Next Page: 25
|Cache||By Victor Davis Hanson|
Many of its marquee reporters have resigned, were fired, or reassigned for fake-news bias (e.g., Thomas Frank, Eric Lichtblau, and Lex Haris), or came under fire for false reporting (Jim Sciutto, Marshall Cohen, and Carl Bernstein) or have had to offer retractions and/or apologies (Gloria Borger, Eric Lichtblau, Jake Tapper, and Brian Rokus.)
Its anchors have apologized for obscenity (Anderson Cooper) or simply making up false statements (Chris Cuomo), while analysts have been caught in a number of contradictions about their own role in on-going scandals (James Clapper).
The common denominator has been the new journalistic ethos that aborting the Trump presidency justifies any means necessary to achieve such noble ends.
Throughout CNN’s descent into parody, progressives still smiled at the usefulness of CNN for the larger project of delegitimizing the Trump presidency. Few understood the Thucydidean concept that once nihilists destroy norms and protocols of ethical behavior for perceived short-term advantage, they usually rue the loss when they themselves become victims of their own biased zealotry and are in dire need of the civilizational help they recently ruined.
So it was last week, when CNN moderator Abby Phillip warped the recent Democratic presidential primary debate by not asking, so much as accusing, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) about a claim that he said a woman such as Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) could not be elected president—in the fashion of a “When did you stop beating your wife?” question: “Senator Sanders, CNN reported yesterday, and Senator Warren confirmed in a statement, that in 2018 you told her that you did not believe that a woman could win the election. Why did you say that?”
Leftists were outraged at the CNN host’s flagrant bias—as if there was gambling really going on in Casablanca, as if CNN’s own Candy Crowley had not attempted to hijack the second 2012 presidential debate to aid favorite Barack Obama, or as if CNN’s Donna Brazile had not leaked a debate question to aid Hillary Clinton in 2016.
The same irony is on display with the Democratic presidential field. One strange theme has been dominant since the primary debates began: the more the white frontrunners pontificated on “diversity” and deplored “white privilege,” the whiter the Democratic field seemed to grow—until there were no nonwhite candidates left.
Thus, according to progressive doctrine, the white liberals and democratic socialists on the Democratic debate platform, not Democratic voters, pollsters, and donors themselves, are in a way culpable for the absence of candidates of color, whether or not a Biden, Buttigieg, Sanders, or Warren was guided by prejudicial behavior in beating a Booker, Castro, Harris, Patrick, or Yang.
Perhaps if the Democratic candidates lived by the rules they had enforced on universities or other public agencies, then an underrepresented Cory Booker or Julian Castro would have been by fiat reinstated on the debate stage and an “overrepresented” Bernie Sanders or Pete Buttigieg, the beneficiaries of centuries of “white privilege,” would be passed over from the opportunity—for the greater societal good of diversity.
The idea that a Biden or Warren “earned” their stronger polling or greater fundraising, based on any meritocratic notion of out-debating, out-hustling, out-campaigning, or out-politicking a Harris, Castro, or Booker would be considered not just absurd, but proof of the bias of any who embraced such a structurally racist position.
Absurd? Perhaps, but for the rest of the country that has been lectured unceasingly by progressive elite scolds, it was pure schadenfreude.
Democrats may also be hoisted by their own petard in the ongoing impeachment psychodrama. They more or less rigged the House impeachment proceeding, by using their majority to depart from past practice. They monopolized the witness lists, selectively leaked, and rushed to indict Trump on the theory that every day the president was not impeached was another day the country was endangered.
Then when bipartisan support never appeared, when there was no special counsel’s damning report, when there was no public majority support, and when there was not the appearance of constitutional indictments for treason, bribery, and specific high crimes and misdemeanors, the impeachment writs simply sat, ossifying as if the House prosecutors suddenly wished to be sober, judicious, and reflective, when in truth they were finagling ways to fortify their anemic writs before what they feared would be a disastrous and embarrassing Senate acquittal.
Democrats insisted that the Senate trial have witnesses and that Republican senators conduct the proceeding in a nonpartisan fashion antithetical to the partisan manner in which they had rammed through impeachment in the House. In other words, Democrats demanded that Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) not replay the roles of Reps. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).
Yet the obvious expectation in such a free-for-all impeachment and trial circus was always that Hunter Biden and Joe Biden would be the most preeminent witnesses called, given Trump’s logical defense that the younger Biden was utterly corrupt, was known to be corrupt but found useful by Ukrainians, and thus naturally such a high-profile case justified presidential suspicions of Ukrainian requests for aid—with the corollary that the elder Biden, the font for Hunter’s ability to leverage money for access, would not be able to testify honestly about the degree to which he knew of his son’s skullduggery.
Joe Biden, despite his senior moments and his lifelong reckless speech, may be for now the Democrats only hope to carry the Midwest swing states that sent Donald Trump to the White House. Thus, the Democrats in the very fashion they have conducted themselves throughout this impeachment farce, may be insidiously destroying the candidate with the best chance of regaining the White House—even while likely enhancing Donald Trump’s polls.
That the Democrats realized such risks and ignored them, either suggests the Left wants to finish off the Biden candidacy, or their obsessions with destroying Trump outweighs any practical considerations of replacing the president with one of their own.
These are strange times, in which progressives grow near quiet when courageous Iranians hit the streets to protest a murderous government, but express remorse over the killing of one of the most murderous of all Iranian autocrats.
For years, leftists have decried the bipartisan kid-gloves treatment of China, as its mercantilism systematically hollowed out the old Democratic blue-collar base in the Midwest—only to blast the first president who agreed that China had to be confronted before it eroded what was left of the American industrial heartland.
And we were always warned to fear the government overreach of the intelligence agencies, even as ex-high officials go on liberal networks, warping their use of their security clearances, to contextualize their own previous unethical behavior.
Of all the strange symptoms of Trump Derangement Syndrome, progressive self-immolation is the strangest.
Read more at American Greatness.
Le numérique, vecteur d’interactions au sein des établissements scolaires Les interactions sont au cœur des apprentissages et des pratiques d’enseignement : interactions avec l’environnement, avec les pairs, avec les membres de la communauté éducative, avec les savoirs. Développer des projets d’équipement en outils et contenus numériques dans un établissement scolaire, c’est penser de façon globale […]
L’article Formation pédagogique : deuxième édition des Rencontres Mlfnumérique à Casablanca ! est apparu en premier sur Mission laïque française.
|Cache||Os Strokes, de Julian Casablancas, vão atuar no festival NOS Alive em julho. Êxitos como 'Last Nite', 'Reptilia' e 'You Only Live Once' irão ouvir-se no verão português|
Revelan cartel de la tercera edición del festival
Se reveló el cartel de la tercera edición del festival Corona Capital Guadalajara, el cual será por primera vez de dos días: 16 y 17 de mayo. En esta ocasión los headliners serán The Strokes y Kings of Leon.
Después de su presentación en la décima edición del Corona Capital 2019 en el Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez, Julian Casablancas y compañía regresarán al país para cerrar el primer día del evento. El sábado también estará presente Foals, Blondie, Death Cab For Cutie, The New Regime, entre otros.
Mientras que Kings of Leon regresa al país después de formar parte del Pa'l Norte 2019. La banda liderada por Caleb Followill será la estelar del domingo, mismo día que tocarán grupos como The Hives, Of Monsters and Men y Two Door Cinema Club.
La fase 1 de los boletos tendrá un costo de 1800 pesos en nivel general, mientras que la sección Comfort Pass tendrá un valor de 2400 pesos en la misma fase. También estará la zona Citibanamex Plus con un precio de 3600 pesos en su fase 1.
Durante sus tres ediciones, bandas como The Killers, Tame Impala, Phoenix y The Chemical Brothers han formado parte del Corona Capital Guadalajara.
Recrutement BMCE Bank (16 Profils): -Conseiller de Clientèle – Marrakech et Régions. -Conseiller de Clientèle – Agadir et Régions. -Chargé d’Appui Commercial – Fès et Régions. -Conseiller de Clientèle – Casablanca et Régions. -Conseiller de Clientèle – Rabat et Régions. -Conseiller de Clientèle – Tanger et Régions. -Chargé d’Appui Commercial – Hoceima & Nador. -Chargés […]
Hyatt Regency Casablanca recherche de Nouveaux Profils: -Guest Service Officers (Front Office). -HouseKeeping Team Leaders. -Sales Executives. Hôtel de luxe situé au cœur de Casablanca, le Hyatt Regency vous propose un cadre luxueux pour votre séjour au Maroc. Hyatt a été fondée en 1957 par Jay Pritzker, au moment où il a acheté l’hôtel Hyatt […]
Anapec: Recrutement de 100 Opérateurs de Fabrication sur Casablanca. L’Agence Nationale de Promotion de l’Emploi et des Compétences (ANAPEC) est un établissement public doté de la personnalité morale et de autonomie financière car il s’agit un réseau d’agences en contact direct avec le public, qui délivrent des services. L’ANAPEC est un intermédiaire actif sur le […]