary had been set up to reap a 200% annual return. It meant that Microsoft’s price for the transaction was not remotely plausible.

Hoory argued that just about every aspect of the deal should be valued differently. Just what those numbers were is not public, but it’s clear he thought Microsoft had caused the Puerto Rican subsidiary to substantially underpay for the software rights while overestimating how much profit the U.S. operation could legitimately send to Puerto Rico.

The presentation put Microsoft on notice. Their big, bold Puerto Rican deal was the target of a big, bold audit. After Hoory finished his presentation, Microsoft’s tax team “said they had to think a little,” Hoory later testified.

It’s routine for IRS agents to share initial findings with corporations under audit. The point is to see whether the two sides might come to an agreement or at least agree on certain aspects and narrow the number of issues under dispute. That was part of Hoory’s mission that day.

But a month later, Microsoft told Hoory and Maruca that it did not want to discuss resolution. Instead, the company wanted the IRS to finalize its findings. With that in hand, Microsoft could then move the fight to another part of the IRS: the Office of Appeals. There, Microsoft had good reason to think it would fare much better.

The Office of Appeals provides taxpayers big and small with an independent review. If an agent has gotten it wrong, appeals can fix it. The office also aims to stem the flood of tax disputes into the courts. It’s where taxpayers go looking to cut a deal.

IRS agents often grouse about working hard on an exam only to see an appeals officer slash the amount of tax owed. To some veterans, the Office of Appeals is known as “the gift shop.”

“No question, Exam hates Appeals,” said Gerry Ouellette, who served as an appeals officer on large corporate cases until 2012 and now works with a Boston firm that advises taxpayers facing audits.

But there’s a logic to the slashing, he said. One reason that tax bills are cut is because the IRS fears it may lose in court. Appeals officers are supposed to judge the “litigation hazard” of a case and put a number on it. For instance, an appeals officer who thinks the IRS is only 30% likely to prevail in court might settle for 30 cents on the dollar.

That’s particularly likely to happen on large, complex audits. According to a 2016 report by the IRS’ inspector general, appeals of transfer pricing audits reduced the amount of tax owed by an average of 81%.

Appeals officers often feel pressure to be lenient, said Willie Chin, a recently retired Appeals officer who handled corporate cases. “If I have to give up the penalty to resolve the case, to move the case along, that’s the idea: to move the case along,” he said. Large corporations rarely face penalties at all, a 2019 report by the IRS’ inspector general found, and when they do, they can count on an appeal to reduce or eliminate the penalties 94% of the time.

The story is different for taxpayers who aren’t represented by a battalion of attorneys and CPAs, Chin said: “In my opinion, we hammer the little guys and we let the big guys go.”

Maruca and Hoory knew all this. It was no mystery why Microsoft was so eager to appeal. But they also knew they could prevent it.

The IRS has the power to “designate a case for litigation” — in other words, force a taxpayer to skip Appeals and go straight to court. It is a move sure to anger a powerful adversary. Not only does an appeal offer the corporation a good opportunity to see the audit overturned, but it does so with the promise that it will keep the details quiet. The U.S. Tax Court, by contrast, is a public forum.

In March 2014, Hoory told Microsoft that the IRS was considering designating the case for litigation. The case was just too big and unique to send to Appeals. “It is such a huge divergence in numbers,” he later testified, “and we have put a lot of energy into it.”

Hoory’s move was aggressive, but not unprecedented. From 2010 through April 2019, the IRS designated 13 cases for litigation, according to agency documents ProPublica obtained through a public records request. The IRS refused to divulge a list of those cases, but the known instances include other large corporations facing transfer-pricing audits: Amazon, Coca-Cola and Facebook.

Maruca and Hoory had other, more radical ideas on how to tackle such a massive case.They wanted to hire a high-powered outside attorney to help the IRS. In the past, they believed, the IRS had failed in court on big, complex cases for two main reasons. The first was that the agency hadn’t done enough work uncovering evidence. It was an error they were well on their way to fixing, they thought. The other stumbling block was the agency’s inability to make a persuasive argument and tell a compelling story to a judge.

Maruca and Hoory wanted a legal star, someone with the experience of winning an enormously complex case against a gigantic foe. But such attorneys are typically found in elite law firms, where large corporate clients might balk at the firm representing the IRS.

Maruca and Hoory concentrated on finding top attorneys who didn’t usually handle tax matters. Their first choice was David Boies. He had beaten Microsoft before, when he represented the Justice Department in its landmark 1998 antitrust lawsuit against the company. But Boies had another case that created a conflict of interest and couldn’t take the assignment.

The IRS’ next choice was Quinn Emanuel, which describes itself as a “global litigation colossus without equal.” That fit the bill. In May 2014, the two sides signed a $2.2 million contract. It provided for two of the firm’s top partners, John Quinn and John Gordon, each of whom bill more than $1,000 an hour, to spend hundreds of hours on the case along with a small team of other Quinn Emanuel lawyers.

The IRS did this quietly. It wasn’t until late August 2014, on the third page of a letter to Microsoft about scheduling further employee interviews, that Hoory let word slip. The IRS “will have one or more contractors attend,” he wrote. This “may include outside counsel from Quinn Emanuel.”

It didn’t go unnoticed. For the next week, Hoory and Mike Bernard, then Microsoft’s U.S. tax counsel, fired letters back and forth. Microsoft requested a copy of the IRS “engagement letter” with Quinn Emanuel. Hoory, apparently determined not to be too helpful, responded that there was none. When Bernard expressed disbelief and asked more generally for any contract, Hoory sent over a copy of the main section of the contract.

Microsoft was “deeply concerned” about the role of Quinn Emanuel, Bernard wrote, because the firm represented Microsoft competitors like Google and Motorola. He asked Hoory for more details. “We have conflict, confidentiality and ethical concerns,” he wrote.

Hoory responded but also urged Microsoft to make it clear whether it would allow the Quinn Emanuel attorneys to participate in the interviews. When Bernard again asked for more detail, Hoory wrote that he’d been accommodating, but “we are at a decision point now.” Would Microsoft prevent the Quinn Emanuel attorneys from questioning witnesses? “If you do not agree or do not respond, the Service will consider alternatives,” Hoory wrote.

A few weeks later, Hoory arrived at Microsoft’s Redmond, Washington, headquarters with a team of a few other IRS employees, a couple hired experts and Gordon of Quinn Emanuel. On Microsoft’s side, two senior tax executives and a group of Baker McKenzie attorneys attended the interviews.

Microsoft’s outside attorneys kept a close watch on Gordon, the IRS’ outside attorney. Whenever Gordon repeatedly pressed a Microsoft employee for an answer, Daniel Rosen of Baker McKenzie jumped in. “This is being done under the proviso that you guys control this,” Rosen told Hoory, according to a transcript of one interview. “If you don’t control Mr. Gordon, then this is over.” A few days later, when Gordon pushed another Microsoft employee to clarify an answer, the scene repeated. “We’re done with this line of questioning,” Rosen said. “And Mr. Gordon’s not directing this witness to answer any questions,” he said, “Mr. Hoory can, but this gentleman cannot.”

By this time, the investigation had grown intense. Hoory and his team were racing to put their case together while pushing Microsoft to provide more documents. They were up against an approaching deadline. At the end of the year, the statute of limitations would expire. The law gives the IRS three years to complete an audit, and Microsoft had agreed several times to give the IRS more time, as large corporations often do. Microsoft had done this because it was hoping to resolve the audit without a messy court battle. Now that hope was gone, and there would be no more extensions.

As the clock ticked down, Hoory considered his options. Microsoft had both buried the IRS in paper — sending over 1 million pages, much of which Hoory later said wasn’t relevant — and, in his view, failed to send everything the IRS had asked for. If he hurriedly wrapped up the case, he ran the risk of missing crucial pieces of evidence. The stakes, he decided, were too high. So, yet again, he decided to take a remarkable step.

In audits of large corporations, the law grants the IRS a special power. It can issue a “designated summons” for documents and interviews that, with the approval of a federal judge, temporarily stops the clock. After the summons is resolved, the clock starts again. It’s a muscle move that wrenches away any control the corporation has over the audit.

Before Maruca and Hoory arrived in 2011, the IRS had not used this tool since 1996. Partly, that was because it clashed with an IRS culture that valued amicable relations with the country’s largest taxpayers. There was also the potential cost to antagonizing powerful opponents. But for Hoory, these were secondary concerns. In October 2014, the IRS issued a designated summons to Microsoft, demanding 48 categories of documents.

The IRS also summoned for interviews a roster of Microsoft employees, including Steve Ballmer, who’d recently left as CEO. KPMG, too, got a summons. The IRS then filed suit in a federal court in Seattle to enforce its demands.

Microsoft set out to quash the summonses. Its attorneys argued that federal rules exclusively permit IRS employees to question witnesses. The IRS had broken the law by allowing the Quinn Emanuel attorneys to question witnesses, according to Microsoft, and by essentially putting them in charge of the audit.

It was fundamentally wrong for the IRS to use high-powered litigators, one Microsoft attorney argued in a hearing, because “they know how to win, and that’s very different” than the IRS’ mission. The IRS was supposed to work with taxpayers to “find the right number,” she said, not focus on winning.

The marks of Quinn Emanuel’s obsession with winning were all over the IRS’ actions, Microsoft’s attorneys contended. It was the hired sharks who’d prompted the agency to deluge Microsoft with more document and interview requests. It was their idea to force those interviews to be under oath, as opposed to the more common IRS practice of conducting “informal” interviews. And it was their idea to knock on Ballmer’s door with a summons. “It’s not unusual, in high-stakes litigation,” said one of Microsoft’s attorneys, for law firms “to try to put pressure on their opponent by doing things like asking to depose the CEO.”

The dispute over the summons became an opportunity for Microsoft to put Hoory — and the sort of IRS that he represented — on trial. Hoory took the stand to defend the IRS’ actions.

At the hearing in August 2015, Philip Beck handled the questioning for Microsoft. A top litigator, he’d once been a hired gun for the government himself, having replaced Boies as counsel in the antitrust case against Microsoft. Now he was on Microsoft’s side, arguing against the government’s use of outside counsel.

Beck found Hoory to be a frustrating quarry. He would not be pinned down and had a detailed explanation for everything. After an hour of this, Beck complained, “Your Honor, we are never going to get done today if I get 10-minute answers for yes or no questions.” The judge urged Hoory to be briefer. “I will do my best, Your Honor,” Hoory replied.

Beck’s frustrations continued as Hoory clouded the simplicity of Microsoft’s case. But in one area, Hoory allowed a simple answer. Beck asked: Wasn’t this “the first time in the history of the universe” that the IRS had hired an outside law firm to help conduct an audit?

Hoory said that was correct, adding, “I guess I am a trailblazer.”

Microsoft’s complaints grew louder when Hoory and a Justice Department attorney presented the IRS’ side. In addition to laying out the Puerto Rico transaction, Hoory divulged details that made an obvious tax dodge look even worse. Microsoft’s lawyers called that “mudslinging” meant to “punish” the company “for daring to oppose the IRS.”

Hoory testified that Microsoft had used a growth rate of 4% for tax purposes while publicly reporting to investors expected growth of 10% to 12%. One error in their calculations, he said, had “understated revenues by approximately $15 billion.”

After almost four hours of testimony, Hoory stepped down. “It has been a long day,” U.S. District Court Judge Ricardo Martinez said. “Mr. Hoory talks a mile a minute, and it was hard to follow up on all of that.” He added, turning to Hoory, “Working for the IRS is a good job for you.”

Microsoft, meanwhile, was fighting on other fronts, too. Its attorneys pursued Freedom of Information Act requests to dig up as much as they could about the Quinn Emanuel hiring, eventually filing several lawsuits to force the IRS to turn over documents.

The company also turned to its friends in Congress for help. In May 2015, Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, then the chair of the committee that oversees the IRS, and who counted Microsoft as one of his top campaign contributors, fired off a letter to the IRS commissioner about “outsourcing” the agency’s audit of “a corporate taxpayer.” That “appears to violate federal law and the express will of the Congress,” he wrote, and the $2.2 million contract “calls into question the IRS’ use of its limited resources.” By that time, Republicans in Congress had cut the IRS’ budget by $1.5 billion from its 2010 peak. (A spokesperson for Hatch declined to comment.)

Hatch asked the IRS “to immediately halt” Quinn Emanuel’s work on the case. Microsoft filed a copy of the letter in court a few days later.

But Martinez ruled in favor of the IRS and its use of the special summons to suspend the statute of limitations and demand additional documents. He wrote that he was “troubled” by the IRS’ use of outside counsel since it was unprecedented and that the hiring might “lead to further scrutiny by Congress.” But, he wrote, “Microsoft has no factual basis for the grand assertion that Quinn Emanuel was or will be engaging in taxation or conducting the audit.” Rather, the firm’s role was “limited” and “under the direct supervision of the IRS.”

The IRS had clear legal authority to hire Quinn Emanuel and for its attorneys to question witnesses, the judge ruled. Microsoft would have to comply with the summons.

It was a setback for Microsoft. But as the court case ground on, the company and its allies went to work on Capitol Hill to make sure something like this never happened again.

In the autumn of 2015, a new trade group emerged. It was called the Coalition for Effective and Efficient Tax Administration, or CEETA. Among the members were Microsoft, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a host of other business and tech groups. The new coalition hired lobbyists at PwC, another Big Four firm and one with a stable of well-connected former government officials and congressional staff.

The new group’s clout soon became clear. In October 2015, just a few days after CEETA members fired off a letter to the IRS decrying the use of outside counsel on audits, Pam Olson, one of CEETA’s PwC lobbyists, sat down for a two-hour meeting with Doug O’Donnell, the head of the IRS division that audits large corporations.

“When it comes to the tax law, I don’t like the word ‘enforcement,’” Olson, who oversaw tax policy as a Treasury Department official in the early 2000s, said in a speech to corporate tax executives that December. “Let’s remember that the agency is the Internal Revenue Service,” she said. Olson forwarded a copy of her speech to O’Donnell, who responded, according to emails obtained by ProPublica, “Thanks for sharing — I appreciate your perspective.” He said he would pass it on to other senior IRS officials.

CEETA’s lobbyists stalked the halls of Congress, urging reforms in response to the IRS’ newfound aggression. They found a ready audience. In late 2015, a senior aide to Hatch participated in an online seminar for tax professionals along with a senior Microsoft executive. According to a description, participants discussed “the actions of an increasingly aggressive IRS” and the need for reform. (The aide, Christopher Armstrong, has since left Congress and now works as a lobbyist. He did not respond to requests for comment.)

“Focusing on litigation destroys cooperative relationships between taxpayers and the IRS,” read a document distributed by CEETA’s lobbyists to lawmakers around that time and obtained by ProPublica. The proposals targeted the three bold steps Hoory had taken in the Microsoft audit: CEETA wanted lawmakers to curtail the IRS’ ability to block taxpayers’ access to the Office of Appeals, rein in the use of designated summons and prohibit outside lawyers from questioning witnesses.

The IRS had used these tools to audit one of the world’s largest companies and in few other cases. From 2010 through 2019, it blocked appeals in 13 cases (not counting Microsoft’s), used a designated summons in one case other than Microsoft’s and hired an outside attorney on an audit once. By comparison, from 2010 through 2018, the IRS completed about 18,000 audits of corporations with assets above $1 billion.

But CEETA members warned that the tactics posed a threat to small businesses. The leader of one tech group testified before the House Committee on Small Business about the IRS’ use of “intimidation tactics.” And the Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council sent a letter to Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, warning that small business owners “certainly do not have the resources to go up against a powerful $1,000-an-hour legal team in a tax dispute.”

A spokesman for CEETA, Brian Cove of Financial Executives International, said in a statement, “CEETA believed that IRS audit process changes often spread from one part of the IRS to another and could have an impact on small businesses.”

Portman introduced a bill that followed all three of CEETA’s recommendations. The next year, a bipartisan group of House lawmakers introduced a bill that largely mirrored Portman’s. CEETA cheered both times. (The lawmakers declined to comment.) Microsoft, Coca-Cola and Facebook, all companies that had had their path to appeals blocked, lobbied to support one or both bills, along with a collection of tech and business groups.

The ideas were ultimately included in a large, bipartisan bill called the “Taxpayer First Act” with a wide range of IRS reforms. The bill contained provisions similar to what CEETA had sought, though milder. The IRS would have a new process to follow in order to block appeals or designate summonses and would have to report to Congress when it did so. And the agency would now be barred from using an outside attorney to question a witness under oath. The bill passed overwhelmingly and was signed into law in July.

CEETA’s success sent a clear message to the IRS, one the agency appears to have heeded. In 2016, for example, when the IRS was locked in a battle with Facebook, the agency considered using a designated summons since the statute expiration was approaching. But the IRS did not use it, even though, according to an agency court filing, “the examination team had not completed its fact gathering efforts when the clock ran out.”

The era of daring, new initiatives has passed at the IRS. Instead, the agency appears to have largely avoided picking fights with large corporations and embraced the sort of cooperation urged by Microsoft and CEETA. In part, this is because the IRS is simply too weak. The agency has lost more than a third of its enforcement staff since 2010, and the result has been fewer audits. For corporations with assets over $20 billion, the audit rate has declined from about 100% in 2010 to under 50% in 2018.

See the Chart: The IRS Has Been Auditing the Largest Corporations Less Aggressively

The makeup of those remaining audits tells a story, too. The number of contentious audits, where corporations disagreed with the agency’s findings, have plummeted from 185 to 25, a drop of 86%. But audits that ended in agreement have stayed relatively steady over the years. Not surprisingly, audits ending in agreement tend to result in relatively small adjustments.

Microsoft, meanwhile, has continued to reap the benefits of its offshore deals. In 2017, the last year before the new tax law cut the corporate rate from 35% to 21%, Microsoft paid $2.4 billion in taxes on $29.9 billion in income, a rate of 8%. By that point, Microsoft had stored $142 billion in profits offshore, according to its public filings. Only two other U.S. companies had accrued more, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy: Apple, with $246 billion, and Pfizer, with $199 billion.

Bringing those foreign profits into the U.S., Microsoft disclosed in 2017, would have resulted in a $45 billion tax bill. Of course, the company didn’t do that. Instead, like other companies that stashed profits offshore, it waited for a better deal. There was good reason to wait: Back in 2004, for example, Congress had passed a tax holiday that allowed multinationals to bring home foreign profits at a tax rate of 5.25%.

At the end of 2017, the Trump administration and Republican Congress came through. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act required U.S. companies to bring home those foreign profits, but at a one-time rate ranging from 8% to 15.5%. So, instead of a $45 billion tax bill, Microsoft says it will pay $18 billion under this provision, a savings of $27 billion.

Time marches on. But the IRS and Microsoft are still in court, the clock still stopped.

The two sides most recently brawled in 2016. As before, the fight involved Hoory and the IRS taking a relatively aggressive position, and Microsoft and its allies reacting with dismay.

The dispute began when Microsoft refused to turn over some documents, most of them involving KPMG, in response to the summons. Microsoft argued the documents were protected by a privilege for tax advice. The government countered with an inflammatory claim: The Puerto Rico deal was, as Hoory put it in a filing, “illusory in nature, serving no material economic purpose except to shift income to Puerto Rico” and was thus a tax shelter.

A tax shelter is something done mainly to avoid taxes, whether legally or illegally, and the law provides far less protection for advice on such a scheme. In response, Microsoft argued that its Puerto Rican company “was a real business with real risks and was not a tax shelter.”

Its allies jumped in to help, too. The Chamber of Commerce filed an amicus brief, arguing that “the extreme positions articulated by the government … would chill businesses from obtaining and relying on the uninhibited advice of their tax advisors.” Other business groups made similar arguments.

In May 2017, Martinez ruled that he would view the disputed documents privately and then decide whether they ought to be turned over. Nearly three years later, he has yet to issue a ruling. (The judge was still reviewing the question as of early January, according to a person in his chambers.)

And so, 12 years after the IRS began its audit of the Puerto Rico deal, eight years after Hoory began his work on it, and five years after the IRS sued to enforce its summons, the audit continues.

One day, the judge will issue his ruling. Soon after, perhaps, the summons will be fully resolved, and the clock will start again. A few months later, the IRS will, at long last, officially tell Microsoft what it owes. In all likelihood, Microsoft will then file a petition in U.S. Tax Court, thus beginning a new court battle. From there, the fight could shift to a U.S. appeals court. A further appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is certainly possible.

And then, eventually, perhaps someday in the mid-2020s, the audit of Microsoft’s 2005 Puerto Rico deal will be done.

Update, Jan. 22, 2020: On Jan. 17, 2020, after this story was finalized for publication, but before it published, U.S. District Court Judge Ricardo Martinez issued his ruling on the remaining, disputed documents. It was another big win for the IRS in the case. (Martinez, who had taken the better part of three years to consider the ruling, issued it 10 days after ProPublica inquired about the delay.) Almost none of the documents were protected by various privileges, he ruled. Most crucially, he decided that all KPMG documents must be turned over, because the firm had been promoting a tax shelter. He wrote, “the Court finds itself unable to escape the conclusion that a significant purpose, if not the sole purpose, of Microsoft’s transactions was to avoid or evade federal income tax.” It’s an outcome that “serves the public interest,” he wrote, given the difficulty of the IRS’ task of discovering underreporting of corporate taxes.

Barring an appeal, the ruling resolves the summons enforcement case and means the audit can now be completed by the IRS in the coming months.


Human Intelligence. Simplifying Complex Problems with Cheryl Mobley of Recalibrate.   


That mindset that says 'One right answer'? You have to pull back and re-examine your assumptions: there IS more than one right answer.

(#94). Think your problems are too big to solve? Think again! Recalibrate CEO Cheryl Mobley impressed us so much with her presentation at a past ENGAGE conference that we had to sit down with her one-to-one to talk Human Intelligence, career future-proofing and about how the phone in your pocket could help unleash your creative problem-solving skills.



  • What does it take to become a better problem-solver in an increasingly more complex business world?
  • Why is it important for the challenges we're today as well as for the opportunities we'll come across in the future?
  • How do we fight the urge to jump in quickly to face a problem, when we SHOULD be stepping back and taking the time to SOLVE it creatively? 



Cheryl Mobley is based in Texas and has a 20 year track record of helping executives solve problems, get results and grow the bottom line. She launched reCalibrate a few years back after a career as a successful serial entrepreneur and served as President for a highly successful hospital. She's worked around the world and a few of her clients include Allied Irish Bank, Reed McClure Law Firm, Transglobal Services, Active Spine & Sport, the Washington State Department of Transportation and the Charles Schwab Corporation, one of the largest brokerage firms in the world.

Cheryl has presented to many groups and organisations, and has been featured in publications including AICPA, The News Tribune, WAC, Washington Journal, Women on the Move, and The Greater Seattle Area Chamber of Commerce and more. 

She is currently wrapping up writing her first book, that is tentatively titled: "Face to Face: 12 Wild Leadership Lessons from a South African Horse Safari". She'll also be launching her new podcast "Unearthing" early this year.

Connect with her on LinkedIn here.





The Voices. These conversations with expert guests are recorded by different members of the AICPA & CIMA team from our offices around the world. While the sound quality may vary, the insights will always be consistently useful.

Hear more. Get our shows every week automatically and free. Share them easily with colleagues and friends by using the icons on your app or media player.

Skill Up. Find related CPD/CPE resources at the AICPA Store and the CGMA Store.

Connect. #GoBeyondDisruption @AICPANews @CIMA_News



Know someone who'd enjoy this topic? Click on these links to share this episode with colleagues and friends.

©2020 Association of International Certified Professional Accountants (AICPA & CIMA)


Senior Program Officer – Discovery Hubs & Network, Discovery & Translational Sciences - Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation - Seattle, WA   

Our Global Health Program harnesses advances in science and technology to save lives in poor countries. We focus on the health problems that have a major impact…
From The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation - Sat, 11 Jan 2020 09:10:50 GMT - View all Seattle, WA jobs

Cronología del coronavirus originado en China, la enfermedad que tiene en vilo a todo el mundo   

Cronología del coronavirus originado en China, la enfermedad que tiene en vilo a todo el mundo

Cada día llegan nuevas noticias sobre el coronavirus originado en China. En esta cronología, que iremos actualizando, puedes seguirlas paso a paso.

Parece que ha transcurrido mucho más tiempo, pero no ha pasado ni un mes desde que se daban a conocer los primeros casos del coronavirus que tiene a toda China y al resto del mundo en vilo. Las noticias se enmarañan unas con otras y el número de infectados y víctimas no para de crecer.

Además, la alarma se está extendiendo a otros países, en los que ya han comenzado a aparecer los primeros pasos, llegando incluso a atravesar las fronteras de Asia.

¿Pero qué ha ocurrido exactamente en estos 23 días? En esta cronología repasamos los sucesos más importantes que se han ido dando desde entonces e iremos añadiendo las nuevas noticias que se conozcan al respecto.

31 de diciembre de 2019: el brote se hace público

El gobierno chino, junto a la Organización Mundial de la Salud, da a conocer la existencia en el país de una misteriosa enfermedad respiratoria, surgida en la ciudad de Wuhan, muy probablemente en un mercado de marisco en el que se vendían animales vivos. De momento se han detectado 27 casos, algunos de ellos críticos y otros próximos a recibir el alta médica.

9 de enero: el culpable sale a la luz

Tras unos primeros días de gran preocupación, por temor a que la enfermedad estuviese relacionada con el SARS, que tantas personas mató en China entre 2002 y 2003, los resultados de la secuenciación de las muestras extraídas de algunos de los enfermos concluyen que se trata también de un coronavirus, pero aparentemente mucho menos letal. Para entonces el número de enfermos ha ascendido hasta 59, todos ellos dentro de las fronteras chinas, pero ya hay algunos casos fuera de la ciudad de Wuhan.

11 de enero: primera víctima

La noticia que todo el mundo temía llega el 11 de enero, con el anuncio del fallecimiento de la primera víctima de del coronavirus. Se trata de un hombre de 61 años, afectado por un cáncer y enfermedad hepática crónica.

13 de enero: primer caso fuera de China

Aunque había algunas personas en observación en varios países asiáticos, el primer caso confirmado de infección por el coronavirus se hace esperar hasta el 13 de enero, cuando el Ministerio de Salud Pública de Tailandia informa sobre una mujer china que ha enfermado de neumonía después de regresar de un viaje en Wuhan.

17 de enero: empiezan los controles

Tras las noticias llegadas desde Tailandia, en Estados Unidos se toma la determinación de establecer controles de temperatura en tres de sus aeropuertos más grandes, incluido el de Nueva York, al que llegan vuelos directos desde Wuhan.

En días posteriores empezará a tomarse esta medida en los principales aeropuertos de Australia, Bangladesh, Nepal, Singapur, Rusia, Malasia, Vietnam, Japón, Tailandia, Corea del Sur y Taiwán.

20 de enero: el virus se transmite de humano a humano

Si bien en un inicio se pensaba que la transmisión solo podía darse de animales a humanos, el gobierno chino y la Organización Mundial de la Salud han anunciado la existencia de los primeros casos demostrados de contagio entre humanos. Además, varios trabajadores de los centros sanitarios en los que estaban ingresados los enfermos también han contraído la enfermedad. Dos días después, el viceministro de la Comisión Nacional de Salud, Li Bin, habla sobre la posibilidad de que el coronavirus mute y pueda propagarse todavía más fácilmente. Ya se conocen seis víctimas y el número de infectados supera los 300.

21 de enero: el virus sale de Asia

El primer caso fuera de Asia, concretamente en Estados Unidos, es un hombre de 30 años, residente en Seattle. Acudió él mismo a las autoridades, después de comenzar a sentir los síntomas a su vuelta de Wuhan y conocer la noticia del virus en televisión.

Por el momento está ingresado para su monitorización, pero se encuentra en buen estado y evoluciona favorablemente.

Se conoce también un caso sospechoso en Australia, pero aún no se ha confirmado que se trate del coronavirus.

22 de enero: los infectados podrían ser mucho más

Dada la rapidez con la que se está propagando el virus por otros países, expertos del Imperial College de Londres lanzan un comunicado en el que se calcula que la cifra real de enfermos por el coronavirus podría ser mucho mayor, situándose por encima de los 1.700.

22 de enero: el gobierno cierra la ciudad de Wuhan

Al ser la ciudad en la que se encuentra el mayor número de enfermos y, además, en la que tuvo origen el virus, el gobierno chino ha tomado la determinación de cerrar las fronteras de Wuhan. La medida se hará oficial el día 23, a las 10 de la mañana. Desde ese momento, los 11 millones de habitantes de esta región no podrán atravesar sus fronteras, como tampoco podrán hacerlo quienes se encuentren en el exterior. Esta precaución se toma cuando se conocen ya 17 víctimas y más de 400 personas infectadas.

22 de enero: aparece el animal culpable

Aunque el coronavirus comenzó a extenderse desde un mercado de marisco, no hay constancia de que pueda transmitirse desde animales marinos. Por eso, quedaba la opción de que fueran algunos de los animales vivos que se vendían también en algunos de sus puestos. Se ha apuntado a varios candidatos. Sin embargo, un estudio recién publicado señala con mayor probabilidad a que se trate de alguna de las especies de serpiente cuya carne se comercializaba para el cocinado de sopas.

23 de enero: se anuncia un caso sospechoso en México

El presidente de México, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, ha dado a conocer que las autoridades sanitarias del país se encuentran estudiando el caso de un enfermo ingresado en el estado de Tamaulipas.

Se trata de un profesor universitario de origen chino, de 57 años, que viajó por Navidad a su país de procedencia, el pasado 25 de diciembre, para regresar a tierras mexicanas el 10 de enero, cuando el coronavirus ya había comenzado a expandirse por China.

23 de enero: otra ciudad cerrada

Tras hacerse oficial el cierre de Wuhan, el gobierno chino ha decidido tomar la misma medida en Huanggang y Ezhou, ambas también en la provincia de Hubei. En este caso son 8 millones de personas las que no podrán salir al exterior. En cuanto a los enfermos, las víctimas siguen siendo 17, pero ya hay más de 600 infectados.

23 de enero: El coronavirus podría haber llegado a Europa

El medio de noticias francés Le Figaro ha anunciado hoy la existencia de un caso en observación; que, de confirmarse, se convertiría en el primero en suelo galo y también dentro de Europa.

Se trata de una mujer china que tras pasar unas vacaciones en Wuhan informó a su embajada que había comenzado a experimentar fiebre y tos, ambos síntomas característicos del coronavirus. A pesar de todo, logró volar hasta Francia, donde finalmente fue contactada para que acudiera de inmediato a los servicios sanitarios indicados. Una vez allí fue ingresada y aislada y se encuentra a la espera de resultados.

Este artículo está en constante desarrollo. Actualiza periódicamente para leer la información más reciente.


EMPLOYER RELATIONS MANAGER | University of Washington   

Seattle, Washington, As a UW employee, you have a unique opportunity to change lives on our campuses, in our state and around the world. UW employees offer their boundless energy, creative problem solving skills and dedi

Seattle-area voters will be the first to cast ballots on smartphones   


Voters in one Seattle area district will be the first in the country to cast a ballot using their smartphone.

Read Entire ArticleRead Comments


Last week: 6-6Weeks 1 through 12: 79-81-5   

Home team shown in bold. Odds taken from Odds Shark.Green Bay (-13.5) vs. ArizonaThe Packers might be a long shot to make the playoffs Authentic Devin Singletary Jersey , but they are still really good at home.<em>Pick: Green Bay (-13.5)</em>Atlanta (-2.5) vs. BaltimoreLike the Packers, the Falcons are a lot better at home. Lamar Jackson vs. Matt Ryan has potential to be a lot of fun, but I think the vet takes it over the rook.<em>Pick: Atlanta (-2.5)</em>Miami (-3.5) vs. BuffaloJosh Allen played well last week against a scuffling Jaguars team, but can he put it together for two games in a row? I have my doubts. I’ll take Miami.<em>Pick: Miami (-3.5)</em>Carolina (-3) vs. Tampa BayDivisional games are normally tight, but the Panthers <em>need</em> this win. They can’t afford to lose their fourth in a row, and I don’t think they will.<em>Pick: Carolina (-3)</em>Chicago (-3.5) vs. New York Giants It’s Chase Daniel again this week for the Bears. If he plays well again, which team is going to give him a multi-year deal this offseason? Some GM out there just might.<em>Pick: Chicago (-3.5)</em>Houston (-5.5) vs. ClevelandFresh off the Hue Jackson revenge game Devin Singletary Jersey Boys , the Browns (especially Baker Mayfield) have had plenty to say this week. They’ll want to back it up with another solid performance, so this one stays close. Plus, the Texans are due for a clunker.<em>Pick: Cleveland (+5.5)</em>Denver (-5) vs. Cincinnati Jeff Driskel will get a start in place of Andy Dalton for the Bengals this week, and if he plays well things might start to get a little interesting in Cincinnati. However, the Broncos are quietly playing some good ball. I’ll take them.<em>Pick: Denver (-5)</em>Indianapolis (-4) vs. Jacksonville The Jaguars are a mess.<em>Pick: Indianapolis (-4)</em>Los Angeles Rams (-10) vs. DetroitThe Rams are coming off a bye after that thrilling Monday Night Football victory a few weeks back. The Lions are also coming off a mini-bye of sorts after losing to Chase Daniel on Thanksgiving. Give me the Rams.<em>Pick: Los Angeles Rams (-10)</em>Kansas City (-14) vs. Oakland The Raiders are a mess.<em>Pick: Kansas City (-14)</em>Tennessee (-9.5) vs. New York JetsI know the Jets aren’t good by any means, but 9.5 is a lot here. I think this game gets mucked up and ends up closer than people think.<em>Pick: New York Jets (+9.5)</em>New England (-5) vs. MinnesotaA matchup of two teams that haven’t really been as good as we thought they would be this year. Prediction: Kirk Cousins and Tom Brady both put up some big numbers.<em>Pick: New England (-5)</em>Seattle (-10) vs. San FranciscoThe Seahawks just keep on winning games. It may stop sometime, but not against the 49ers.<em>Pick: Seattle (-10)</em>Pittsburgh (-3) vs. Los Angeles ChargersThe Bolts are still looking for that signature win. There’s no better time to get it than in Pittsburgh on Sunday Night Football.<em>Pick: Los Angeles Chargers (+3)</em>Philadelphia (-6) vs. WashingtonIf the Eagles can’t get on track at home against a Colt McCoy-led Redskins team Youth LeSean McCoy Jerseys , they aren’t going to get back on track.<em>Pick: Philadelphia (-6)</em> Bills Mafia is lit.From a distance it may seem odd for this win, over a now 3-8 Denver Broncos team, to be the one that moved the needle for so many. Even still, for a significant part of the fan base, it’s now safe to freely buy into what the 2019 season could be for the Buffalo Bills. The reason for this sudden burst of optimism is simple; the possibility of the heartbreaking loss to a team the Bills “should” beat is now gone.The Opponent Roller CoasterThe whole scenario makes more sense to those who’ve been riding the roller coaster of being a Bills fan this season (and maybe the last two decades). If the Bills lose in the coming weeks to the Dallas Cowboys, Baltimore Ravens, New England Patriots LeSean McCoy Jerseys Stitched , or even Pittsburgh Steelers then it will at least feel reasonable. Those are all teams that seem to be decent or better and most of them are going to take place in hostile stadiums. A loss in Dallas or Foxborough or Pittsburgh doesn’t have the same kind of embarrassing sting that a loss to a bad Denver Broncos or Miami Dolphins team would.The Bills have already gotten the most out of the historically easy portion of their schedule. And it is for that reason that Bills fans are no longer constantly in fear of the other shoe dropping.Decent and BeyondInstead, it’s now okay to believe the substantial evidence that this team is itself decent (or better). Decent teams show obvious superiority to inferior opponents. Decent teams display dangerous characteristics that can flare up at any moment. Decent teams show consistency enough to flaunt their strengths for notable stretches of time. Decent teams have decent or better records. And the Bills check each of those boxes quite comfortably after eleven games.Now the 2019 Bills and their fans turn the corner. Over two-thirds of the way through the season, the Bills doubters need no longer prepare to hit Twitter or the comments section on Mondays to tamper others’ enthusiasm. And their counterparts no longer need to build a case why a win against a suspect opponent still matters. Those days are gone; from here on out, the wins and losses speak for themselves. From the day the schedule dropped in the offseason, this upcoming stretch of games has been the so-called “Murderers’ Row” for the 2019 Bills. Any win against the upcoming onslaught of the next four opponents is going to be gladly accepted. Style points aren’t going to matter for the Bills much as we’re all trying to avoid the topics of politics and religion with our in-laws on Thursday. The only thing that will matter is getting out of Dallas with a win. And that same sentiment carries into the next games against the Ravens, Steelers, and Patriots.Positioned WellThe Bills have put themselves in terrific position for the postseason—in such a way that some fans (this podcaster included) haven’t even experienced as adults. The excitement of being able to acknowledge that feat while not simultaneously worrying that everything you want to believe about this team is a lie is intoxicating Youth Kyle Williams Jerseys , and Bills Mafia deserves to be partaking.The Bills currently sit as 7-point road underdogs to the Dallas Cowboys on Thanksgiving. While a loss wouldn’t be devastating, it’s also not a game that feels impossible to win. Regardless of this outcome, the Bills then get an extra long week to prepare for a visit from the Baltimore Ravens.Can you imagine what New Era would be like if the get to 9-3 Bills, coming off a nationally televised win, hosting Lamar Jackson and the Baltimore Ravens at home next week?Now that would be positioned well and would be a hell of a sight. Let’s hope it’s one that Bills Mafia gets to see.You can follow me on Twitter @NickBat and look for episodes of “The Nick & Nolan Show” podcast on the Buffalo Rumblings podcast network.

1 Dead, 7 Wounded In Downtown Seattle Shooting   

SEATTLE (AP) — Multiple people opened fire outside a McDonald’s in the busiest part of downtown Seattle during the evening commute Wednesday, killing one person and wounding seven others, police said. Seattle Fire Chief Harold Scoggins said authorities began receiving calls of multiple gunshot victims at about 5 p.m. One person was found dead and […]

Non-QM, Loan Trading Products; Comp Survey; Moderate Expansion Continues   


Posted To: Pipeline Press

Did you know that you can vote by smart phone in Seattle ? Did you know that less than 20 percent of the world's population has ever taken a single flight ? (U.S. citizens? About 50%.) Did you know that many economists have forecast that this year will bring neither a recession nor outstanding growth? Market indicators, however, signal strong investor optimism. How about future housing values this year? The Basis Point's latest deep dive on current/future state of home valuations have two major implications for debate and discussion: a hybrid robot/human valuation model makes the system safer than human-only appraisals, and valuations can now power instant home buying, financing, improving. Instant home buying? Push button get mortgage? What if I can't get the movers out to my place for 30...(read more)

Forward this article via email:  Send a copy of this story to someone you know that may want to read it.


Property Accountant | Greystar   

Seattle, Washington, Job DescriptionThe Property Accountant applies generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to analyze financial information, reconcile financial statements, prepare general and standard journal e

Operations Assistant Treasury (R0006313) - HomeStreet Bank - Seattle, WA   

Scheduling monthly ALCO meetings, coordinating meeting package materials, maintain ALCO work plan, provide editing and compilation support of for the Asset…
From HomeStreet Bank - Wed, 08 Jan 2020 04:50:31 GMT - View all Seattle, WA jobs

Comment on World News (Jan 19, 2020 EDN): Syrian Jihadists Filmed Jet-Setting To Next Proxy War On Commercial Plane – Turkish President Erdogan Transferring Jihadist from Syrian province of Idlib to Libya on a private Jet – Not Just Hunter: Widespread Biden Family Profiteering Exposed – 944 Trillion Reasons Why The Fed Is Quietly Bailing Out Hedge Funds – IMF Chief Warns Global Economy Faces New “Great Depression” – “We’re Ready To Fight”: 1000s Expected At Massive Gun-R   


Family Medicine | Swedish   

Seattle, Washington, Swedish Ravenna Primary Care is seeking a full-time physician to join their team. Enjoy meaningful work and experience all that the beautiful city of Seattle has to offer. Blend of Prima

Senior Project Manager, Clinical Trials/ Clinical Research Compliance | Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   

Seattle, Washington, Cures Start Here. At Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, home to three Nobel laureates, interdisciplinary teams of world-renowned scientists seek new and innovative ways to prevent, diagnose and

Anchor QEA Summer Internship | Anchor QEA   

Seattle, Washington,   Ideal candidates will have the following: Current student or graduates majoring in fisheries; environmental sciences; planning/land use; landscape architecture; or coastal, geotechnica

Anchor QEA Summer Internship | Anchor QEA   

Seattle, Washington,   Ideal candidates will have the following: Current student or graduates majoring in fisheries; environmental sciences; planning/land use; landscape architecture; or coastal, geotechnica

Sales Consultant - Digital Transformation - Konica Minolta - Seattle, WA   

Konica Minolta is an equal opportunity and affirmative action employer. Join Konica Minolta and help drive innovation as we transform the Workplace of the…
From Konica Minolta US - Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:32:01 GMT - View all Seattle, WA jobs

Ricoh Technician Supervisor - Pacific Office Automation - Seattle, WA   

We are the largest private dealership in the nation, and one of the world’s largest dealers for Konica Minolta copiers, printers, faxes, and multifunctional…
From Indeed - Tue, 21 Jan 2020 23:57:22 GMT - View all Seattle, WA jobs

Technical Project Manager - Pacific Office Automation - Seattle, WA   

With over 40 years of success in office equipment and technology sales/service, our growth and reputation have afforded us great relationships with top…
From Indeed - Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:28:58 GMT - View all Seattle, WA jobs

Pediatric Gastroenterology Physician | Swedish   

Seattle, Washington, Seeking a per diem board-certified/board-eligible Pediatric Gastroenterologist. Join a collegial pediatric medical community supporting Swedish Medical Center. Enjoy a healthy work-life balance in th

Pediatric Orthopedic Physician | Swedish   

Seattle, Washington, Seeking a Per Diem Board Certified Orthopedic physician with experience in Pediatrics. Join a collegial pediatric medical community supporting Swedish Medical Center. Enjoy a healthy work-life balanc

Family Medicine | Swedish   

Seattle, Washington, Swedish Ravenna Primary Care is seeking a full-time physician to join their team. Enjoy meaningful work and experience all that the beautiful city of Seattle has to offer. Blend of Prima

Episode #153 - Upcoming Event: Discussing Celebrity Chef Angie Mar at the Renton Technical College with Chef Tony Parker, Head Chef, and Carrie Shaw, Executive Director.    


Welcome back to another great episode of "Open House with Team Reba". This week, Reba and Eric welcomed Chef Tony Parker, who is the Head Chef of the Culinary Arts Program at Renton Technical College, and Carrie Shaw, who is the Executive Director of the Renton Technical College Foundation.

They talk about how renowned New York Chef Angie Mar is bringing her passion for all things luxury and meat to Renton Technical College on Tuesday, January 28th!

Chef Mar is a Seattle native and the owner and Executive Chef of the famed Beatrice Inn in Manhattan. She'll be joined by the acclaimed Christopher Chan, Advanced Sommelier, winemaker, and radio host, for an evening of fabulous food and the best of wine pairing.

Tuesday, Jan. 28

5PM - Butcher + Beast Bash. Come meet Chef Angie Mar and celebrate the release of her new cookbook. You will hear about her remarkable journey from Seattle to the top restaurants in NYC, and learn the best of wine pairing tips from Advance Sommelier Christopher Chan. You'll enjoy student cooking demonstrations, sumptuous appetizers, and wine pairing personally selected by Chef Mar and Mr. Chan. Tickets include a complimentary copy of Butcher + Beast: Mastering the Art of Meat.

7PM - Celebrity Chef Dinner. An intimate, multi-course dinner prepared by Chef Mar and RTC Culinary students, with Christopher Chan sharing his wine expertise in RTC's Demonstration Kitchen for 48 lucky guests!

Proceeds from the Celebrity Chef Dinner and Butcher + Beast Bash go to enhance RTC’s culinary arts program and support student scholarships.

Tickets are limited so make your reservations today!


Guest post: After looking at the data of 80 tech companies- what have I learned? Part I   


This is a guest post by Segah A. Mir, Partner and Consultant at Seattle-based Caura & Co.

tech companies

The past five years have given me a tremendous opportunity to see firsthand the data of over 80 VC-backed tech companies. That is close to 100 teams and 300 individuals. Naturally, I’ve got to see a lot of data — very detailed information on every transaction, activity, click, and interaction. What would be expected of me now is to go about promoting for everyone to collect as much information in order to make data driven decisions. Instead, I think all of us in the data profession should be honest about the pitfalls of always championing data-centric approach. Here is why:

  • Data is not always right
  • Not everyone is naturally comfortable with understanding data

Let’s dive right in…

Data is not always right

Most of us are familiar with the notion “garbage in, garbage out”, so this is not such a new idea. And yet, I would take this a step further. Even when input data is good, data used today as part of analytics is often not correct. In tech we generally focus on simplifying conclusions and interpretations for the C-level leadership, while we ourselves try to handle the underlying complexity. But therein lies a problem. When it comes to data, there is an inverse relationship between informational completeness and inference simplicity.

This applies to all phases of problem solving — from how data is transported to how it is modeled and analyzed. The more assumptions individuals at all phases of the process make, the more likely resulting conclusions are wrong or off. I commonly encounter statisticians who are obviously familiar with technical underpinnings (i.e. lower R²) of, say, relying on high dimensionality datasets, and yet they cannot see the forest through the trees when it comes to their overall analysis.

So what ought a modern data practitioner in such circumstances do? “Embrace the uncertainty” would be my advice. When organizational leaders implicitly expect the data team to answer every analytical question, they ignore the tangible costs of getting to the truth. The time wasted by a data specialist is not that important in the grand scheme of things. Reframing the problem in terms of expected uncertainty allows leaders to seek alternative venues — like having the CEO visit key customers — with more transparent cost-benefit calculations (e.g. time of the CEO to make the trip). The added benefit is that the priorities shift from finding analytical answers, to discovering the truth.

What I’ve seen the best teams do is to embrace this uncertainty head on. Some make it clear in every presentation that they are confident about directional accuracy only. They acknowledge that their snapshot data could be off, but that in itself would not interfere with their recommendations. Others, such as my former boss, Lloyd Tabb, are well aware of the problem with small numbers in SaaS companies. They might inspect data to learn more about customers’ behavior, but they will shy away from drawing up statistical inferences using small samples.

Not everyone is meant to work with data

This next point is going to be controversial, though it really should not be. I’ve had older organizational leaders hint at this in private conversations. To my own fault, I’ve only recently begun to see this as clearly: peoples’ brains work completely differently. Ray Dalio’s Principles has several chapters on this very topic, so I won’t delve on it here. In brief, there are so many dimensions in which someone might flourish, and yet have no abilities in reading or interpreting data. And it is OK.

Good teams embrace equally non-data driven approaches as well data-driven ones. Snapchat famously was a good example of that in its early years. It made successful decisions about growth using design thinking over commonplace reliance on A/B testing. So why is it that most organizations that I come across believe in putting data in front of every employee and rewarding data-driven behavior? I think it stems from insecurity about how teams are managed. When data and authority are the key frameworks for making decisions and resolving arguments, management of companies is more straightforward.

The problem is that data is often just an excuse to transfer decision making from those who are not as capable of at interpreting data. This might, for example, mean giving more decision making power around the product experience to someone with a business degree rather than someone with a creative design background. Neither is really a standalone qualifier — in my opinion. Data, like everything else, can be manipulated to fit our own biases. Stories can be told to fit our own biases. Stories and data together can be manipulated to fit someone’s bias. That’s just how it is. We should not tell ourselves anything otherwise.

What I suggest instead is that companies draw the line between “having optional access” and “requiring mandatory use.” This might make management of some teams more challenging. Data is a convenient common framework for resolving arguments. But multiple ways of making a decision force teams to find alternative ways to self-organize. Ultimately while we keep insisting that there is some panacea, every organization and team requires its own rules for effective decision making (see my earlier reference to Ray Dalio).

Bottom line, data is important, but it is one of many important factors. We can practice our profession, encourage the use of data when it makes sense, but embrace other possibilities as well. And it is OK.


Contract Email Production Specialist - ExtraHop Networks, Inc. - Seattle, WA   

At ExtraHop, our Marketing and Business Development team is building, developing, and communicating a better way to run IT and business operations.
From ExtraHop Networks, Inc. - Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:11:46 GMT - View all Seattle, WA jobs

Sr. Manager, Product Management - Services LLC - Seattle, WA   

Machine Learning, AI & Big Data experience. Knowledge of A/B testing and how to measure using Google Analytics or Adobe Analytics.
From - Tue, 21 Jan 2020 07:55:12 GMT - View all Seattle, WA jobs

Sr. Product Marketing Manager, Digital Marketing - Amazon Web Services, Inc. - Seattle, WA   

Marketo, Adobe CQ, Adobe Target, etc. Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics etc.). Strong execution capability with highest standards in a rapidly evolving business…
From - Tue, 24 Dec 2019 07:54:50 GMT - View all Seattle, WA jobs

UX Designer, Amazon Fashion - Services, Inc. - Seattle, WA   

Proficiency in design software such as Sketch and Adobe Creative Suite. Fostering a shared understanding of the customer-centric intersection between design,…
From - Tue, 17 Dec 2019 07:54:14 GMT - View all Seattle, WA jobs

The Snowplow team will be in the Bay Area and Seattle in October - get in touch if you'd like to meet   


I (Alex) will be in the Bay Area and Seattle for two weeks starting from Monday 6th October, visiting Snowplow customers, users and partners. If you’re interested in meeting up to discuss Snowplow, event analytics or unified log processing more generally, I’d love to arrange a meeting!


I will be based in San Francisco from Monday October 6th, then flying up to Seattle early on the 15th, staying there for the rest of the week. If you are interested in using Snowplow, or partnering with us, then please get in touch! I’ll be spending some time down the peninsula in Mountain View and Santa Cruz too.

Reach out to me at alex@ (email address on our full domain) to setup a meeting, suggest an event to attend or for anything else Bay Area- or Seattle-related!


Wild Winter Adventures in Washington State   



Our top picks for winter adventures: 


Crystal Mountain. No one is quite sure why Crystal Mountain is still relatively “unknown” outside of Washington state. (Actually it’s probably because the locals are trying to keep it that way!) Crystal boasts masses of terrain, a great lift and trail system, superb “inbounds backcountry” areas bookending the terrain, and if you are there when the sun shines, views to die for. The biggest resort in the state, it averages 486 inches annually, with 57 designated trails and 2,300 acres (931 hectares) of lift serviced terrain, making it the largest ski resort in Washington. The terrain stretches across half a dozen peaks and basins and provides a myriad of variation including groomers, steeps, trees, cliffs, bowls, chutes and backcountry access.

Mt Baker has its own cult following due to it’s insane snowfall - a jaw-dropping 701 inches average annually. If big snow is on your bucket list, this is a must-experience for any powder hound. However, it is an expert’s mountain and it’s not the best place to go for beginners or intermediates. You don’t come here to ski groomers, it’s all about powder, hits, steeps, trees, chutes and cliffs. The closest large town, Bellingham, about an hour and fifteen minutes away, is absolutely charming. A destination to explore in its own right, Bellingham is located on beautiful Bellingham Bay with tons of parks and waterfalls seemingly around every corner.

Want to make it a treasure hunt and bag all you can? Here’s the rest of the roundup:


Methow Trails
With over 220 kilometers of groomed, interconnected nordic ski trails, Methow Trails is the largest in North America, even though it’s relatively unknown. Plus you can ski right from town, which means you can load up on coffee and fresh baked goods at either of the three main access areas: Sun Mountain Lodge, Mazama and Winthrop. Kids ski free, there’s lots of dog friendly trails (and free doggie trail passes with pics if you stop in) and plenty of rentals, lessons and camps for beginners. You can also rent a fat tire bike or a pair of snowshoes and just get out there and enjoy yourself right away. Plenty of trailside lodging is available if you book early enough too!

If you’re a XC ski fan, there’s plenty of other places to explore as well, including Stevens Pass Nordic Center (28 km), Summit at Snoqualmie (50 km), Lake Wenatchee State Park, Echo Ridge near Chelan (40 km), White Pass (18 km) Mount Spokane State Park (50+km) and the Palouse to Cascades State Park Trail.

(aka, “Go Big or Go Home")

For access to completely untouched, deep North Cascades powder, heli-skiing is the way to go. According to Outside Magazine, North Cascade Heli Skiing is ranked in the top 10 places to heli-ski in North America (including Canada and Alaska). “You’ll be guaranteed at least seven runs a day. And if you’ve never been to this side of the North Cascades, the word cement does not apply. Start dreaming of fluffy, and almost Alaska big.” 


Cape Flattery, Neah Bay 
The lookout at the end of Cape Flattery Trail is one of the best spots in the state for storm watching. As the northwestern-most point in the continental US, waves crash relentlessly, especially during big storms. The trail is only three quarters of a mile and an easy walk, with four viewpoints at the end. Dress appropriately, it’s cold and wet!

Cape Disappointment State Park
With two active lighthouses plus massive waves, this spot is ideal for photographers. With spray getting tossed up to 100 feet in the air, there’s plenty of action and visual excitement. Winds at North Head have been recorded up to 126 miles per hour! The state park has campsites and cabins plus an interpretive center for learning about the area’s history.


Luge at the Loup - now the first area in the Western US to offer Luge Sledding! 5 km and more than 1200 feet of elevation gain, with 12 km of groomed luge trails.


Did you know that Washington State has an official State Waterfall?

Palouse Falls, perhaps the crown jewel of the beautiful Southeast Region of Washington State, holds this impressive title.

Over 13,000 years ago the Ice Age floods carved out the path that the Palouse River now follows, and the Palouse Falls is one of the last remaining active waterfalls along its path. Plummeting 200 feet, the falls is a bucket-list subject for northwest photographers, as the frothy falls cascade prominently, framed by a striking bowl of geometric basalt columns.

The river keeps flowing onwards past the falls through the Palouse River Canyon, full of coulees, cataracts, pools, buttes and pinnacles that characterize the scablands in this region.

The designation for Washington's official state waterfall came in 2014, when the State Legislature passed a bill that was lobbied for by school children from the nearby town of Washtunca.

Artists and photographers are drawn to the bewitching landscapes of this region, as the rolling hills, shades of changing light, and shifting seasons create a year-round opportunity for creative expression and interpretation.

Learn More


Seattle’s iconic The Red Door announces it is closing after 31+ years   


By Kendall Jones, Washington Beer Blog

  Well, this is hard to report. This one hurts. So many memories. One of Seattle’s first bars to focus

For the latest news and information about beer in and around Washington, visit Washington Beer Blog.


Family Medicine Residency Program Director | Swedish   

Seattle, Washington, Seeking a full-time, board-certified/board-eligible Family Medicine physician to act as program director for the Swedish Cherry Hill Family Medicine Residency program located on the Swedish Cherry Hi

Pediatric Nephrology Physician | Swedish   

Seattle, Washington, Seeking a Per Diem board-certified/board-eligible Pediatric Nephrologist. Join a collegial pediatric medical community supporting Swedish Medical Center. Enjoy a healthy work-life balance in the beau

Key Account Director   

WA-Seattle, WA, Bertelsmann is a media, services and education company that operates in about 50 countries around the world. It includes the broadcaster RTL Group, the trade book publisher Penguin Random House, the magazine publisher Gruner + Jahr, the music company BMG, the service provider Arvato, the Bertelsmann Printing Group, the Bertelsmann Education Group, and Bertelsmann Investments, an international netw

Engineer 3   

WA-Seattle, job summary: The Engineer will be part of a key team that applies scientific, mathematical & social principles to design, build, & maintain technology products, devices, systems, & solutions. These technology products & solutions provide amazing customer experiences while meeting the needs of the business. Key Responsibilities - Develop large scale RESTful Web Services in Service Oriented Architec

Contract Customer Marketing Manager - ExtraHop Networks, Inc. - Seattle, WA   

Ability to build excellent rapport with internal and external teams; Strategic and analytical thinker with ability to blend technology and business strategy to…
From ExtraHop Networks, Inc. - Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:14:38 GMT - View all Seattle, WA jobs

Seattle-area voters will vote with their phones in elections first   


All voters in a typically low-turnout Seattle-area board of supervisors election in February will be able to vote by smartphone.

For the first time, all voters in a U.S. election will be able to vote using their smartphones, NPR’s Miles Parks reports.

Read Full Story


Seattle Prohibition   

Seattle Prohibition: Bootleggers, Rumrunners and Graft in the Queen City is a great read that gave me insight into Seattle history that I knew nothing about. Fascinating stuff. If you want to read about an interesting person, look up Al Hubbard. 5 out of 5 moonshines.

Geotechnical Engineer | Material Testing & Inspection   

Seattle, Washington, Material Testing and Inspections(MTI) has an opening for a Geotechnical Engineer based out of its offices in Seattle, WA.   Summary: The successful candidate will be responsible for preparing g

Medical Director Organ Transplant | Swedish   

Seattle, Washington, Swedish Medical Center is seeking a board-certified Surgeon to act as Transplant Center Director. The successful candidate will have completed an ASTS-approved transplant fellowship for an establishe

Pediatric Orthopedic Physician | Swedish   

Seattle, Washington, Seeking a Per Diem Board Certified Orthopedic physician with experience in Pediatrics. Join a collegial pediatric medical community supporting Swedish Medical Center. Enjoy a healthy work-life balanc

Database Engineer   

WA-Seattle, Net2Source is a Global Workforce Solutions Company headquartered at NJ, USA with its branch offices in Asia Pacific Region. We are one of the fastest growing IT Consulting company across the USA and we are hiring " Database Engineer” for one of our clients. We offer a wide gamut of consulting solutions customized to our 450+ clients ranging from Fortune 500/1000 to Start-ups across various vertica

Postdoctoral Scholar - Development of a Coupled Multi-Fishery Ecological-Economic Model | University of Washington   

Seattle, Washington, Required PhD or foreign equivalent in Environmental or Natural Resource Economics, Natural Resource Management, Quantitative Fishery Ecology, Statistics, or related field. Strong quantitative and mode

Front-End Software Engineer, Orchestration Team - Outreach - Seattle, WA   

Our application is 100% built in React and we use TypeScript and Apollo Client/GraphQL. We are looking for an experienced front-end software engineer who has a…
From Outreach - Thu, 11 Jul 2019 21:15:13 GMT - View all Seattle, WA jobs
Next Page: 25

© Googlier LLC, 2019